Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-003813-24 | EudraCT Number |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The main objective of this study is to establish the safety as well as the efficacy of local insertion of Iloprost at the fracture site for bone healing of the proximal humeral fracture.
The study will have two treatment groups and one control group. All patients will receive the standard of care procedure (reduction and angular stable (PHILOS) plate fixation). The two treatment groups will additionally be treated with two different Iloprost doses.
Subjects will be assessed for study eligibility within 24h after admission (screening period). Eligible subjects will be assessed for baseline parameters on day 0. Within 96 hours of the study, subjects will undergo surgery, reduction, and angular stable (PHILOS) plate fixation. During the procedure, a catheter will be inserted in the fracture site of the treatment groups in order to deliver the Iloprost locally in the fracture site.
The expected total duration of study participation for each subject comprises 52 weeks, among which 26 weeks include active study participation. At the study end, a telephone call with the subjects will be performed for safety assessment. Recruitment will be completed in approximately 18 months.
Follow up visits following the surgical operation shall take place during weeks 3, 6, 12, and 26. The last follow-up will be a phone call during week 52 for the purpose of safety assessment.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| First intervention group (0.125 ng/kg/min Iloprost) | Experimental | The first intervention group will receive open reduction and internal fixation with an angular stable plate (PHILOSâ„¢ - Depuy Synthes) + Iloprost treatment. Patients will locally receive a dose of 0.125 ng/kg/min of Iloprost over 24 hours via a catheter and an electronic pump system. The catheter will be inserted during the surgical procedure. Infusion of Iloprost will start 24hrs post-operatively and the dose will be delivered over 24h. |
|
| Second intervention group (0.25 ng/kg/min Iloprost) | Experimental | The second intervention group will also receive open reduction and internal fixation with an angular stable plate (PHILOSâ„¢ - Depuy Synthes) + Iloprost treatment. Patients will locally receive a dose of 0.25 ng/kg/min of Iloprost over 24 hours via a catheter and an electronic pump system. Infusion will start 24hrs post-operatively and the dose will be delivered over 24h. |
|
| Control intervention group | Other | Control intervention: Patients will receive the standard of care procedure for such fractures, i.e. standard of care open reduction and internal fixation with an angular stable plate (PHILOSâ„¢ - Depuy Synthes). |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.125 ng/kg/min Iloprost | Drug | Drug administration through a catheter (inserted at the end of the surgical procedure) begins 24±2 hours after surgery: 0.125 ng/kg/min Iloprost for a duration of 24 hours |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Toxicity grading in accordance with the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) | Toxicity grading in accordance with the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) | 12 months |
| Efficacy analysis using the Tip Apex Distance (TAD) readout | TAD is an indicator of the progress of fracture healing and the probability of potential complications. Thus, it reflects both the safety and efficacy of the investigational treatment. To evaluate the treatment success rate, we will calculate the percentage loss of the summation of TADs of all locking screws. The value will be classified into one of five ranks as measured after 12 weeks of postoperative follow-up compared to the baseline measurement. For the percentage of original Tip Apex Distance, the sum of the Tip Apex Distance of the humeral head screws will be used: Grade 1: 76%-100% preservation of the original distance (representing the best possible result), Grade 2: 51%-75% preservation of the original distance, Grade 3: 26%-50% preservation of the original distance, Grade 4: 0%-25% preservation of the original distance, and Grade 5: if the patient shows signs of screw protrusion (cut out). Grade 1 will be considered as treatment success, grades 2-5 as treatment failure. | 12 weeks after surgery |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Rate of humeral head necrosis | Osteonecrosis of the humeral head is a common complication in proximal humerus fracture. (1) The occurrence of osteonecrosis varies significantly according to the grading of the fracture in addition to the initial displacement (valgus or varus), Soft tissue handling during surgical fixation can influence the rate of osteonecrosis (2,3). Both a radiologist and an orthopedic surgeon will confirm the diagnosis of osteonecrosis of the humeral head radiologically at 12th-week and 26th-week visits. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tobias Winkler, Prof.Dr.med | Contact | +49 30 450 559 084 | tobias.winkler@charite.de | |
| Sven Geissler, Dr. - Ing. | Contact | +49 30 450659539 | sven.geissler@charite.de |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Tobias Winkler, Prof. Dr.med | Charite University, Berlin, Germany | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Center for Muskuloskeletal Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin | Recruiting | Berlin | 13353 | Germany |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21968245 | Background | Brorson S, Rasmussen JV, Frich LH, Olsen BS, Hrobjartsson A. Benefits and harms of locking plate osteosynthesis in intraarticular (OTA Type C) fractures of the proximal humerus: a systematic review. Injury. 2012 Jul;43(7):999-1005. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2011.08.025. Epub 2011 Oct 2. | |
| 16394748 | Background | DeFranco MJ, Brems JJ, Williams GR Jr, Iannotti JP. Evaluation and management of valgus impacted four-part proximal humerus fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006 Jan;442:109-14. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000194675.64387.33. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
A randomized interventional study with parallel groups. Open labeled, add-on controlled study.
