Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of this observational prospective study is to assess the change in Dilapan-S rod diameters using transvaginal ultrasound over a period of 12 hours in term women undergoing induction of labor.
On admission for induction, study participants assigned to each group underwent continuous cardiotocography for 20 minutes prior to placement of the Dilapan-S rods (rod size: 4 x 65mm). Placement of the Dilapan-S rods was limited to three physicians with the majority placed by the primary investigator. Placement was completed in a sterile manner under direct visualization and in accordance with the manufacturer's guidelines. The number of rods placed varied per individual and was based on the discretion of the physician. Each participant allocated to the Dilapan-S with saturated gauze group received placement of one, 4x4 inch gauze saturated with 10 cc of normal saline and placed at the level of the external os. Immediately after placement of the Dilapan-S rods, the study participant was asked to complete a patient satisfaction survey.
Pre-specified transvaginal ultrasound assessment was performed at hours 3, 6, 8, and 12 post Dilapan-S placement using a GE Voluson E10 machine with a transvaginal GE RIC 5-9D transducer. Performance of the ultrasound evaluation was limited to the primary investigator and two co-authors of the study. After completion of the 12-hour ultrasound, the Dilapan-S rods and gauze, if used, were removed as per the manufacturer's instructions. The participant was then asked to complete a post Dilapan-S patient satisfaction survey.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pregnant individuals with Dilapan-S only | 22 women received Dilapan-S rods without gauze at start of induction. |
| |
| Pregnant individuals with Dilapan-S plus gauze placement | 22 women received Dilapan-S rods with 1 gauze at start of induction. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gauze | Other | placement of gauze |
| |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Diameter change of Dilapan-S | Rod diameters of Dilapan-S rods were measured via transvaginal ultrasound at 3,6,8, and 12 hours after placement. | 12 hours |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Gauze placement and rod diameter | Rod diameters of Dilapan-S rods plus gauze placement were measured via transvaginal ultrasound at 3,6,8, and 12 hours after placement. | 12 hours |
| Patient satisfaction |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Pregnant individuals at term undergoing labor induction at single academic institution.
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Elizabeth Seagraves, DO | Eastern Virginia Medical School MFM Fellowship | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eastern Virginia Medical School | Norfolk | Virginia | 23501 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 26538408 | Background | Chen W, Xue J, Peprah MK, Wen SW, Walker M, Gao Y, Tang Y. A systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing the use of Foley catheters, misoprostol, and dinoprostone for cervical ripening in the induction of labour. BJOG. 2016 Feb;123(3):346-54. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13456. Epub 2015 Nov 5. | |
| 30089070 | Background |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Recent declines in induction of labor by gestational age | View source |
Not provided
Study protocol, statistical analysis plan, informed consent form were made available. Results from the study will be available to the manufacturer (Medicem) after statistical analysis is completed and will not be shared with the manufacturer during study execution. The manufacturer company will not be involved in data analysis and all data will be independently analyzed by HADSI. The results of this study will be presented at conferences or published in a peer-review journal.
1-2 months after conclusion of study
Results and statistical analysis will be available at the conclusion of the study
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| No gauze |
| Other |
no gauze |
|
Patient satisfaction scores were assessed based on gauze versus no gauze placement.
| 12 hours |
| Grobman WA, Rice MM, Reddy UM, Tita ATN, Silver RM, Mallett G, Hill K, Thom EA, El-Sayed YY, Perez-Delboy A, Rouse DJ, Saade GR, Boggess KA, Chauhan SP, Iams JD, Chien EK, Casey BM, Gibbs RS, Srinivas SK, Swamy GK, Simhan HN, Macones GA; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Labor Induction versus Expectant Management in Low-Risk Nulliparous Women. N Engl J Med. 2018 Aug 9;379(6):513-523. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1800566. |
| Background | American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Induction of Labor. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 107. August 2009. |
| 30790569 | Background | Saad AF, Villarreal J, Eid J, Spencer N, Ellis V, Hankins GD, Saade GR. A randomized controlled trial of Dilapan-S vs Foley balloon for preinduction cervical ripening (DILAFOL trial). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Mar;220(3):275.e1-275.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.01.008. Epub 2019 Feb 18. |
| 25618749 | Background | Drunecky T, Reidingerova M, Plisova M, Dudic M, Gdovinova D, Stoy V. Experimental comparison of properties of natural and synthetic osmotic dilators. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015 Aug;292(2):349-54. doi: 10.1007/s00404-015-3623-3. Epub 2015 Jan 25. |
| 30107363 | Background | Gupta J, Chodankar R, Baev O, Bahlmann F, Brega E, Gala A, Hellmeyer L, Hruban L, Maier J, Mehta P, Murthy A, Ritter M, Saad A, Shmakov R, Suneja A, Zahumensky J, Gdovinova D. Synthetic osmotic dilators in the induction of labour-An international multicentre observational study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018 Oct;229:70-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.08.004. Epub 2018 Aug 3. |
| 22114527 | Background | Chambers DG, Willcourt RJ, Laver AR, Baird JK, Herbert WY. Comparison of Dilapan-S and laminaria for cervical priming before surgical pregnancy termination at 17-22 weeks' gestation. Int J Womens Health. 2011;3:347-52. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S25551. Epub 2011 Oct 20. |
| Background | Abuhamad, A. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology: A Practical Approach. Chapter 1: Basic Physical Principles of Medical Ultrasound. 2014. |
| 29667082 | Background | Sung YT, Wu JS. The Visual Analogue Scale for Rating, Ranking and Paired-Comparison (VAS-RRP): A new technique for psychological measurement. Behav Res Methods. 2018 Aug;50(4):1694-1715. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1041-8. |
| 24735056 | Background | Kliger M, Stahl S, Haddad M, Suzan E, Adler R, Eisenberg E. Measuring the Intensity of Chronic Pain: Are the Visual Analogue Scale and the Verbal Rating Scale Interchangeable? Pain Pract. 2015 Jul;15(6):538-47. doi: 10.1111/papr.12216. Epub 2014 Apr 16. |
| Women's Health Fastfacts | View source |