Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| R01AG058671 | U.S. NIH Grant/Contract | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| MedStar Health | OTHER |
| Johns Hopkins Community Physicians | OTHER |
| National Institute on Aging (NIA) | NIH |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study evaluates the efficacy of Sharing Healthcare Wishes in Primary Care (SHARE), a two-group randomized trial at up to 9 primary care practices in which 124 dyads receive a control protocol of minimally enhanced usual care and 124 dyads receive the SHARE protocol. This study tests the efficacy of SHARE on quality of communication (primary outcome) and advance care planning processes (secondary outcomes) at 6 months among primary care patients with cognitive impairment (mild-severe) and family caregiver dyads. For patients who die while enrolled in the study by 24 months, this study examines the quality of end-of-life care and bereaved family caregiver experiences with medical decision-making (secondary outcomes).
SHARE is guided by the patient-provider communication, family caregiving, health services, and health informatics literatures in acknowledging the multiple pathways by which interpersonal relationships influence treatment decisions and end-of-life care. Each component of SHARE has been found to improve a range of communication outcomes in other care contexts, but have not previously been applied in this combination or examined with regard to advance care planning in persons with cognitive impairment. SHARE is designed to be broadly scalable and widely relevant to diverse primary care patients and stakeholders. The study goal is to engage family members or friends ("family" and/or "caregiver") in longitudinal interactions with primary care clinicians and stimulate and support advance care planning discussions in primary care. SHARE seeks to improve communication for persons with cognitive impairment by establishing a structured protocol to proactively engage family caregivers in ongoing interactions with primary care clinicians and stimulate and support advance care planning in primary care throughout the disease trajectory.
SHARE evaluates a multicomponent communication intervention to proactively engage family members or friends and support advance care planning in primary care. SHARE encompasses the following four therapeutic elements: 1) a letter from the practice introducing the initiative, 2) access to a designated person (medical assistant, social worker, nurse, or lay person) trained to lead advance care planning discussions, 3) person-family agenda-setting to align perspectives about the role of the caregiver and stimulate discussion about goals of care, and 4) education about communication and available resources, including a 44-page brochure developed by the National Institute on Aging entitled "A Guide for Older People: Talking with your Doctor", a blank easy to complete advance directive, and facilitated registration to the patient portal (for patient and caregiver) to extend electronic interactions and information access to family. The control group receives minimally enhanced usual care with print educational materials that include the 44-page brochure developed by the National Institute on Aging entitled "A Guide for Older People: Talking with your Doctor" and a blank easy-to-complete advance directive. Participants in both groups are followed over a 24-month period. Outcomes are assessed from patient and caregiver enrollment surveys conducted in-person or by telephone or video conference at enrollment and follow-up telephone or web surveys at 6, 12, and 24 months; Electronic health record portal activity; information about advance directive completion from the electronic medical record; burdensome care at the end of life from family survey and Chesapeake Regional Information System for our Patients (CRISP).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| SHARE | Experimental | SHARE components include: 1) a letter from the practice introducing the initiative, 2) access to a designated person (medical assistant, social worker, nurse, or lay person) trained to lead advance care planning discussions, 3) person-family agenda-setting to align perspectives about the role of the caregiver and stimulate discussion about goals of care, and 4) education about communication and available resources, including a 44-page brochure developed by the National Institute on Aging entitled "A Guide for Older People: Talking with your Doctor", a blank easy to complete advance directive, and facilitated registration to the patient portal (for patient and caregiver participants) to extend electronic interactions and information access to family. |
|
| Minimally Enhanced Usual Care | Placebo Comparator | Minimally enhanced usual care participants are provided with print educational materials that include a 44-page brochure developed by the National Institute on Aging entitled "A Guide for Older People: Talking with your Doctor" and a blank easy-to-complete advance directive. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sharing Healthcare Wishes in Primary Care (SHARE) | Behavioral | SHARE is a multicomponent communication intervention to proactively engage family members or friends to support advance care planning in primary care. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Average Scores for Patient and Caregiver-Reported Quality of Communication at 6-Months | The primary outcome assesses family-reported quality of communication with the primary care team using the 7-item end-of-life subscale of the validated Quality of Communication Scale. The scale for each item is from 0 ('Worst you can imagine') to 10 ('Best you can imagine'), with a range of 0-70 with higher scores indicating higher perceived quality of communication. | 6 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Average Scores for Patient and Caregiver-Reported Readiness to Engage in Advance Care Planning at 6-months | The Advance Care Planning Engagement Survey is a validated patient-reported questionnaire that assesses advance care planning process measures on a 5-point Likert scale. The outcome assesses a 6-item subscale of the Advance Care Planning Engagement Survey that includes parallel items for patient and family participants. The scale for each item is from 1 ("I have never thought about it") to 5 ("I have already done it"), with a range of 6-30 with higher scores indicating higher perceived readiness to engage in advance care planning. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Jennifer Wolff, PhD | Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Johns Hopkins Community Physicians - Remington | Baltimore | Maryland | 21211 | United States | ||
| MedStar Union Memorial Hospital |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 27026614 | Background | Wolff JL, Berger A, Clarke D, Green JA, Stametz R, Yule C, Darer JD. Patients, care partners, and shared access to the patient portal: online practices at an integrated health system. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 Nov;23(6):1150-1158. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw025. Epub 2016 Mar 28. | |
| 31165374 | Background | Wolff JL, Aufill J, Echavarria D, Heughan JA, Lee KT, Connolly RM, Fetting JH, Jelovac D, Papathakis K, Riley C, Stearns V, Thorner E, Zafman N, Levy HP, Dy SM, Wolff AC. Sharing in care: engaging care partners in the care and communication of breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Aug;177(1):127-136. doi: 10.1007/s10549-019-05306-9. Epub 2019 Jun 4. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Of 4,441 patient-family dyads who were outreached, 606 opted out of the study via opt-out card, and 3,835 were screened. Of 3,835 screened, 3,557 were ineligible (369 unreachable, 2,458 did not meet eligibility criteria, 730 refused, 5 consented not randomized due to lost to follow up). Patient and caregivers were enrolled as dyads. A total of 273 patient-family dyads were enrolled and randomized. The total number of individual participants is 546 (Participants started in Protocol Section).
Participants were recruited from 8 primary care practices at two health systems from October 2020 to December 2022. Both patient and care partner must have been eligible to participate. Eligible patients were ≥80 years and screened positive for cognitive impairment (1+ incorrect answer or unable to respond to a 6-item screening survey). Eligible care partners were ≥18 years, English-speaking, no life-threatening illness, and did not screen positive for cognitive impairment.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | SHARE Group | Of 273 enrolled patient-family dyads, 145 were randomized to the SHARE intervention group and received a packet from the primary care practice including a person-family agenda setting checklist, blank advance directive, guide for communication with clinicians, instructions for completing proxy registration for the patient portal and an invitation to a facilitator led advance care planning (ACP) conversation. |
| FG001 | Control Group | Of 273 enrolled patient-family dyads, 128 were assigned to the control group and received minimally enhanced usual care encompassing an introductory letter, the guide for communicating with clinicians and blank advance directive. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Patients and Caregivers
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | SHARE Group | Of 273 patient-family dyads enrolled, 145 patients and 145 caregivers were randomized to the SHARE intervention group and received a packet from the primary care practice including a person-family agenda setting checklist, blank advance directive, guide for communication with clinicians, instructions for completing proxy registration for the patient portal and an invitation to a facilitator led ACP conversation. A total of 290 participants were randomized to the SHARE intervention group. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | The row population for each row (patient and caregiver) differs from the overall number of baseline participants because each row specifies the number of participants analyzed separately by patient or caregiver. |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Average Scores for Patient and Caregiver-Reported Quality of Communication at 6-Months | The primary outcome assesses family-reported quality of communication with the primary care team using the 7-item end-of-life subscale of the validated Quality of Communication Scale. The scale for each item is from 0 ('Worst you can imagine') to 10 ('Best you can imagine'), with a range of 0-70 with higher scores indicating higher perceived quality of communication. | 216 represents the total number participants (patients, caregivers) assessed in the intervention group for this outcome at 6 months, and 194 represents the total number of participants (patients, caregivers) assessed in the control group for this outcome at 6 months. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | 6 months |
|
Up to 24 months
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | SHARE Group: Patients | The SHARE intervention group received a packet from the primary care practice including a person-family agenda setting checklist, blank advance directive, guide for communication with clinicians, instructions for completing proxy registration for the patient portal and an invitation to a facilitator led ACP conversation. |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patient Hospitalized, Rehabilitated or Placed in Hospice | General disorders | Non-systematic Assessment | Caregivers reported to staff members during outreach for follow-up if patient was hospitalized, rehabilitated or placed in hospice. Patients |
Not provided
Primary care practices in one geographic location inhibits generalizability. Study is subject to Methodological challenges in the field, like including a lack of established and reliable gold standard measures of clinically meaningful endpoints.
