Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 75068 | Other Identifier | Regional ethical committee |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This current protocol encompasses an investigator-blinded randomized exercise intervention in 10 COVID-19 survivors that have been discharged from hospital. The subjects will be randomized to perform three different exercise training protocols in a random order.
The aim is to clarify the feasibility and safety of three training protocols in COVID-19 survivors. The hypothesis is that patients surviving COVID-19 will be able to comply to all training protocols.
The study is a randomized crossover trial testing the feasibility and safety of three different training protocols in 10 COVID-19 survivors that have been discharged from hospital. The subjects will be randomized to perform three different exercise training protocols in a random order.
The aim is to clarify the feasibility and safety of three training protocols in COVID-19 survivors. The hypothesis is that patients surviving COVID-19 will be able to comply to all training protocols.
The study consists of 4 visits with 1 baseline session (a medical screening and fitness test) and 3 different training sessions. Each training is separated by 1-week washout, to account for potential confounding by leisure activity performed just before the training, patients will be wearing activity watches (Polar).
Feasibility and safety evaluation will be based on 1) how tolerable and enjoyable the training was based on a subjective questionnaire (Likert Scale) 2) compliance to the prescribed exercise protocol with regard to duration and intensity and 3) experienced side effects.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4X4 | Experimental | An exercise training protocol with a duration of 38 minutes consisting of a 10 minutes warm up with a heart rate of 60-70% of HRmax followed by 4 intervals of 4 minutes at an intensity that will induce at least 85% of HRmax (we will start with 75% of watt max). Each interval is separated by 3-minute active pauses, biking at 50-70% of HRmax. Following this a 3-minute cooldown (at warm up intensity) will be performed. |
|
| 6X1 | Active Comparator | An exercise training protocol with a duration of 38 minutes consisting of a 10 minutes warm up on 30% of watt-max followed by 6 intervals of 1 minute at 100% of the watt-max. Each interval is interspersed by 3-minute active pauses at 30% of watt-max. Following this a 7-minute cooldown (at warm up intensity) will be performed. |
|
| 10-20-30 | Active Comparator | An exercise training protocol with a duration of 38 minutes consisting of a 10 minutes warm up at 60-70% of HRmax followed by 3 intervals of 5 minutes interspersed by 3 minutes on 50-70% of HRmax. Each interval consists of 5 minutes of 5 repeated 30-20-10 intervals, consisting of 30 seconds at easy pace, 20 seconds at medium pace and 10 seconds at all-out. Following this a 7-minute cooldown (at warm up intensity) will be performed. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exercise training | Behavioral | Feasibility and safety of 3 different training protocols will be tested. Therefore the intervention is three different exercise protocols (4X4, 6X1, and 10-20-30). The exercise workload is set according to the patients HRmax or wattmax from a VO2max test at the baseline testing. All training protocols have a duration of 38 minutes and start with a 10-minute warm up and a 3-7-minute cool-down period. The intervals in the training protocols are interspersed with a 3-minute active rest. Therefore the three exercise protocols are matched on duration, and they all fall within the category of high-intensity-interval training. The accumulated time spend with a heart rate >85% of HR max will be evaluated to determine the intensity. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| 10-point Likert scale | the 10-point Likert scale, which evaluates enjoyment and perceived tolerance of each training protocol at the end of each training session using a 10-point Likert scale, which is one of the most fundamental and frequently used psychometric tools in social science research. Patients have to indicate the degree to which they agreed with the following statement before training: "How motivated are you for today's training?" following two statements after the training: "How enjoyable have today´s training session been?" and "How tolerant has today´s training been?" A higher number describes better agreement. | Through study completion, an average of 3 months |
| Participant adherence to the training dose | Percentage completed exercise of the total duration | Through study completion, an average of 3 months |
| Participant adherence to the training intensity | Percentage of the exercise session spent at a heart rate above 85% of maximal heart rate | Through study completion, an average of 3 months |
| Adverse effects | Adverse effect which leads to termination of the exercise training, registered as a binary outcome (yes/no) | Through study completion, an average of 3 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Rate of perceived exertion | Verification of training intensity is evaluated by rate of perceived exertion after each interval (6-20 Borg scale) and after completed training (1-10 Borg scale), and from accumulated minutes in the predefined heart rate zones. | The secondary outcome measure will be evaluated through study completion, an average of 3 months |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Regitse Christensen, MD PhD | Center for Physical Activity Research, Rigshospitalet | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rigshospitalet | Copenhagen | 2100 | Denmark |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 34794987 | Derived | Rasmussen IE, Foged F, Bjorn Budde J, Rasmussen RS, Rasmussen V, Lyngbaek M, Jonck S, Krogh-Madsen R, Lindegaard B, Ried-Larsen M, Jorgensen PG, Lund MAV, Kober L, Vejlstrup N, Pedersen BK, Berg RMG, Christensen RH. Protective potential of high-intensity interval training on cardiac structure and function after COVID-19: protocol and statistical analysis plan for an investigator-blinded randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 18;11(11):e048281. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048281. |
Not provided
Not provided
Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in publications from this study (after deidentification), and the analytic code can be shared beginning 6 months after publication of pre-specified primary, and secondary outcomes and ending 5 years following this to researchers, who provide a methodologically sound proposal. Proposals should be directed to the corresponding or last author of this manuscript. To gain access, data requestors will need to sign a data access agreement.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Sep 22, 2020 | Sep 22, 2020 | Prot_SAP_001.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000086382 | COVID-19 |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011024 | Pneumonia, Viral |
| D011014 | Pneumonia |
| D012141 | Respiratory Tract Infections |
| D007239 | Infections |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D015444 | Exercise |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009043 | Motor Activity |
| D009068 | Movement |
| D009142 | Musculoskeletal Physiological Phenomena |
| D055687 | Musculoskeletal and Neural Physiological Phenomena |
Not provided
Not provided
This study uses a randomized crossover trial testing the feasibility of 3 different training protocols.
Not provided
Not provided
Participants are randomly allocated following successful completion of the baseline measurements. A researcher, that is not involved in testing or training procedures, generates a computer-generated block randomization schedule with balanced permutations. To ascertain allocation concealment, the block sizes will not be disclosed. The schedule is forwarded to a research assistant, who is not involved in any study procedures and stored on a password protected computer. Following the baseline measurements, the participants are given consecutive numbers. These are forwarded to the research assistant, who returns the corresponding allocation sequence to the study coordinator. The participants are blinded for treatment allocation until treatment assignment. However, following the initial two treatments blinding of the participants is no longer possible. All study personal involved with data collection will be blinded during baseline testing.
|
| Post COVID-19 Functional scale | Functional capacity of the patients is another outcome which is assessed with the Post COVID-19 Functional scale, which is a scale to measure the consequence of the disease beyond binary outcomes. The scale ranges from 0-4, where 4 describes "worst functional limitation (worse outcome)". | The secondary outcome measure will be evaluated through study completion, an average of 3 months |
| D014777 |
| Virus Diseases |
| D018352 | Coronavirus Infections |
| D003333 | Coronaviridae Infections |
| D030341 | Nidovirales Infections |
| D012327 | RNA Virus Infections |
| D008171 | Lung Diseases |
| D012140 | Respiratory Tract Diseases |