Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is characterized by sudden, severe, usually unilateral, transient, stinging, recurrent electrocute-like shock in one or more divisions of the trigeminal nerve, lasting from a few seconds to less than 2 minutes.Simple daily-life activities, such as washing the face, brushing the teeth, eating, and talking, or the slight touch of trigger points may trigger the attack of pain of TN, resulting in a decline in the patient's quality of life (QoL). Trigger zones predominantly locate in the perioral and nasal region. Paroxysmal pain is associated with triggers in virtually all patients with TN. TN may be caused by abnormality of the trigger zone and the blockade of Na+ channel of trigger zone may be a novel and effective treatment methods for TN. Currently, most patients with TN may not achieve adequate pain relief with a single therapeutic agent. Multiple analgesics targeting different mechanisms of the pain pathway are often used.5% lidocaine medicated plaster (LMP) is a white hydrogel plaster containing adhesive material. LMP was approved for post-herpetic neuralgia (PHN) treatment by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 1999. Tamburin et al reported that 2 patients with primary TN who stopped oral drugs because of side effects or refused surgical procedures. Both patients were instructed to wear LMP over the affected area and LMP resulted in reduction of pain intensity and the number of pain paroxysms without side effects. However, due to limitations of these open-label design studies, the observed reductions in pain intensity may have been due to treatment effect, placebo effect, changes in underlying disease state, or a combination of these factors. Therefore, randomized controlled trials will be need to be performed to draw about the efficacy of the LMP in TN.
The PATCH trial is a prospective, double-blinded, vehicle-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter, enriched enrolment with randomized withdrawal (EERW) trial aimed at estimating the efficacy and safety of LMP in patients with TN. After providing informed consent and completing a baseline evaluation, patients will participate in an initial open-label treatment period of LMP (active patches). This openly titrated process is close to clinical practice and can provide data on the proportion of responders and non-responders, the optimal dose of the analgesic drug, and the proportion of withdrawal due to adverse effects. A responder at the end of the open-label treatment phase will be included in the subsequently double-blind treatment phase.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| The LMP group | Experimental | The LMP group will receive lidocaine patches (active patches) measuring 10 cm x 14 cm contains 700 mg lidocaine (5% w/w). |
|
| The control group | Placebo Comparator | The control group will receive vehicle patches that are identical to the active patch, except for the absence of lidocaine, without any optical differences. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5% lidocaine medicated plaster | Drug | The 5% lidocaine medicated plaster is measuring 10 cm x 14 cm contains 700 mg lidocaine (5% w/w) For each patient, the painful area and the trigger point will be chosen for treatment. The investigator will instruct the patient to replace the patch every 12 hours. The patches could be applied during the night (application in the evening and removal in the morning), or during the day. Patients will be told to apply up to three patches at one time. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| the number of treatment failures on LMP vs. number of treatment failures on vehicle patches throughout the double-blind treatment phase | Patients will be defined as treatment failure at the end of the double-blind treatment phase or premature discontinuation if one of the following situations occurs:
| Through study completion, an average of 7 weeks. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Time to loss of therapeutic response (LTR) | LTR will be defined as number of days to treatment failure in the double-blind phase after randomization. | During the double-blind phase after randomization, an average of 7weeks. |
| Proportion of responders and non-responders |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Fang Luo | Beijing Tiantan Hospital | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beijing Tiantan Hospital | Beijing | Beijing Municipality | 100050 | China | ||
| Beijing China-Janpan Friendship Hospital |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 28708009 | Background | Di Stefano G, Maarbjerg S, Nurmikko T, Truini A, Cruccu G. Triggering trigeminal neuralgia. Cephalalgia. 2018 May;38(6):1049-1056. doi: 10.1177/0333102417721677. Epub 2017 Jul 14. | |
| 32413700 | Background | Liu M, Zhong J. Mechanism underlying cranial nerve rhizopathy. Med Hypotheses. 2020 Sep;142:109801. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2020.109801. Epub 2020 May 6. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014277 | Trigeminal Neuralgia |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020433 | Trigeminal Nerve Diseases |
| D005156 | Facial Neuralgia |
| D005155 | Facial Nerve Diseases |
| D009059 | Mouth Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| vehicle plaster | Drug | Vehicle patches are identical to the active patch, except for the absence of lidocaine, without any optical differences.For each patient, the painful area and the trigger point will be chosen for treatment. The investigator will instruct the patient to replace the patch every 12 hours. The patches could be applied during the night (application in the evening and removal in the morning), or during the day. Patients will be told to apply up to three patches at one time. |
|
A responder at the end of the open-label treatment phase will be defined as follows:
|
| Through the open-label period, an average of 3 weeks. |
| the proportion of the patients who report pain relief of 50% or greater | The pain relief will be assessed by Item 8 on the BPI-SF. Patients will be asked to circle the percentage value from 0% (no relief) to 100% (complete relief) that shows how much pain relief they have achieved during the prior 24 hours at end of open-label phase, and end of double-blind phase or premature discontinuation | At 3 weeks, 7 weeks |
| The pain intensity | Patients will be asked to circle the number on an 11-point Likert scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable) that describe their worst pain (worst pain), their least pain (least pain) and their pain on average (average pain) in the previous 24 hours and how much pain they are experiencing at the time of the evaluation (pain right now). | Through study completion, an average of 7 weeks. |
| The number of paroxysms | The number of paroxysms experienced in the past 4 days weekly | Through study completion, an average of 7 weeks. |
| The severity of paroxysms | The severity of paroxysms experienced in the past 4 days weekly | Through study completion, an average of 7 weeks. |
| Quality of life (QoL) | Pain interference with the QOL will be assessed by Items 9A-G on the BPI-SF weekly. On these items, patients will be also asked to circle the number on an 11-point Likert scale of 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (completely interferes) that describes the extent to which pain have interfered with their activities of daily living during the prior 24 hours. | Through study completion, an average of 7 weeks. |
| Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) at baseline, at end of open-label phase, and end of double-blind phase or premature discontinuation | Nineteen individual items generate seven "component" scores: subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleeping medication, and daytime dysfunction. The sum of scores for these seven components yields one global score. The total scores are 21. The higher the scores mean the worse the sleep. | At baseline, 3 weeks, 7weeks |
| Short form 36 health survey questionnaire (SF-36) at baseline, end of open-label phase, and end of double-blind phase or premature discontinuation | It measures health on eight multi-item dimensions, covering functional status, wellbeing, and overall evaluation of health. | At baseline, 3 weeks, 7weeks |
| The cost of treatment | The total cost of all medications for TN and the cost of LMP | Through study completion, an average of 7 weeks. |
| Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at end of open-label phase, and end of double-blind phase or premature discontinuation | A 7-point Likert scale, where 1 = very much improved to 7 = very much worse with a value of 4 representing no change | At 3 weeks, 7 weeks |
| Study blindness | Both the clinician and patient can guess whether the drug used during double-blind phase is LMP or vehicle patches. | Through study completion, an average of 7 weeks. |
| Beijing |
| China |
| Sanbo Brain Hospital, Capital Medical University | Beijing | China |
| Jilin province people's hospital | Jilin City | China |
| Linfen People's Hospital | Shanxi | China |
| 19142669 | Background | Cheville AL, Sloan JA, Northfelt DW, Jillella AP, Wong GY, Bearden Iii JD, Liu H, Schaefer PL, Marchello BT, Christensen BJ, Loprinzi CL. Use of a lidocaine patch in the management of postsurgical neuropathic pain in patients with cancer: a phase III double-blind crossover study (N01CB). Support Care Cancer. 2009 Apr;17(4):451-60. doi: 10.1007/s00520-008-0542-x. Epub 2009 Jan 13. |
| 12616661 | Background | Gammaitoni AR, Alvarez NA, Galer BS. Safety and tolerability of the lidocaine patch 5%, a targeted peripheral analgesic: a review of the literature. J Clin Pharmacol. 2003 Feb;43(2):111-7. doi: 10.1177/0091270002239817. |
| 25070398 | Background | Tamburin S, Schweiger V, Magrinelli F, Brugnoli MP, Zanette G, Polati E. Effect of 5% lidocaine medicated plaster on pain intensity and paroxysms in classical trigeminal neuralgia. Ann Pharmacother. 2014 Nov;48(11):1521-4. doi: 10.1177/1060028014544166. Epub 2014 Jul 28. |
| 39193836 | Derived | Zhao C, Shrestha N, Ren H, Zhang B, Shen Y, Meng L, Wu D, Wang B, Fan B, Luo F. The PATCH trial: 5% lidocaine-medicated plaster for trigeminal neuralgia-Results of a multicentric, enriched enrollment, randomized withdrawal, double-blind, vehicle-controlled, parallel-group study. Headache. 2024 Nov-Dec;64(10):1318-1328. doi: 10.1111/head.14814. Epub 2024 Aug 28. |
| 34341037 | Derived | Zhao C, Shrestha N, Liu H, Shen Y, Meng L, Fan B, Luo F. The PATCH trial: efficacy and safety of 5% lidocaine-medicated plaster for the treatment of patients with trigeminal neuralgia: a study protocol for a multicentric, double-blind, enriched enrolment randomised withdrawal, vehicle-controlled study. BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 2;11(8):e045493. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045493. |
| D009057 |
| Stomatognathic Diseases |
| D003389 | Cranial Nerve Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |