Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to compare the Vivaer procedure with radiofrequency (RF) energy to sham procedure for treatment of nasal airway obstruction (NAO).
The purpose of this study is to compare the Vivaer procedure for treatment of nasal airway obstruction (NAO) with a sham procedure that simulates the actual procedure as closely as possible absent the delivery of radiofrequency (RF) energy to the nasal tissue.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vivaer Procedure | Active Comparator | The Vivaer procedure will be performed in the study clinic using the Vivaer ARC Stylus and Aerin Console. The Vivaer ARC Stylus is a disposable handheld device capable of delivering bipolar radiofrequency energy to tissue when connected to the Aerin Console radiofrequency generating device. Participants in this study will undergo bilateral treatment of the nasal valves in a single study session. Each side of the nose will be treated with up to four (4) non-overlapping applications of RF energy at the junction of the upper and lower lateral cartilage on the lateral nasal wall. Treatment settings to be used are: temperature 60° C, power 4 watts, treatment time 18 seconds, and cooling time 12 seconds. No repeat ("touch up") procedures will be permitted after the initial procedure through the end of the study (24 months). |
|
| Sham Control Procedure | Sham Comparator | The sham control procedure will be performed in the study clinic using the Vivaer ARC Stylus while audible sounds that accurately simulate the Aerin Console's active treatment are produced even though RF energy is not being generated or delivered. All other aspects of the procedure will be the same as used for the active treatment, including administration of anesthetic agent(s). |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vivaer ARC Stylus | Device | The Vivaer procedure will be performed in the study clinic using the Vivaer ARC Stylus and Aerin Console. The Vivaer ARC Stylus is a disposable handheld device capable of delivering bipolar radiofrequency energy to tissue when connected to the Aerin Console radiofrequency generating device. Participants in this study will undergo bilateral treatment of the nasal valves in a single study session. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) Scale - 3 Month Responder Rate | The Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) Scale is a patient self-reported questionnaire consisting of 5 symptoms of nasal obstruction: nasal congestion, nasal blockage, trouble breathing, trouble sleeping, and getting enough air during exercise. Patients will report over the past 1 month how much the symptoms have been a problem. Total score ranges from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate worse obstruction. Severity of symptoms can be classified as mild (range, 5-25), moderate (range, 30-50), severe (range, 55-75), or extreme (range, 80-100) nasal obstruction, based on responses. | 3 months visit following the study procedure. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) Scale Mean Change From Baseline Through 3 Months | The NOSE Scale is a patient self-reported questionnaire consisting of 5 symptoms of nasal obstruction: nasal congestion, nasal blockage, trouble breathing, trouble sleeping, and getting enough air during exercise. Patients will report over the past 1 month how much the symptoms have been a problem. Total score ranges from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate worse obstruction. This study will measure the mean change in NOSE Scale from baseline to 3 months after procedure. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| NOSE Scale Score - 3 Month Responder Rate Improvement in NOSE Score | The NOSE Scale is a validated disease-specific health status instrument used by clinicians to measure the outcome of patients treated for nasal obstruction. The NOSE Scale consists of 5 items, each scored using a 5-point Likert scale to make a total score range of 0 through 100, where higher scores indicate worse obstruction. Severity of symptoms can be classified as range, 5-25), (range, 30-50), severe (range, 55-75), or extreme (range, 80-100) nasal obstruction, based on responses to the NOSE survey. Measurement is # improvement in NOSE Scale score from baseline, the lower the score the less obstruction or a change to lower score indicates improvement in nasal airway obstruction. These data represents percent improvement in NOSE Scale score from baseline at 3 months |
Inclusion Criteria:
Age 18 to 85 years (inclusively).
Willing and able to provide informed consent.
Willing and able to comply with the subject-specific requirements outlined in the Study Protocol.
Seeking treatment for nasal obstruction and willing to undergo an office-based procedure.
Baseline Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) Scale score ≥ 55.
Nasal valve is a primary or significant contributor to the patient's nasal obstruction as determined by the study investigator (based on clinical presentation, physical examination, nasal endoscopy, etc.) and the patient has a positive response to any of the following temporary measures (based on patient history or office exam):
Dissatisfaction with medical management as judged by the patient. Defined as failed medical therapy (eg, decongestants, antihistamines, and/or nasal sprays for an appropriate period of time), but a positive response to internal or external nasal dilators.
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Joseph Han, MD | EVMS Medical Group | Principal Investigator |
| Stacey Silvers, MD | Madison ENT | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roseville Facial Plastic Surgery | Roseville | California | 95661 | United States | ||
| Breathe Clear Institute |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 34240571 | Result | Silvers SL, Rosenthal JN, McDuffie CM, Yen DM, Han JK. Temperature-controlled radiofrequency device treatment of the nasal valve for nasal airway obstruction: A randomized controlled trial. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2021 Dec;11(12):1676-1684. doi: 10.1002/alr.22861. Epub 2021 Jul 9. | |
| 36048465 | Result | Han JK, Silvers SL, Rosenthal JN, McDuffie CM, Yen DM. Outcomes 12 Months After Temperature-Controlled Radiofrequency Device Treatment of the Nasal Valve for Patients With Nasal Airway Obstruction. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Oct 1;148(10):940-946. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2022.2293. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
There was no wash out or run in for this study
Particpants were recruited based on physican referral at 16 academic medical centers and clinics between August 12,2020 and December 28, 2020. The First Participant enrolled on August 12, 2020 and the last participant enrolled on December 28, 2020.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Active Treatment Arm: Vivaer Procedure Only | A 2:1 site-stratified randomization will be used to allocate participants with NAO to either the active treatment arm (Vivaer procedure) or the control arm (sham procedure) Subjects randomized to the Active Treatment will receive the Vivaer procedure. The Vivaer procedure will be performed in the study clinic using the Vivaer ARC Stylus and Aerin Console. The Vivaer ARC Stylus is a disposable handheld device capable of delivering bipolar radiofrequency energy to tissue when connected to the Aerin Console radiofrequency generating device. Participants in this study will undergo bilateral treatment of the nasal valves in a single study session. Each side of the nose will be treated with up to four (4) non-overlapping applications of RF energy at the junction of the upper and lower lateral cartilage on the lateral nasal wall. Treatment settings to be used are: temperature 60° C, power 4 watts, treatment time 18 seconds, and cooling time 12 seconds. No repeat ("touch up") procedures will be permitted after the initial procedure through the end of the study (24 months). Participants in this study will undergo bilateral treatment of the nasal valves in a single study session. Active treatment participants (Vivaer procedure) will have an extended follow-up with evaluations conducted in-office at 6 months (26 weeks) and remotely at 12 months (52 weeks) and 24 months (104 weeks). |
| FG001 | Control Arm: Sham Control Procedure First, Optional Crossover to Vivaer Procedure | A 2:1 site-stratified randomization will be used to allocate participants with NAO to either the active treatment arm (Vivaer procedure) or the control arm (sham procedure) The sham control procedure will be performed in the study clinic using the Vivaer ARC Stylus while audible sounds that accurately simulate the Aerin Console's active treatment are produced even though RF energy is not being generated or delivered. All other aspects of the procedure will be the same as used for the active treatment, including administration of anesthetic agent(s). Participants receiving the sham procedure may elect to crossover to the active treatment arm (Vivaer procedure) within 30 days after the 3-month follow-up evaluation provided they still meet all eligibility criteria. Continued follow-up will be conducted at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after the Vivaer procedure to provide additional information on longer-term efficacy and duration of treatment effect. Participants that received the sham procedure and do not elect to crossover or no longer meet all eligibility criteria will be exited from the study following the 3-month evaluation. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initial Period |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||
| Crossover Period |
|
A total of 119 eligible patients were randomized. Assignment with 78 in the active treatment arm and 41 in the sham-control arm. One patient in the active treatment arm withdrew consent before treatment. One patient in the sham-control arm was lost to follow-up before the 3-month visit (primary endpoint).Therefore, a total of 117 patients (77 active treatment and40 sham control) were included in the analysis of the 3-month primary endpoint.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Active Treament Arm - Vivaer Procedure Only | The Vivaer procedure will be performed in the study clinic using the Vivaer ARC Stylus and Aerin Console. The Vivaer ARC Stylus is a disposable handheld device capable of delivering bipolar radiofrequency energy to tissue when connected to the Aerin Console radiofrequency generating device. Participants in this study will undergo bilateral treatment of the nasal valves in a single study session. Each side of the nose will be treated with up to four (4) non-overlapping applications of RF energy at the junction of the upper and lower lateral cartilage on the lateral nasal wall. Treatment settings to be used are: temperature 60° C, power 4 watts, treatment time 18 seconds, and cooling time 12 seconds. No repeat ("touch up") procedures will be permitted after the initial procedure through the end of the study (24 months). Vivaer ARC Stylus: The Vivaer procedure will be performed in the study clinic using the Vivaer ARC Stylus and Aerin Console. The Vivaer ARC Stylus is a disposable handheld device capable of delivering bipolar radiofrequency energy to tissue when connected to the Aerin Console radiofrequency generating device. Participants in this study will undergo bilateral treatment of the nasal valves in a single study session. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Age for inclusion 18-85 (inclusive). Age reported for overall analyzed participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) Scale - 3 Month Responder Rate | The Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) Scale is a patient self-reported questionnaire consisting of 5 symptoms of nasal obstruction: nasal congestion, nasal blockage, trouble breathing, trouble sleeping, and getting enough air during exercise. Patients will report over the past 1 month how much the symptoms have been a problem. Total score ranges from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate worse obstruction. Severity of symptoms can be classified as mild (range, 5-25), moderate (range, 30-50), severe (range, 55-75), or extreme (range, 80-100) nasal obstruction, based on responses. | The percentage of patients designated responders, defined as 20% or greater improvement (decrease) in Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE)Scale score or 1 or greater NOSE Scale severity category improvement from baseline. Error bars indicate 95% CIs. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | 3 months visit following the study procedure. |
|
1 year
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Vivaer Procedure | A 2:1 site-stratified randomization will be used to allocate participants with NAO to either the active treatment arm (Vivaer procedure) or the control arm (sham procedure) Subjects randomized to the Active Treatment will receive the Vivaer procedure. The Vivaer procedure will be performed in the study clinic using the Vivaer ARC Stylus and Aerin Console. The Vivaer ARC Stylus is a disposable handheld device capable of delivering bipolar radiofrequency energy to tissue when connected to the Aerin Console radiofrequency generating device. Participants in this study will undergo bilateral treatment of the nasal valves in a single study session. Each side of the nose will be treated with up to four (4) non-overlapping applications of RF energy at the junction of the upper and lower lateral cartilage on the lateral nasal wall. Treatment settings to be used are: temperature 60° C, power 4 watts, treatment time 18 seconds, and cooling time 12 seconds. No repeat ("touch up") procedures will be permitted after the initial procedure through the end of the study (24 months). Participants in this study will undergo bilateral treatment of the nasal valves in a single study session. Active treatment participants (Vivaer procedure) will have an extended follow-up with evaluations conducted in-office at 6 months (26 weeks) and remotely at 12 months (52 weeks) and 24 months (104 weeks). |
Not provided
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nasal Bleeding | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment |
Medication use was not dictated by the protocol and could affect symptom relief; Data presented are through 12 months and continued follow-up will provide additional data on long term durability. Only subjects with nasal valve collapse as primary NAO were enrolled, but some subjects may have other contributors - for this reason, eligibility exclusion criteria should be considered with results.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tien Dang Sr. Clinical Affairs Manager | Aerin Medical | 669-256-6596 | tdang@aerinmedical.com |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Sep 15, 2020 | Oct 7, 2022 | Prot_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Apr 13, 2022 | Nov 7, 2022 | SAP_001.pdf |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D015508 | Nasal Obstruction |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009668 | Nose Diseases |
| D012140 | Respiratory Tract Diseases |
| D000402 | Airway Obstruction |
| D012131 | Respiratory Insufficiency |
Not provided
Not provided
2:1 site-stratified randomization will be used to allocate participants to either the active treatment arm (Vivaer procedure) or the control arm (sham procedure). Crossover within 30 days after 3 month follow-up visit.
Not provided
Not provided
Participant will be blinded to the study arm they are assigned to.
|
| Sham | Device | The sham control procedure will be performed in the study clinic using the Vivaer ARC Stylus while audible sounds that accurately simulate the Aerin Console's active treatment are produced even though RF energy is not being generated or delivered. All other aspects of the procedure will be the same as used for the active treatment, including administration of anesthetic agent(s). |
|
| Change from Baseline to 3 months following the study procedure. |
| Percentage of Participants With Treatment Related Events (Safety) - Through 3 Months | Characterizing the type and frequency of adverse events reported. Subjects will be asked about possible side effects or adverse experiences related to the study procedure at each follow up visit. All events will be documented and identified as to its relationship and level of relatedness to the study device and/or study procedure. Date of onset, seriousness, intensity, duration and outcome will be documented. | At or following the study procedure up to to 3 months. |
| 3 Month |
| NOSE Scale Score - 3 Month Average | The NOSE Scale is a validated disease-specific health status instrument used by clinicians to measure the outcome of patients treated for nasal obstruction. The NOSE Scale consists of 5 items, each scored using a 5-point Likert scale to make a total score range of 0 through 100, where higher scores indicate worse obstruction. Severity of symptoms can be classified as range, 5-25), range, 30-50), severe (range, 55-75), or extreme (range, 80-100) nasal obstruction, based on responses to the NOSE survey. These data represents the NOSE Scale average score from baseline at 3 months | 3 Month |
| NOSE Scale Score - 6 Month Average | The NOSE Scale is a validated disease-specific health status instrument used by clinicians to measure the outcome of patients treated for nasal obstruction. The NOSE Scale consists of 5 items, each scored using a 5-point Likert scale to make a total score range of 0 through 100, where higher scores indicate worse obstruction. Severity of symptoms can be classified as range, 5-25), range, 30-50), severe (range, 55-75), or extreme (range, 80-100) nasal obstruction, based on responses to the NOSE survey. These data represents the NOSE Scale average score from baseline at 6 months | 6 Month |
