Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of pain relief of modified sodium hyaluronate gel for injection when used for the correction of moderate or severe nasolabial folds.
One hundred and thirty patients were enrolled and there two sides of nasolabial folds (NLF) were randomized to receive HA with lidocaine or HA. The primary outcome was immediate visual analogue scale (VAS) of pain evaluated after injection for both NLF sides. Secondary outcomes including VAS pain, wrinkle severity rating scale (WSRS), global aesthetic improvement scale (GAIS) and AE were observed at 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 follow-ups.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| HA + Lidocaine | Experimental | Sodium Hyaluronate with Lidocaine Hydrochloride |
|
| HA | Active Comparator | Sodium Hyaluronate |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HA+Lidocaine | Device | 20 mg |
| |
| HA |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Immediate VAS pain evaluated after injection for both NLF sides | The VAS scale uses a 100 mm line labelled at '0' with 'no pain' and '100' with 'worst pain'. | Immediate post-injection |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| VAS pain evaluated 15, 30, 45 and 60 minutes after injection for both NLF sides | The VAS scale uses a 100 mm line labelled at '0' with 'no pain' and '100' with 'worst pain'. | 15, 30, 45 and 60 minutes post-injection |
| On-site WSRS evaluated by site blinded-evaluator at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beijing | Beijing | China | ||||
| Shanghai |
Not provided
Subject's two sides of nasolabial folds (NLF) were randomized to receive FACILLEĀ® Light (contains Lidocaine) or FACILLEĀ® (without Lidocaine).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Device |
20 mg |
|
Evaluators assess the wrinkle severity of nasolabial folds on site or photographically with 5 graded scale,1 to 5 was represented 'absent' to 'extreme'. |
| 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-injection |
| GAIS evaluated photographically by independent blinded-evaluator at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months | Evaluators and subjects assess the improvement of correction with 5 graded scale,1 to 5 was represented 'exceptional improvement' to 'worsened'. | 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-injection |
| Adverse events reported from the baseline and during the study period | The safety assessment was based on reports of adverse events, defined as any unwanted events whether it was thought to be related to the study drugs or not, were recorded during each follow up and at any time the patient reported an event to the investigator during the study period. | 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-injection |
| Shanghai |
| China |