Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| EMN Trial Office S.r.l. Impresa Sociale | OTHER |
| Sanofi | INDUSTRY |
| Amgen | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This protocol is a phase III study designed to compare the efficacy and the safety of Isa-KRd induction, transplant, Isa-KRd post ASCT consolidation and Isa-KRd light consolidation vs KRd induction, transplant, KRd post ASCT consolidation and KRd light consolidation After confirmation of eligibility criteria patients will be randomized to one of the 2 treatment groups in a 1:1 randomization ratio.
This is a open-label randomized phase III study that enrolls newly diagnosed MM patient eligible for high-dose chemotherapy and ASCT. Patients will be randomized at enrolment (1:1, stratification according to ISS Stage [3 levels: I vs II vs III] and cytogenetic risk FISH [2 levels: high-risk vs standard risk/missing] based on presence of t(4;14), t(14;16), and/or del 17p)) into 2 treatment arms: -ARM A: induction with 4 cycles of Isatuximab-Carfilzomib-Lenalidomide-dexamethasone (Isa-KRd) followed by cyclophophamide and stem cell collections, chemotherapy with Melphalan 200 mg/m2 followed by ASCT (Mel200-ASCT), 4 cycles of Isa-KRd post ASCT consolidation and 12 cycles of Isatuximab-Lenalidomide-Carfilzomib-dexamethasone (IsaKRd) light consolidation; ARM B: induction with 4 cycles of Carfilzomib-Lenalidomide-dexamethasone (KRd) followed by cyclophophamide and stem cell collections, chemotherapy with Melphalan 200 mg/m2 followed by ASCT (Mel200-ASCT), 4 cycles of KRd post ASCT consolidation and 12 cycles of Carfilzomib-Lenalidomide-dexamethasone (KRd) light consolidation. Details of all treatments (dose and schedule) are given in paragraph 8. After light consolidation patients are allowed to receive Lenalidomide maintenance as per standard of care.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Krd Induction | Experimental | 4 28 day cycles of Carfilzomib = 20 mg/m2 IV on day 1 cycle 1 only, followed by 56 mg/m2 IV on days 8, 15 cycle 1 and on days 1, 8, 15 for cycles 2-4 Lenalidomide= 25 mg orally daily on days 1-21 Dexamethasone = 40 mg orally/IV on days 1, 8, 15, 22 |
|
| Isa-KRd induction | Experimental | Isatuximab= 10 mg/kg IV on day 1, 8, 15, and 22 during Cycle 1, followed by 10 mg/kg IV on days 1 and 15 during Cycles 2 to 4. Carfilzomib = 20 mg/m2 IV on day 1 cycle 1 only, followed by 56 mg/m2 IV on days 8, 15 cycle 1 and on days 1, 8, 15 for cycles 2-4 Lenalidomide= 25 mg orally daily on days 1-21 Dexamethasone = 40 mg orally/IV on days 1, 8, 15, 22 |
|
| KRd post ASCT consolidation | Experimental | 4 28 day cycles of Carfilzomib = 56 mg/m2 IV on days 1, 8, 15 cycle 5-8 Lenalidomide= 25 mg orally daily on days 1-21 Dexamethasone = 40 mg orally/IV on days 1, 8, 15, 22 |
|
| Isa-KRd post ASCT consolidation: | Experimental | 4 28 day cycles of Isatuximab= 10 mg/kg IV on days 1 and 15 on cycles 5-8 Carfilzomib = 56 mg/m2 IV on days 1, 8, 15 cycle 5-8 Lenalidomide= 25 mg orally daily on days 1-21 Dexamethasone = 40 mg orally/IV on days 1, 8, 15, 22 |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carfilzomib Lenalidomide Dexamethasone | Drug | Isatuximab-Carfilzomib-Lenalidomide-Dexamethasone (Isa-KRd) versus Carfilzomib-Lenalidomide-Dexamethasone (KRd) in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients eligible for autologous stem cell transplantation |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Rate of MRD negativity after ASCT consolidation treatment by NGS | The rate of MRD negativity is determined as the proportion of patients with MRD negativity (≥10-5 sensitivity level) after ASCT consolidation treatment using ITT principle. For patients who withdraw from the study or are lost to follow up before four post ASCT consolidation cycles, the best MRD assessment will be considered. Patients will be classified as MRD positive if they have only MRD positive test results or do not undergo MRD assessment. | The end of consolidation, average of 12 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Post induction MRD negativity rate by NGS | The rate of MRD negativity after induction is determined as the proportion of patients with MRD negativity (≥10-5 sensitivity level, NGS) after the induction phase using ITT principle. Patients will be classified as MRD positive if they have only MRD positive test results or do not undergo MRD assessment/sample not adequate. | The end of induction, average of 4 months |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Patient with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma and eligible to ASCT.
Patient is, in the investigator's opinion, willing and able to comply with the study visits and procedures required per protocol.