| NOSE Scale Score - 12 Month Average | The NOSE Scale is a validated disease-specific health status instrument used by clinicians to measure the outcome of patients treated for nasal obstruction. The NOSE Scale consists of 5 items, each scored using a 5-point Likert scale to make a total score range of 0 through 100, where higher scores indicate worse obstruction. Severity of symptoms can be classified as range, 5-25), range, 30-50), severe (range, 55-75), or extreme (range, 80-100) nasal obstruction, based on responses to the NOSE survey. These data represents the NOSE Scale average score from baseline at 12 months | 12 Month |
| NOSE Scale Score - 24 Month Average | The NOSE Scale is a validated disease-specific health status instrument used by clinicians to measure the outcome of patients treated for nasal obstruction. The NOSE Scale consists of 5 items, each scored using a 5-point Likert scale to make a total score range of 0 through 100, where higher scores indicate worse obstruction. Severity of symptoms can be classified as range, 5-25), range, 30-50), severe (range, 55-75), or extreme (range, 80-100) nasal obstruction, based on responses to the NOSE survey. These data represents the NOSE Scale average score from baseline at 12 months | 24 Month |
| NOSE Scale Score - 6 Month Responder Rate Improvement in NOSE Score | The NOSE Scale is a validated disease-specific health status instrument used by clinicians to measure the outcome of patients treated for nasal obstruction. The NOSE Scale consists of 5 items, each scored using a 5-point Likert scale to make a total score range of 0 through 100, where higher scores indicate worse obstruction. Severity of symptoms can be classified as range, 5-25), range, 30-50), severe (range, 55-75), or extreme (range, 80-100) nasal obstruction, based on responses to the NOSE survey. Measurement is # improvement in NOSE Scale score from baseline These data represents percent improvement in NOSE Scale score from baseline at 6 months | 6 Month |
| NOSE Scale Score - 12 Month Responder Rate Improvement in NOSE Score | The NOSE Scale is a validated disease-specific health status instrument used by clinicians to measure the outcome of patients treated for nasal obstruction. The NOSE Scale consists of 5 items, each scored using a 5-point Likert scale to make a total score range of 0 through 100, where higher scores indicate worse obstruction. Severity of symptoms can be classified as range, 5-25), range, 30-50), severe (range, 55-75), or extreme (range, 80-100) nasal obstruction, based on responses to the NOSE survey. These data represents percent improvement in NOSE Scale score from baseline at 12 months | 12 Month |
| NOSE Scale Score -24 Month Responder Rate Improvement in NOSE Score | The NOSE Scale is a validated disease-specific health status instrument used by clinicians to measure the outcome of patients treated for nasal obstruction. The NOSE Scale consists of 5 items, each scored using a 5-point Likert scale to make a total score range of 0 through 100, where higher scores indicate worse obstruction. Severity of symptoms can be classified as range, 5-25), range, 30-50), severe (range, 55-75), or extreme (range, 80-100) nasal obstruction, based on responses to the NOSE survey. These data represents percent improvement in NOSE Scale score from baseline at 12 months | 24 Month |
| Epworth Sleepiness Scale - 3 Month | The ESS evaluates the self-reported likelihood of dozing or falling asleep in 8 daytime situations with likelihood rated No Chance (0), Slight (1), Moderate (2), or High Chance (3).40 The total of the scores across the 8 questions can be categorized and interpreted as: 0-7 It is unlikely that you are abnormally sleepy. 8-9 You have an average amount of daytime sleepiness. 10-15 You may be excessively sleepy depending on the situation. You may want to consider seeking medical attention. 16-24 You are excessively sleepy and should consider seeking medical attention. The mean change in Epworth Sleepiness Scale score from baseline was also analyzed at 3-, 6-, and 12-months post procedure. NOSE Scale and Epworth Sleepiness Scale data were also collected at 1 month post procedure. Data reported here is from 3M as 12M was not included because of the long-term follow-up focus of the report. | 3 Months |
| Epworth Sleepiness Scale - 6 Month | The ESS evaluates the self-reported likelihood of dozing or falling asleep in 8 daytime situations with likelihood rated No Chance (0), Slight (1), Moderate (2), or High Chance (3).40 The total of the scores across the 8 questions can be categorized and interpreted as: 0-7 It is unlikely that you are abnormally sleepy. 8-9 You have an average amount of daytime sleepiness. 10-15 You may be excessively sleepy depending on the situation. You may want to consider seeking medical attention. 16-24 You are excessively sleepy and should consider seeking medical attention. The mean change in Epworth Sleepiness Scale score from baseline was also analyzed at 3-, 6-, and 12-months post procedure. NOSE Scale and Epworth Sleepiness Scale data were also collected at 1 month post procedure. Data reported here is from 3M as 12M was not included because of the long-term follow-up focus of the report. | 6 Months |
| Epworth Sleepiness Scale - 12 Months | The ESS evaluates the self-reported likelihood of dozing or falling asleep in 8 daytime situations with likelihood rated No Chance (0), Slight (1), Moderate (2), or High Chance (3).40 The total of the scores across the 8 questions can be categorized and interpreted as: 0-7 It is unlikely that you are abnormally sleepy. 8-9 You have an average amount of daytime sleepiness. 10-15 You may be excessively sleepy depending on the situation. You may want to consider seeking medical attention. 16-24 You are excessively sleepy and should consider seeking medical attention. The mean change in Epworth Sleepiness Scale score from baseline was also analyzed at 3-, 6-, and 12-months post procedure. NOSE Scale and Epworth Sleepiness Scale data were also collected at 1 month post procedure. Data reported here is from 3M as 12M was not included because of the long-term follow-up focus of the report. | 12 Months |
| Epworth Sleepiness Scale - 24 Months | The ESS evaluates the self-reported likelihood of dozing or falling asleep in 8 daytime situations with likelihood rated No Chance (0), Slight (1), Moderate (2), or High Chance (3).40 The total of the scores across the 8 questions can be categorized and interpreted as: 0-7 It is unlikely that you are abnormally sleepy. 8-9 You have an average amount of daytime sleepiness. 10-15 You may be excessively sleepy depending on the situation. You may want to consider seeking medical attention. 16-24 You are excessively sleepy and should consider seeking medical attention. The mean change in Epworth Sleepiness Scale score from baseline was also analyzed at 3-, 6-, and 12-months post procedure. NOSE Scale and Epworth Sleepiness Scale data were also collected at 1 month post procedure. Data reported here is from 3M as 12M was not included because of the long-term follow-up focus of the report. | 24 Months |
| Concomitant Medication and Mechanical Nasal Aid Analysis | Medications tracked during the trial were antihistamines, decongestants, leukotriene inhibitors, intranasal steroids, anticholinergics, and immunotherapy. Use of nasal strips/cones was also tracked. | 12 Months |
| Torrance |
| California |
| 90503 |
| United States |
| ENT and Allergy Associates of Florida | Coral Springs | Florida | 33065 | United States |
| ENT Associates of South Florida | Fort Lauderdale | Florida | 33301 | United States |
| ENT and Allergy Associates of Florida | Port Saint Lucie | Florida | 34952 | United States |
| Advanced ENT and Allergy KY | Louisville | Kentucky | 40207 | United States |
| Madison ENT | New York | New York | 10016 | United States |
| Piedmont ENT Associates NC | Winston-Salem | North Carolina | 27103 | United States |
| Bethlehem ENT | Bethlehem | Pennsylvania | 18017 | United States |
| ENT Associates of Texas (ENTtex) | McKinney | Texas | 75070 | United States |
| Ogden Clinic | Ogden | Utah | 84403 | United States |
| EVMS Ear Nose and Throat Surgeons | Norfolk | Virginia | 23507 | United States |
| 38217847 | Result | Silvers SL, McDuffie CM, Yen DM, Rosenthal JN, Davis SE, Han JK. Two-year outcomes of radiofrequency device treatment of the nasal valve for nasal airway obstruction. Rhinology. 2024 Jun 1;62(3):310-319. doi: 10.4193/RhinRhin23.377. |
| 39822054 | Result | Han JK, Rosenthal JN, McDuffie CM, Yen DM, Bikhazi NB, Kakarlapudi VV, Silvers SL. Temperature-Controlled Radiofrequency Treatment of the Nasal Valve in Patients With Nasal Obstruction: Long-Term Outcomes. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2025 Apr;172(4):1214-1223. doi: 10.1002/ohn.1118. Epub 2025 Jan 17. |
| Lost to Follow-up |
|
| Ineligible for Crossover and Exited as study complete |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
| BG001 | Control Sham Control Procedure First, Then Optional Crossover to Vivaer Procedure | The sham control procedure will be performed in the study clinic using the Vivaer ARC Stylus while audible sounds that accurately simulate the Aerin Console's active treatment are produced even though RF energy is not being generated or delivered. All other aspects of the procedure will be the same as used for the active treatment, including administration of anesthetic agent(s). Sham: The sham control procedure will be performed in the study clinic using the Vivaer ARC Stylus while audible sounds that accurately simulate the Aerin Console's active treatment are produced even though RF energy is not being generated or delivered. All other aspects of the procedure will be the same as used for the active treatment, including administration of anesthetic agent(s). |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Count of Participants |
| Participants |
|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
|
| Sex/Gender, Customized | Overall percentage for analyzed participants | Number | participants |
|
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Patients self-identified race and ethnicity. Race and ethnicity classifications were adapted from US Food and Drug Administration-recommended classifications. These data were assessed to aid in interpretation of trial generalizability and conclusions and frame any relevant implications for clinical care. | Number | participants |
|
| Baseline NOSE Scale Score | The primary and secondary end point measures of this trial analyzed at 3, 6, and 12 months post procedure were (1) responder rate, where a responder was defined as 20% or greater improvement (decrease) in NOSE Scale score or 1 or greater NOSE Scale severity category improvement16from baseline, and (2) the mean change in NOSE Scale score from baseline. | Mean | Standard Deviation | Average Score |
|
| Ease-of-breathing VAS Score | Ease-of-breathing VAS is a 100-mm scale, where 0=no difficulty breathing and 100=extreme difficulty breathing. VAS=visual analog scale. | Median | Standard Deviation | score |
|
| OG000 |
| Active Treatment Arm: Vivaer Procedure |
A 2:1 site-stratified randomization will be used to allocate participants with NAO to either the active treatment arm (Vivaer procedure) or the control arm (sham procedure) Subjects randomized to the Active Treatment will receive the Vivaer procedure. The Vivaer procedure will be performed in the study clinic using the Vivaer ARC Stylus and Aerin Console. The Vivaer ARC Stylus is a disposable handheld device capable of delivering bipolar radiofrequency energy to tissue when connected to the Aerin Console radiofrequency generating device. Participants in this study will undergo bilateral treatment of the nasal valves in a single study session. Each side of the nose will be treated with up to four (4) non-overlapping applications of RF energy at the junction of the upper and lower lateral cartilage on the lateral nasal wall. Treatment settings to be used are: temperature 60° C, power 4 watts, treatment time 18 seconds, and cooling time 12 seconds. No repeat ("touch up") procedures will be permitted after the initial procedure through the end of the study (24 months). Participants in this study will undergo bilateral treatment of the nasal valves in a single study session. Active treatment participants (Vivaer procedure) will have an extended follow-up with evaluations conducted in-office at 6 months (26 weeks) and remotely at 12 months (52 weeks) and 24 months (104 weeks). |
| OG001 | Control Arm: Sham Control Procedure | A 2:1 site-stratified randomization will be used to allocate participants with NAO to either the active treatment arm (Vivaer procedure) or the control arm (sham procedure) The sham control procedure will be performed in the study clinic using the Vivaer ARC Stylus while audible sounds that accurately simulate the Aerin Console's active treatment are produced even though RF energy is not being generated or delivered. All other aspects of the procedure will be the same as used for the active treatment, including administration of anesthetic agent(s). Participants receiving the sham procedure may elect to crossover to the active treatment arm (Vivaer procedure) within 30 days after the 3-month follow-up evaluation provided they still meet all eligibility criteria. Continued follow-up will be conducted at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after the Vivaer procedure to provide additional information on longer-term efficacy and duration of treatment effect. Participants that received the sham procedure and do not elect to crossover or no longer meet all eligibility criteria will be exited from the study following the 3-month evaluation. |
|
|
| Secondary | Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) Scale Mean Change From Baseline Through 3 Months | The NOSE Scale is a patient self-reported questionnaire consisting of 5 symptoms of nasal obstruction: nasal congestion, nasal blockage, trouble breathing, trouble sleeping, and getting enough air during exercise. Patients will report over the past 1 month how much the symptoms have been a problem. Total score ranges from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate worse obstruction. This study will measure the mean change in NOSE Scale from baseline to 3 months after procedure. | At baseline, all patients were classified as having extreme or severe obstruction, based on the NOSE-scale severity classification system. This outcome measure shows the difference in overall score between baseline and 3 months. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | score on a scale | Change from Baseline to 3 months following the study procedure. |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Treatment Related Events (Safety) - Through 3 Months | Characterizing the type and frequency of adverse events reported. Subjects will be asked about possible side effects or adverse experiences related to the study procedure at each follow up visit. All events will be documented and identified as to its relationship and level of relatedness to the study device and/or study procedure. Date of onset, seriousness, intensity, duration and outcome will be documented. | Adverse events considered at least possibly related to the device and/or procedure | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | At or following the study procedure up to to 3 months. |
|
|
|
| Other Pre-specified | NOSE Scale Score - 3 Month Responder Rate Improvement in NOSE Score | The NOSE Scale is a validated disease-specific health status instrument used by clinicians to measure the outcome of patients treated for nasal obstruction. The NOSE Scale consists of 5 items, each scored using a 5-point Likert scale to make a total score range of 0 through 100, where higher scores indicate worse obstruction. Severity of symptoms can be classified as range, 5-25), (range, 30-50), severe (range, 55-75), or extreme (range, 80-100) nasal obstruction, based on responses to the NOSE survey. Measurement is # improvement in NOSE Scale score from baseline, the lower the score the less obstruction or a change to lower score indicates improvement in nasal airway obstruction. These data represents percent improvement in NOSE Scale score from baseline at 3 months | The combined active treatment group contains patients from the index active treatment arm and the crossover active treatment arm. The term baseline in the index active treatment arm refers to the out-come measure value prior to original active treatment procedure, and in the case of the crossover active treatment arm, baseline refers to the value reported at the time of requalification for crossover. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | 3 Month |
|
|
|
| Other Pre-specified | NOSE Scale Score - 3 Month Average | The NOSE Scale is a validated disease-specific health status instrument used by clinicians to measure the outcome of patients treated for nasal obstruction. The NOSE Scale consists of 5 items, each scored using a 5-point Likert scale to make a total score range of 0 through 100, where higher scores indicate worse obstruction. Severity of symptoms can be classified as range, 5-25), range, 30-50), severe (range, 55-75), or extreme (range, 80-100) nasal obstruction, based on responses to the NOSE survey. These data represents the NOSE Scale average score from baseline at 3 months | The combined active treatment group contains patients from the index active treatment arm and the crossover active treatment arm. The term baseline in the index active treatment arm refers to the out-come measure value prior to original active treatment procedure, and in the case of the crossover active treatment arm, baseline refers to the value reported at the time of requalification for crossover. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | score on a scale | 3 Month |
|
|
|
| Other Pre-specified | NOSE Scale Score - 6 Month Average | The NOSE Scale is a validated disease-specific health status instrument used by clinicians to measure the outcome of patients treated for nasal obstruction. The NOSE Scale consists of 5 items, each scored using a 5-point Likert scale to make a total score range of 0 through 100, where higher scores indicate worse obstruction. Severity of symptoms can be classified as range, 5-25), range, 30-50), severe (range, 55-75), or extreme (range, 80-100) nasal obstruction, based on responses to the NOSE survey. These data represents the NOSE Scale average score from baseline at 6 months | The combined active treatment group contains patients from the index active treatment arm and the crossover active treatment arm. The term baseline in the index active treatment arm refers to the out-come measure value prior to original active treatment procedure, and in the case of the crossover active treatment arm, baseline refers to the value reported at the time of requalification for crossover. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | score on a scale | 6 Month |
|
|
|
| Other Pre-specified | NOSE Scale Score - 12 Month Average | The NOSE Scale is a validated disease-specific health status instrument used by clinicians to measure the outcome of patients treated for nasal obstruction. The NOSE Scale consists of 5 items, each scored using a 5-point Likert scale to make a total score range of 0 through 100, where higher scores indicate worse obstruction. Severity of symptoms can be classified as range, 5-25), range, 30-50), severe (range, 55-75), or extreme (range, 80-100) nasal obstruction, based on responses to the NOSE survey. These data represents the NOSE Scale average score from baseline at 12 months | The combined active treatment group contains patients from the index active treatment arm and the crossover active treatment arm. The term baseline in the index active treatment arm refers to the out-come measure value prior to original active treatment procedure, and in the case of the crossover active treatment arm, baseline refers to the value reported at the time of requalification for crossover. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | score on a scale | 12 Month |
|
|
|
| Other Pre-specified | NOSE Scale Score - 24 Month Average | The NOSE Scale is a validated disease-specific health status instrument used by clinicians to measure the outcome of patients treated for nasal obstruction. The NOSE Scale consists of 5 items, each scored using a 5-point Likert scale to make a total score range of 0 through 100, where higher scores indicate worse obstruction. Severity of symptoms can be classified as range, 5-25), range, 30-50), severe (range, 55-75), or extreme (range, 80-100) nasal obstruction, based on responses to the NOSE survey. These data represents the NOSE Scale average score from baseline at 12 months | The combined active treatment group contains patients from the index active treatment arm and the crossover active treatment arm. The term baseline in the index active treatment arm refers to the out-come measure value prior to original active treatment procedure, and in the case of the crossover active treatment arm, baseline refers to the value reported at the time of requalification for crossover. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | score on a scale | 24 Month |
|
|
|
| Other Pre-specified | NOSE Scale Score - 6 Month Responder Rate Improvement in NOSE Score | The NOSE Scale is a validated disease-specific health status instrument used by clinicians to measure the outcome of patients treated for nasal obstruction. The NOSE Scale consists of 5 items, each scored using a 5-point Likert scale to make a total score range of 0 through 100, where higher scores indicate worse obstruction. Severity of symptoms can be classified as range, 5-25), range, 30-50), severe (range, 55-75), or extreme (range, 80-100) nasal obstruction, based on responses to the NOSE survey. Measurement is # improvement in NOSE Scale score from baseline These data represents percent improvement in NOSE Scale score from baseline at 6 months | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | 6 Month |
|
|
|
| Other Pre-specified | NOSE Scale Score - 12 Month Responder Rate Improvement in NOSE Score | The NOSE Scale is a validated disease-specific health status instrument used by clinicians to measure the outcome of patients treated for nasal obstruction. The NOSE Scale consists of 5 items, each scored using a 5-point Likert scale to make a total score range of 0 through 100, where higher scores indicate worse obstruction. Severity of symptoms can be classified as range, 5-25), range, 30-50), severe (range, 55-75), or extreme (range, 80-100) nasal obstruction, based on responses to the NOSE survey. These data represents percent improvement in NOSE Scale score from baseline at 12 months | The combined active treatment group contains patients from the index active treatment arm and the crossover active treatment arm. The term baseline in the index active treatment arm refers to the out-come measure value prior to original active treatment procedure, and in the case of the crossover active treatment arm, baseline refers to the value reported at the time of requalification for crossover. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | 12 Month |
|
|
|
| Other Pre-specified | NOSE Scale Score -24 Month Responder Rate Improvement in NOSE Score | The NOSE Scale is a validated disease-specific health status instrument used by clinicians to measure the outcome of patients treated for nasal obstruction. The NOSE Scale consists of 5 items, each scored using a 5-point Likert scale to make a total score range of 0 through 100, where higher scores indicate worse obstruction. Severity of symptoms can be classified as range, 5-25), range, 30-50), severe (range, 55-75), or extreme (range, 80-100) nasal obstruction, based on responses to the NOSE survey. These data represents percent improvement in NOSE Scale score from baseline at 12 months | The combined active treatment group contains patients from the index active treatment arm and the crossover active treatment arm. The term baseline in the index active treatment arm refers to the out-come measure value prior to original active treatment procedure, and in the case of the crossover active treatment arm, baseline refers to the value reported at the time of requalification for crossover. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | score on a scale | 24 Month |
|
|
|
| Other Pre-specified | Epworth Sleepiness Scale - 3 Month | The ESS evaluates the self-reported likelihood of dozing or falling asleep in 8 daytime situations with likelihood rated No Chance (0), Slight (1), Moderate (2), or High Chance (3).40 The total of the scores across the 8 questions can be categorized and interpreted as: 0-7 It is unlikely that you are abnormally sleepy. 8-9 You have an average amount of daytime sleepiness. 10-15 You may be excessively sleepy depending on the situation. You may want to consider seeking medical attention. 16-24 You are excessively sleepy and should consider seeking medical attention. The mean change in Epworth Sleepiness Scale score from baseline was also analyzed at 3-, 6-, and 12-months post procedure. NOSE Scale and Epworth Sleepiness Scale data were also collected at 1 month post procedure. Data reported here is from 3M as 12M was not included because of the long-term follow-up focus of the report. | The combined active treatment group contains patients from the index active treatment arm and the crossover active treatment arm. The term baseline in the index active treatment arm refers to the out-come measure value prior to original active treatment procedure, and in the case of the crossover active treatment arm, baseline refers to the value reported at the time of requalification for crossover. | Posted | Mean | Full Range | score on a scale | 3 Months |
|
|
|
| Other Pre-specified | Epworth Sleepiness Scale - 6 Month | The ESS evaluates the self-reported likelihood of dozing or falling asleep in 8 daytime situations with likelihood rated No Chance (0), Slight (1), Moderate (2), or High Chance (3).40 The total of the scores across the 8 questions can be categorized and interpreted as: 0-7 It is unlikely that you are abnormally sleepy. 8-9 You have an average amount of daytime sleepiness. 10-15 You may be excessively sleepy depending on the situation. You may want to consider seeking medical attention. 16-24 You are excessively sleepy and should consider seeking medical attention. The mean change in Epworth Sleepiness Scale score from baseline was also analyzed at 3-, 6-, and 12-months post procedure. NOSE Scale and Epworth Sleepiness Scale data were also collected at 1 month post procedure. Data reported here is from 3M as 12M was not included because of the long-term follow-up focus of the report. | The combined active treatment group contains patients from the index active treatment arm and the crossover active treatment arm. The term baseline in the index active treatment arm refers to the out-come measure value prior to original active treatment procedure, and in the case of the crossover active treatment arm, baseline refers to the value reported at the time of requalification for crossover. | Posted | Mean | Full Range | score on a scale | 6 Months |
|
|
|
| Other Pre-specified | Epworth Sleepiness Scale - 12 Months | The ESS evaluates the self-reported likelihood of dozing or falling asleep in 8 daytime situations with likelihood rated No Chance (0), Slight (1), Moderate (2), or High Chance (3).40 The total of the scores across the 8 questions can be categorized and interpreted as: 0-7 It is unlikely that you are abnormally sleepy. 8-9 You have an average amount of daytime sleepiness. 10-15 You may be excessively sleepy depending on the situation. You may want to consider seeking medical attention. 16-24 You are excessively sleepy and should consider seeking medical attention. The mean change in Epworth Sleepiness Scale score from baseline was also analyzed at 3-, 6-, and 12-months post procedure. NOSE Scale and Epworth Sleepiness Scale data were also collected at 1 month post procedure. Data reported here is from 3M as 12M was not included because of the long-term follow-up focus of the report. | The combined active treatment group contains patients from the index active treatment arm and the crossover active treatment arm. The term baseline in the index active treatment arm refers to the out-come measure value prior to original active treatment procedure, and in the case of the crossover active treatment arm, baseline refers to the value reported at the time of requalification for crossover. | Posted | Mean | Full Range | score on a scale | 12 Months |
|
|
|
| Other Pre-specified | Epworth Sleepiness Scale - 24 Months | The ESS evaluates the self-reported likelihood of dozing or falling asleep in 8 daytime situations with likelihood rated No Chance (0), Slight (1), Moderate (2), or High Chance (3).40 The total of the scores across the 8 questions can be categorized and interpreted as: 0-7 It is unlikely that you are abnormally sleepy. 8-9 You have an average amount of daytime sleepiness. 10-15 You may be excessively sleepy depending on the situation. You may want to consider seeking medical attention. 16-24 You are excessively sleepy and should consider seeking medical attention. The mean change in Epworth Sleepiness Scale score from baseline was also analyzed at 3-, 6-, and 12-months post procedure. NOSE Scale and Epworth Sleepiness Scale data were also collected at 1 month post procedure. Data reported here is from 3M as 12M was not included because of the long-term follow-up focus of the report. | The combined active treatment group contains patients from the index active treatment arm and the crossover active treatment arm. The term baseline in the index active treatment arm refers to the out-come measure value prior to original active treatment procedure, and in the case of the crossover active treatment arm, baseline refers to the value reported at the time of requalification for crossover. | Posted | Mean | Full Range | score on a scale | 24 Months |
|
|
|
| Other Pre-specified | Concomitant Medication and Mechanical Nasal Aid Analysis | Medications tracked during the trial were antihistamines, decongestants, leukotriene inhibitors, intranasal steroids, anticholinergics, and immunotherapy. Use of nasal strips/cones was also tracked. | Posted | Number | percent | 12 Months |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 108 |
| 0 |
| 108 |
| 7 |
| 108 |
| EG001 | Sham Control Procedure | The sham control procedure will be performed in the study clinic using the Vivaer ARC Stylus while audible sounds that accurately simulate the Aerin Console's active treatment are produced even though RF energy is not being generated or delivered. All other aspects of the procedure will be the same as used for the active treatment, including administration of anesthetic agent(s). Sham: The sham control procedure will be performed in the study clinic using the Vivaer ARC Stylus while audible sounds that accurately simulate the Aerin Console's active treatment are produced even though RF energy is not being generated or delivered. All other aspects of the procedure will be the same as used for the active treatment, including administration of anesthetic agent(s). | 0 | 39 | 0 | 39 | 1 | 39 |
| Nasal Congestion | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Vasovagal reaction | Nervous system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| D012120 |
| Respiration Disorders |
| D010038 | Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases |
| Headache |
|
| No Safety Issue |
|
|