Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Sahajanand Medical Technologies Limited | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The study compares the outcome of the ultrathin stent strut Supraflex Cruz stent to the thin stent strut Ultimaster Tansei stent in a PCI population at high risk for bleeding (HBR).
Study design: An Investigator-initiated, multi-center, randomized clinical trial in HBR patients receiving PCI with Supraflex Cruz or Ultimaster Tansei stents
Study population: 2 x 368 (736) patients, who undergo a PCI and are at high risk for bleeding (HBR).
Intervention: Patients are treated according to the randomized regimen at index PCI and at planned staged procedures. Either with the ultrathin stent strut Supraflex Cruz stent to the thin stent strut Ultimaster Tansei stent
DAPT treatment (combination and duration) is according to the Guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology for Myocardial Revascularization.
Follow-up is scheduled at 1 month, 6 months and 12 months post index PCI procedure.
Primary study parameters/outcome of the study:
The primary endpoint Net Adverse Clinical Endpoints (NACE) defined as a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization, stroke and bleeding events defined as BARC 3 or 5 at 12 months follow-up after the index PCI.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Supraflex Cruz stent | Active Comparator | Randomization to Supraflex Cruz stent |
|
| Ultimaster Tansei stent | Active Comparator | Randomization to Ultimaster Tansei stent |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Supraflex Cruz 60 Micron | Device | percutaneous coronary intervention |
| |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Net Adverse Clinical Endpoints (NACE) | The primary endpoint Net Adverse Clinical Endpoints (NACE) defined as a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization, stroke and bleeding events defined as BARC 3 or 5 at 12 months follow-up after the index PCI. | 1 year |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Major adverse cardiac and cerebral events (MACCE) | Major adverse cardiac and cerebral events (MACCE) defined as a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization and stroke | 1 year |
| Major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding (MCB) |
Not provided
Inclusion criteria:
Patients are eligible for inclusion into the study if the following criteria are met.
Major HBR criteria are the following:
Minor HBR criteria are the following:
Exclusion criteria:
Patients are not eligible if any of the following applies:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Pieter Smits, MD, PhD | Research Maatschap Cardiologen Rotterdam Zuid | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jeroen Bosch ziekenhuis | 's-Hertogenbosch | Netherlands | ||||
| Meander ziekenhuis |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 39351676 | Derived | Smits PC, Tonino PAL, Hofma SH, van Kuijk JP, Spano F, Al Mafragi A, Pisters R, Polad J, Bogaerts K, Oemrawsingh RM, Paradies V. Comparison of Ultrathin- Versus Thin-Strut Stents in Patients With High Bleeding Risk PCI: Results From the COMPARE 60/80 HBR Trial: An Open-Label, Randomized, Controlled Trial. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Oct;17(10):e014042. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.123.014042. Epub 2024 Oct 1. | |
| 34503738 |
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Date | Date Unknown |
|---|---|---|
| Release | Nov 8, 2024 | |
| Reset | Jan 3, 2025 | |
| Release | Jan 28, 2025 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Patient will be blinded for the stent that is used
| Ultimaster Tansei 80 Micron |
| Device |
percutaneous coronary intervention |
|
Major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding (MCB) defined as a composite of type 2, 3 and 5 BARC bleeding events |
| 1 year |
| Target Lesion Failure (TLF) | Target Lesion Failure (TLF) is defined as cardiac death, myocardial infarction attributed to the target vessel and clinically indicated target lesion revascularization | 1 year |
| Target vessel failure (TVF) | Target Vessel Failure (TVF) is defined as cardiac death, myocardial infarction attributed to the target vessel and clinically indicated target vessel revascularization | 1 year |
| The composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction and stroke | The composite endpoint of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction and stroke | 1 year |
| The composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke and major bleed BARC 3 and 5 | The composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke and major bleed according to BARC 3 and 5 | 1 year |
| Stent thrombosis | Stent thrombosis according to the ARC definitions | 1 year |
| Myocardial infarction | Myocardial infarction. | 1 year |
| Urgent target vessel revascularization | Urgent target vessel revascularization. | 1 year |
| Non-target vessel revascularization | Non-target vessel revascularization. | 1 year |
| Clinically indicated target vessel revascularization | Clinically indicated target vessel revascularization. | 1 year |
| Bleeding events | Bleeding events according to the BARC, TIMI and GUSTO classification | 1 year |
| Transfusion rates | Transfusion rates both in patients with and/or without clinically detected over bleeding | 1 year |
| Event rates according to the PRECISE-DAPT | Event rates according to the PRECISE-DAPT score | 1 year |
| Procedural success | Procedural success is defined as angiographic success with no in-hospital MACE, defined as death, MI with new Q-waves on electrocardiogram (ECG) or urgent target vessel revascularization (TVR) (including both repeat PCI and coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) | At completion of the baseline PCI |
| Device success | Device success (applying a lesion-level analysis) | At discharge of baseline hospitalisation, on average 3 days |
| Amersfoort |
| Netherlands |
| Rijnstate ziekenhuis | Arnhem | Netherlands |
| Tergooi ziekenhuis Blaricum | Blaricum | Netherlands |
| Amphia Ziekenhuis | Breda | Netherlands |
| Albert Schweitzer ziekenhuis | Dordrecht | Netherlands |
| Catherina ziekenhuis | Eindhoven | Netherlands |
| MCL Leeuwarden | Leeuwarden | Netherlands |
| St.Antonius ziekenhuis | Nieuwegein | Netherlands |
| Maasstadziekenhuis | Rotterdam | Netherlands |
| Ziekenhuis Zorgsaam | Terneuzen | Netherlands |
| Derived |
| Capodanno D. Another Coronary Stent for Patients at High Bleeding Risk. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Sep 13;14(17):1884-1887. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.07.028. No abstract available. |
| Reset | Feb 19, 2025 |
Not provided
| Release Date | Unrelease Date | Unrelease Date Unknown | Reset Date | MCP Release Number |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2024 | Jan 3, 2025 | |||
| Jan 28, 2025 | Feb 19, 2025 |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006331 | Heart Diseases |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided