Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This is a prospective, randomized, unblinded trial of trauma patients in the ICU who are identified as being at a high risk to develop acute respiratory failure.
We hope that this study will help the study team to identify how best to use a more aggressive respiratory treatment strategy in a high risk trauma population (thoracic trauma or trauma patients requiring thoracic surgery, spine surgery, or open abdominal procedures) to try and decrease the need for intubation with mechanical ventilation.
All patients consented will be randomly assigned into one of three groups: nasal cannula (control group, our current standard of care), high-flow nasal cannula, high-flow nasal cannula plus noninvasive ventilation.
After obtaining consent, patient will be randomized to interventions 1:1:1 within each of two groups: patients admitted to the ICU without being intubated OR intubated patients undergoing an extubation.
Randomization will be managed through RedCap. After consent, the treating clinician will log into RedCap to obtain the patient's treating assignment.
The primary outcome of interest is failure of conservative ventilation intervention in prevention of initial intubation or prevention of reintubation.
A chart review of all enrolled patients will be done quarterly to assess morbidity, mortality, and outcomes.
No placebo will be used as all qualifying patients will be placed on nasal cannula, high-flow nasal cannula, or high-flow nasal cannula plus noninvasive ventilation. All other treatments will be standard of care.
Participants in the study will continue until the patient is discharged from the trauma ICU.
The study will end when the last person enrolled has been discharged from the trauma ICU. If patient's participation ends prematurely, available data will be entered into the database and evaluated appropriately.
This study will take place at the OU Medical Center (OUMC) among patients admitted to the Trauma Intensive Care Unit.
Consent for study enrollment will take place at OUMC during discussion with physician providing trauma care and the patient, family member, or next of kin consenting for the study.
The following data will be collected and recorded: Supplemental oxygen requirements, Date/Time of arrival, Date/Time of Admission to ICU, Date/Time of intubation procedure, Date/Time of extubation, Ventilator settings, Duration of intubation, Comorbidities, PaCO2 values, PaO2 values, Vital signs at arrival and at admission to ICU, Age,Gender, Weight, Height, BMI, Traumatic injuries, Diagnosis, Past medical history/medical co-morbidities, Glasgow coma scale, Oxygen saturation, Negative inspiratory force score, Rapid shallow breathing index score, Pulmonary treatments, including an intolerance to therapy, Injury Severity Score (ISS) and/or Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Not Intubated | Active Comparator | Patients admitted with a trauma injury who do not need to be intubated to receive treatment. Intubated means putting a tube down your throat to keep your airway from collapsing. Participants will be randomized to receive one of the three interventions in this arm. |
|
| Intubated Patients Undergoing Extubation | Active Comparator | Patients admitted with a trauma injury who had to be intubated for treatment of their injury. Interventions administered after the tube is extubated (removed from throat). Participants will be randomized to receive one of the three interventions in this arm. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard of Care - Nasal Cannula | Other | Standard of care. Flexible tube to provide extra oxygen when patients need a little help, but are not in respiratory distress. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| failure rates-nonintubated patients | Among injured patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) without being intubated, do failure rates within the first 48 hours of ICU admission differ with respect to type of initial respiratory intervention: nasal cannula, high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC), or HFNC plus non-invasive ventilation (BiPAP). Failure is defined as escalation to intubation. | first 48 hours |
| failure rates-intubated patients | Among injured patients arriving intubated or who undergo intervention after hospital arrival, do failure rates within the first 48 hours after extubation differ with respect to type of initial respiratory intervention: nasal cannula, high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC), or HFNC plus non-invasive ventilation (BiPAP). Failure is defined as requiring reintubation. | first 48 hours |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Mortality | Assess mortality of enrolled patients by quarterly retrospective chart reviews. | Up to 2 years |
| Length of hospital stay | Compare length of hospitalization between groups |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Celia Y Quang, MD | University of Oklahoma | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OU Medical Center | Oklahoma City | Oklahoma | 73104 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 26926168 | Result | Thille AW, Boissier F, Ben-Ghezala H, Razazi K, Mekontso-Dessap A, Brun-Buisson C, Brochard L. Easily identified at-risk patients for extubation failure may benefit from noninvasive ventilation: a prospective before-after study. Crit Care. 2016 Feb 26;20:48. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1228-2. | |
| 31577036 | Result | Thille AW, Muller G, Gacouin A, Coudroy R, Decavele M, Sonneville R, Beloncle F, Girault C, Dangers L, Lautrette A, Cabasson S, Rouze A, Vivier E, Le Meur A, Ricard JD, Razazi K, Barberet G, Lebert C, Ehrmann S, Sabatier C, Bourenne J, Pradel G, Bailly P, Terzi N, Dellamonica J, Lacave G, Danin PE, Nanadoumgar H, Gibelin A, Zanre L, Deye N, Demoule A, Maamar A, Nay MA, Robert R, Ragot S, Frat JP; HIGH-WEAN Study Group and the REVA Research Network. Effect of Postextubation High-Flow Nasal Oxygen With Noninvasive Ventilation vs High-Flow Nasal Oxygen Alone on Reintubation Among Patients at High Risk of Extubation Failure: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2019 Oct 15;322(15):1465-1475. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.14901. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D063087 | Noninvasive Ventilation |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012121 | Respiration, Artificial |
| D058109 | Airway Management |
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
| D012138 | Respiratory Therapy |
Not provided
Not provided
Participants will be randomized into 1 of 3 interventions: nasal cannula, high flow nasal cannula, and high flow nasal cannula plus noninvasive ventilation within each of two groups: patients admitted to ICU without being intubated OR intubated patients undergoing an extubation.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| High-flow nasal cannula | Other | Same as nasal cannula, except the oxygen is heated or humidified and the flow is stronger, pushing air into the lungs to help keep the airway open. |
|
|
| HFNC plus non-invasive ventilation | Other | This method uses HFNC as described above and adds noninvasive ventilation which is similar to CPAP machine and uses a mask rather than having to intubate (putting a tube down your throat to keep your airway from collapsing). |
|
| up to 60 days |
| Length of ICU stay | Compare length of ICU stay between groups | up to 30 days |
| Discharge location | was patient discharged to home, rehabilitation facility, skilled nursing, death; compare between groups | up to 60 days |
| Complications | Compare complications (such as need to be mechanically ventilated, infections, etc.) between groups | up to 2 years |
| 30326893 | Result | Xu Z, Li Y, Zhou J, Li X, Huang Y, Liu X, Burns KEA, Zhong N, Zhang H. High-flow nasal cannula in adults with acute respiratory failure and after extubation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Respir Res. 2018 Oct 16;19(1):202. doi: 10.1186/s12931-018-0908-7. |
| 16354864 | Result | Honrubia T, Garcia Lopez FJ, Franco N, Mas M, Guevara M, Daguerre M, Alia I, Algora A, Galdos P. Noninvasive vs conventional mechanical ventilation in acute respiratory failure: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial. Chest. 2005 Dec;128(6):3916-24. doi: 10.1378/chest.128.6.3916. |
| 30996619 | Result | Halub ME, Spilman SK, Gaunt KA, Lamb KD, Jackson JA, Oetting TW, Sahr SM. High-flow nasal cannula therapy for patients with blunt thoracic injury: A retrospective study. Can J Respir Ther. 2016 Fall;52(4):110-113. Epub 2016 Nov 1. |
| 26060320 | Result | Gaunt KA, Spilman SK, Halub ME, Jackson JA, Lamb KD, Sahr SM. High-Flow Nasal Cannula in a Mixed Adult ICU. Respir Care. 2015 Oct;60(10):1383-9. doi: 10.4187/respcare.04016. Epub 2015 Jun 9. |
| 29208754 | Result | Lamb KD, Spilman SK, Oetting TW, Jackson JA, Trump MW, Sahr SM. Proactive Use of High-Flow Nasal Cannula With Critically Ill Subjects. Respir Care. 2018 Mar;63(3):259-266. doi: 10.4187/respcare.05793. Epub 2017 Dec 5. |