Ocular discomfort was assessed using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) that ranged from 0 millimeters (mm) (no ocular discomfort) to 100 mm (maximum ocular discomfort). Ocular discomfort was assessed at Baseline prior to CAE exposure and at Day 28 prior to CAE exposure. The Day 28 value was subtracted from the Baseline value. A more negative change value indicates a better outcome. This was a subject based assessment, and subject assigned a single score for both eyes. This is a co-primary endpoint.

Intent-to-Treat (ITT) with data at both visits

The Schirmer test measures tear production. Following instillation of topical anesthetic drops, Schirmer strips were placed on the lower eye lids, eyes were closed, and strips remained in place for 5 minutes or until both strips reached a maximum score. The strips were removed, and the amount of wetting was recorded on a scale from 0 mm (no tear production) to 35 mm (maximum tear production). The test was performed at Baseline prior to CAE exposure and at Day 28 prior to CAE exposure. The Day 28 value was subtracted from the Baseline value. A more positive change value indicates a better outcome. One eye (study eye) contributed data to the analysis. This is a co-primary endpoint.

ITT with data at both visits

Ocular discomfort was assessed using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) that ranged from 0 mm (no ocular discomfort) to 100 mm (maximum ocular discomfort) prior to CAE exposure. This was a subject based assessment, and subject assigned a single score for both eyes.

ITT with data at visit

Ocular discomfort was assessed using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) that ranged from 0 mm (no ocular discomfort) to 100 mm (maximum ocular discomfort). Ocular discomfort was assessed at Baseline prior to CAE exposure and at Day 84 prior to CAE exposure. The Day 84 value was subtracted from the Baseline value. A more negative change value indicates a better outcome. This was a subject based assessment, and subject assigned a single score for both eyes.

ITT with data at both visits

Ocular discomfort was assessed using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) that ranged from 0 mm (no ocular discomfort) to 100 mm (maximum ocular discomfort) prior to CAE exposure. This was a subject based assessment, and subject assigned a single score for both eyes.

ITT with data at visit

The Schirmer test measures tear production. Following instillation of topical anesthetic drops, Schirmer strips were the placed on the lower eye lids, eyes were closed, and strips remained in place for 5 minutes or until both strips reached a maximum score. The strips were removed, and the amount of wetting was recorded on a scale from 0 mm (no tear production) to 35 mm (maximum tear production). The test was performed at Baseline prior to CAE exposure and at Day 84 prior to CAE exposure. The Day 84 value was subtracted from the Baseline value. A more positive change value indicates a better outcome. One eye (study eye) contributed data to the analysis.

ITT with data at both visits

The Schirmer test measures tear production. Following instillation of topical anesthetic drops, Schirmer strips were the placed on the lower eye lids, eyes were closed, and strips remained in place for 5 minutes or until both strips reached a maximum score. The strips were removed, and the amount of wetting was recorded on a scale from 0 mm (no tear production) to 35 mm (maximum tear production). A higher score indicates a better outcome. The test was performed prior to CAE exposure. One eye (study eye) contributed data to the analysis.

ITT with data at both visits

The Schirmer test measures tear production. Following instillation of topical anesthetic drops, Schirmer strips were the placed on the lower eye lids, eyes were closed, and strips remained in place for 5 minutes or until both strips reached a maximum score. The strips were removed, and the amount of wetting was recorded on a scale from 0 mm (no tear production) to 35 mm (maximum tear production). A higher score indicates a better outcome. The test was performed prior to CAE exposure. One eye (study eye) contributed data to the analysis.

ITT with data at visit

Ocular pain was assessed using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) that ranged from 0 mm (no ocular pain) to 100 mm (maximum ocular pain). Ocular pain was assessed at Baseline prior to CAE exposure and at Day 84 prior to CAE exposure. The Day 84 value was subtracted from the Baseline value. A more negative change value indicates a better outcome. This was a subject based assessment, and subject assigned a single score for both eyes.

