Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Surgical hand scrubbing is the removal of transient flora and reduction of permanent flora as much as possible before any sterile gloves are worn before any surgical intervention. It is a cheap and easy method to prevent infections. Effective use of surgical hand scrubbing has an important role in preventing and reducing the transfer of health-related infections. Although many studies have been performed on surgical hand scrubbing, no standard practice has been found in the method of scrubbing and optimal duration of scrubbing time. The aim of this study is to compare evidence-based surgical hand scrubbing methods in order to prevent surgical site infections.
Methods H0: There is no difference between the effectiveness of different surgical hand scrubbing methods on the bacterial flora in the hand H1: There is a difference between the effectiveness of different surgical hand scrubbing methods on the bacterial flora in the hand.
Time H0: There is no difference between the effectiveness of different the duration of scrubbing time on the bacterial flora in the hand.
H1: There is a difference between the effectiveness of different the duration of scrubbing time on the bacterial flora in the hand.
Original Value: Surgical site infections (SSI) are a serious problem due to increased morbidity and mortality, prolonged hospitalization, hospitalization and consumption of health resources. It is reported from guides that the several factors like hair removal, skin antisepsis, prevention of hypothermia, antimicrobial prophylaxis, providing adequate oxygenation applied in intraoperative period reduce SSI. In addition to these factors, it is known that hand antisepsis of the surgical team is one of the most important factors in preventing SSI. Surgical hand scrubbing is the removal of transient flora and reduction of permanent flora as much as possible before any sterile gloves are worn before any surgical intervention. It is a cheap and easy method to prevent infections. Effective use of surgical hand scrubbing has an important role in preventing and reducing the transfer of health-related infections. Therefore, the research topic is directly related to patient safety and is considered to be one of the important areas of health services at national and international level in terms of establishing institutional culture in the prevention of surgical site infections. Although many studies have been performed on surgical hand scrubbing, no standard practice has been found in the method of scrubbing and optimal duration of scrubbing time. The aim of this study is to compare evidence-based surgical hand scrubbing methods in order to prevent surgical site infections.
Method: The research is a randomized controlled prospective study. The universe of the research was surgeon and operating room nurses in Gulhane Training and Research Hospital. The sample size is at least 180 people for one-way analysis of variance with G * Power version 3.1.19 software to determine a medium level (0.25) effect size between 4 groups at 0.80 power and 0.05 type I error level calculated (Tsai, 2016). Participants was divided into 4 groups by randomization method.
The participants in the first group performed the surgical hand scrubbing for 1 minute and with using a nail brush.
The participants in the second group performed the surgical hand scrubbing for 1 minute and without using a nail brush.
The participants in the third group performed the surgical hand scrubbing for 2 minute and with using a nail brush.
The participants in the fourth group performed the surgical hand scrubbing for 2 minute and without using a nail brush.
Standard Practices in All Groups
Volunteers' Exclusion Criteria (Different from Exclusion Criteria):
This research will take place in three stages. At all stages (before surgical hand scrubbing, immediately after and at the end of the surgery), culture will be taken from the active hands of the participants with the Glove Juice Method. At all stages, culture will be taken from the participants via Glove Juice Method.
Glove Juice Method It is a method used to determine the number of bacteria on hand. In this method, individuals will be provided to wear gloves on their dominant hand. Powder-free sterile gloves were used for all sampling. Then, 50 ml of 'Tryptic Soy Broth' medium was placed inside the glove and all surfaces of the gloved hand were massaged for 60 seconds by the researcher. A sample was taken from the liquid in the glove using aseptic techniques and analyzed.
Applications in Medical Microbiology Laboratory Before surgical hand scrubbing, samples taken with glove liquid technique were diluted 1:10 in Müller Hinton Broth broth in the laboratory (500 μl sample, 4.5 ml. Müeller Hinton Broth). And 300 μl of it was placed on 5% sheep blood agar plates with sterile micropipettes. 1 ml each of the other samples (after surgical hand scrubbing and at the end of the surgery) was spread diluted into three 5 % sheep blood agar plates with sterile micropipettes. All samples were incubated at 35° C for 48 hours under atmospheric conditions. Total bacterial load was determined by counting the total colony forming units (CFU) on the plates.
Statistical Method SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) Windows Version 22.00 package program will be used in the statistical analysis of the data obtained at the end of the study. Number,%, mean ± standard deviation, median (25% -75%) values will be used in defining the data. Kolmogorov-Smirnov test will be used to evaluate the suitability for normal distribution. In comparative statistics, appropriate tests will be used according to the normal distribution of the sample. In statistical decisions, p ≤ 0.05 level will be accepted as an indicator of significant difference.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Group I (Brushed-1 minute) | Experimental | Surgical hand scrubbing will be performed in 1 minute using a brush. |
|
| Group II (Brushless-1 minute) | No Intervention | Surgical hand scrubbing will be performed in 1 minute without using a brush. | |
| Group III (Brushed-2 minutes) | Experimental | Surgical hand scrubbing will be performed in 2 minute using a brush. |
|
| Group IV (Brushless-2 minutes) | No Intervention | Surgical hand scrubbing will be performed in 2 minute without using a brush. |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Using a brush | Other | Surgical hand scrubbing will be performed in 1 minute and 2 minutes using a disposable nail brush. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| The number of bacteria on hand | The effect of brush usage and time on bacterial flora in hand during surgical hand. Bacterial analysis was carried out in three consecutive measurement. | ''just before surgical hand scrubbing'' |
| The number of bacteria on hand | The effect of brush usage and time on bacterial flora in hand during surgical hand scrubbing | 'immediately after surgical hand scrubbing'' |
| The number of bacteria on hand | The effect of brush usage and time on bacterial flora in hand during surgical hand scrubbing | ''after surgery (between 90-120 minutes after surgical hand scrubbing)'' |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Health Sciences Gulhane Faculty of Nursing | Ankara | Turkey (Türkiye) |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 34029650 | Derived | Parlak EA, Iyigun E, Albay A, Bedir O. Impact of methods and duration of surgical hand scrub on bacterial count: A randomized controlled trial. Am J Infect Control. 2021 Nov;49(11):1376-1383. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2021.05.006. Epub 2021 May 23. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Date | Date Unknown |
|---|---|---|
| Release | Oct 7, 2020 | |
| Reset | Oct 29, 2020 | |
| Release | Oct 11, 2021 | |
| Reset | Nov 8, 2021 |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Nov 5, 2019 | Aug 12, 2020 | Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
Not provided
Not provided
| Release Date | Unrelease Date | Unrelease Date Unknown | Reset Date | MCP Release Number |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2020 | Oct 29, 2020 | |||
| Oct 11, 2021 |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013530 | Surgical Wound Infection |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014946 | Wound Infection |
| D007239 | Infections |
| D011183 | Postoperative Complications |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
It is the blind that makes microbiological and statistical analysis
| Nov 8, 2021 |
| D013568 |
| Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |