Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
low recruitment, preliminary analysis indicates that primary endpoint has been met
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study seeks to compare the accuracy and acceptability of Human Papillomavirus (HPV) testing self-sampling kit versus standard clinician-sampled HPV testing for cervical cancer screening. The primary outcome of this study is the concordance between screening results on self-sampling kits compared to clinician-collected HPV test and Pap smear results. Secondary endpoints will include acceptability of self-sampling and barriers to cervical cancer screening. These endpoints will be analyzed to try to circumvent barriers to the cervical cancer screening and ascertain whether self-sampling is a viable alternative to clinician sampling.
The American Cancer Society estimates that 4,170 women in the United States (US) will die from cervical cancer in 2018. Screening can reduce cancer mortality by (1) detecting malignancies when they are more treatable and (2) for some tests, identifying precancerous lesions for removal. Guidelines recommend cytology and/or human papillomavirus (HPV) testing for cervical cancer screening among women ages 30-65 years, but screening rates are suboptimal.
To help bridge these gaps in screening, HPV self-sampling would be an alternative to clinical screening. However, there are concerns about the comparability and acceptability of self-sampling kits. The impact of the proposed project is to compare HPV self-screening results with Pap smear results and clinician-collected HPV tests to ultimately improve the uptake of HPV screening. This study will be conducted in a normal risk population.
Subjects who have an upcoming well-woman appointment will be identified from Penn State Health, Department of Family and Community Medicine, clinic schedules. Clinicians who are a part of the study team will identify these patients two weeks prior to their appointment and send their information to a study coordinator, who will then call these patients to provide more information and assess their interest in participating. Patients who schedule within the two week period or were not contacted by a study team member for any reason will be given a card with general information about the study at their well-woman visit so that these women can contact a study team member if they are interested. A total of 197 participants will be recruited into this study.
Interested participants will be screened for eligibility over the phone and sent a self-sampling kit through the mail with a Summary Explanation of Research form, instructions, and pre-paid mailer to return the kit. Participants may collect their sample two weeks before or after their well-woman visit. A study team member will contact the participants at different time points within the 28 day window to determine whether the sample was collected and to administer the follow-up survey.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Self-Sampling Kit | Experimental | Self-Sampling kit (Evalyn Brush) to collect samples for analysis for HPV/Cervical cancer screening. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HPV Self-Sampling Kit (Evalyn Brush) | Device | The Evalyn Brush is a self-sampling kit that can be used to collect a sample to screen for HPV/Cervical cancer at home. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Concordance of Screening Results of the Self-sampling Kit Compared to Clinical-collected Samples | Number of participants whose results of the self-sampling kit were in concordance with the clinician-sampled HPV test and clinician-sampled Pap smear results. | Within two weeks of the well-woman visit |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Completed Self-Sampling Kits | The number of participants provided a kit vs. those who completed the sample collection | 28 days (two weeks before or after the well-woman visit) |
| Number of Participants Who Reported Problems With Using Self-Sampling Kits |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Jennifer Moss, PhD | Penn State College of Medicine | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Penn State College of Medicine | Hershey | Pennsylvania | 17033 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 29313949 | Background | Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2018. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Jan;68(1):7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21442. Epub 2018 Jan 4. | |
| 27071351 | Background | Shieh Y, Eklund M, Sawaya GF, Black WC, Kramer BS, Esserman LJ. Population-based screening for cancer: hope and hype. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2016 Sep;13(9):550-65. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2016.50. Epub 2016 Apr 13. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Participants | Participants in this group were those scheduled for routine cervical cancer screening. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Participants | Participants in this group were those scheduled for routine cervical cancer screening. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Number of Participants With Concordance of Screening Results of the Self-sampling Kit Compared to Clinical-collected Samples | Number of participants whose results of the self-sampling kit were in concordance with the clinician-sampled HPV test and clinician-sampled Pap smear results. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Within two weeks of the well-woman visit |
|
|
Adverse events were assessed over 41 days, which was the longest period between the clinician-collected and self-collected tests.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Participants | Participants in this group were those scheduled for routine cervical cancer screening. |
Not provided
Not provided
small sample size due to slow participant accrual, exclusion of patients who do not seek care (population most likely to benefit from self-sampling)
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jennifer L. Moss, PhD | Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine | 7175310003 | 323429 | jmoss1@pennstatehealth.psu.edu |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Apr 6, 2023 | Oct 4, 2023 | Prot_SAP_002.pdf |
| ICF | No | No | Yes | Informed Consent Form | May 10, 2022 | Oct 4, 2023 | ICF_003.pdf |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002583 | Uterine Cervical Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014594 | Uterine Neoplasms |
| D005833 | Genital Neoplasms, Female |
| D014565 | Urogenital Neoplasms |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
Not provided
Not provided
Participants who enroll in the study will be asked to complete an HPV self-sampling test in addition to attending their well-woman visit and receiving a clinician-sampled Pap Smear/HPV test. Participants will collect the sample at home and mail it back to the Penn State Health clinical laboratory, where the results will be compared to those obtained from the Pap Smear/HPV test at their clinic appointment. Participants will also complete a follow up survey over the phone after their sample is collected.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The number of participants, among those who completed the sample collection, who reported problems using the self-sampling kit. |
| Within two weeks of the well-woman visit |
| Background | U. S. Preventive Services Task Force. Final recommendation statement: Cervical cancer: Screening; 2018. https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/Page/Document/RecommendationStatementFinal/cervical-cancer-screening2. Accessed 2018. |
| 22422631 | Background | Saslow D, Solomon D, Lawson HW, Killackey M, Kulasingam SL, Cain J, Garcia FA, Moriarty AT, Waxman AG, Wilbur DC, Wentzensen N, Downs LS Jr, Spitzer M, Moscicki AB, Franco EL, Stoler MH, Schiffman M, Castle PE, Myers ER; ACS-ASCCP-ASCP Cervical Cancer Guideline Committee. American Cancer Society, American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, and American Society for Clinical Pathology screening guidelines for the prevention and early detection of cervical cancer. CA Cancer J Clin. 2012 May-Jun;62(3):147-72. doi: 10.3322/caac.21139. Epub 2012 Mar 14. |
| 38516651 | Derived | Wong A, Morgis R, Entenman J, Ramirez SI, Hays AL, Wright TS, Scartozzi CM, Ruffin MT, Moss JL. Exploratory Analysis of Concordance Between Clinician-Collected and Self-Sampled Human Papillomavirus Tests in a Small Cohort of Average- and High-Risk Patients. Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle). 2024 Mar 13;5(1):259-266. doi: 10.1089/whr.2024.0004. eCollection 2024. |
| Participants |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| annual household income | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Completed Self-Sampling Kits | The number of participants provided a kit vs. those who completed the sample collection | Total number of participants that were provided with a self-sampling kit. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 28 days (two weeks before or after the well-woman visit) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Participants Who Reported Problems With Using Self-Sampling Kits | The number of participants, among those who completed the sample collection, who reported problems using the self-sampling kit. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Within two weeks of the well-woman visit |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 35 |
| 0 |
| 35 |
| 0 |
| 35 |
Not provided
Not provided
| D009369 |
| Neoplasms |
| D002577 | Uterine Cervical Diseases |
| D014591 | Uterine Diseases |
| D005831 | Genital Diseases, Female |
| D052776 | Female Urogenital Diseases |
| D005261 | Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications |
| D000091642 | Urogenital Diseases |
| D000091662 | Genital Diseases |