Fielding quality of communication instrument has not been used primary care context to cognitively impairment patients and their care partners.
Observed treatment effects were variable by outcome.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr. Jennifer Wolff | Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Heath | 4105020458 | jwolff2@jhu.edu |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Oct 1, 2023 | Sep 26, 2024 | Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D060825 | Cognitive Dysfunction |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003072 | Cognition Disorders |
| D019965 | Neurocognitive Disorders |
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011320 | Primary Health Care |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003191 | Comprehensive Health Care |
| D010346 | Patient Care Management |
| D006298 | Health Services Administration |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Minimally Enhanced Usual Care | Behavioral | Minimally enhanced usual care participants are provided with print educational materials that include a 44-page brochure developed by the National Institute on Aging entitled "A Guide for Older People: Talking with your Doctor" and a blank easy-to-complete advance directive. |
|
| 6 months |
| Proportion of Patients With Documentation of Advance Directive Completion in the Electronic Health Record at 6-months | Documentation of advance directive completion in the electronic health record is defined as having a durable power of attorney or a living will documented in the primary care electronic health record. The Medical Order for Life Sustaining Treatment (MOLST) will not be included for this outcome as the completion of a Maryland MOLST is mandatory in certain situations, such as on transfer between settings of care, and is not indicative of having had an advance care planning discussion or naming a durable power of attorney. | 6 months |
| Average Scores for Bereaved Family-Reported Decisional Conflict | Caregivers of patients who die are asked to assess their Decisional Conflict 2-3 months after patient's death. The Decisional Conflict Scale is a 16-item instrument scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 ("strongly agree") to 4 ("strongly disagree").The 16 items are summed, divided by 16, then multiplied by 25 to yield scores that range from 0 (no decisional conflict) to 100 (extremely high decisional conflict). Higher scores indicate higher decisional conflict. | 24 months |
| Average Scores for Bereaved Family-Reported Decisional Regret | Caregivers of patients who die are asked to assess their Decisional Regret 2-3 months after patient's death. This outcome assesses bereaved family-reported decisional regret using a 5-item instrument that assesses the extent to which decision-makers experience regret about care. Response options are assessed using a 5-item Likert scale in which scores of 1 indicate the least regret and 5 the most regret. Scores are then reduced by 1 point and multiplied by 25 for a scale that ranges in value from 0 to 100. Prior studies have categorized scores of 0 as no regret, 1 to 25 as mild regret, and more than 25 as heightened regret. Higher scores indicate stronger feelings of regret. | 24 months |
| Average Scores for Bereaved Family Symptoms of Anxiety | Caregivers of patients who die are asked to respond to questions about Symptoms of Anxiety 2-3 months after patient's death. This outcome assesses bereaved family symptoms of anxiety using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item questionnaire (GAD-7). The GAD-7 is a validated instrument that asks about symptoms of anxiety using a two-week recall period with response categories that vary from 0 ("not at all") to 3 ("nearly every day"). Item responses are summed to construct composite scores. Higher scores indicate more symptoms of anxiety. | 24 months |
| Average Scores for Bereaved Family-Reported Satisfaction With Care at the End-of-Life in Dementia | Caregivers of patients who die are asked to assess their Satisfaction with Care at the End-of-life in Dementia 2-3 months after patient's death using the Satisfaction with Care at the End-of-Life in Dementia (SWC-EOLD). This is a 10-item instrument measured on a 4-point Likert scale that ranges from 1 ("strongly disagree") to 4 ("strongly agree") with a summary score ranging from 10-40 in which higher values indicate higher satisfaction. Higher scores indicate better satisfaction with care at the end-of-life in dementia. | 24 months |
| Proportion of Patients Who Received Burdensome Care | For patients who die while enrolled in the study by 24 months, this outcome assesses the proportion of patients who received burdensome care near the end of life. Burdensome care is defined as any intensive care unit use or life prolonging care (cardiopulmonary resuscitation, mechanical ventilation, tracheostomy, dialysis, artificial nutrition, chemotherapy) within 30 days of death using dates and services abstracted from medical records and the Chesapeake Regional Information System (CRISP), Maryland's Health Information Exchange, which includes all hospital encounters. | 24 months |
| Baltimore |
| Maryland |
| 21218 |
| United States |
| Beacham Center | Baltimore | Maryland | 21224 | United States |
| Medstar Harbor Hospital | Baltimore | Maryland | 21225 | United States |
| Johns Hopkins Community Physicians - Greater Dundalk | Dundalk | Maryland | 21222 | United States |
| Medstar CSA Collington and House call Program | Mitchellville | Maryland | 20721 | United States |
| Johns Hopkins Community Physicians - White Marsh | Nottingham | Maryland | 21236 | United States |
| Medstar CSA Montgomery County | Olney | Maryland | 20832 | United States |
| MedStar Health at Leisure World Boulevard | Silver Spring | Maryland | 20906 | United States |
| 30022409 | Background | Wolff JL, Roter DL, Boyd CM, Roth DL, Echavarria DM, Aufill J, Vick JB, Gitlin LN. Patient-Family Agenda Setting for Primary Care Patients with Cognitive Impairment: the SAME Page Trial. J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Sep;33(9):1478-1486. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4563-y. Epub 2018 Jul 18. |
| 37116645 | Background | Wolff JL, Cagle J, Echavarria D, Dy SM, Giovannetti ER, Boyd CM, Hanna V, Hussain N, Reiff JS, Scerpella D, Zhang T, Roth DL. Sharing Health Care Wishes in Primary Care (SHARE) among older adults with possible cognitive impairment in primary care: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Contemp Clin Trials. 2023 Jun;129:107208. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2023.107208. Epub 2023 Apr 26. |
| 38754769 | Background | Cagle JG, Reiff JS, Smith A, Echavarria D, Scerpella D, Zhang T, Roth DL, Hanna V, Boyd CM, Hussain NA, Wolff JL. Assessing Advance Care Planning Fidelity within the Context of Cognitive Impairment: The SHARE Trial. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2024 Aug;68(2):180-189. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.05.002. Epub 2024 May 15. |
| 39189632 | Background | Wolff JL, Cagle JG, Hanna V, Dy SM, Echavarria D, Giovannetti ER, Boyd CM, Saylor MA, Hussain N, Reiff JS, Scerpella D, Zhang T, Sekhon VK, Roth DL. Sharing health care wishes among older adults with cognitive impairment in primary care: Results from a randomized controlled trial. Alzheimers Dement. 2024 Oct;20(10):7263-7273. doi: 10.1002/alz.14210. Epub 2024 Aug 27. |
| 36069000 | Derived | Reiff JS, Cagle J, Zhang T, Roth DL, Wolff JL. Fielding the quality of communication questionnaire to persons with cognitive impairment and their family in primary care: A pilot study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2023 Jan;71(1):221-226. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18034. Epub 2022 Sep 6. |
| Dropped due to provider change between either 6, 12 or 24 months |
|
| Dropped due to caregiver change between either 6, 12 or 24 months |
|
| Dropped due to participants missing assessment at both 6 and 12-month |
|
| Lost to Follow-up |
|
| Still collecting 24-month assessment |
|
| BG001 | Control Group | Of 273 patient-family dyads enrolled, 128 patients and 128 caregivers were assigned to the control group and received minimally enhanced usual care encompassing an introductory letter, the guide for communicating with clinicians and blank advance directive. A total of 256 participants were randomized to the control group. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Count of Participants |
| Participants |
|
| Age, Continuous | The row population for each row (patient and caregiver) differs from the overall number of baseline participants because each row specifies the number of participants analyzed separately by patient or caregiver. | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | The row population for each row (patient and caregiver) differs from the overall number of baseline participants because each row specifies the number of participants analyzed separately by patient or caregiver. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | The row population for each row (patient and caregiver) differs from the overall number of baseline participants because each row specifies the number of participants analyzed separately by patient or caregiver. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | The row population for each row (patient and caregiver) differs from the overall number of baseline participants because each row specifies the number of participants analyzed separately by patient or caregiver. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Education >12th grade | Patients' and Caregivers' measures were assessed separately. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Patient Diagnosis of Cognitive Impairment | Patients only | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Patient - Moderate or Severe Cognitive Impairment (based on TICS-m score) | We use the Modified Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (TICS-m) to categorize normal cognitive functioning (scores of 32-50), mild cognitive impairment (scores of 28-31) or severe (scores of less than 27) cognitive impairment. | Patients only. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Patient - Live Alone | Patient only | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Caregiver Relationship to Patient | This measure was only assessed for the caregivers. | The row population differs from the overall number of participants because this measure was only assessed for the caregiver population. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Patient Reported Quality of Life | Quality of Life Alzheimer's Disease (QoL-AD) scale is dementia specific and brief and uses the patient's own responses. It has 13 items covering the domains of physical health, energy, mood, living situation, memory, family, marriage, friends, chores, fun, money, self, and life as a whole. These are scored on a 4-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (poor) to 4 (excellent), with a possible total range from 13 to 52. Higher scores indicate better quality of life. | Patient only | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale |
|
| Caregiver Reported Fair or Poor Self-rated Health | Caregivers were asked to rate their physical health using a 4-item Likert scale (poor, fair, good or excellent). The number of caregivers indicating poor or fair physical health is reported. | Caregivers only | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Caregiver Reported - Hours helping patient in a typical week | Caregivers were asked to estimate the number of hours in a typical week spent helping the enrolled patient. | Caregivers only | Mean | Standard Deviation | hours/week |
|
| Caregiver Reported - Years accompanying patients to visits | Caregivers were asked to estimate the number of years accompanying the enrolled patient to primary care doctor visits. | Caregivers only | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
|
| Caregiver - Symptoms of caregiving burden | Caregiver burden measured with 13-item Zarit Burden Inventory +1 global item as reported. Each item is scored 0-4 for a range of 0-52,higher scores indicating greater burden. | Caregivers only | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale |
|
| Caregiver - Symptoms of anxiety | Caregiver anxiety was measured using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) which is a 7-item validated instrument that ask about symptoms of anxiety using a two-week recall period with response categories that vary from 0 ("not at all") to 3 ("nearly every day"). Item responses are summed to construct composite scores; range 0-21. Higher scores indicates more symptoms of anxiety. | Caregivers only | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale |
|
| Caregiver - Shared decision-making | Caregivers were asked to reflect on their interactions with the enrolled patient's primary care doctor and their team in the past 6 months using the CollaboRATE-10 scale. CollaboRATE-10 is a 3-item measure of the shared-decision making process on a 10-point anchored scale, ranging from 0 (no effort was made) to 10 (every effort was made). Participant's scores were summed and multiplied by 3.704 to transform the CollaboRATE-10 scale to 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better interactions on shared-decision making process between caregiver and patient's primary care doctor. | Caregivers only | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale |
|
| Caregiver - Therapeutic Alliance | Caregivers were asked to reflect on the extent to which they felt a sense of mutual understanding, caring and trust with the enrolled patient's doctor. The 16-item Human Connection Scale (THC) was used to assess therapeutic alliance between patient and physician on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 1-4 with various response categories depending on the relevance to question. The individual scores were summed; score range from 16-64. Higher scores indicate better sense of mutual understanding, caring and trust with patient's doctor. | Caregivers only | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale |
|
| OG001 | Minimally Enhanced Usual Care | Minimally enhanced usual care participants are provided with print educational materials that include a 44-page brochure developed by the National Institute on Aging entitled "A Guide for Older People: Talking with your Doctor" and a blank easy-to-complete advance directive. Minimally Enhanced Usual Care: Minimally enhanced usual care participants are provided with print educational materials that include a 44-page brochure developed by the National Institute on Aging entitled "A Guide for Older People: Talking with your Doctor" and a blank easy-to-complete advance directive. |
|
|
| Secondary | Average Scores for Patient and Caregiver-Reported Readiness to Engage in Advance Care Planning at 6-months | The Advance Care Planning Engagement Survey is a validated patient-reported questionnaire that assesses advance care planning process measures on a 5-point Likert scale. The outcome assesses a 6-item subscale of the Advance Care Planning Engagement Survey that includes parallel items for patient and family participants. The scale for each item is from 1 ("I have never thought about it") to 5 ("I have already done it"), with a range of 6-30 with higher scores indicating higher perceived readiness to engage in advance care planning. | 216 represents the total number participants (patients, caregivers) assessed in the intervention group for this outcome at 6 months, and 194 represents the total number of participants (patients, caregivers) assessed in the control group for this outcome at 6 months. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | 6 months |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Proportion of Patients With Documentation of Advance Directive Completion in the Electronic Health Record at 6-months | Documentation of advance directive completion in the electronic health record is defined as having a durable power of attorney or a living will documented in the primary care electronic health record. The Medical Order for Life Sustaining Treatment (MOLST) will not be included for this outcome as the completion of a Maryland MOLST is mandatory in certain situations, such as on transfer between settings of care, and is not indicative of having had an advance care planning discussion or naming a durable power of attorney. | Data was not collected. | Posted | 6 months |
|
|
| Secondary | Average Scores for Bereaved Family-Reported Decisional Conflict | Caregivers of patients who die are asked to assess their Decisional Conflict 2-3 months after patient's death. The Decisional Conflict Scale is a 16-item instrument scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 ("strongly agree") to 4 ("strongly disagree").The 16 items are summed, divided by 16, then multiplied by 25 to yield scores that range from 0 (no decisional conflict) to 100 (extremely high decisional conflict). Higher scores indicate higher decisional conflict. | Not Posted | 24 months | Participants |
| Secondary | Average Scores for Bereaved Family-Reported Decisional Regret | Caregivers of patients who die are asked to assess their Decisional Regret 2-3 months after patient's death. This outcome assesses bereaved family-reported decisional regret using a 5-item instrument that assesses the extent to which decision-makers experience regret about care. Response options are assessed using a 5-item Likert scale in which scores of 1 indicate the least regret and 5 the most regret. Scores are then reduced by 1 point and multiplied by 25 for a scale that ranges in value from 0 to 100. Prior studies have categorized scores of 0 as no regret, 1 to 25 as mild regret, and more than 25 as heightened regret. Higher scores indicate stronger feelings of regret. | Not Posted | 24 months | Participants |
| Secondary | Average Scores for Bereaved Family Symptoms of Anxiety | Caregivers of patients who die are asked to respond to questions about Symptoms of Anxiety 2-3 months after patient's death. This outcome assesses bereaved family symptoms of anxiety using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item questionnaire (GAD-7). The GAD-7 is a validated instrument that asks about symptoms of anxiety using a two-week recall period with response categories that vary from 0 ("not at all") to 3 ("nearly every day"). Item responses are summed to construct composite scores. Higher scores indicate more symptoms of anxiety. | Not Posted | 24 months | Participants |
| Secondary | Average Scores for Bereaved Family-Reported Satisfaction With Care at the End-of-Life in Dementia | Caregivers of patients who die are asked to assess their Satisfaction with Care at the End-of-life in Dementia 2-3 months after patient's death using the Satisfaction with Care at the End-of-Life in Dementia (SWC-EOLD). This is a 10-item instrument measured on a 4-point Likert scale that ranges from 1 ("strongly disagree") to 4 ("strongly agree") with a summary score ranging from 10-40 in which higher values indicate higher satisfaction. Higher scores indicate better satisfaction with care at the end-of-life in dementia. | Not Posted | 24 months | Participants |
| Secondary | Proportion of Patients Who Received Burdensome Care | For patients who die while enrolled in the study by 24 months, this outcome assesses the proportion of patients who received burdensome care near the end of life. Burdensome care is defined as any intensive care unit use or life prolonging care (cardiopulmonary resuscitation, mechanical ventilation, tracheostomy, dialysis, artificial nutrition, chemotherapy) within 30 days of death using dates and services abstracted from medical records and the Chesapeake Regional Information System (CRISP), Maryland's Health Information Exchange, which includes all hospital encounters. | Not Posted | 24 months | Participants |
| 34 |
| 145 |
| 8 |
| 145 |
| 0 |
| 145 |
| EG001 | Control Group: Patients | The control group received minimally enhanced usual care encompassing an introductory letter, the guide for communicating with clinicians and blank advance directive. | 29 | 128 | 3 | 128 | 0 | 128 |
| EG002 | SHARE Group: Caregivers | The SHARE intervention group received a packet from the primary care practice including a person-family agenda setting checklist, blank advance directive, guide for communication with clinicians, instructions for completing proxy registration for the patient portal and an invitation to a facilitator led ACP conversation. | 0 | 145 | 1 | 145 | 0 | 145 |
| EG003 | Control Group: Caregivers | The control group received minimally enhanced usual care encompassing an introductory letter, the guide for communicating with clinicians and blank advance directive. | 2 | 128 | 0 | 128 | 0 | 128 |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Between 18 and 65 years |
|
| >=65 years |
|
| Male |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
| Not Hispanic or Latino |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
| White |
|
| Other race/missing |
|
| Asian |
|
| White |
|
| Other race/missing |
|
| Other (friend, other relative) |
|
| Patients |
|
|