ITT with data at both visits

Ocular pain was assessed prior to CAE exposure using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) that ranged from 0 mm (no ocular pain) to 100 mm (maximum ocular pain) prior to CAE exposure. This was a subject based assessment, and subject assigned a single score for both eyes.

ITT with data at visit

Ocular pain was assessed using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) that ranged from 0 mm (no ocular pain) to 100 mm (maximum ocular pain). Ocular pain was assessed at Baseline prior to CAE exposure and at Day 28 prior to CAE exposure. The Day 28 value was subtracted from the Baseline value. A more negative change value indicates a better outcome. This was a subject based assessment, and subject assigned a single score for both eyes.

ITT with data at both visits

Ocular pain was assessed prior to CAE exposure using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) that ranged from 0 mm (no ocular pain) to 100 mm (maximum ocular pain) prior to CAE exposure. This was a subject based assessment, and subject assigned a single score for both eyes.

ITT with data at visit

Ocular pain was assessed using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) that ranged from 0 mm (no ocular pain) to 100 mm (maximum ocular pain). Ocular pain was assessed at Baseline prior to CAE exposure and at Day 84 following CAE exposure. The Day 84 value was subtracted from the Baseline value. A more negative change value indicates a better outcome. This was a subject based assessment, and subject assigned a single score for both eyes.

ITT with data at both visits

Ocular pain was assessed using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) that ranged from 0 mm (no ocular pain) to 100 mm (maximum ocular pain) following CAE exposure. This was a subject based assessment, and subject assigned a single score for both eyes.

ITT with data at visit

Ocular pain was assessed using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) that ranged from 0 mm (no ocular pain) to 100 mm (maximum ocular pain). Ocular pain was assessed at Baseline prior to CAE exposure and at Day 28 following CAE exposure. The Day 28 value was subtracted from the Baseline value. A more negative change value indicates a better outcome. This was a subject based assessment, and subject assigned a single score for both eyes.

ITT with data at both visits

Ocular pain was assessed using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) that ranged from 0 mm (no ocular pain) to 100 mm (maximum ocular pain) following CAE exposure. This was a subject based assessment, and subject assigned a single score for both eyes.

ITT with data at visit

The SANDE questionnaire assesses the frequency and severity of dry eye disease symptoms. Subjects used 2 unique, 100 mm Visual Analogue Scales (VAS) to mark the frequency of symptoms (0=rarely, 100=all the time) and the severity of symptoms (0=very mild, 100=very severe) for both eyes together. The Global SANDE score was calculated by multiplying the frequency score by the severity score and obtaining the square root. The final value was rounded nearest whole number. The SANDE questionnaire was completed at Baseline prior to CAE exposure and at Day 28 prior to CAE exposure. The Day 28 value was subtracted from the Baseline value. A more negative change value indicates a better outcome. This was a subject based assessment, and subject assigned a single score for both eyes.

ITT with data at both visits

The SANDE questionnaire assesses the frequency and severity of dry eye disease symptoms. Subjects used 2 unique, 100 mm Visual Analogue Scales (VAS) to mark the frequency of symptoms (0=rarely, 100=all the time) and the severity of symptoms (0=very mild, 100=very severe) for both eyes together. The Global SANDE score was calculated by multiplying the frequency score by the severity score and obtaining the square root. The final value was rounded nearest whole number. The SANDE questionnaire was completed prior to CAE exposure. This was a subject based assessment, and subject assigned a single score for both eyes.

ITT with data at visit

The SANDE questionnaire assesses the frequency and severity of dry eye disease symptoms. Subjects used 2 unique, 100 mm Visual Analogue Scales (VAS) to mark the frequency of symptoms (0=rarely, 100=all the time) and the severity of symptoms (0=very mild, 100=very severe) for both eyes together. The Global SANDE score was calculated by multiplying the frequency score by the severity score and obtaining the square root. The final value was rounded nearest whole number. The SANDE questionnaire was completed at Baseline prior to CAE exposure and at Day 84 prior to CAE exposure. The Day 84 value was subtracted from the Baseline value. A more negative change value indicates a better outcome. This was a subject based assessment, and subject assigned a single score for both eyes.

ITT with data at both visits

The SANDE questionnaire assesses the frequency and severity of dry eye disease symptoms. Subjects used 2 unique, 100 mm Visual Analogue Scales (VAS) to mark the frequency of symptoms (0=rarely, 100=all the time) and the severity of symptoms (0=very mild, 100=very severe) for both eyes together. The Global SANDE score was calculated by multiplying the frequency score by the severity score and obtaining the square root. The final value was rounded nearest whole number. The SANDE questionnaire was completed prior to CAE exposure. This was a subject based assessment, and subject assigned a single score for both eyes.

ITT with data at visit

Eye dryness was assessed using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) that ranged from 0 mm (no eye dryness) to 100 mm (maximum eye dryness). Eye dryness was assessed at Baseline prior to CAE exposure and at Day 28 prior to CAE exposure. The Day 28 value was subtracted from the Baseline value. A more negative change value indicates a better outcome. This was a subject based assessment, and subject assigned a single score for both eyes.

ITT with data at both visits

Eye dryness was assessed using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) that ranged from 0 mm (no eye dryness) to 100 mm (maximum eye dryness) prior to CAE exposure. This was a subject based assessment, and subject assigned a single score for both eyes.

ITT with data at visit

Eye dryness was assessed using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) that ranged from 0 mm (no eye dryness) to 100 mm (maximum eye dryness). Eye dryness was assessed at Baseline prior to CAE exposure and at Day 84 prior to CAE exposure. The Day 84 value was subtracted from the Baseline value. A more negative change value indicates a better outcome. This was a subject based assessment, and subject assigned a single score for both eyes.

ITT with data at both visits

Eye dryness was assessed using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) that ranged from 0 mm (no eye dryness) to 100 mm (maximum eye dryness) prior to CAE exposure. This was a subject based assessment, and subject assigned a single score for both eyes.

ITT with data at visit

Ocular discomfort was assessed using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) that ranged from 0 mm (no ocular discomfort) to 100 mm (maximum ocular discomfort). Ocular discomfort was assessed at Baseline prior to CAE exposure and at Day 14 prior to CAE exposure. The Day 14 value was subtracted from the Baseline value. A more negative change value indicates a better outcome. This was a subject based assessment, and subject assigned a single score for both eyes.

ITT with data at both visits

Ocular discomfort was assessed using a 5-point proprietary scale where 0=no discomfort and 4=constant discomfort. Ocular discomfort was assessed at Baseline prior to CAE exposure and at Day 28 prior to CAE exposure. The Day 28 value was subtracted from the Baseline value. A more negative change value indicates a better outcome. One eye (study eye) contributed data to the analysis.

ITT with data at both visits

Ocular discomfort was assessed using a 5-point proprietary scale where 0=no discomfort and 4=constant discomfort. Ocular discomfort was assessed at Baseline prior to CAE exposure and at Day 84 prior to CAE exposure. The Day 84 value was subtracted from the Baseline value. A more negative change value indicates a better outcome. One eye (study eye) contributed data to the analysis.

ITT with data at both visits

Ocular discomfort was assessed using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) that ranged from 0 mm (no ocular discomfort) to 100 mm (maximum ocular discomfort) prior to CAE exposure. This was a subject based assessment, and subject assigned a single score for both eyes.

ITT with data at visit

Ocular pain was assessed using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) that ranged from 0 mm (no ocular pain) to 100 mm (maximum ocular pain). Ocular pain was assessed at Baseline prior to CAE exposure and at Day 14 prior to CAE exposure. The Day 14 value was subtracted from the Baseline value. A more negative change value indicates a better outcome. This was a subject based assessment, and subject assigned a single score for both eyes.

ITT with data at both visits

Ocular pain was assessed using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) that ranged from 0 mm (no ocular pain) to 100 mm (maximum ocular pain) prior to CAE exposure. This was a subject based assessment, and subject assigned a single score for both eyes.

