Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The objectives of the study are:
This is a randomized, controlled, multi-centre trial of the efficacy and safety of the Occlutech septal occluder (Figulla Flex II) compared to the AGA septal occluder (Amplatzer ASO) for transcatheter closure of secundum atrial septal defects in patients.
Inclusion criteria A patient will be eligible for study participation if he/she meets the following criteria:
A patient will be excluded from the study if he/she meets the following criteria:
Has multiple defects which can�ft adequately be covered by the device
Has associated congenital cardiac anomalies which require cardiac surgery
a. Has a known sensitivity to contrast media that cannot be controlled adequately with pre-medication.
Patient is currently participating in another clinical device or drug trial that has not completed its primary endpoint or that will clinically confound the current study endpoints or does not permit subjects to participate in other studies. Typically, subjects that are involved in the long-term surveillance phase of a clinical study are eligible.
Has ostium primum atrial septal defects
Has sinus venosus atrial septal defects
Has partial anomolous pulmonary venous drainage
Has pulmonary vascular resistance above 7 Woods units or a right-toleft shunt at the atrial level with a peripheral arterial saturation less than 94%
Has a recent myocardial infarction, unstable angina and decompensated congestive heart failure (CHF)
Has right and/or left ventricular decompensation with ejection fraction of < 30%
Has an active bacterial and/or viral infection
Has any type of serious infection < 1 month prior to the procedure
Has malignancy where life expectancy is < 2 years
Has demonstrated intracardiac thrombi on echocardiography
Weighs < 8 kg
Has gastritis, gastric ulcer, duodenal ulcer, etc. and other contraindications to aspirin therapy unless other anti-platelet agents can be administered for 6 months
Has an unstable condition or otherwise thought to be unreliable or incapable of complying with the requirements of the clinical investigational plan (CIP).
Has any disorder that, in the opinion of the Investigator, might interfere with the conduct of the study.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Occlutech septal occluder ( Figulla Flex II) | Experimental | Occlutech septal occluder (Figulla Flex II) |
|
| Amplatzer Septal Occluder (ASO) | Active Comparator | St. Jude AGA septal occluder (Amplatzer ASO) |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| transcatheter closure of secundum atrial septal defects in patients | Device | transcatheter closure of secundum atrial septal defects in patients |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Efficacy: the rate of a successful placement of the device | The primary efficacy endpoint was early efficacy success rate, which was defined as the rate of a successful placement of the device, and successful closure of the defects without major complication, surgical reintervention, device embolization or moderate or large residual shunt the day after procedure but no later than 36 hours after the procedure. | the day after procedure but no later than 36 hours after the procedure. |
| Efficacy:The secondary efficacy endpoint is the rate of closure success (residual shunt is smaller than or equal to 2 mm) within 6 months after the procedure, without the need for surgical repair. | The secondary efficacy endpoint is the rate of closure success (residual shunt is smaller than or equal to 2 mm) within 6 months after the procedure, without the need for surgical repair. | within 6 months after the procedure |
| Efficacy:Other efficacy endpoint was the rate of complete closure (no residual shunt) at 6 months after the procedure. | Other efficacy endpoint was the rate of complete closure (no residual shunt) at 6 months after the procedure. | at 6 months after the procedure. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Safety: Major, minor complications rate, all SAEs | Major and complications rate | 6 and 12 months post procedure |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
A patient will be eligible for study participation if he/she meets the following criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Has multiple defects which can't adequately be covered by the device
Has associated congenital cardiac anomalies which require cardiac surgery
a. Has a known sensitivity to contrast media that cannot be controlled adequately with pre-medication.
Patient is currently participating in another clinical device or drug trial that has not completed its primary endpoint or that will clinically confound the current study endpoints or does not permit subjects to participate in other studies. Typically, subjects that are involved in the long-term surveillance phase of a clinical study are eligible.
Has ostium primum atrial septal defects
Has sinus venosus atrial septal defects
Has partial anomolous pulmonary venous drainage
Has pulmonary vascular resistance above 7 Woods units or a right-toleft shunt at the atrial level with a peripheral arterial saturation less than 94%
Has a recent myocardial infarction, unstable angina and decompensated congestive heart failure (CHF)
Has right and/or left ventricular decompensation with ejection fraction of < 30%
Has an active bacterial and/or viral infection
Has any type of serious infection < 1 month prior to the procedure
Has malignancy where life expectancy is < 2 years
Has demonstrated intracardiac thrombi on echocardiography
Weighs < 8 kg
Has gastritis, gastric ulcer, duodenal ulcer, etc. and other contraindications to aspirin therapy unless other anti-platelet agents can be administered for 6 months
Has an unstable condition or otherwise thought to be unreliable or incapable of complying with the requirements of the clinical investigational plan (CIP).
Has any disorder that, in the opinion of the Investigator, might interfere with the conduct of the study.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This is a randomized, controlled, multi-centre trial of the efficacy and safety of the Occlutech septal occluder (Figulla Flex II) compared to the AGA septal occluder (Amplatzer ASO) for transcatheter closure of secundum atrial septal defects in patients.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided