Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Baui Biotech Co., Ltd. | UNKNOWN |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Rigid interbody fusion device in bulk configuration has been widely used in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) surgery. It is a randomized, prospective, multicenter clinical study to compare rigid and non-rigid fusion device in ACDF for cervical degenerative disc disease.
This study is a randomized, prospective, multicenter clinical trial comparing rigid (PEEK) interbody fusion device with non-rigid (Titanium Alloy, Z-Brace, Baui Biotech) interbody fusion device in ACDF surgery at 11 clinical sites. ACDF was performed with stand-alone interbody fusion device and artificial bone graft (hydroxyapatite/tricalcium phosphate). Patients have 1-level or 2-level cervical degenerative disc disease approved for ACDF surgery by National Health Insurance, which is the blind, third-party, administrative approved and insurance reimbursement for surgical indication. Total 180 patients were enrolled, and 180 patients were randomized into either investigational device (non-rigid) group or the control (rigid) group in a 2:1 ratio. After confirming a patient's eligibility and having the patient sign an informed consent form, the site investigator or study coordinator call the coordinator at National Taiwan University Hospital for the randomization. Each patient will be then assigned to 1 of the treatment group according to a randomized schedule. Patient were evaluated preoperatively, one month postoperatively, and 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months postoperatively. Measured outcomes included overall success, Neck Disability Index (NDI), VAS neck and arm pain, adjacent range of motion, patient satisfaction, anxiety score, SF-12 MCS/PCS, major complications, subsequent surgery rate, and subsidence and fusion rate on radiological examinations. The primary endpoint was a FDA composite definition of success comprising clinical improvement and absence of major complications and secondary surgery events.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Investigational device (non-rigid) group | Experimental | Use non-rigid (Titanium Alloy, Z-Brace, Baui Biotech) interbody fusion device. |
|
| Control device (rigid) group | Active Comparator | Use rigid (PEEK) interbody fusion device . |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Z-Brace interbody fusion device | Combination Product | Use non-rigid (Titanium Alloy, Z-Brace, Baui Biotech) interbody fusion device in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) surgery |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change from baseline postoperative condition (if patients have major complications) | No adverse events (AEs) classified as major complications by Research Ethics Committee. | Patient were evaluated one month postoperatively, and 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months postoperatively. |
| Change from baseline postoperative condition (if patients have subsequent surgeries) | No subsequent surgical intervention. | Patient were evaluated one month postoperatively, and 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months postoperatively. |
| Change from baseline Subsidence and Fusion rate | Subsidence and fusion rate on radiological. | Patient were evaluated one month postoperatively, and 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months postoperatively. |
| Change from baseline Adjacent range of motion | Adjacent range of motion on radiological. | Patient were evaluated preoperatively, one month postoperatively, and 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months postoperatively. |
| Change from baseline Neck Disability Index (NDI) | An improvement in Neck Disability Index (NDI) score of at least 30 points for a patient with a preoperative NDI score of 60 or greater; or an improvement of at least 50% of preoperative NDI score for patients with a preoperative score of less than 60. | Patient were evaluated preoperatively, one month postoperatively, and 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months postoperatively. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Visual analogue scale (neck and arm and chest pain) | Patient will be evaluated by Visual analogue scale(VAS) for their neck, arm and chest pain. The minimum value is 0 and the maximum value is 10. Higher score means a worse outcome. | Patient were evaluated preoperatively, one month postoperatively, and 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months postoperatively. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dar-Ming Lai | Contact | +886-2312-3456 | 65078 | dmlai@ntu.edu.tw |