ITT with data at visit

The SANDE questionnaire assesses the frequency and severity of dry eye disease symptoms. Subjects used 2 unique, 100 mm Visual Analogue Scales (VAS) to mark the frequency of symptoms (0=rarely, 100=all the time) and the severity of symptoms (0=very mild, 100=very severe) for both eyes together. The Global SANDE score was calculated by multiplying the frequency score by the severity score and obtaining the square root. The final value was rounded nearest whole number. The SANDE questionnaire was completed at Baseline prior to CAE exposure and at Day 14 prior to CAE exposure. The Day 14 value was subtracted from the Baseline value. A more negative change value indicates a better outcome. This was a subject based assessment, and subject assigned a single score for both eyes.

ITT with data at both visits

The SANDE questionnaire assesses the frequency and severity of dry eye disease symptoms. Subjects used 2 unique, 100 mm Visual Analogue Scales (VAS) to mark the frequency of symptoms (0=rarely, 100=all the time) and the severity of symptoms (0=very mild, 100=very severe) for both eyes together. The Global SANDE score was calculated by multiplying the frequency score by the severity score and obtaining the square root. The final value was rounded nearest whole number. The SANDE questionnaire was completed prior to CAE exposure. This was a subject based assessment, and subject assigned a single score for both eyes.

ITT with data at visit

Eye dryness was assessed using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) that ranged from 0 mm (no eye dryness) to 100 mm (maximum eye dryness). Eye dryness was assessed at Baseline prior to CAE exposure and at Day 14 prior to CAE exposure. The Day 14 value was subtracted from the Baseline value. A more negative change value indicates a better outcome. This was a subject based assessment, and subject assigned a single score for both eyes.

ITT with data at both visits

Eye dryness was assessed using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) that ranged from 0 mm (no eye dryness) to 100 mm (maximum eye dryness) prior to CAE exposure. This was a subject based assessment, and subject assigned a single score for both eyes.

ITT with data at visit

The Schirmer test measures tear production. Following instillation of topical anesthetic drops, Schirmer strips were the placed on the lower eye lids, eyes were closed, and strips remained in place for 5 minutes or until both strips reached a maximum score. The strips were removed, and the amount of wetting was recorded on a scale from 0 mm (no tear production) to 35 mm (maximum tear production). The test was performed at Baseline prior to CAE exposure and at Day 84 prior to CAE exposure. A higher percentage indicates a better outcome. One eye (study eye) contributed data to the analysis.

ITT with data at both visits

The Schirmer test measures tear production. Following instillation of topical anesthetic drops, Schirmer strips were the placed on the lower eye lids, eyes were closed, and strips remained in place for 5 minutes or until both strips reached a maximum score. The strips were removed, and the amount of wetting was recorded on a scale from 0 mm (no tear production) to 35 mm (maximum tear production). The test was performed at Baseline prior to CAE exposure and at Day 28 prior to CAE exposure. A higher percentage indicates a better outcome. One eye (study eye) contributed data to the analysis.

ITT with data at both visit

The Schirmer test measures tear production. Following instillation of topical anesthetic drops, Schirmer strips were the placed on the lower eye lids, eyes were closed, and strips remained in place for 5 minutes or until both strips reached a maximum score. The strips were removed, and the amount of wetting was recorded on a scale from 0 mm (no tear production) to 35 mm (maximum tear production). The test was performed at Baseline prior to CAE exposure and at Day 28 prior to CAE exposure. A higher percentage indicates a better outcome. One eye (study eye) contributed data to the analysis.

ITT with data at both visits

The Schirmer test measures tear production. Following instillation of topical anesthetic drops, Schirmer strips were the placed on the lower eye lids, eyes were closed, and strips remained in place for 5 minutes or until both strips reached a maximum score. The strips were removed, and the amount of wetting was recorded on a scale from 0 mm (no tear production) to 35 mm (maximum tear production). The test was performed at Baseline prior to CAE exposure and at Day 84 prior to CAE exposure. A higher percentage indicates a better outcome. One eye (study eye) contributed data to the analysis.

ITT with data at both visits