Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Professional Education and Research Institute | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this clinical investigation is to assess performance of the Medaxis Debritom+™ and to collect subject outcome data in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) vs Standard sharp debridement.
The economic burden of DFUs costs the United States over $50 billion each year. The cost to treat one subject with DFUs ranges from $11,700 to $16,883. Although approximately 70% of DFUs are shown to heal with good SOC, at least 30% become chronic wounds. These non-healing wounds are at greater risk for infection and lower extremity amputation. Consequently, good standard of care therapy is important for subjects with chronic DFUs to improve subject outcomes, lower treatment costs and reduce the risk of complications.
The removal of necrotic tissue such as slough, eschar, and underlying biofilm constitutes one of the most important parts of standard of care (SOC). Currently, a variety of techniques are used to debride chronic wounds, such as larval therapy, autolytic and enzymatic methods, monofilament polyester fiber pads or brushes, and mechanical debridement with curettes and scalpels. It has also been demonstrated that more frequent debridement, on average, results in faster wound healing. While regarded as the "gold standard," sharp debridement requires considerable experience of clinicians to ensure that contaminated and devitalized tissue is entirely removed without extensively damaging surrounding healthy tissue. Moreover, a recent research has demonstrated that even when surgical debridement is well-conducted so that it removes the majority of biofilm, within 72 hours, biofilm often re-establishes itself. Given that perhaps 60% of chronic wounds have been found to harbor biofilm, it is challenging to keep such wounds free of biofilm so that the wound-healing process can be sustained. Consequently, any method that could potentially remove more biofilm and/or prevent its recurrence could improve the wound healing trajectory.
Medaxis Debritom+™ cleans and stimulates acute and chronic wounds precisely in a tissue-preserving manner. Its high-pressure micro fluid jet removes slough such as fibrin, necrosis or biofilm, as well as foreign bodies, in effect providing an efficient irrigation and debridement of contaminated wounds. The purpose of this clinical investigation is to assess performance of Medaxis Debritom+™ and to collect subject outcome data in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) vs Standard sharp debridement.
There are two arms in the study:
Arm 1: The Experimental Arm , that will include SOC Therapy. SOC therapy in this study is offloading of the DFU (CAM boots or total contact casting [TCC] if the subject's foot is too large for a CAM), use of the Medaxis Debritom+™ micro jet to clean the wound followed by a wound care covering ( Fibracol dressing or equivalent) along with a moisture retention dressing and a padded 3-layer dressing comprised of 4x4 gauze pads, soft roll and compression wrap (DynaflexTM or equivalent).
Arm 2: The Standard of Care Arm. The SOC therapy in this study is offloading of the DFU (CAM boots or total contact casting [TCC] if the subject's foot is too large for a CAM), appropriate sharp or surgical debridement, followed by a wound care covering (Fibracol dressing or equivalent) along with a moisture retention dressing and a padded 3-layer dressing comprised of 4x4 gauze pads, soft roll and compression wrap (DynaflexTM or equivalent).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| (Medaxis Debritom+™) micro fluid jet wound therapy | Experimental | Medaxis Debritom+™ is a high-quality, micro fluid jet therapy device designed to remove fibrin, necrotic tissue, and biofilm from wound surfaces by mechanical cleaning and stimulation of the diabetic foot wound |
|
| Sharp Surgical Debridement | Active Comparator | Use of a surgical scalpel or curette to remove fibrin, necrotic tissue and biofilm from wound surfaces by mechanically cleaning the wound |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medaxis Debritom+ | Other | Advanced micro fluid jet therapy to clean and stimulate wound |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Proportion of wounds completely healed at or before 16 weeks | examine the time it takes the wound to heal over a 16 week period | 16 weeks |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Incidence of any index wound-related cellulitis or infection by 16 weeks | examine the number of subject that develop wound cellulitis or infection over 16 weeks | 16 weeks |
| Cost of treatment, including any index wound-related complications, by 16 weeks |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Robert Galiano, MD | Northwestern University School of Medicine | Principal Investigator |
| David Armstrong, DPM, MD, PhD | University of Southern California; Keck School of Medicine | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCR Research | San Francisco | California | 94115 | United States | ||
| Doctors Research Network |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Sharp Surgical Debridement | Other | Scalpel or Curette to clean and debride wound |
|
| Additional Outer Dressing Application | Other | Application of moisture retentive dressing, and a multi layer compression dressing |
|
| Offloading | Other | Patient will be offloaded in a diabetic camboot after treatment, or total contact cast if patient cannot be fit with diabetic offloading boot |
|
|
| Fibracol Wound Dressing | Other | Application of a collagen alginate dressing |
|
|
examine the cost of all treatments within 16 weeks |
| 16 weeks |
| Percent Area Reduction at 16 weeks. | examine the reduction in wound size at 16 weeks | 16 weeks |
| Cost of hospitalization for any index wound-related event, including any wound recurrence involving the area of the index wound by 16 weeks | examine the patient hospitalization costs for wound related event over 16 weeks | 16 weeks |
| Incidence of hospitalization between randomization and EOS for any index wound-related event, including any wound recurrence involving the area of the index wound | examine the incidence of subject being hospitalized during the study period | 16 weeks |
| Moleculight imaging | Difference in wound bioburden from wound biopsy | 2 weeks |
| Kent Imaging - Snapshot camera | test oxygenation of wound tissue | 16 weeks |
| South Miami |
| Florida |
| 33143 |
| United States |
| Foot and Ankle Associates of the Mid-Atlantic | Frederick | Maryland | 21703 | United States |
| Foot and Ankle Associates of the Mid-Atlantic | Raleigh | North Carolina | 27609 | United States |
| Lower Extremity Institute for Research and Therapy, LLC | Youngstown | Ohio | 44512 | United States |
| Foot and Ankle Associates of the Mid-Atlantic | Salem | Virginia | 24153 | United States |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D017719 | Diabetic Foot |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003925 | Diabetic Angiopathies |
| D014652 | Vascular Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
| D016523 | Foot Ulcer |
| D007871 | Leg Ulcer |
| D012883 | Skin Ulcer |
| D012871 | Skin Diseases |
| D017437 | Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases |
| D048909 | Diabetes Complications |
| D003920 | Diabetes Mellitus |
| D004700 | Endocrine System Diseases |
| D003929 | Diabetic Neuropathies |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000464 | Alginates |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011134 | Polysaccharides |
| D002241 | Carbohydrates |
Not provided
Not provided