Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7OT2OD028190-02 | U.S. NIH Grant/Contract | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Indiana University | OTHER |
| National Institutes of Health (NIH) | NIH |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to examine if sending mild electrical signals just under your skin will improve atrial fibrillation symptoms by controlling your heart rate.
Patients will have a 1:1 randomization to receive subcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (ScNS) to observe if the stimulation can reduce atrial fibrillation burden in patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF). All subjects will undergo the implant of a neurostimulator lead. The experimental group will receive stimulation and the control group will not receive stimulation. All subjects will complete the same follow up visits to compare the 2 groups.
Primary Objective: To test the hypothesis that chronic subcutaneous nerve stimulation can reduce AF burden in patients with severe symptomatic AF unresponsive to conventional therapies
The secondary objective:
To test the hypotheses that the effect of ScNS on the following endpoints is different between the two randomization groups:
The study will enroll patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation unresponsive to conventional therapy defined by not responding to at least 1 antiarrhythmic drug. The study will enroll 30 patients, including 15 men and 15 women between the 18 and 75 years old. There will be no sex/gender/racial/ethnic based exclusion. Patients will be enrolled from the Cedars Sinai Medical Center.
The patients will undergo surgical implantation of an externalized lead under the skin on the chest wall. The wire is then connected to a neurostimulator. The experimental group (Group A) will receive ScNS (3.5mA) for two weeks. The sham group (Group B) will receive sham (0 mA) stimulation for two weeks. The AF burden will be assessed by a 7-day mobile cardiac telemetry device provided by Preventice. An additional mobile cardiac telemetry device, Bittium Faros, will also be worn at similar time points to monitor skin sympathetic nerve activity. An Apple watch will be used to collect additional information on the frequencies of AF between the Baseline Visit until the 3 Month Visit 7 Day Mobile Cardiac Telemetry is complete. After completion of the week 3 visit, the sham group (Group B) will be able to receive ScNS (3.5 mA) for two weeks. The AF burden will be assessed post-procedure by mobile cardiac telemetry by Preventice and Bittium Faros
Study duration: 36 Months
Subject duration: up to 5 months.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental Group | Experimental | Will receive stimulation ScNS at 3.5mA output |
|
| Control Group | Sham Comparator | Does not receive therapy |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Device Implant with Active Treatment | Device | ScNS at 3.5mA output for 2 weeks |
| |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in AF Burden | Using mobile cardiac telemetry (MCT) to observe if AF burden is lower at 2 Weeks compared to Baseline in the active treatment group than the sham control group | 2 weeks |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Ventricular Rate Control | Improved ventricular rate control during AF. AF-Free time was separated. Rate control during AF was categorized as the VR <=110 BPM stage. | 3 Months |
| Average Skin Sympathetic Nerve Activity (SKNA) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
18 to 75 years of age
Symptomatic Paroxysmal AF.
Unresponsive to conventional therapy is defined by not responding to at least 1 antiarrhythmic drug (class I, class III, or atrioventricular nodal blocker).
The left atrial size <50 mm by transthoracic echocardiography documented by eligibility visit echocardiogram
Documented atrial fibrillation as defined as atrial fibrillation >30 seconds in duration with an atrial fibrillation burden determined by a minimum of 7 days of continuous ePatch monitoring within 6 months before surgery.
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Peng-Sheng Chen, MD | Cedars-Sinai Medical Center | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CedarsSinaiMC | Los Angeles | California | 90048 | United States |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
46 subjects were enrolled in the study and underwent mobile cardiac telemetry and echocardiogram to determine eligibility. Out of this group, 16 subjects were deemed eligible and completed a baseline visit prior to the procedure and randomization.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Experimental Group | Will receive stimulation ScNS at 3.5mA output Device Implant with Active Treatment: ScNS at 3.5mA output for 2 weeks |
| FG001 | Control (Sham) Group | Does not receive therapy Device Implant without Active Treatment: No device output for 2 weeks. After Week 3, has the option to forego the Week 12 Follow Up visit and, instead, repeat device implantation to crossover to the experimental group to receive stimulation. Will repeat all visits and assessments. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Device Implantation and Randomization |
| |||||||||||||
| Week 1 Follow Up |
| |||||||||||||
| Week 2 Follow Up and Device Removal |
| |||||||||||||
| Week 3 Follow Up |
| |||||||||||||
| Crossover Option |
| |||||||||||||
| Week 12/Month 3 Follow Up |
|
Due to low baseline burden (<1%), 2 randomized subjects from each group were excluded from efficacy analysis. Therefore, although randomized, baseline measures were not and analyzed.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Experimental Group | Will receive stimulation ScNS at 3.5mA output Device Implant with Active Treatment: ScNS at 3.5mA output for 2 weeks |
| BG001 | Control Group | Does not receive therapy Device Implant without Active Treatment: No device output for 2 weeks |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Due to low baseline burden (<1%), 2 randomized subjects from each group were excluded from efficacy analysis. |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Change in AF Burden | Using mobile cardiac telemetry (MCT) to observe if AF burden is lower at 2 Weeks compared to Baseline in the active treatment group than the sham control group | We initially randomized 16 patients with paroxysmal AF. However, the DSMB decided that those with < 1% AF per week during the eligibility visit did not have sufficient AF burden to detect therapy effects. Therefore, all patients (2 in each group) with < 1% baseline AF burden were excluded from the analysis as screen failures. The remaining 12 included 8 men and 4 women with an average age of 60.9 ± 10.2 years | Posted | Mean | Inter-Quartile Range | percentage of time in AF | 2 weeks |
|
Adverse event data was collected for participants from Eligibility timepoint until Week 12/Month 3 MCT monitoring was completed.
A crossover option was only given to those randomized to sham group initially, after the completion of the primary endpoint (Week 3 FU).
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Experimental Group | Will receive stimulation ScNS at 3.5mA output Device Implant with Active Treatment: ScNS at 3.5mA output for 2 weeks |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NA (elective left heart catheterization) | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment | Underwent elective left heart catheterization (DES to RCA) |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NA (Skin Irritation) | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment | Skin irritation from MCT patch electrode |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr. Peng-Sheng Chen | Cedars-Sinai Medical Center | 310-967-2707 | Peng-Sheng.Chen@cshs.org |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Apr 19, 2023 | Jun 23, 2025 | Prot_SAP_002.pdf |
| ICF | No | No | Yes | Informed Consent Form | Nov 21, 2022 | Oct 18, 2024 | ICF_001.pdf |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001281 | Atrial Fibrillation |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001145 | Arrhythmias, Cardiac |
| D006331 | Heart Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D004864 | Equipment and Supplies |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Patients will have a 1:1 randomization to receive subcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (ScNS) to observe if the stimulation can reduce atrial fibrillation burden in patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF). All subjects will undergo the implant of a neurostimulator lead.
The experimental group will receive stimulation and the control group will not receive stimulation. All subjects will complete the same follow up visits comparing the 2 groups. The control group will have an option to cross over to the experimental group 3 weeks post-randomization to receive the stimulation. They will repeat the baseline visit, procedure visit and all follow-up visits post-procedure.
Not provided
Not provided
Subjects will not be aware whether the ScNS is turned on or off. However, after three weeks from the initial surgery, control subjects that decide to the second procedure will be aware of what group they were randomized to.
| Device Implant without Active Treatment |
| Device |
No device output for 2 weeks |
|
Reduction of SKNA taken from ME6000 (biomonitor) during Six Minute Walk test.
SKNA is sympathetic nerve activity (SNA) recording from a skin-patch electrode used with the ME6000.
