Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Clovis Oncology, Inc. | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The study consists of a retrospective observational, multicenter study in which the fundamental exposure factor being investigated is a drug (rucaparib).
A clinical database will be built including clinical data in three scenarios of rucaparib treatment: (1) platinum-sensitive BRCA-mutated patients after progression, (2) maintenance therapy in patients after a platinum-sensitive relapse in response, and (3) treatment therapy in BRCA-mutated patients who are currently platinum-resistant.
The specific objectives of the study are:
An observational study (GEICO 87-R) was performed in high-grade ovarian cancer patients treated within the rucaparib access program (RAP) in Spain. The aim was to better understand rucaparib's management in real-life setting, to optimize future use, considering Pt-sensitive and Pt-resistant BRCAmut treatment and maintenance patients.
A retrospective study was performed at 22 GEICO hospitals in Spain that treated patients within RAP (600 mg BID) since September 2018. Adult women with high-grade epithelian ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer, with medical record available, were included. Patient characteristics, medical history, safety, efficacy, and dosing data were collected.
The setting of this observational study was rucaparib's access program (RAP) in Spain, in the context of real-life use of the product.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rucaparib | Drug | Participating local sites (GEICO-associated hospitals with expertise in gynecological cancer management) will enter clinical data of those patients who have previously participated in the rucaparib access program (RAP) in Spain and have given their consent. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Relevant Co-morbidities | Patient characteristics and medical history Detected diseases include: arterial hypertension, diabetes melliutus, COPD, ischemic cardiomyopathy, cerebrovascular disease, obesity, etc. Measurements were done at baseline | 0 months - Measurements were done at baseline |
| Other Previous Cancers? | Patient characteristics and medical history. Descriptive statistics: Other cancers present during trial including endometrial, breast , colorrectal, lung or other cancers Measurements were done at baseline | 0 months - Measurements were done at baseline |
| Family History of Cancers? | Patient characteristics and medical history Family history of other cancers including ovarian, breast and others Measurements were done at baseline | 0 months - Measurements were done at baseline |
| FIGO STAGE | Stage = tumor size and location; higher stage = more spread metastasis I Tumor confined to the corpus uteri IA No or less than half myometrial invasion IB Invasion equal to or more than half of the myometrium IC IA+IB + ascites IC1 surgical spill IC2 Capsule rupture before surgery or tumor on ovarian surface II Tumor invades cervical stroma, but does not extend beyond the uterus III Local and/or regional spread of the tumor IIIA Tumor invades the serosa of the corpus uteri and/or adnexae IIIA2 involvement of uterine subserosa or spread through uterine serosa IIIB Vaginal involvement and/or parametrial involvement IIIC Metastases to pelvic and/or para-aortic lymph nodes IIIC1 Positive pelvic nodes IIIC2 Positive para-aortic nodes with or without positive pelvic lymph nodes IV Tumor invades bladder and/or bowel mucosa, and/or distant metastases IVA Tumor invasion of bladder and/or bowel mucosa IVB Distant metastasis (intra-abdominal metastases and/or inguinal nodes) | 0 months - Measurements were done at baseline |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
1. Patients without medical record available (lost, empty or unretrievable clinical information).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Adult (18 years or more) women diagnosed with high-grade epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Alfonso Yubero, Dr. | Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hospital Torrecárdenas | Almería | Andalusia | 04009 | Spain | ||
| Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Rucaparib - Treatment | The population will include all patients who received at least one dose of rucaparib as part of the RAP in GEICO-associated hospitals. The sample size will be based on the accrual rate of the RAP and the date of rucaparib launch in Spain. Studied patients were the ones recruited between July 2020 and February 2021 Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients without medical record available (lost, empty or unretrievable clinical information). Rucaparib was given as maintenance or Pt-resistant and Pt-sensitive treatment This group includes: Platinum-sensitive BRCA-mutated patients after progression, and BRCA-mutated patients who are currently platinum-resistant. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Jul 29, 2021 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Tumor Histology |
