Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The study was terminated prematurely due to administrative reasons; loss of several research personnel. Because of strict eligibility criteria, the investigators anticipated delays in completing enrollment and therefore decided to terminate early.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
To determine efficacy and safety profile of dexamethasone 0.4mg lacrimal insert in dry eye related ocular surface inflammation.
Previous studies showed that dexamethasone and loteprednol topical drops have led to favorable results. However, the requirement of frequent instillation of drops by the patients is problematic causing discomfort and blurring of vision and requires remembering and dexterity for instillation, poor compliance is not uncommon. In addition Investigators believe that instillation of drops disturbs the homeostasis of the natural tear film due to physical and chemical trauma due to large drop volume (50 microliters) hammering on the eye surface (which can only hold 7 to 10 microliters). Particularly washing away of the mucin layer that holds all the "good ingredients" in the tears is harmful to the ocular surface. Therefore, "dropless" treatment of dry eye is desirable.
Dextenza® (dexamethasone ophthalmic insert, Ocular Therapeutix Inc., Bedford, MA) is a corticosteroid intracanalicular insert approved by US-FDA in November 2018 for the treatment of post-surgical ocular inflammation and pain. It is inserted into the lower lacrimal punctum and into the canaliculus. A single insert releases a 0.4 mg dose of dexamethasone for up to 30 days following insertion. Dextenza® is resorbable and does not require removal. Investigators hypothesize that Dextenza® could mimic short-term topical steroid use in a tapering manner in patients with clinically significant dry eye and show efficacy in improving its symptoms and signs, as was previously shown with other steroid preparations. If proven, the use of Dextenza® may shift paradigms in the management of the clinically significant ocular surface disease. To test this hypothesis, investigators propose to study the effects of Dextenza® in the treatment of clinically significant dry eye.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment Arm | Experimental | Commercially available Sustained Release Dexamethasone, 0.4 mg intracannalicular insert (DEXTENZA® - Ocular Therapeutix, Bedford, MA) |
|
| Control Arm | Sham Comparator | Commercially available EXTENDED WEAR SYNTHETIC ABSORBABLE PUNCTAL PLUG made of E-Caprolactone-L-Lactide copolymer (PCL) (Vera90â„¢ - Elkridge, MD) |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sustained Release Dexamethasone, 0.4 mg | Drug | dexamethasone 0.4mg lacrimal insert |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Efficacy Endpoint as Assessed by Dry Eye Sign Using Ocular Surface Scale (OSS) | OSS will be graded according to the Sjögren's International Collaborative Clinical Alliance (SICCA) grading system. Maximum possible fluorescein score (the punctate epithelial erosions grade + any extra points for modifiers [central staining, confluent staining, and filaments]) will be 6 and minimum of 0. Maximum possible conjunctival staining score (the punctate epithelial erosions grade on the temporal and nasal sides) will be 6 and minimum of 0. The total possible maximum OSS, derived by summing the corneal and conjunctival scores, will be 12 for each eye, and minimum OSS will be 0. Higher corneal, conjunctival, and staining scores represent worse outcomes. The difference between the average corneal staining in the treated arm versus the average corneal staining in the sham arm will be compared statistically. | 28 days |
| Patient Reported Symptom | (1)eye dryness, (2)eye discomfort, or (3)eye fatigue will be measured using visual analogue scale (0 to 100). The difference between the average bothersome symptom in the treated arm versus the average most bothersome symptom in the sham arm will be compared statistically. Higher VAS scores indicate worse eye dryness, discomfort, or fatigue. | 28 Days |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Subjects Achieving 2 Severity Grade Improvement in Corneal Staining | Corneal staining responder analysis. Responder is defined as two full severity grade improvement in corneal staining. The percentage of subjects achieving two severity grades improvement in corneal staining (responders) in the treated arm versus sham arm will be compared statistically. | 42 days |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants With Intraocular Pressure Increase | Intraocular Pressure (IOP) measurement obtained using applanation tonometry | At day 30 and day 42 |
Inclusion Criteria:
A patient's study eye must meet the following criteria to be eligible for inclusion in the study:
Male or Female Age 18-100
Capacity to give informed consent
Ability to follow study direction and complete all study visits
A previous or current diagnosis of dry eye by an eye care specialist, whereas treatment is requiring the use of a topical steroid
Able to have a lacrimal plug placement into both lower puncta. If lower puncta are already plugged or cauterized/sealed, upper puncta will be used
Females of childbearing potential unwilling to use reliable form(s) of birth control throughout study period
Clinical diagnosis of dry eye syndrome (DES) or keratoconjunctivitis sicca (KCS), in which the following has been bilaterally documented in the ophthalmic and medical histories:
i. history/diagnosis of dry eye ii. has taken or is on prescription drops (including but not limited to topical steroids, cyclosporine or lifitegrast)
Presence of all of the following in both eyes at Baseline (Day 1):
i. Total OSS of 3 or more with at least 2+ corneal staining (0-6) ii. Unanesthetized Schirmer level of <10 mm at 5 minutes iii. Presence of significant symptoms defined as 30mm or higher score of (1) eye dryness, or (2) eye fatigue, or (3) eye discomfort as measured using VAS, in both eyes. At the baseline visit, the most bothersome symptom (of the three) will be determined and used as the main symptom outcome measure throughout the study.
Exclusion Criteria:
A patient who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded from the study:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Esen Akpek, MD | Johns Hopkins University | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine | Baltimore | Maryland | 21287 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 38492864 | Derived | Lin MX, Guo L, Saldanha IJ, VanCourt S, Zeng J, Karakus S, Hessen M, Li G, Akpek EK. Dexamethasone Intracanalicular Insert for Clinically Significant Aqueous-Deficient Dry Eye: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Ophthalmology. 2024 Sep;131(9):1033-1044. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2024.03.010. Epub 2024 Mar 15. |
Not provided
Not provided
Aggregated information only will be shared with sponsor
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Single-center, participant- and outcome assessor-masked, randomized controlled trial at the Ocular Surface Disease Clinic of Wilmer Eye Institute, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine in Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | All Study Participants | All participants received treatment and control. Treatment: Commercially available Sustained Release Dexamethasone, 0.4 mg intracannalicular insert (DEXTENZA® - Ocular Therapeutix, Bedford, MA) Sustained Release Dexamethasone, 0.4 mg: dexamethasone 0.4mg lacrimal insert Control: FCIProlong® made of E-Caprolactone-L-Lactide copolymer (PCL) (FCI Ophthalmics Inc., Pembroke, MA) E-Caprolactone-L-Lactide copolymer (PCL) punctal plug: Control eye will receive a tear duct plug without the dexamethasone (EXTENDED WEAR SYNTHETIC ABSORBABLE PUNCTAL PLUG made of E-Caprolactone-L-Lactide copolymer (PCL). Absorbs in 60 to 180 days. Size 0.5mm which is comparable to the study treatment) |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Sep 21, 2020 |
Not provided
Not provided
Prospective, Double Masked, Interventional Study.
Not provided
Not provided
The patient and the examining physician/outcomes accessor will be masked. The treating physician cannot be masked.
| E-Caprolactone-L-Lactide copolymer (PCL) punctal plug | Other | Control eye will receive a tear duct plug without the dexamethasone (EXTENDED WEAR SYNTHETIC ABSORBABLE PUNCTAL PLUG made of E-Caprolactone-L-Lactide copolymer (PCL). Absorbs in 60 to 180 days. Size 0.5mm which is comparable to the study treatment) |
|
|
| Percentage of Subjects Achieving Improvement in Their Most Bothersome Symptom | Symptom responder analysis. Responder is defined as 30% or more improvement in the most bothersome symptom (VAS score is decreased by 30 points or more). The percentage of subjects achieving a 30% improvement in their most bothersome symptom (responders) in the treated arm versus the sham arm will be compared statistically. | 42 days |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
Only 75 (150 eyes) patients' data were analyzed at baseline as 2 patients were lost to follow-up before week 4.
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | All Study Participants | All participants received treatment and control. Treatment: Commercially available Sustained Release Dexamethasone, 0.4 mg intracannalicular insert (DEXTENZA® - Ocular Therapeutix, Bedford, MA) Sustained Release Dexamethasone, 0.4 mg: dexamethasone 0.4mg lacrimal insert Control: FCIProlong® made of E-Caprolactone-L-Lactide copolymer (PCL) (FCI Ophthalmics Inc., Pembroke, MA) E-Caprolactone-L-Lactide copolymer (PCL) punctal plug: Control eye will receive a tear duct plug without the dexamethasone (EXTENDED WEAR SYNTHETIC ABSORBABLE PUNCTAL PLUG made of E-Caprolactone-L-Lactide copolymer (PCL). Absorbs in 60 to 180 days. Size 0.5mm which is comparable to the study treatment) |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| eyes |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Customized | Count of Participants | Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||||||||||
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||||||||||
| Posterior Blepharitis | Count of Participants | Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||||||||||
| Visually Significant Cataract | Count of Participants | Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||||||||||
| Anterior Blepharitis | Count of Participants | Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||||||||||
| Punctal plugs | Count of Participants | Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||||||||||
| Sjögren's | Count of Participants | Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||||||||||
| Pseudophakia | Count of Participants | Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||||||||||
| Conjunctival Scarring/Punctal stenosis | Count of Participants | Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||||||||||
| Corneal Haze/Scarring | Count of Participants | Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||||||||||
| Corneal Vascularization | Count of Participants | Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||||||||||
| History of Corneal Ulceration | Count of Participants | Participants | Participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Efficacy Endpoint as Assessed by Dry Eye Sign Using Ocular Surface Scale (OSS) | OSS will be graded according to the Sjögren's International Collaborative Clinical Alliance (SICCA) grading system. Maximum possible fluorescein score (the punctate epithelial erosions grade + any extra points for modifiers [central staining, confluent staining, and filaments]) will be 6 and minimum of 0. Maximum possible conjunctival staining score (the punctate epithelial erosions grade on the temporal and nasal sides) will be 6 and minimum of 0. The total possible maximum OSS, derived by summing the corneal and conjunctival scores, will be 12 for each eye, and minimum OSS will be 0. Higher corneal, conjunctival, and staining scores represent worse outcomes. The difference between the average corneal staining in the treated arm versus the average corneal staining in the sham arm will be compared statistically. | Only 75 (150 eyes) patients' data were analyzed as 2 patients were lost to follow-up before 28 days. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | 28 days | eyes | eyes |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Patient Reported Symptom | (1)eye dryness, (2)eye discomfort, or (3)eye fatigue will be measured using visual analogue scale (0 to 100). The difference between the average bothersome symptom in the treated arm versus the average most bothersome symptom in the sham arm will be compared statistically. Higher VAS scores indicate worse eye dryness, discomfort, or fatigue. | Only 75 (150 eyes) patients' data were analyzed as 2 patients were lost to follow-up before 28 days. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | 28 Days | eyes | eyes |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Subjects Achieving 2 Severity Grade Improvement in Corneal Staining | Corneal staining responder analysis. Responder is defined as two full severity grade improvement in corneal staining. The percentage of subjects achieving two severity grades improvement in corneal staining (responders) in the treated arm versus sham arm will be compared statistically. | 74 (148 eyes) patients' data were analyzed as 3 patients were lost to follow-up before 42 days. | Posted | Number | Percentage of responders | 42 days | eyes | eyes |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Subjects Achieving Improvement in Their Most Bothersome Symptom | Symptom responder analysis. Responder is defined as 30% or more improvement in the most bothersome symptom (VAS score is decreased by 30 points or more). The percentage of subjects achieving a 30% improvement in their most bothersome symptom (responders) in the treated arm versus the sham arm will be compared statistically. | 74 (148 eyes) patients' data were analyzed as 3 patients were lost to follow-up before 42 days. | Posted | Number | Percentage of responders | 42 days | eyes | eyes |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other Pre-specified | Percentage of Participants With Intraocular Pressure Increase | Intraocular Pressure (IOP) measurement obtained using applanation tonometry | 75 (150 eyes) patients' data were analyzed at day 30. 74 (148 eyes) patients' data were analyzed at day 42. | Posted | Number | percentage of subjects with IOP increase | At day 30 and day 42 | eyes | eyes |
|
|
Up to 42 days
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Treatment Arm | Treatment: Commercially available Sustained Release Dexamethasone, 0.4 mg intracannalicular insert (DEXTENZA® - Ocular Therapeutix, Bedford, MA) Sustained Release Dexamethasone, 0.4 mg: dexamethasone 0.4mg lacrimal insert | 0 | 77 | 1 | 77 | 19 | 77 |
| EG001 | Control Arm | Control: FCIProlong® made of E-Caprolactone-L-Lactide copolymer (PCL) (FCI Ophthalmics Inc., Pembroke, MA) E-Caprolactone-L-Lactide copolymer (PCL) punctal plug: Control eye will receive a tear duct plug without the dexamethasone (EXTENDED WEAR SYNTHETIC ABSORBABLE PUNCTAL PLUG made of E-Caprolactone-L-Lactide copolymer (PCL). Absorbs in 60 to 180 days. Size 0.5mm which is comparable to the study treatment) | 0 | 77 | 1 | 77 | 10 | 77 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Day 14 | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | Non-systematic Assessment | On 7/7/22, patient saw her neurosurgeon and was diagnosed with "high-grade glioma" and offered surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy. PI and pt. jointly decided to withdraw study consent in order for patient to focus on post neurosurgical recovery. |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Week 6: Raised intraocular pressure (increase by 5-10 mm Hg from baseline) | Eye disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Week 6: Raised intraocular pressure (increase by >10 mm Hg from baseline) | Eye disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Week 6: Worsening of Corneal Fluorescein staining (increase by ≥2 from baseline) | Eye disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Week 6: Worsening of conjunctival lissamine green staining (increase by ≥2 from baseline) | Eye disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
The study was not able to enroll its planned sample size. VAS, while consistently used in measuring clinical symptoms of illnesses, is limited in that patients may encounter difficulties in rating their symptomology, especially if the participants feel ambivalent towards the VAS prompts.
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael Lin, BA, Research coordinator | Johns Hopkins Wilmer Eye Institute | 8653851192 | mlin60@jhu.edu |
| Dec 4, 2023 |
| Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
| ICF | No | No | Yes | Informed Consent Form | May 2, 2021 | Dec 4, 2023 | ICF_001.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D015352 | Dry Eye Syndromes |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007766 | Lacrimal Apparatus Diseases |
| D005128 | Eye Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002123 | Calcium Dobesilate |
| D000070635 | Punctal Plugs |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001557 | Benzenesulfonates |
| D001555 | Benzene Derivatives |
| D006841 | Hydrocarbons, Aromatic |
| D006844 | Hydrocarbons, Cyclic |
| D006838 | Hydrocarbons |
| D009930 | Organic Chemicals |
| D001190 | Arylsulfonates |
| D017739 | Arylsulfonic Acids |
| D013451 | Sulfonic Acids |
| D013456 | Sulfur Acids |
| D013457 | Sulfur Compounds |
| D019736 | Prostheses and Implants |
| D004864 | Equipment and Supplies |
Not provided
Not provided
| 50-59 years |
|
| 60-69 years |
|
| 70-79 years |
|
| 80 years or older |
|
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
|
| Black or African American |
|
| White |
|
| More than one race |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
|
| Day 28 Corneal Staining Mean Staining - Subgroup 18-59 |
|
|
| Day 28 Corneal Staining Mean Staining - Subgroup 60+ |
|
|
| Day 28 Corneal Staining Subgroup analysis by Sjögren's status - Yes |
|
|
| Day 28 Corneal Staining Subgroup analysis by Sjögren's status - No |
|
|
| Day 28 Conjunctival Staining Mean Staining |
|
|
| Day 28 Conjunctival Staining Mean Staining - Subgroup 18-59 |
|
|
| Day 28 Conjunctival Staining Mean Staining - Subgroup 60+ |
|
|
| Day 28 Conjunctival Staining Subgroup analysis by Sjögren's status - Yes |
|
|
| Day 28 Conjunctival Staining Subgroup analysis by Sjögren's status - No |
|
|
| t-test, 2 sided |
| 0.19 |
| Mean Difference (Final Values) |
| -0.50 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -1.28 |
| 0.28 |
| Superiority |
| Corneal staining sub-group analysis, day 28, 60+ year old subgroup. | t-test, 2 sided | 0.047 | Mean Difference (Final Values) | -0.94 | 2-Sided | 95 | -1.86 | -0.02 | Superiority |
| Corneal staining sub-group analysis, day 28, Sjogren's subgroup. | t-test, 2 sided | 0.08 | Mean Difference (Final Values) | -0.69 | 2-Sided | 95 | -1.49 | 0.10 | Superiority |
| Corneal staining sub-group analysis, day 28, non-Sjogren's subgroup. | t-test, 2 sided | 0.09 | Mean Difference (Final Values) | -0.77 | 2-Sided | 95 | -1.67 | 0.14 | Superiority |
| Conjunctival staining analysis, day 28 | t-test, 2 sided | < 0.001 | Mean Difference (Final Values) | -0.68 | 2-Sided | 95 | -1.05 | -0.30 | Superiority |
| Conjunctival staining sub-group analysis, day 28, 18-59 year old subgroup. | t-test, 2 sided | 0.58 | Mean Difference (Final Values) | -0.21 | 2-Sided | 95 | -1.04 | 0.61 | Superiority |
| Conjunctival staining sub-group analysis, day 28, 60+ year old subgroup. | t-test, 2 sided | 0.021 | Mean Difference (Final Values) | -1.19 | 2-Sided | 95 | -2.17 | -0.21 | Superiority |
| Conjunctival staining sub-group analysis, day 28, Sjogren's subgroup. | t-test, 2 sided | 0.16 | Mean Difference (Final Values) | -0.77 | 2-Sided | 95 | -1.88 | 0.34 | Superiority |
| Conjunctival staining sub-group analysis, day 28, non-Sjogren's subgroup. | t-test, 2 sided | 0.097 | Mean Difference (Final Values) | -0.71 | 2-Sided | 95 | -1.55 | 0.14 | Superiority |
| Units |
|---|
| Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
| eyes |
|
|
|
| Units |
|---|
| Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
| eyes |
|
|
|
| Units |
|---|
| Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
| eyes |
|
|
|
| eyes |
|
|
|
|
|