Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
vaccination uptake 80% in the target population/new COVID variant
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Prothya Biosolutions | INDUSTRY |
| ZonMw: The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development | OTHER |
| Leiden University Medical Center | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
An effective, widely available, and safe treatment that can decrease the duration, severity and fatality of COVID-19 is urgently needed. Also, in the most affected regions the pressure on health care systems including ventilator support capacity can be a limiting factor for survival. Initial studies including from our group indicate that administering convalescent plasma containing high titers of neutralizing antibodies to COVID-19 patients who are already relatively late during the disease course after hospital admission is not effective, which can be explained by high titers of autologous antibodies present in patients. Thus, the antiviral capacity of convalescent plasma is hypothesized to be best positioned early in the disease course and in patients at increased risk for a severe disease course. If effective, any treatment that decreases the need for hospital admission is very valuable but so far, no COVID-19 treatment has been shown to prevent clinical deterioration when given before patients are admitted to the hospital.
Primary objective:
To evaluate the efficacy, feasibility and safety following the administration of convalescent plasma (ConvP) as a therapy for outpatients diagnosed with COVID-19 at increased risk for an unfavourable clinical outcome and within 7 days after symptom onset.
Study design:
This trial is a nationwide multicenter, double blind, randomized controlled trial in the Netherlands. Patients will be randomized between the transfusion of 300mL of convP versus regular fresh frozen plasma (FFP).
Patient population:
Patients with polymerase chain reaction (PCR) confirmed COVID disease with less than 8 days of symptoms, age 70 or older or 50-69 years with at least 1 additional risk factor for severe COVID-19 are eligible.
Intervention:
300mL of convP with a minimum level of neutralizing antibodies.
A total of 690 patients will be included. Expected duration of accrual: 18-24 months Duration of follow up :Day 28 for the primary endpoint
Secondary (exploratory) objectives
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| ConvP | Experimental | 300 mL convalescent plasma with a minimum of neutralizing antibodies |
|
| FFP | Active Comparator | 300 mL Fresh Frozen plasma |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ConvP | Biological | Infusion of plasma retrieved from donors with a history of PCR proven symptomatic COVID. Plasma will be administered according to the Erasmus MC KIS protocol regarding the use of blood products |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Highest disease status | Highest disease status on the 5-point ordinal disease severity scale in the convP group will be compared with the FFP group. | 28 days following transfusion of convP or FFP |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of deaths | Percentage of deaths in the convP group compared to the FFP group | 28 days following transfusion of convP or FFP |
| Percentage of hospital admissions | Percentage of hospital admissions in the convP group compared to the FFP group |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Highest disease status stratified by presence of neutralizing antibodies and by symptom duration at baseline | Analysis of primary endpoint following transfusion of convP versus FFP stratified by the presence of neutralizing antibodies at baseline and by symptom duration at baseline. | 28 days following transfusion of convP or FFP |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Bart Rijnders, MD, PhD | Erasmus Medical Center | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Erasmus Medical Center | Rotterdam | South Holland | 3000 CA | Netherlands | ||
| Meander Medisch Centrum |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 35546145 | Derived | Millat-Martinez P, Gharbharan A, Alemany A, Rokx C, Geurtsvankessel C, Papageorgiou G, van Geloven N, Jordans C, Groeneveld G, Swaneveld F, van der Schoot E, Corbacho-Monne M, Ouchi D, Piccolo Ferreira F, Malchair P, Videla S, Garcia Garcia V, Ruiz-Comellas A, Ramirez-Morros A, Rodriguez Codina J, Amado Simon R, Grifols JR, Blanco J, Blanco I, Ara J, Bassat Q, Clotet B, Baro B, Troxel A, Zwaginga JJ, Mitja O, Rijnders BJA; CoV-Early study group; COnV-ert study group. Prospective individual patient data meta-analysis of two randomized trials on convalescent plasma for COVID-19 outpatients. Nat Commun. 2022 May 11;13(1):2583. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-29911-3. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| FFP | Biological | Infusion of thawed non-convalescent plasma Plasma will be administered according to the Erasmus Medical Center quality protocol regarding the use of blood products |
|
|
| 28 days following transfusion of convP or FFP |
| Percentage of ICU admissions | Percentage of ICU admissions in the convP group compared to the FFP group | 28 days following transfusion of convP or FFP |
| Disease duration in days of symptoms | Disease duration in days of symptoms in the convP group compared to the FFP group | 28 days following transfusion of convP or FFP |
| Age and clinical frailty score | Age and clinical frailty score stratified analysis of percentage of primary endpoint following transfusion of convP versus FFP. | 28 days following transfusion of convP or FFP |
| Change in proportion of detectable SARS-Cov-2 RT-PCR results |
Change in proportion of detectable SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR results at day 3, 7, 14 and 28 following transfusion according to the presence of neutralizing antibodies at baseline |
| Day 3, 7, 14 and 28 following transfusion of convP or FFP |
| Amersfoort |
| Netherlands |
| Rijnstate Ziekenhuis | Arnhem | Netherlands |
| Amphia Ziekenhuis | Breda | Netherlands |
| Groene Hart Ziekenhuis | Gouda | Netherlands |
| University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG) | Groningen | Netherlands |
| Spaarne Gasthuis | Haarlem | Netherlands |
| Medisch Centrum Leeuwarden | Leeuwarden | Netherlands |
| Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum | Leiden | Netherlands |
| Sint Antonius Ziekenhuis | Nieuwegein | Netherlands |
| Bernhoven Hospital | Uden | Netherlands |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000086382 | COVID-19 |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011024 | Pneumonia, Viral |
| D011014 | Pneumonia |
| D012141 | Respiratory Tract Infections |
| D007239 | Infections |
| D014777 | Virus Diseases |
| D018352 | Coronavirus Infections |
| D003333 | Coronaviridae Infections |
| D030341 | Nidovirales Infections |
| D012327 | RNA Virus Infections |
| D008171 | Lung Diseases |
| D012140 | Respiratory Tract Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided