Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Artificial Intelligence Research Institute, Spanish National Research Council | UNKNOWN |
| University of Helsinki | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Music-Supported Therapy (MST) is a rehabilitation technique to improve the upper extremity motor function of stroke patients through playing musical instruments. A modified version of the MST protocol has been created (hereafter, referred as enriched MST, eMST) to include (i) a home-based self-training program using an app for electronic tablets and (ii) weekly group sessions of musical playing strengthening the motivational and emotional components of music playing. A randomised controlled trial will be conducted to test the effectiveness of this enriched MST (eMST) protocol in improving motor functions, cognition, emotional well-being and quality of life when compared to a program of home-based exercises utilizing the Graded Repetitive Arm Supplementary Program (GRASP). Sixty stroke patients will be recruited and randomly allocated to an eMST group (n=30) or a control GRASP intervention group (n=30). Patients will be evaluated before and after a 10-week intervention, as well as at 3-month follow-up. The primary outcome of the study is the functionality of the paretic upper limb measured with the Action Research Arm Test. Secondary outcomes include other motor and cognitive functions, emotional well-being and quality of life measures as well as self-regulation and self-efficacy outcomes. We hypothesize that patients treated with eMST will show larger improvements in their motor and cognitive functions, emotional well-being and quality of life than patients treated with a home-based GRASP intervention.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enriched Music-Supported Therapy group | Experimental | Participants in the eMST-group will follow a 10-week program of Enriched Music-Supported Therapy. The program comprises 3 individual self-training sessions and 1 group session per week (total program duration: 40 hours). |
|
| Control group | Active Comparator | Participants in the control intervention group will follow the Graded Repetitive Arm Supplementary Program (GRASP, Harris et al., 2009). They will be asked to complete 4 weekly one-hour session for 10 weeks (total program duration: 40 hours). |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Enriched Music-Supported Therapy | Behavioral | Home-based rehabilitation program for stroke patients aimed at improving the upper extremity motor function. The program is based on musical training, combining self-training sessions of music playing using an app for electronic tablets and music therapy group sessions. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Action Research Arm Test | Upper extremity function measure. The measure is a 19-item test divided into four subtests (grasp, grip, pinch and gross movement). For each item, the patient is asked to perform a simple task that involves a functional movement of the affected upper limb. Each task is rated using a 4-point ordinal scale. The maximum possible score is 57 and the minimal clinically important difference is 5.7 points. | immediately after the intervention |
| Change in Action Research Arm Test | Upper extremity function measure. The measure is a 19-item test divided into four subtests (grasp, grip, pinch and gross movement). For each item, the patient is asked to perform a simple task that involves a functional movement of the affected upper limb. Each task is rated using a 4-point ordinal scale. The maximum possible score is 57 and the minimal clinically important difference is 5.7 points. | 3 months after completing the intervention |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Motor Recovery after Stroke | Motor impairment measure. It comprises 33 items that evaluate motor impairment in the affected upper limb. The test is divided into 4 sections (shoulder, forearm and elbow, wrist, hand and coordination) assessing reflexes, flexor and extensor synergies, range of motion, and overall coordination and speed of the upper extremity. Each item is graded using an ordinal scale from 0 to 2. The maximum possible score is 66 and the minimal clinically important difference for chronic stroke patients is 5.2 points. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment Self-regulation Questionnaire | Self-regulation measure. It evaluates the type of self-regulation (external, interjected, identified or intrinsic) or motivation (external or intrinsic) of the participants to engage with the rehabilitation program. It is a 15-item self-report questionnaire scored on a 7-point scale (1: not all true; 4: somewhat true; 7: very true). | Baseline |
Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antoni RodrÃguez Fornells, PhD | Contact | +34934020489 | antoni.rodriguez@icrea.cat | |
| Jennifer Grau Sánchez, PhD | Contact | +34934020489 | jennifergrau@euit.fdsll.cat |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Antoni RodrÃguez Fornells, PhD | Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute, University of Barcelona | Principal Investigator |
| Jennifer Grau Sánchez, PhD | Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute, University of Barcelona |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute | L'Hospitalet de Llobregat | Barcelona | 08908 | Spain |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 39112892 | Derived | Segura E, Grau-Sanchez J, Cerda-Company X, Porto MF, De la Cruz-Puebla M, Sanchez-Pinsach D, Cerquides J, Duarte E, Palumbo A, Turry A, Raghavan P, Sarkamo T, Munte TF, Arcos JL, Rodriguez-Fornells A. Enriched music-supported therapy for individuals with chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial. J Neurol. 2024 Oct;271(10):6606-6617. doi: 10.1007/s00415-024-12570-3. Epub 2024 Aug 7. | |
| 33435919 |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Research group webpage | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020521 | Stroke |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002561 | Cerebrovascular Disorders |
| D001927 | Brain Diseases |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D018737 | Hand Strength |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D053580 | Muscle Strength |
| D010808 | Physical Examination |
| D019937 | Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures |
| D003933 | Diagnosis |
Not provided
Not provided
A parallel-group randomised controlled trial will be conducted with participants being randomised to either an enriched Music-Supported Therapy group or to a control treatment group receiving the Graded Repetitive Arm Supplementary Program (GRASP, Harris et al., 2009).
Not provided
Not provided
A clinical researcher with expertise in stroke rehabilitation will perform the evaluations and will be blinded to participants' group allocation.
|
|
| Graded Repetitive Arm Supplementary Program | Behavioral | Home-based rehabilitation program for stroke patients aimed at improving the upper extremity motor function. The program comprises self-training sessions of mass repetition of movements and task-specific exercises for the upper extremity. |
|
|
| immediately after the intervention |
| Change in Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Motor Recovery after Stroke | Motor impairment measure. It comprises 33 items that evaluate motor impairment in the affected upper limb. The test is divided into 4 sections (shoulder, forearm and elbow, wrist, hand and coordination) assessing reflexes, flexor and extensor synergies, range of motion, and overall coordination and speed of the upper extremity. Each item is graded using an ordinal scale from 0 to 2. The maximum possible score is 66 and the minimal clinically important difference for chronic stroke patients is 5.2 points. | 3 months after completing the intervention |
| Change in Grip Strength in Kgs | Grip strength measure, Biometrics E-Link tool | immediately after the intervention |
| Change in Grip Strength in Kgs | Grip strength measure, Biometrics E-Link tool | 3 months after completing the intervention |
| Change in Box and Block Test | Gross manual dexterity measure | immediately after the intervention |
| Change in Box and Block Test | Gross manual dexterity measure | 3 months after completing the intervention |
| Change in Nine Hole Pegboard Test | Fine manual dexterity measure | immediately after the intervention |
| Change in Nine Hole Pegboard Test | Fine manual dexterity measure | 3 months after completing the intervention |
| Change in Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory | Motor performance in activities of daily living measure. The test is composed of 13 different tasks (i.e. open a jar of coffee, make a phone call, clean a pair of eyeglasses) and each task is graded using an ordinal scale from 1 to 7. Maximum score is 91, indicating good performance. | immediately after the intervention |
| Change in Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory | Motor performance in activities of daily living measure. The test is composed of 13 different tasks (i.e. open a jar of coffee, make a phone call, clean a pair of eyeglasses) and each task is graded using an ordinal scale from 1 to 7. Maximum score is 91, indicating good performance. | 3 months after completing the intervention |
| Change in Behaviour Rating Inventory of Executive Function | Executive function measure. It comprises 75 items describing various behaviours, and the participant is asked to report if the behaviour is never a problem, sometimes a problem or often a problem. | immediately after the intervention |
| Change in Behaviour Rating Inventory of Executive Function | Executive function measure. It comprises 75 items describing various behaviours, and the participant is asked to report if the behaviour is never a problem, sometimes a problem or often a problem. | 3 months after completing the intervention |
| Change in Sustained Attention to Response Task | Sustained attention measure | immediately after the intervention |
| Change in Sustained Attention to Response Task | Sustained attention measure | 3 months after completing the intervention |
| Change in Figural Memory Subtest | Visuospatial memory measure | immediately after the intervention |
| Change in Figural Memory Subtest | Visuospatial memory measure | 3 months after completing the intervention |
| Change in Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test | Verbal learning measure | immediately after the intervention |
| Change in Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test | Verbal learning measure | 3 months after completing the intervention |
| Change in Fluency Test | Verbal fluency measure | immediately after the intervention |
| Change in Fluency Test | Verbal fluency measure | 3 months after completing the intervention |
| Change in Beck Depression Inventory-II | Depression measure. It comprises 21 multiple-choice questions that are scored on a scale from 0 to 3. The participant is asked about feelings, thoughts and behaviours of the past week. Higher scores indicate depression severity and the maximum possible score of the measure is 63. | immediately after the intervention |
| Change in Beck Depression Inventory-II | Depression measure. It comprises 21 multiple-choice questions that are scored on a scale from 0 to 3. The participant is asked about feelings, thoughts and behaviours of the past week. Higher scores indicate depression severity and the maximum possible score of the measure is 63. | 3 months after completing the intervention |
| Change in Apathy Evaluation Scale | Apathy measure. The scale comprises a self and informant reports both consisting of 18 items that are scored on a 4-point Likert scale, where higher scores indicate more apathy. | immediately after the intervention |
| Change in Apathy Evaluation Scale | Apathy measure. The scale comprises a self and informant reports both consisting of 18 items that are scored on a 4-point Likert scale, where higher scores indicate more apathy. | 3 months after completing the intervention |
| Change in Profile of Mood States | Mood measure. The measure includes 65 items that are scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 "not at all" to 4 "extremely". | immediately after the intervention |
| Change in Profile of Mood States | Mood measure. The measure includes 65 items that are scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 "not at all" to 4 "extremely". | 3 months after completing the intervention |
| Change in Stroke Impact Scale | Quality of life measure. It is a 59-item self-report questionnaire that assesses muscle strength, hand function, basic and instrumental activities of daily living, global mobility, communication, emotion, memory and thinking, and participation. | immediately after the intervention |
| Change in Stroke Impact Scale | Quality of life measure. It is a 59-item self-report questionnaire that assesses muscle strength, hand function, basic and instrumental activities of daily living, global mobility, communication, emotion, memory and thinking, and participation. | 3 months after completing the intervention |
| Treatment Questionnaire Concerning Continued Program | Self-regulation measure. It is a 15-item self-report questionnaire scored on a 7-point scale (1: not all true; 4: somewhat true; 7: very true). | Week 5 (after the first half of the intervention) |
| Intrinsic Motivation Inventory | Motivation measure. It consists of 24 self-report questions divided into six different psychological constructs reflecting positive or negative predictors of intrinsic motivation: 1) interest/enjoyment; 2) perceived competence; 3) effort/importance; 4) pressure/tension; 5) perceived choice; and 6) value/usefulness. It is scored on a 7-point scale (1: not all true; 4: somewhat true; 7: very true). | immediately after the intervention |
| Strategies Used to Promote Health Questionnaire | Self-efficacy measure. It is a 29-item self-report questionnaire that evaluates the degree of self-care and self-efficacy through four factors consistent with the underlying self-efficacy theory upon which the scale is based: 1) coping, 2) stress reduction, 3) making decisions, and 4) enjoying life. It is scored on a 5-point scale (from 1: very little confidence to 5: quite a lot of confidence). | Baseline |
| Derived |
| Grau-Sanchez J, Segura E, Sanchez-Pinsach D, Raghavan P, Munte TF, Palumbo AM, Turry A, Duarte E, Sarkamo T, Cerquides J, Arcos JL, Rodriguez-Fornells A. Enriched Music-supported Therapy for chronic stroke patients: a study protocol of a randomised controlled trial. BMC Neurol. 2021 Jan 12;21(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12883-020-02019-1. |
| D014652 | Vascular Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
| D009142 |
| Musculoskeletal Physiological Phenomena |
| D055687 | Musculoskeletal and Neural Physiological Phenomena |