Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Bimaxillary dental proclination is the condition where the upper and lower dental arches are procline thus increase lip fullness. Since the aim of orthodontic treatment in bimaxillary proclination in to get flatten profile where the incisor inclinations are purposely reduced or interincisal angle are increased, therefore it is guarded for corrected dentition to maintain stable or not post orthodontic treatment.Therefore, this study is looking into evidence which is the best retainer to maintain stability of bimaxillary proclination cases following fixed appliances treatment.
Study title Stability of Bimaxillary Proclination Cases Following Fixed Appliances Treatment: A Randomized Control Trial
Study Population Pre-treatment of bimaxillary proclination patient who completed active orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances and are scheduled to debond at Orthodontic Clinic, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Malaya.
Study Design Randomized, prospective, single-center control trial. Three parallel arm groups of patients will be assigned for 3 types of retention methods; 1.VFR 2.Fixed bonded retainer 3.Double regime (bonded & VFR)
Aim of study To determine the best mode of retention to maintain the stability of bimaxillary proclination cases treated by four premolars extraction and fixed appliances.
Specific Objectives
Sample Size The sample size calculation was done using G*power software version 3.1.The f-test, repeated measures ANOVA, within-between interaction were used.
Based on the effect size of 0.43 (Keating PJ 1986), maximum accuracy (power) of 80% (0.80), error of 5% (0.05), number of groups are 3, number of measurements are 2, correlation among repetitive measures is 0.5, nonsphericity correlation is 1, total number of 18 subjects needed for entire study. Allowing for 50% dropout, a final sample size of 27 subjects with 9 subjects per group will be used.
Study Duration September 2019 - Disember 2021
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vacuum formed retainer group | Experimental | It will be constructed following manufacturer's instructions for the thickness. |
|
| Fixed bonded retainer group | Experimental | fixed bonded wire will be bonded on individual tooth extended distal to extraction space that were previously closed by fixed appliances treatment. |
|
| Vacuum formed retainer and fixed bonded retainer | Experimental | Double regime retainer that will be consisted of bonded retainer and vacuum formed retainer for upper and lower arch. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vacuum formed retainer, fixed bonded retainer, vacuum formed and fixed bonded retainer | Other | Patients will be instructed to wear the removable vacuum form retainer for 8 to 10 hours per day and only removed the retainers during tooth brushing. (Thickett 2010), (Gill 2007). The vacuum formed retainer will be constructed using thermoplastic material that will be purchased from manufacturer at 1.0mm thickness. Meanwhile, bonded retainer will be done using Ormco ® response deadsoft retainer wire size 0.190 round, made in USA by ORMCO Corporation, the fixed bonded wire will be extended distal to the extraction spaces that were previously closed by fixed appliances on both the upper and lower arches. The bonded retainer will be wearing by patients for 24 hours. Double regime retainer that will be comprised of vacuum formed and bonded retainer will be constructed using the same properties as vacuum formed retainer and bonded retainer. A standard oral and written instruction will be given to patients regarding retainer's uses. (Shawesh M et.al, 2009). |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Stability: Change in the incisal inclinations | To measure any changes in the upper incisor to maxillary plane angle, lower incisor to mandibular plane angle and changes in interincisal angle. This angular measurement will be measured in degree. | 1 year post debond of orthodontic fixed appliances |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Stability: Soft tissue changes | To measure any changes in the nasolabial angle, labiomental angle. These will be measured in degree. The upper and lower lips distances in relation to Rickett's Esthetic line will be measured in millimeter (mm). | 1 year post debond of orthodontic fixed appliances |
| Stability of dentition |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr. Norhidayah Mohd Tahir, MOrth | Contact | +603 79674802 | 4883 | norhidayahmt@um.edu.my |
| Dr. Nurulhuda Maskim, BDS | Contact | dgd180002@siswa.um.edu.my |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Dr.Norhidayah@Nor Zahidah Mohd Tahir, MOrth | Faculty of Dentistry University of Malaya Kuala Lumpur | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Faculty of Dentistry University of Malaya | Recruiting | Petaling Jaya | Kuala Lumpur | 50603 | Malaysia |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2591485 | Result | Lew K. Profile changes following orthodontic treatment of bimaxillary protrusion in adults with the Begg appliance. Eur J Orthod. 1989 Nov;11(4):375-81. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.ejo.a036009. | |
| 26877981 | Result | Ab Rahman N, Low TF, Idris NS. A survey on retention practice among orthodontists in Malaysia. Korean J Orthod. 2016 Jan;46(1):36-41. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2016.46.1.36. Epub 2016 Jan 25. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study will be encompassed 3 groups of patients that will be assigned for 3 types of retention methods;
Not provided
Not provided
The patient will be decided for the type of retention treatment by picking an opaque and sealed envelope.
The participants study models will be examined and assigned with a blinding code by first researcher , who will be blinded to the subjects' retainer allocation. Patients name on the printed radiograph will also be removed. Therefore,the first researcher will be blinded to those she will be measuring. The blinding code will be prepared by second researcher before first researcher measure the casts and radiographs.
|
Any irregularity at lower labial segment will be measured using Little Irregularity Index. This will be measured in millimeter (mm). |
| 1 year post debond of orthodontic fixed appliances |
| Changes in arches parameters | Intra arch changes will be measure based on intermolar width, intercanine width, arch length, overbite and overjet. This will be measured in millimeter (mm). | 1 year post debond of orthodontic fixed appliances |
| Impact of retainers on Oral Health Related Quality of Life | Patients perception towards retainer will be measured using an Oral Health Related Quality of Life (OHIP) questionnaire. Patients will be assessed on how often they experienced the problems mentioned in the questionnaire throughout the time they use the retainers. The scale will be recorded as very often, quite often, sometimes, never, don't know. | 1 year post debond of orthodontic fixed appliances |
| 3465369 | Result | Keating PJ. The treatment of bimaxillary protrusion. A cephalometric consideration of changes in the inter-incisal angle and soft tissue profile. Br J Orthod. 1986 Oct;13(4):209-20. |
| 19797411 | Result | Shawesh M, Bhatti B, Usmani T, Mandall N. Hawley retainers full- or part-time? A randomized clinical trial. Eur J Orthod. 2010 Apr;32(2):165-70. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjp082. Epub 2009 Oct 1. |
| 19828592 | Result | Thickett E, Power S. A randomized clinical trial of thermoplastic retainer wear. Eur J Orthod. 2010 Feb;32(1):1-5. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjp061. Epub 2009 Oct 14. |
| 17902334 | Result | Gill DS, Naini FB, Jones A, Tredwin CJ. Part-time versus full-time retainer wear following fixed appliance therapy: a randomized prospective controlled trial. World J Orthod. 2007 Fall;8(3):300-6. |
| 39912971 | Derived | Maskim N, Mohd Tahir NNZ, Wan Hassan WN. A randomized controlled trial comparing retainers in bimaxillary proclination cases. Clin Oral Investig. 2025 Feb 6;29(2):117. doi: 10.1007/s00784-025-06199-3. |