| 3 months |
| Quality of Life - EQ-5D-5L | Improvement of quality of life as measured by the EQ-5D-5L | 3 months |
| Quality of Life - AFEQT | Improvement of quality of life as measured by the Atrial Fibrillation Effect on QualiTy-of-Life (AFEQT) Questionnaire. A score of 0 indicates the most severe symptoms or disability and a score of 100 indicates no limitation or disability. Thus, higher scores on the AFEQT instrument indicate better health status. | 3 months |
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Mean |
| Standard Deviation |
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Due to low baseline burden (<1%), 2 randomized subjects from each group were excluded from efficacy analysis. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Due to low baseline burden (<1%), 2 randomized subjects from each group were excluded from efficacy analysis. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Due to low baseline burden (<1%), 2 randomized subjects from each group were excluded from efficacy analysis. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Due to low baseline burden (<1%), 2 randomized subjects from each group were excluded from efficacy analysis. | Number | participants |
|
| Smoking | Due to low baseline burden (<1%), 2 randomized subjects from each group were excluded from efficacy analysis. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Alcohol abuse | Due to low baseline burden (<1%), 2 randomized subjects from each group were excluded from efficacy analysis. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Hypertension | Due to low baseline burden (<1%), 2 randomized subjects from each group were excluded from efficacy analysis. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Stroke | Due to low baseline burden (<1%), 2 randomized subjects from each group were excluded from efficacy analysis. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Coronary Artery Disease | Due to low baseline burden (<1%), 2 randomized subjects from each group were excluded from efficacy analysis. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Hyperlipidemia | Due to low baseline burden (<1%), 2 randomized subjects from each group were excluded from efficacy analysis. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) | Due to low baseline burden (<1%), 2 randomized subjects from each group were excluded from efficacy analysis. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) | Due to low baseline burden (<1%), 2 randomized subjects from each group were excluded from efficacy analysis. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Peripheral vascular disease (PVD) | Due to low baseline burden (<1%), 2 randomized subjects from each group were excluded from efficacy analysis. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| COPD | Due to low baseline burden (<1%), 2 randomized subjects from each group were excluded from efficacy analysis. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Chronic renal failure/ kidney injury | Due to low baseline burden (<1%), 2 randomized subjects from each group were excluded from efficacy analysis. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Asthma | Due to low baseline burden (<1%), 2 randomized subjects from each group were excluded from efficacy analysis. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Diabetes mellitus | Due to low baseline burden (<1%), 2 randomized subjects from each group were excluded from efficacy analysis. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| On chronic dialysis | Due to low baseline burden (<1%), 2 randomized subjects from each group were excluded from efficacy analysis. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Sleep disordered breathing | Due to low baseline burden (<1%), 2 randomized subjects from each group were excluded from efficacy analysis. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Previous open heart surgery | Due to low baseline burden (<1%), 2 randomized subjects from each group were excluded from efficacy analysis. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Coronary Artery Bypass Graft | Due to low baseline burden (<1%), 2 randomized subjects from each group were excluded from efficacy analysis. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Initial weight | Due to low baseline burden (<1%), 2 randomized subjects from each group were excluded from efficacy analysis. | Mean | Standard Deviation | kilograms |
|
| BMI | Due to low baseline burden (<1%), 2 randomized subjects from each group were excluded from efficacy analysis. | Mean | Standard Deviation | kg/m^2 |
|
| OG001 |
| Control Group |
Does not receive therapy Device Implant without Active Treatment: No device output for 2 weeks |
|
|
| Secondary | Ventricular Rate Control | Improved ventricular rate control during AF. AF-Free time was separated. Rate control during AF was categorized as the VR <=110 BPM stage. | 1 patient who crossed over to the stimulation group did not have the 12-week visit | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 3 Months |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Average Skin Sympathetic Nerve Activity (SKNA) | Reduction of SKNA taken from ME6000 (biomonitor) during Six Minute Walk test. SKNA is sympathetic nerve activity (SNA) recording from a skin-patch electrode used with the ME6000. | We initially randomized 16 patients with paroxysmal AF. However, the DSMB decided that those with < 1% AF per week during the eligibility visit did not have sufficient AF burden to detect therapy effects. Therefore, all patients (2 in each group) with < 1% baseline AF burden were excluded from the analysis as screen failures. The sham group was given the option to crossover to the experimental group after Week 3. One participant crossed over, therefore for month 3 data, N = 5. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | microvolts | 3 months |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Quality of Life - EQ-5D-5L | Improvement of quality of life as measured by the EQ-5D-5L | EQ-5D-5L index scores range from -0.59 to 1, where 1 is the best possible health state. EQ-5D-5L health scores range from 5 (11111) to 25 (55555), where 5 is the best possible health state. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | 3 months |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Quality of Life - AFEQT | Improvement of quality of life as measured by the Atrial Fibrillation Effect on QualiTy-of-Life (AFEQT) Questionnaire. A score of 0 indicates the most severe symptoms or disability and a score of 100 indicates no limitation or disability. Thus, higher scores on the AFEQT instrument indicate better health status. | Overall or subscale scores range from 0-100. A score of 0 corresponds to complete disability (or responding "extremely" limited, difficult or bothersome to all questions answered), while a score of 100 corresponds to no disability (or responding "not at all" limited, difficult or bothersome to all questions answered). | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | 3 months |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 8 |
| 1 |
| 8 |
| 6 |
| 8 |
| EG001 | Control Group | Does not receive therapy Device Implant without Active Treatment: No device output for 2 weeks | 0 | 8 | 0 | 8 | 7 | 8 |
| EG002 | Control Group Crossed Over to Experimental | 1 sham participant chose to crossover and did not experience any adverse events to report. | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
|
| NA (elective left heart catheterization) | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment | Underwent elective left heart catheterization (PCI to LAD) |
|
| Brief "Black Out" Periods | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment | Hospitalization following a syncopal episode |
|
|
| NA (Bleeding) | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment | Bleeding from the insertion site |
|
| NA (Pain) | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment | Pain localized at lead site/stimulation point |
|
| NA (Goosebumps) | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment | Goosebumps during stimulation |
|
| NA (Hot Flashes) | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment | Hot flashes post-stimulation |
|
| NA (Skin Redness) | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Extremity weakness, swelling, and/or pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment | Neck, back, finger, leg joint pains |
|
| Allergic reaction | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment | Allergic reaction to Tegaderm |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| D013568 |
| Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| VR ≤ 110 bpm |
|
| VR > 110 bpm |
|
| Week 1 |
|
|
| Week 2 |
|
|
| Week 3 |
|
|
| 3 Months |
|
|
| Baseline - Lead 2 - At Rest |
|
|
| Baseline - Lead 1 - Stress |
|
|
| Baseline - Lead 2 - Stress |
|
|
| Baseline - Lead 1 - Recovery |
|
|
| Baseline - Lead 2 - Recovery |
|
|
| Procedure - Lead 1 - At Rest |
|
|
| Procedure - Lead 2 - At Rest |
|
|
| Week 1 - Lead 1 - At Rest |
|
|
| Week 1 - Lead 2 - At Rest |
|
|
| Week 1 - Lead 1 - Stress |
|
|
| Week 1 - Lead 2 - Stress |
|
|
| Week 1 - Lead 1 - Recovery |
|
|
| Week 1 - Lead 2 - Recovery |
|
|
| Week 2 - Lead 1 - At Rest |
|
|
| Week 2 - Lead 2 - At Rest |
|
|
| Week 2 - Lead 1 - Stress |
|
|
| Week 2 - Lead 2 - Stress |
|
|
| Week 2 - Lead 1 - Recovery |
|
|
| Week 2 - Lead 2 - Recovery |
|
|
| Week 3 - Lead 1 - At Rest |
|
|
| Week 3 - Lead 2 - At Rest |
|
|
| Week 3 - Lead 1 - Stress |
|
|
| Week 3 - Lead 2 - Stress |
|
|
| Week 3 - Lead 1 - Recovery |
|
|
| Week 3 - Lead 2 - Recovery |
|
|
| Month 3 - Lead 1 - At Rest |
|
|
| Month 3 - Lead 2 - At Rest |
|
|
| Month 3 - Lead 1 - Stress |
|
|
| Month 3 - Lead 2 - Stress |
|
|
| Month 3 - Lead 1 - Recovery |
|
|
| Month 3 - Lead 2 - Recovery |
|
|
| Week 12 (total score) |
|
| Baseline (index value) |
|
| Week 3 (index value) |
|
| Week 12 (index value) |
|
| Week 12 AFEQT Global Score |
|