| Fon-Yih Tsuang | Contact | +886-972651142 | tsuangfy@gmail.com |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chung Shan Medical University Hospital | Recruiting | Taichung | South Dist. | 402 | Taiwan |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12897467 | Background | Zdeblick TA, Phillips FM. Interbody cage devices. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Aug 1;28(15 Suppl):S2-7. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000076841.93570.78. | |
| 1440038 | Background | Brodke DS, Zdeblick TA. Modified Smith-Robinson procedure for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1992 Oct;17(10 Suppl):S427-30. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199210001-00014. |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| W. Bonfield MW, K.E. Tanner. Interfaces in analogue biomaterials. Acta Materialia. 1998;46(7):2509-18. | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Total 180 patients were enrolled, and 180 patients were randomized into either investigational device (non-rigid) group or the control (rigid) group in a 2:1 ratio.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| PEEK interbody fusion device | Combination Product | Use rigid (PEEK) interbody fusion device in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) surgery |
|
| Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire | Patients will be surveyed by Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire. There are two questions on the questionnaire to evaluate if they are satisfied with their treatment and if they will recommend their respective surgery to a friend. | Patient were evaluated one month postoperatively, and 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months postoperatively. |
| Anxiety score | The Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI). The minimum value is 0 and the maximum value is 63. Higher scores mean a worse outcome. | Patient were evaluated preoperatively, one month postoperatively, and 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months postoperatively. |
| Short form-12 mental component scale and physical component scale (SF-12 MCS/PCS) score | Short form-12 mental component scale and physical component scale. The minimum value of physical component scale (PCS-12) is 18.4 and the maximum value of PCS-12 is 57.8. The minimum value of mental component scale (MCS-12) is 18.7 and the maximum value of MCS-12 is 65.2. Higher scores mean a better outcome. | Patient were evaluated preoperatively, one month postoperatively, and 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months postoperatively. |
| Number of days using Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory analgesics(NSAIDs) | Number of days using Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory analgesics(NSAIDs) | Patient were evaluated preoperatively, one month postoperatively, and 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months postoperatively. |
| Depression Score | Beck Depression Inventory(BDI). The minimum value is 0 and the maximum value is 63. Higher scores mean a worse outcome. | Patient were evaluated preoperatively, one month postoperatively, and 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months postoperatively. |
| Fu Jen Catholic University Hospital | Recruiting | New Taipei City | Taishan District | 243 | Taiwan |
|
| Taipei Municipal Wan Fang Hospital | Not yet recruiting | Taipei | Wenshan Dist. | 116 | Taiwan |
|
| National Taiwan University Hospital Yunlin Branch | Recruiting | Douliu | Yunlin County | 640 | Taiwan |
|
| Taipei Medical University-Shuang Ho Hospital,Ministry of Health and Welfare | Recruiting | New Taipei City | Zhonghe District | 23561 | Taiwan |
|
| MacKay Memorial Hospital | Recruiting | Taipei | Zhongshan | 10449 | Taiwan |
|
| National Taiwan University Hospital | Recruiting | Taipei | Zhongzheng Dist. | 100 | Taiwan |
|
| National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu Branch | Recruiting | Hsinchu | 300 | Taiwan |
|
| China Medical University Hospital | Recruiting | Taichung | 404332 | Taiwan |
|
| Jen-Ai Hospital Dali Branch | Recruiting | Taichung | 412 | Taiwan |
|
| National Cheng Kung University Hospital | Not yet recruiting | Tainan | Taiwan |
|
| Min-Sheng General Hospital | Recruiting | Taoyuan | 330 | Taiwan |
|
| Chang Gung Memorial Hospital | Not yet recruiting | Taoyuan | Taiwan |
|
| 25982430 | Background | Shriver MF, Lewis DJ, Kshettry VR, Rosenbaum BP, Benzel EC, Mroz TE. Pseudoarthrosis rates in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a meta-analysis. Spine J. 2015 Sep 1;15(9):2016-27. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.05.010. Epub 2015 May 15. |
| 8408151 | Background | Bohlman HH, Emery SE, Goodfellow DB, Jones PK. Robinson anterior cervical discectomy and arthrodesis for cervical radiculopathy. Long-term follow-up of one hundred and twenty-two patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993 Sep;75(9):1298-307. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199309000-00005. |
| 19262984 | Background | Sugawara T, Itoh Y, Hirano Y, Higashiyama N, Mizoi K. Long term outcome and adjacent disc degeneration after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with titanium cylindrical cages. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2009 Apr;151(4):303-9; discussion 309. doi: 10.1007/s00701-009-0217-5. Epub 2009 Mar 5. |
| 18846395 | Background | Elsawaf A, Mastronardi L, Roperto R, Bozzao A, Caroli M, Ferrante L. Effect of cervical dynamics on adjacent segment degeneration after anterior cervical fusion with cages. Neurosurg Rev. 2009 Apr;32(2):215-24; discussion 224. doi: 10.1007/s10143-008-0164-2. Epub 2008 Oct 10. |
| 17221174 | Background | Barsa P, Suchomel P. Factors affecting sagittal malalignment due to cage subsidence in standalone cage assisted anterior cervical fusion. Eur Spine J. 2007 Sep;16(9):1395-400. doi: 10.1007/s00586-006-0284-8. Epub 2007 Jan 13. |
| 15260088 | Background | Goffin J, Geusens E, Vantomme N, Quintens E, Waerzeggers Y, Depreitere B, Van Calenbergh F, van Loon J. Long-term follow-up after interbody fusion of the cervical spine. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2004 Apr;17(2):79-85. doi: 10.1097/00024720-200404000-00001. |
| 10436851 | Background | Maiman DJ, Kumaresan S, Yoganandan N, Pintar FA. Biomechanical effect of anterior cervical spine fusion on adjacent segments. Biomed Mater Eng. 1999;9(1):27-38. |
| 3775422 | Background | Gore DR, Gardner GM, Sepic SB, Murray MP. Roentgenographic findings following anterior cervical fusion. Skeletal Radiol. 1986;15(7):556-9. doi: 10.1007/BF00361055. |
| 30415055 | Background | Gao X, Yang Y, Liu H, Meng Y, Zeng J, Wu T, Hong Y. A Comparison of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty and Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion in Patients with Two-Level Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease: 5-Year Follow-Up Results. World Neurosurg. 2019 Feb;122:e1083-e1089. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.10.231. Epub 2018 Nov 9. |
| 27771787 | Background | Ma Z, Ma X, Yang H, Guan X, Li X. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus cervical arthroplasty for the management of cervical spondylosis: a meta-analysis. Eur Spine J. 2017 Apr;26(4):998-1008. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4779-7. Epub 2016 Oct 22. |
| 27295435 | Background | Kuang L, Chen Y, Wang B, Li L, Lu G. Cervical Disk Arthroplasty Versus Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion for the Treatment of 2-Level Cervical Spondylopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Clin Spine Surg. 2016 Nov;29(9):372-382. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000395. |
| 26872258 | Background | Hu Y, Lv G, Ren S, Johansen D. Mid- to Long-Term Outcomes of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for Treatment of Symptomatic Cervical Disc Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Eight Prospective Randomized Controlled Trials. PLoS One. 2016 Feb 12;11(2):e0149312. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149312. eCollection 2016. |
| 22960519 | Background | Ding D, Shaffrey ME. Cervical disk arthroplasty: patient selection. Clin Neurosurg. 2012;59:91-7. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31826b6fbe. No abstract available. |
| 19468885 | Background | Jaramillo-de la Torre JJ, Grauer JN, Yue JJ. Update on cervical disc arthroplasty: where are we and where are we going? Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2008 Jun;1(2):124-30. doi: 10.1007/s12178-008-9019-2. |
| 28057595 | Background | Tahal D, Madhavan K, Chieng LO, Ghobrial GM, Wang MY. Metals in Spine. World Neurosurg. 2017 Apr;100:619-627. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.12.105. Epub 2017 Jan 3. |
| 31528438 | Background | Epstein NE. A Review of Complication Rates for Anterior Cervical Diskectomy and Fusion (ACDF). Surg Neurol Int. 2019 Jun 7;10:100. doi: 10.25259/SNI-191-2019. eCollection 2019. |
| 12188968 | Background | Goffin J, Casey A, Kehr P, Liebig K, Lind B, Logroscino C, Pointillart V, Van Calenbergh F, van Loon J. Preliminary clinical experience with the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis. Neurosurgery. 2002 Sep;51(3):840-5; discussion 845-7. doi: 10.1227/00006123-200209000-00048. |