Patient characteristics and medical history Tumor histology history Measurements were done at baseline |
| 0 months - Measurements were done at baseline |
| BCRA Status | Patient characteristics and medical history mutational status (BRCA 1/2 [germline/somatic] and in other HRR genes) Measurements were done at baseline | 0 months - Measurements were done at baseline |
| Deficiencies in Other Genes Involved in Homologous Recombination | Patient characteristics and medical history Other HRR deficiencies including RAD51C, RAD51D, PALBB2, BRIP1, CHEK1, CHEK2, BARD1, FAM175A, NEN, ATM, EMSY and others Measurements were done at baseline | 0 months - Measurements were done at baseline |
| Surgeries Before Rucaparib | Patient characteristics and medical history Total number of surgeries per patient before treatment started Measurements were done at baseline | 0 months - Measurements were done at baseline |
| Previous Lines | Patient characteristics and medical history: Prior lines of platinum-based chemotherapy | 0-24 months |
| PARPi Before Rucaparib | Patient characteristics and medical history: PARPi treatment before rucaparib Measurements were done at baseline | 0 months - Measurements were done at baseline |
| Average Dose of Rucaparib Received Per 12 Hours | Rucaparib dosing data Descrption: average dose of rucaparib administered (mg/12h) | 0-12 months |
| Rucaparib Drug Exposure | Rucaparib dosing data: mean starting dose, number of dose reductions, reasons for reductions, number of treatment discontinuations, reasons for discontinuations, duration of treatment, and switching of maintenance therapy to another PARP inhibitor (including reasons for switching). Rucaparib drug exposure in months Patient 14-001 has been eliminated for not following the treatment scheme | 0-24 months |
| Dose Reductions | Rucaparib dosing data: mean starting dose, number of dose reductions, reasons for reductions, number of treatment discontinuations, reasons for discontinuations, duration of treatment, and switching of maintenance therapy to another PARP inhibitor (including reasons for switching). Specific description: How many dose reductions had to be conducted on each patient *Patient 14-001 from treatment group has been eliminated by not following the tratment scheme | 0-12 months |
| Number of Dose Interruptions | Rucaparib dosing data: mean starting dose, number of dose reductions, reasons for reductions, number of treatment discontinuations, reasons for discontinuations, duration of treatment, and switching of maintenance therapy to another PARP inhibitor (including reasons for switching). Specific description: How many dose interruptions had to be conducted on each patient *Patient 14-001 from treatment group has been eliminated by not following the tratment scheme | 0-12 months |
| Duration of Response (DoR) | Rucaparib efficacy data: best response rates in the treatment indication patients, duration of response and PFS in the treatment indication patients, PFS in the maintenance indication patients, radiological response to chemotherapy in maintenance patients (and impact of response on patient evolution). For maintenance patients: Duration of response has been calculated taking into account the date of CR or RP prior to RAP until progression (on last follow date) during Rucaparib as a maintenance treatment. For treatment patients: Duration of response has been calculated taking into account the best response date (PR or CR) during Rucaparib until progression of follow-up date (Only patients with PR or CR as best overall response) | 0-36 months |
| End of Treatment | Rucaparib dosing data: mean starting dose, number of dose reductions, reasons for reductions, number of treatment discontinuations, reasons for discontinuations, duration of treatment, and switching of maintenance therapy to another PARP inhibitor (including reasons for switching). Description: Rucaparib exposure termination (reasons) | 0-24 months |
| Objective Response Rate (ORR) | Rucaparib efficacy data ORR: Confirmed best overall tumor response of CR or PR according to RECIST v1.1 or Response and normalization or Response according to Rustin criteria. The RECIST v1.1 answer prevailed over the Rustin criterion answer except where RECIST is 'Not assessable' and Rustin criterion is different than 'Not assessable'. ORR was calculated only on the treatment population and not on the maintenance population. *This measurement was only taken in participants from the treatment group as these present an active disease, therefore Rucaparib was administered in order to reduce tumoral charge or control tumor progression. On the other hand, participants from the maintenance group have already responded to previous treatments, and rucaparib was administered I order to maintain response rate and/or delay progression, which was measured using "free-progression survival". | 0-24 months |
| Progression-free Survival (PFS) | Rucaparib efficacy data: best response rates in the treatment indication patients, duration of response and PFS in the treatment indication patients, PFS in the maintenance indication patients, radiological response to chemotherapy in maintenance patients (and impact of response on patient evolution). It represents the length of time during and after treatment that a patient lives with the disease, but without it getting worse. | 0-24 months |
| Radiological Best Overall Response | Rucaparib efficacy data Radiological best overall response - Only 19 radiologically evaluable patients (treatment group only) *This measurement was only taken in participants from the treatment group as these present an active disease, therefore Rucaparib was administered in order to reduce tumoral charge or control tumor progression. On the other hand, participants from the maintenance group have already responded to previous treatments, and rucaparib was administered I order to maintain response rate and/or delay progression, which was measured using "free-progression survival". | 0-24 months |
| Biological Best Overall Response | Rucaparib efficacy data: best response rates in the treatment indication patients, duration of response and PFS in the treatment indication patients, PFS in the maintenance indication patients, radiological response to chemotherapy in maintenance patients (and impact of response on patient evolution). Biological best overall response - Only 16 assessable patients (Treatment arm only) *This measurement was only taken in participants from the treatment group as these present an active disease, therefore Rucaparib was administered in order to reduce tumoral charge or control tumor progression. On the other hand, participants from the maintenance group have already responded to previous treatments, and rucaparib was administered I order to maintain response rate and/or delay progression, which was measured using "free-progression survival". | 0-24 months |
| Málaga |
| Andalusia |
| 29010 |
| Spain |
| Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío | Seville | Andalusia | 41013 | Spain |
| Hospital Universitario Nuestra Señora de Valme | Seville | Andalusia | 41014 | Spain |
| Hospital General San Jorge | Huesca | Aragon | 22004 | Spain |
| Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa | Zaragoza | Aragon | 50009 | Spain |
| Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet | Zaragoza | Aragon | 50009 | Spain |
| Hospital Universitario Son Espases | Palma de Mallorca | Balearic Islands | 07120 | Spain |
| Hospital Universitario de Araba Txagorritxu | Vitoria-Gasteiz | Basque Country | 01009 | Spain |
| Hospital del Mar | Barcelona | Catalonia | 08003 | Spain |
| Hospital Clínic i Provincial | Barcelona | Catalonia | 08036 | Spain |
| Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Pontevedra | Pontevedra | Galicia | 36071 | Spain |
| Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada | Fuenlabrada | Madrid | 28942 | Spain |
| Clínica Universidad de Navarra | Madrid | Madrid | 28027 | Spain |
| MD Anderson Cancer Center | Madrid | Madrid | 28033 | Spain |
| Hospital Clínico San Carlos | Madrid | Madrid | 28040 | Spain |
| Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz | Madrid | Madrid | 28040 | Spain |
| Hospital Universitario 12 Octubre | Madrid | Madrid | 28041 | Spain |
| Centro Integral Oncológico Clara Campal | Madrid | Madrid | 28050 | Spain |
| Hospital Universitario Infanta Sofía | San Sebastián de los Reyes | Madrid | 28702 | Spain |
| Instituto Valenciano De Oncologia | Valencia | Valencia | 46009 | Spain |
| Hospital Universitari i Politecnic La Fe | Valencia | Valencia | 46026 | Spain |
| Hospital Público Lluis Alcanyis | Xàtiva | Valencia | 46800 | Spain |
| FG001 | Rucaparib - Maintenance | The population will include all patients who received at least one dose of rucaparib as part of the RAP in GEICO-associated hospitals. The sample size will be based on the accrual rate of the RAP and the date of rucaparib launch in Spain. Studied patients were the ones recruited between July 2020 and February 2021 Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients without medical record available (lost, empty or unretrievable clinical information). Rucaparib was given as maintenance or Pt-resistant and Pt-sensitive treatment This group includes: Maintenance therapy in patients after a platinum-sensitive relapse in response |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
Histological diagnosis of high-grade epithelian ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer treated in the context of rucaparib access program (RAP) in Spain (RECRUITED Between July 2020 and February 2021) Adult women (18 years or more at the time of diagnosis).
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Rucaparib - Treatment | The population will include all patients who received at least one dose of rucaparib as part of the RAP in GEICO-associated hospitals. The sample size will be based on the accrual rate of the RAP and the date of rucaparib launch in Spain. Studied patients were the ones recruited between July 2020 and February 2021 Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients without medical record available (lost, empty or unretrievable clinical information). Rucaparib was given as maintenance or Pt-resistant and Pt-sensitive treatment This group includes: Platinum-sensitive BRCA-mutated patients after progression, and BRCA-mutated patients who are currently platinum-resistant. |
| BG001 | Rucaparib Maintenance | The population will include all patients who received at least one dose of rucaparib as part of the RAP in GEICO-associated hospitals. The sample size will be based on the accrual rate of the RAP and the date of rucaparib launch in Spain. Studied patients were the ones recruited between July 2020 and February 2021 Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients without medical record available (lost, empty or unretrievable clinical information). Rucaparib was given as maintenance or Pt-resistant and Pt-sensitive treatment This group includes: Maintenance therapy in patients after a platinum-sensitive relapse in response |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | age of the participant | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| ||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Region of Enrollment | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Existence of measurable disease before treatment | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| ECOG | ECOG Performance Status Scale 0 Fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction
| Count of Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||||||
| Weight | Weight in Kg | Weight data from all particpants could not be retrieved | Mean | Standard Deviation | Kilograms |
| |||||||||||||
| Brain metastasis | Existence of brain metastasis before treatment | Number | participants |
| |||||||||||||||
| Relevant comorbidities | Presence of other relevant disease, such as artherial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), Ischemic cardiomyopathy, cerebovascular disease, obesity or other relevant conditions | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Number of Participants With Relevant Co-morbidities | Patient characteristics and medical history Detected diseases include: arterial hypertension, diabetes melliutus, COPD, ischemic cardiomyopathy, cerebrovascular disease, obesity, etc. Measurements were done at baseline | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 0 months - Measurements were done at baseline |
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Other Previous Cancers? | Patient characteristics and medical history. Descriptive statistics: Other cancers present during trial including endometrial, breast , colorrectal, lung or other cancers Measurements were done at baseline | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 0 months - Measurements were done at baseline |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Family History of Cancers? | Patient characteristics and medical history Family history of other cancers including ovarian, breast and others Measurements were done at baseline | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 0 months - Measurements were done at baseline |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | FIGO STAGE | Stage = tumor size and location; higher stage = more spread metastasis I Tumor confined to the corpus uteri IA No or less than half myometrial invasion IB Invasion equal to or more than half of the myometrium IC IA+IB + ascites IC1 surgical spill IC2 Capsule rupture before surgery or tumor on ovarian surface II Tumor invades cervical stroma, but does not extend beyond the uterus III Local and/or regional spread of the tumor IIIA Tumor invades the serosa of the corpus uteri and/or adnexae IIIA2 involvement of uterine subserosa or spread through uterine serosa IIIB Vaginal involvement and/or parametrial involvement IIIC Metastases to pelvic and/or para-aortic lymph nodes IIIC1 Positive pelvic nodes IIIC2 Positive para-aortic nodes with or without positive pelvic lymph nodes IV Tumor invades bladder and/or bowel mucosa, and/or distant metastases IVA Tumor invasion of bladder and/or bowel mucosa IVB Distant metastasis (intra-abdominal metastases and/or inguinal nodes) | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 0 months - Measurements were done at baseline |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Tumor Histology | Patient characteristics and medical history Tumor histology history Measurements were done at baseline | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 0 months - Measurements were done at baseline |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | BCRA Status | Patient characteristics and medical history mutational status (BRCA 1/2 [germline/somatic] and in other HRR genes) Measurements were done at baseline | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 0 months - Measurements were done at baseline |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Deficiencies in Other Genes Involved in Homologous Recombination | Patient characteristics and medical history Other HRR deficiencies including RAD51C, RAD51D, PALBB2, BRIP1, CHEK1, CHEK2, BARD1, FAM175A, NEN, ATM, EMSY and others Measurements were done at baseline | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 0 months - Measurements were done at baseline |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Surgeries Before Rucaparib | Patient characteristics and medical history Total number of surgeries per patient before treatment started Measurements were done at baseline | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 0 months - Measurements were done at baseline |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Previous Lines | Patient characteristics and medical history: Prior lines of platinum-based chemotherapy | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Treatment lines | 0-24 months |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | PARPi Before Rucaparib | Patient characteristics and medical history: PARPi treatment before rucaparib Measurements were done at baseline | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 0 months - Measurements were done at baseline |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Average Dose of Rucaparib Received Per 12 Hours | Rucaparib dosing data Descrption: average dose of rucaparib administered (mg/12h) | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | mg/12h | 0-12 months |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Rucaparib Drug Exposure | Rucaparib dosing data: mean starting dose, number of dose reductions, reasons for reductions, number of treatment discontinuations, reasons for discontinuations, duration of treatment, and switching of maintenance therapy to another PARP inhibitor (including reasons for switching). Rucaparib drug exposure in months Patient 14-001 has been eliminated for not following the treatment scheme | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 0-24 months |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Dose Reductions | Rucaparib dosing data: mean starting dose, number of dose reductions, reasons for reductions, number of treatment discontinuations, reasons for discontinuations, duration of treatment, and switching of maintenance therapy to another PARP inhibitor (including reasons for switching). Specific description: How many dose reductions had to be conducted on each patient *Patient 14-001 from treatment group has been eliminated by not following the tratment scheme | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 0-12 months |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Number of Dose Interruptions | Rucaparib dosing data: mean starting dose, number of dose reductions, reasons for reductions, number of treatment discontinuations, reasons for discontinuations, duration of treatment, and switching of maintenance therapy to another PARP inhibitor (including reasons for switching). Specific description: How many dose interruptions had to be conducted on each patient *Patient 14-001 from treatment group has been eliminated by not following the tratment scheme | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 0-12 months |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Duration of Response (DoR) | Rucaparib efficacy data: best response rates in the treatment indication patients, duration of response and PFS in the treatment indication patients, PFS in the maintenance indication patients, radiological response to chemotherapy in maintenance patients (and impact of response on patient evolution). For maintenance patients: Duration of response has been calculated taking into account the date of CR or RP prior to RAP until progression (on last follow date) during Rucaparib as a maintenance treatment. For treatment patients: Duration of response has been calculated taking into account the best response date (PR or CR) during Rucaparib until progression of follow-up date (Only patients with PR or CR as best overall response) | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | months | 0-36 months |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | End of Treatment | Rucaparib dosing data: mean starting dose, number of dose reductions, reasons for reductions, number of treatment discontinuations, reasons for discontinuations, duration of treatment, and switching of maintenance therapy to another PARP inhibitor (including reasons for switching). Description: Rucaparib exposure termination (reasons) | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 0-24 months |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Objective Response Rate (ORR) | Rucaparib efficacy data ORR: Confirmed best overall tumor response of CR or PR according to RECIST v1.1 or Response and normalization or Response according to Rustin criteria. The RECIST v1.1 answer prevailed over the Rustin criterion answer except where RECIST is 'Not assessable' and Rustin criterion is different than 'Not assessable'. ORR was calculated only on the treatment population and not on the maintenance population. *This measurement was only taken in participants from the treatment group as these present an active disease, therefore Rucaparib was administered in order to reduce tumoral charge or control tumor progression. On the other hand, participants from the maintenance group have already responded to previous treatments, and rucaparib was administered I order to maintain response rate and/or delay progression, which was measured using "free-progression survival". | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 0-24 months |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Progression-free Survival (PFS) | Rucaparib efficacy data: best response rates in the treatment indication patients, duration of response and PFS in the treatment indication patients, PFS in the maintenance indication patients, radiological response to chemotherapy in maintenance patients (and impact of response on patient evolution). It represents the length of time during and after treatment that a patient lives with the disease, but without it getting worse. | Posted | Median | 95% Confidence Interval | months | 0-24 months |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Radiological Best Overall Response | Rucaparib efficacy data Radiological best overall response - Only 19 radiologically evaluable patients (treatment group only) *This measurement was only taken in participants from the treatment group as these present an active disease, therefore Rucaparib was administered in order to reduce tumoral charge or control tumor progression. On the other hand, participants from the maintenance group have already responded to previous treatments, and rucaparib was administered I order to maintain response rate and/or delay progression, which was measured using "free-progression survival". | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 0-24 months |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Biological Best Overall Response | Rucaparib efficacy data: best response rates in the treatment indication patients, duration of response and PFS in the treatment indication patients, PFS in the maintenance indication patients, radiological response to chemotherapy in maintenance patients (and impact of response on patient evolution). Biological best overall response - Only 16 assessable patients (Treatment arm only) *This measurement was only taken in participants from the treatment group as these present an active disease, therefore Rucaparib was administered in order to reduce tumoral charge or control tumor progression. On the other hand, participants from the maintenance group have already responded to previous treatments, and rucaparib was administered I order to maintain response rate and/or delay progression, which was measured using "free-progression survival". | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 0-24 months |
|
1 year
Retrospective study
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Rucaparib - Treatment | The population will include all patients who received at least one dose of rucaparib as part of the RAP in GEICO-associated hospitals. The sample size will be based on the accrual rate of the RAP and the date of rucaparib launch in Spain. Studied patients were the ones recruited between July 2020 and February 2021 Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients without medical record available (lost, empty or unretrievable clinical information). Rucaparib was given as maintenance or Pt-resistant and Pt-sensitive treatment This group includes: Platinum-sensitive BRCA-mutated patients after progression, and BRCA-mutated patients who are currently platinum-resistant. | 24 | 33 | 0 | 33 | 28 | 33 |
| EG001 | Rucaparib - Maintenance | The population will include all patients who received at least one dose of rucaparib as part of the RAP in GEICO-associated hospitals. The sample size will be based on the accrual rate of the RAP and the date of rucaparib launch in Spain. Studied patients were the ones recruited between July 2020 and February 2021 Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients without medical record available (lost, empty or unretrievable clinical information). Rucaparib was given as maintenance or Pt-resistant and Pt-sensitive treatment This group includes: Maintenance therapy in patients after a platinum-sensitive relapse in response | 8 | 18 | 0 | 18 | 16 | 18 |
Not provided
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| GGT increased | Hepatobiliary disorders | Systematic Assessment | gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) increased |
| |
| Neutropenia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | Systematic Assessment | Neutrophil count decreased |
| |
| Thrombocytopenia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | Systematic Assessment | Platelet count decreased |
| |
| Abdominal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| ALT increased | Hepatobiliary disorders | Systematic Assessment | Alanine transaminase (ALT) increased |
| |
| ALP increased | Renal and urinary disorders | Systematic Assessment | Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP)increased |
| |
| AST increased | Hepatobiliary disorders | Systematic Assessment | Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) increased |
| |
| Asthenia | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Colonic obstruction | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Constipation | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Creatinine increased | Renal and urinary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Diarrhea | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Dysgeusia | Nervous system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Fatigue | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Hyponatremia | Endocrine disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Intestinal obstruction | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Myelodysplastic syndrome | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Pleural efussion | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Pruritus | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| President | Grupo Español de Investigación en Cáncer de Ovario | 648495298 | ensayos@sorpromed.com |
| May 10, 2023 |
| Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000077216 | Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial |
| D005185 | Fallopian Tube Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002277 | Carcinoma |
| D009375 | Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial |
| D009370 | Neoplasms by Histologic Type |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D010051 | Ovarian Neoplasms |
| D004701 | Endocrine Gland Neoplasms |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D010049 | Ovarian Diseases |
| D000291 | Adnexal Diseases |
| D005831 | Genital Diseases, Female |
| D052776 | Female Urogenital Diseases |
| D005261 | Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications |
| D000091642 | Urogenital Diseases |
| D005833 | Genital Neoplasms, Female |
| D014565 | Urogenital Neoplasms |
| D000091662 | Genital Diseases |
| D004700 | Endocrine System Diseases |
| D006058 | Gonadal Disorders |
| D005184 | Fallopian Tube Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C531549 | rucaparib |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Rucaparib - Maintenance |
"The population will include all patients who received at least one dose of rucaparib as part of the RAP in GEICO-associated hospitals. The sample size will be based on the accrual rate of the RAP and the date of rucaparib launch in Spain. Studied patients were the ones recruited between July 2020 and February 2021 Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients without medical record available (lost, empty or unretrievable clinical information). Rucaparib was given as maintenance or Pt-resistant and Pt-sensitive treatment This group includes: Maintenance therapy in patients after a platinum-sensitive relapse in response" |
|
|
"The population will include all patients who received at least one dose of rucaparib as part of the RAP in GEICO-associated hospitals. The sample size will be based on the accrual rate of the RAP and the date of rucaparib launch in Spain. Studied patients were the ones recruited between July 2020 and February 2021 Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients without medical record available (lost, empty or unretrievable clinical information). Rucaparib was given as maintenance or Pt-resistant and Pt-sensitive treatment This group includes: Maintenance therapy in patients after a platinum-sensitive relapse in response" |
|
|
| OG001 | Rucaparib - Treatment | "The population will include all patients who received at least one dose of rucaparib as part of the RAP in GEICO-associated hospitals. The sample size will be based on the accrual rate of the RAP and the date of rucaparib launch in Spain. Studied patients were the ones recruited between July 2020 and February 2021 Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients without medical record available (lost, empty or unretrievable clinical information). Rucaparib was given as maintenance or Pt-resistant and Pt-sensitive treatment This group includes: Platinum-sensitive BRCA-mutated patients after progression, and BRCA-mutated patients who are currently platinum-resistant. |
|
|
"The population will include all patients who received at least one dose of rucaparib as part of the RAP in GEICO-associated hospitals. The sample size will be based on the accrual rate of the RAP and the date of rucaparib launch in Spain.
Studied patients were the ones recruited between July 2020 and February 2021
Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria:
1. Patients without medical record available (lost, empty or unretrievable clinical information).
Rucaparib was given as maintenance or Pt-resistant and Pt-sensitive treatment
This group includes: Maintenance therapy in patients after a platinum-sensitive relapse in response"
|
|
"The population will include all patients who received at least one dose of rucaparib as part of the RAP in GEICO-associated hospitals. The sample size will be based on the accrual rate of the RAP and the date of rucaparib launch in Spain. Studied patients were the ones recruited between July 2020 and February 2021 Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients without medical record available (lost, empty or unretrievable clinical information). Rucaparib was given as maintenance or Pt-resistant and Pt-sensitive treatment This group includes: Maintenance therapy in patients after a platinum-sensitive relapse in response" |
|
|
| Rucaparib - Maintenance |
"The population will include all patients who received at least one dose of rucaparib as part of the RAP in GEICO-associated hospitals. The sample size will be based on the accrual rate of the RAP and the date of rucaparib launch in Spain. Studied patients were the ones recruited between July 2020 and February 2021 Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients without medical record available (lost, empty or unretrievable clinical information). Rucaparib was given as maintenance or Pt-resistant and Pt-sensitive treatment This group includes: Maintenance therapy in patients after a platinum-sensitive relapse in response" |
|
|
"The population will include all patients who received at least one dose of rucaparib as part of the RAP in GEICO-associated hospitals. The sample size will be based on the accrual rate of the RAP and the date of rucaparib launch in Spain. Studied patients were the ones recruited between July 2020 and February 2021 Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients without medical record available (lost, empty or unretrievable clinical information). Rucaparib was given as maintenance or Pt-resistant and Pt-sensitive treatment This group includes: Maintenance therapy in patients after a platinum-sensitive relapse in response" |
|
|
|
|
The population will include all patients who received at least one dose of rucaparib as part of the RAP in GEICO-associated hospitals. The sample size will be based on the accrual rate of the RAP and the date of rucaparib launch in Spain.
Studied patients were the ones recruited between July 2020 and February 2021
Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria:
1. Patients without medical record available (lost, empty or unretrievable clinical information).
Rucaparib was given as maintenance or Pt-resistant and Pt-sensitive treatment
This group includes: Maintenance therapy in patients after a platinum-sensitive relapse in response
|
|
T"The population will include all patients who received at least one dose of rucaparib as part of the RAP in GEICO-associated hospitals. The sample size will be based on the accrual rate of the RAP and the date of rucaparib launch in Spain.
Studied patients were the ones recruited between July 2020 and February 2021
Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria:
1. Patients without medical record available (lost, empty or unretrievable clinical information).
Rucaparib was given as maintenance or Pt-resistant and Pt-sensitive treatment
This group includes: Maintenance therapy in patients after a platinum-sensitive relapse in response"
|
|
| OG001 | Rucaparib - Maintenance | "The population will include all patients who received at least one dose of rucaparib as part of the RAP in GEICO-associated hospitals. The sample size will be based on the accrual rate of the RAP and the date of rucaparib launch in Spain. Studied patients were the ones recruited between July 2020 and February 2021 Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients without medical record available (lost, empty or unretrievable clinical information). Rucaparib was given as maintenance or Pt-resistant and Pt-sensitive treatment This group includes: Maintenance therapy in patients after a platinum-sensitive relapse in response" |
|
|
| OG001 | Rucaparib - Maintenance | "The population will include all patients who received at least one dose of rucaparib as part of the RAP in GEICO-associated hospitals. The sample size will be based on the accrual rate of the RAP and the date of rucaparib launch in Spain. Studied patients were the ones recruited between July 2020 and February 2021 Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients without medical record available (lost, empty or unretrievable clinical information). Rucaparib was given as maintenance or Pt-resistant and Pt-sensitive treatment This group includes: Maintenance therapy in patients after a platinum-sensitive relapse in response" |
|
|
| OG001 | Rucaparib - Maintenance | "The population will include all patients who received at least one dose of rucaparib as part of the RAP in GEICO-associated hospitals. The sample size will be based on the accrual rate of the RAP and the date of rucaparib launch in Spain. Studied patients were the ones recruited between July 2020 and February 2021 Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients without medical record available (lost, empty or unretrievable clinical information). Rucaparib was given as maintenance or Pt-resistant and Pt-sensitive treatment This group includes: Maintenance therapy in patients after a platinum-sensitive relapse in response" |
|
|
| OG001 | Rucaparib - Maintenance | The population will include all patients who received at least one dose of rucaparib as part of the RAP in GEICO-associated hospitals. The sample size will be based on the accrual rate of the RAP and the date of rucaparib launch in Spain. Studied patients were the ones recruited between July 2020 and February 2021 Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients without medical record available (lost, empty or unretrievable clinical information). Rucaparib was given as maintenance or Pt-resistant and Pt-sensitive treatment This group includes: Maintenance therapy in patients after a platinum-sensitive relapse in response |
|
|
| OG001 | Rucaparib - Maintenance | "The population will include all patients who received at least one dose of rucaparib as part of the RAP in GEICO-associated hospitals. The sample size will be based on the accrual rate of the RAP and the date of rucaparib launch in Spain. Studied patients were the ones recruited between July 2020 and February 2021 Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients without medical record available (lost, empty or unretrievable clinical information). Rucaparib was given as maintenance or Pt-resistant and Pt-sensitive treatment This group includes: Maintenance therapy in patients after a platinum-sensitive relapse in response" |
|
|
|
|
| OG001 | Rucaparib Maintenance | The population will include all patients who received at least one dose of rucaparib as part of the RAP in GEICO-associated hospitals. The sample size will be based on the accrual rate of the RAP and the date of rucaparib launch in Spain. Studied patients were the ones recruited between July 2020 and February 2021 Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients without medical record available (lost, empty or unretrievable clinical information). Rucaparib was given as maintenance or Pt-resistant and Pt-sensitive treatment This group includes: Maintenance therapy in patients after a platinum-sensitive relapse in response |
|
|
|
|
|
|