Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
low recruitment, preliminary analyses indicates that primary endpoint has been met
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study seeks to compare the accuracy and acceptability of HPV testing self-sampling kit and standard clinician-sampling for HPV testing. The primary outcome of this study is the concordance between screening results on self-sampling kits compared to clinician-collected HPV test, Pap smear results, and colposcopy. Secondary endpoints will include acceptability of self-sampling and barriers to cervical cancer screening. These endpoints will be analyzed to try to circumvent barriers to the cervical cancer screening and ascertain whether self-sampling is a viable alternative.
The American Cancer Society estimates that 4,170 women in the United States (US) will die from cervical cancer in 2018 (Siegel et al., 2018). Screening can reduce cancer mortality by (1) detecting malignancies when they are more treatable and (2) for some tests, identifying precancerous lesions for removal (Shieh et al., 2016). Guidelines recommend cytology and/or HPV testing for cervical cancer screening among women ages 30-65 years, but screening rates are suboptimal (U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, 2018; Saslow et al., 2012).
To help bridge these gaps in screening, HPV self-sampling would be an alternative to clinical-sampling for HPV testing. However, there are concerns about the comparability and acceptability of self-sampling kits.
The main objective of this study is to compare the test characteristics of the human papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling kit versus clinician-sampled HPV testing for cervical cancer screening. Potential participants will be identified from the Penn State Family and Community Medicine and OBGYN clinics after it is determined that they have abnormal findings on their (clinician-sampled) Pap/HPV test and require a follow-up colposcopy. The patient will be pre-screened by a study team member. If they are found to be eligible, a study team member will invite them to participate in the study.
After a participant enrolls in the study, a self-sampling kit is mailed to their home along with a Summary Explanation of Research consent form and instructional sheet. Participants will be asked to complete the kit two weeks before or after their colposcopy, giving them a 28 day collection window. Study team members will perform a follow-up survey after the sample is collected and provide reminder phone calls if needed.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Self-Sampling Kit | Experimental | Participants will be mailed a Self-Sampling kit (Evalyn Brush) to collect samples for analysis for HPV/Cervical cancer screening. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evalyn Brush | Device | The Evalyn Brush is a self-sampling kit that can be used to collect a sample to screen for HPV/Cervical cancer at home. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Concordance of Screening Results of the Self-Sampling Kit Compared to Clinician-collected Samples | The primary outcome of this study is to analyze the number of participants with concordance of screening results of the self-sampling kit compared to clinician-collected HPV test, Pap smear results, and colposcopy. | Within two weeks of their colposcopy exam. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Completed Self-Sampling Kits | The number of participants provided a kit vs. those who completed the sample collection | Within two weeks of their colposcopy exam. |
| Number of Participants Who Reported Problems Using Self-Sampling Kits |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Jennifer Moss, PhD | Penn State College of Medicine | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jennifer Moss | Hershey | Pennsylvania | 17033 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 29313949 | Background | Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2018. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Jan;68(1):7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21442. Epub 2018 Jan 4. | |
| 27071351 | Background | Shieh Y, Eklund M, Sawaya GF, Black WC, Kramer BS, Esserman LJ. Population-based screening for cancer: hope and hype. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2016 Sep;13(9):550-65. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2016.50. Epub 2016 Apr 13. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Participants | The participants in this study were scheduled for a colposcopy procedure due to abnormal findings during their recent standard-of-care, clinical-collected cervical cancer screening. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Participants | The participants in this study were scheduled for a colposcopy procedure due to abnormal findings during their recent standard-of-care, clinical-collected cervical cancer screening. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Number of Participants With Concordance of Screening Results of the Self-Sampling Kit Compared to Clinician-collected Samples | The primary outcome of this study is to analyze the number of participants with concordance of screening results of the self-sampling kit compared to clinician-collected HPV test, Pap smear results, and colposcopy. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Within two weeks of their colposcopy exam. |
|
|
Adverse event information was collected during the time between the clinician and self-sampled tests for all participants, which was 212 days or just over 7 months.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Participants | Participants were those scheduled for a colposcopy procedure due to abnormal findings during their recent standard-of-care, clinical-collected cervical cancer screening. |
Not provided
Not provided
small sample size due to slow participant accrual, exclusion of patients who do not engage in health care (group most likely to benefit from self-sampling)
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jennifer L. Moss, PhD | Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine | 717-531-0003 | 323429 | jmoss1@pennstatehealth.psu.edu |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Apr 20, 2023 | Oct 4, 2023 | Prot_SAP_002.pdf |
| ICF | No | No | Yes | Informed Consent Form | Jun 7, 2022 | Oct 4, 2023 | ICF_003.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002583 | Uterine Cervical Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014594 | Uterine Neoplasms |
| D005833 | Genital Neoplasms, Female |
| D014565 | Urogenital Neoplasms |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
Not provided
Not provided
Participants who enroll in the study will be asked to complete an HPV self-sampling kit in addition to completing their colposcopy exam. Participants will collect the sample at home before or after their exam and mail it back to the Penn State Health laboratory for analysis. The results will be compared to those of the clinician-collected (standard of care) colposcopy exam, Pap, and HPV test. Participants will also complete a follow up survey over the phone after their sample is collected.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The number of participants, among those who completed the sample collection, who reported problems using the self-sampling kit.
| Within two weeks of their colposcopy exam |
| Background | U. S. Preventive Services Task Force. Final recommendation statement: Cervical cancer: Screening; 2018. https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/Page/Document/RecommendationStatementFinal/cervical-cancer-screening2. Accessed 2018. |
| 22422631 | Background | Saslow D, Solomon D, Lawson HW, Killackey M, Kulasingam SL, Cain J, Garcia FA, Moriarty AT, Waxman AG, Wilbur DC, Wentzensen N, Downs LS Jr, Spitzer M, Moscicki AB, Franco EL, Stoler MH, Schiffman M, Castle PE, Myers ER; ACS-ASCCP-ASCP Cervical Cancer Guideline Committee. American Cancer Society, American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, and American Society for Clinical Pathology screening guidelines for the prevention and early detection of cervical cancer. CA Cancer J Clin. 2012 May-Jun;62(3):147-72. doi: 10.3322/caac.21139. Epub 2012 Mar 14. |
| 38516651 | Derived | Wong A, Morgis R, Entenman J, Ramirez SI, Hays AL, Wright TS, Scartozzi CM, Ruffin MT, Moss JL. Exploratory Analysis of Concordance Between Clinician-Collected and Self-Sampled Human Papillomavirus Tests in a Small Cohort of Average- and High-Risk Patients. Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle). 2024 Mar 13;5(1):259-266. doi: 10.1089/whr.2024.0004. eCollection 2024. |
| Participants |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| annual household income | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Participants |
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Completed Self-Sampling Kits | The number of participants provided a kit vs. those who completed the sample collection | Total number of participants who were provided with a self-sampling kit. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Within two weeks of their colposcopy exam. |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Participants Who Reported Problems Using Self-Sampling Kits | The number of participants, among those who completed the sample collection, who reported problems using the self-sampling kit. | Total number of participants who returned the self-sampling kit. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Within two weeks of their colposcopy exam |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 12 |
| 0 |
| 12 |
| 0 |
| 12 |
Not provided
Not provided
| D009369 |
| Neoplasms |
| D002577 | Uterine Cervical Diseases |
| D014591 | Uterine Diseases |
| D005831 | Genital Diseases, Female |
| D052776 | Female Urogenital Diseases |
| D005261 | Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications |
| D000091642 | Urogenital Diseases |
| D000091662 | Genital Diseases |