In this study, patients will be randomized on a 1:1:1 basis to one of the three arms (two treatment arms and one control arm).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| 0.25 ng/kg/min Iloprost | Drug | Drug administration through a catheter (inserted at the end of the surgical procedure) begins 24±2 hours after surgery: 0.25 ng/kg/min Iloprost for a duration of 24 hours |
|
|
| open reduction and internal fixation with an angular stable plate (PHILOS) | Procedure | open reduction and internal fixation with an angular stable plate (PHILOS) |
|
|
| 12 weeks and 26 weeks after surgery |
| Humeral head shaft angle | Humeral head shaft angle is used to plan corrective osteotomies and shoulder arthroplasties as well as to evaluate the postoperative x-ray outcome, as a varus displacement of more than 10 degrees in the X-ray view is considered as loss of fixation (4). | before discharge, 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks and 26 weeks after surgery |
| Pain assessment using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) | The VAS instrument consists of a 10 cm long straight line with defined endpoints, ranging from 'no pain' to 'pain as bad as it could be.' The patient will be asked to mark the respective pain level on the line that is felt subjectively. The distance between 'no pain' and the marked pain level determines the patient's pain. Scores are given in mm, ranging from 0-100 (5). | 24 hours after surgery, before discharge, 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks and 26 weeks after surgery |
| Quality-of-Life (QoL) by applying EQ-5D | Patients will be asked to answer the questionnaire EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D), which is a validated instrument determining the quality of life as a health outcome. Developed in Europe, it is widely applied. The tool offers 5 dimensions including mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression (6). The questionnaire includes a visual analog scale where patients can give information on their health state. | 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks and 26 weeks after surgery |
| Constant-Murley Score (CMS): | The Constant-Murley Score (CMS) is a 100-points scale composed of different parameters to define the level of pain and the ability of the patient to perform normal daily activities. It is used to determine the functional outcome after treatment of shoulder injuries. The higher the score, the better the function of the shoulder is. CMS is divided into four main subscales: pain (max. 15 points), strength (max. 25 points), daily activity (max. 20 points) and range of motion (40 points). The European Society of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery (ESSE) has promoted the Constant- Murley Score as a gold standard for the assessment of shoulder function (7-9). The Constant-Murley Score takes patient sex and age into consideration. The score can be used relative to age and sex (10). | 12 weeks and 26 weeks after surgery |
| Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score (DASH) | DASH is a 30-item questionnaire that determines the ability of a patient to perform certain upper extremity activities. DASH questionnaire is self-reported, where patients can rate the difficulty and interference with daily life (1 = no difficulty or no symptom, 5 = unable to perform or very severe symptom). Subsequently, a score is calculated using a formula. A DASH score of 0 corresponds to no disability and 100 to extreme disability. | 12 weeks and 26 weeks after surgery |
| 23316376 | Background | Khmelnitskaya E, Lamont LE, Taylor SA, Lorich DG, Dines DM, Dines JS. Evaluation and management of proximal humerus fractures. Adv Orthop. 2012;2012:861598. doi: 10.1155/2012/861598. Epub 2012 Dec 18. |
| 26700557 | Background | Malavolta EA, Assuncao JH, Pagotto RA, Avelino RL, Gracitelli ME, Pereira CA, Jacomo AL, Ferreira Neto AA. The rotation of the humeral head does not alter radiographic evaluation of the head-shaft angle. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016 Apr;25(4):543-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.09.026. Epub 2015 Dec 15. |
| 24921952 | Background | Kersten P, White PJ, Tennant A. Is the pain visual analogue scale linear and responsive to change? An exploration using Rasch analysis. PLoS One. 2014 Jun 12;9(6):e99485. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099485. eCollection 2014. |
| 23614330 | Background | Balestroni G, Bertolotti G. [EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D): an instrument for measuring quality of life]. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis. 2012 Sep;78(3):155-9. doi: 10.4081/monaldi.2012.121. Italian. |
| 19639370 | Background | Hirschmann MT, Wind B, Amsler F, Gross T. Reliability of shoulder abduction strength measure for the Constant-Murley score. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Jun;468(6):1565-71. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-1007-3. Epub 2009 Jul 29. |
| 8666631 | Background | Conboy VB, Morris RW, Kiss J, Carr AJ. An evaluation of the Constant-Murley shoulder assessment. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996 Mar;78(2):229-32. |
| 3791738 | Background | Constant CR, Murley AH. A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987 Jan;(214):160-4. |
| 15789004 | Background | Yian EH, Ramappa AJ, Arneberg O, Gerber C. The Constant score in normal shoulders. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2005 Mar-Apr;14(2):128-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2004.07.003. |
| 17534619 | Background | Changulani M, Okonkwo U, Keswani T, Kalairajah Y. Outcome evaluation measures for wrist and hand: which one to choose? Int Orthop. 2008 Feb;32(1):1-6. doi: 10.1007/s00264-007-0368-z. Epub 2007 May 30. |
| 40405317 | Derived | Elazaly H, Dimitriou IM, Maleitzke T, Dahne M, Jaecker V, Maerdian S, Tafelski S, Diekhoff T, Lindner T, Akgun D, Mielke AM, Paksoy A, Amini DA, Planatscher EM, Leopold V, Gonzalez-Khatib S, Kohli PC, Niemann M, Hildebrandt A, Oehme S, Palmowski Y, Paraskevaidis M, Schonnagel L, Braun SB, Pumberger M, Hardt S, Stricker S, Akyuz L, Grutz G, Schaller S, Lauterbach L, Volcksdorff M, Modl L, Textor M, Ort M, Reinke S, Stockle U, Perka C, Duda GN, Schmidt-Bleek K, Geissler S, Winkler T. ILOBONE: A phase I/IIa randomized controlled trial to assess the safety and feasibility of local iloprost therapy for enhancing proximal humerus fracture healing- a pilot study design. J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 May 22;20(1):498. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-05865-2. |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012784 | Shoulder Fractures |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D050723 | Fractures, Bone |
| D014947 | Wounds and Injuries |
| D000070599 | Shoulder Injuries |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D016285 | Iloprost |
| D000070799 | Open Fracture Reduction |
| D005593 | Fracture Fixation, Internal |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011465 | Prostaglandins, Synthetic |
| D011453 | Prostaglandins |
| D015777 | Eicosanoids |
| D005231 | Fatty Acids, Unsaturated |
| D005227 | Fatty Acids |
| D008055 | Lipids |
| D012898 | Autacoids |
| D018836 | Inflammation Mediators |
| D001685 | Biological Factors |
| D005592 | Fracture Fixation |
| D019637 | Orthopedic Procedures |
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
| D013514 | Surgical Procedures, Operative |
Not provided
Not provided