Patient has provided written informed consent in accordance with federal, local, and institutional guidelines prior to initiation of any study-specific activities or procedures. Subject does not have kind of condition that, in the opinion of the Investigator, may compromise the ability of the subject to give written informed consent and patient is, in the investigator(s) opinion, willing and able to comply with the protocol requirements.
Monoclonal plasma cells in the bone marrow ≥10% or presence of a biopsy proven plasmacytoma and documented multiple myeloma satisfying at least one of the calcium, renal, anemia, bone (CRAB) criteria or biomarkers of malignancy criteria:
CRAB criteria:
Biomarkers of Malignancy:
Patient is 18 - 70 years old and is eligible for autologous stem cell transplantation
Patient has measurable disease as defined by any one of the following:
Life expectancy ≥ 3 months
ECOG status ≤2
Clinical laboratory values meeting the following criteria during the Screening Phase:
Females of childbearing potential (FCBP)* complies with the conditions of the Pregnancy Prevention Plan, including confirmation that she has an adequate level of understanding and must agree to ongoing pregnancy testing and to practice contraception or true abstinence. FCBP must use a highly effective and an additional barrier contraception method simultaneously for 4 weeks before starting therapy, during treatment and dose interruptions and for 5 months after the last dose of study drugs.
Male subjects must agree to practice contraception if sexually active with FCBP during the treatment and for 5 months after the last dose of study drugs. Males must agree to refrain from donating sperm for at least 90 days after the last dose of carfilzomib and for at least 5 months after the last dose of isatuximab.
*Note 1: a FCBP is a woman who:
has achieved menarche at some time point,
has not undergone a hysterectomy or bilateral oophorectomy or,
has not been naturally postmenopausal (amenorrhea following cancer therapy does not rule out childbearing potential) for at least 24 consecutive months (ie, has had menses at any time in the preceding 24 consecutive months).
Note 2: true abstinence is acceptable when this is in line with the preferred and usual lifestyle of the patient. Periodic abstinence (eg, calendar, ovulation, symptothermal, post-ovulation methods) and withdrawal are not acceptable methods of contraception.
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Het Ziekenhuisnetwerk Antwerpen - Department of Hematology | Antwerp | Belgium | ||||
| Fakultni Nemocnice Brno - Internal Hematology and Oncology Clinic |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 41942646 | Derived | Gay F, Roeloffzen W, Dimopoulos MA, Rosinol L, van der Klift M, Mina R, Oriol A, Katodritou E, Wu KL, Rodriguez Otero P, Hajek R, Antonioli E, van Duin M, D'Agostino M, Martinez-Lopez J, van Leeuwen-Segarceanu EM, Zamagni E, van de Donk NWCJ, Weisel KC, Pour L, Radocha J, Belotti A, Schjesvold F, Blade J, Einsele H, Sonneveld P, Boccadoro M, Broijl A. Isatuximab, carfilzomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a randomized phase 3 trial. Nat Med. 2026 May;32(5):1773-1782. doi: 10.1038/s41591-026-04282-0. Epub 2026 Apr 6. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| KRd light consolidation | Experimental | 12 28 day cycles of Carfilzomib = 56 mg/m2 IV on days 1, 15 Lenalidomide = 10 mg orally on days 1-21 Dexamethasone = 20 mg orally/IV on days 1, 15 |
|
| Isa-KRd light consolidation | Experimental | Isatuximab= 10 mg/kg IV on day 1 Carfilzomib = 56 mg/m2 IV on days 1, 15 Lenalidomide = 10 mg orally on days 1-21 Dexamethasone = 20 mg orally/IV on days 1, 15 |
|
|
| Isatuximab Carfilzomib Lenalidomide Dexamethasone | Drug | Isatuximab-Carfilzomib-Lenalidomide-Dexamethasone (Isa-KRd) versus Carfilzomib-Lenalidomide-Dexamethasone (KRd) in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients eligible for autologous stem cell transplantation |
|
|
| Progression-free survival (PFS) in the 2 arms | PFS will be measured from the date of randomization to the date of first observation of PD, or death from any cause as an event. Subjects who have not progressed or who withdraw from the study will be censored at the time of the last complete disease assessment. All subjects who were lost to FU will also be censored at the time of last complete disease assessment | approximately up to 5 years |
| Post light-consolidation MRD negativity rate by NGS | The rate of MRD negativity after light consolidation is determined as the proportion of patients with MRD negativity (≥10-5 sensitivity level, NGS) after light consolidation phase using ITT principle. Patients will be classified as MRD positive if they have only MRD positive test results or do not undergo MRD assessment/sample not adequate. Patients who withdraw from the study or are lost to follow up before MRD evaluation, the best MRD assessment will be considered | At the end of light-consolidation, average of 24 months |
| Overall Response Rate (ORR) post-induction | Response rate (sCR, CR, VGPR, PR, ORR) will be evaluated according to IMWG Response criteria after induction. | Approx 4 months |
| Overall Response Rate (ORR) post-transplant | Response rate (sCR, CR, VGPR, PR, ORR) will be evaluated according to IMWG Response criteria after ASCT. | Approximately 8 months |
| Overall Response Rate (ORR) post-consolidation | Response rate (sCR, CR, VGPR, PR, ORR) will be evaluated according to IMWG Response criteria after consolidation. | Approximately 12 months |
| Overall Response Rate (ORR) post light-consolidation | Response rate (sCR, CR, VGPR, PR, ORR) will be evaluated according to IMWG Response criteria after light consolidation. | Approximately 24 months |
| Post ASCT MRD negativity rate by NGS | The rate of MRD negativity after ASCT is determined as the proportion of patients with MRD negativity (≥10-5 sensitivity level), NGS using ITT principle. For patients who withdraw from the study or are lost to follow up before ASCT, the best MRD assessment will be considered. Patients will be classified as MRD positive if they have only MRD positive test results or do not undergo MRD assessment. | After ASCT, approximately 8 months. |
| MRD negativity rate by NGF post induction | The rate of MRD negativity (by NGF) after induction is determined as the proportion of patients with MRD negativity (≥10-5 sensitivity level) after the specific phase using ITT principle. Patients will be classified as MRD positive if they have only MRD positive test results or do not undergo MRD assessment. Patients who withdraw from the study or are lost to follow up before MRD evaluation phase, the best MRD assessment will be considered. | Approximately 4 months |
| MRD negativity rate by NGF post induction | The rate of MRD negativity (by NGF) after ASCT is determined as the proportion of patients with MRD negativity (≥10-5 sensitivity level) after the specific phase using ITT principle. Patients will be classified as MRD positive if they have only MRD positive test results or do not undergo MRD assessment. Patients who withdraw from the study or are lost to follow up before MRD evaluation phase, the best MRD assessment will be considered. | Approximately 8 months |
| MRD negativity rate by NGF post consolidation | The rate of MRD negativity (by NGF) after consolidation is determined as the proportion of patients with MRD negativity (≥10-5 sensitivity level) after the specific phase using ITT principle. Patients will be classified as MRD positive if they have only MRD positive test results or do not undergo MRD assessment. Patients who withdraw from the study or are lost to follow up before MRD evaluation phase, the best MRD assessment will be considered. | Approximately 8 months |
| MRD negativity rate by NGF post light consolidation | The rate of MRD negativity (by NGF) after light consolidation are determined as the proportion of patients with MRD negativity (≥10-5 sensitivity level) after the specific phase using ITT principle. Patients will be classified as MRD positive if they have only MRD positive test results or do not undergo MRD assessment. Patients who withdraw from the study or are lost to follow up before MRD evaluation phase, the best MRD assessment will be considered. | Approximately 24 months |
| Duration of response | Duration of response is defined as the time between first documentation of response (achievement of at least a PR) and PD with deaths owning to causes other than progression not counted, but censored. Responders without disease progression at the cut-off date of final analysis will be censored either at the time of lost to FU, at the time of death due to other cause than PD, or at the at the time of last contact | approximately up to 9 years |
| Duration of MRD negativity (by NGS and NGF) | The duration of MRD Negativity (by NGS and NGF) is defined as time between first MRD Negativity and first MRD positivity. Patients without MRD positivity will be censored at last complete assessment | approximately up to 9 years |
| Determine the rate of sustained for 1-year MRD negativity (by NGF and NGS) from post ASCT consolidation to post light consolidation | Rate of 1 year sustained MRD negativity by NGS (from post ASCT consolidation to post light consolidation) will be also evaluated. | approximately up to 9 years |
| Determine the time to progression (TTP) | From the date of randomization to the date of first disease progression or death per PD, whichever occurs first | approximately up to 9 years |
| Overall Survival (OS) | Overall Survival (OS), measured from the date of from randomization to the date the subject's death | approximately up to 9 years |
| Time to next therapy (TNT) | TNT will be measured from the date of randomization to the date of next anti-myeloma therapy. Death due to any cause before starting therapy will be considered an event. Subjects who have not progressed or who withdraw from the study will be censored at the time of the last complete disease assessment. Subjects lost to FU will also be censored at the time of last contact. | approximately up to 9 years |
| Progression-free survival on the next line of therapy (PFS2) | Progression-free survival on the next line of therapy (PFS2) is defined as the time from randomization to progression on the next line of treatment or death, whichever comes first. | approximately up to 9 years |
| Brno |
| Czechia |
| Fakultni Nemocnice Hradec Kralove - 4th Department of Internal Medicine | Nový Hradec Králové | Czechia |
| Fakultni Nemocnice Ostrava - Department of Haematooncology | Ostrava | Czechia |
| Vseobecna Fakultni Nemocnice V Praze - Internal Medicine, Hematology Clinic | Prague | Czechia |
| Medical Center - University Of Freiburg - Department Innere Medizin Klinik für Innere Medizin I | Freiburg im Breisgau | Germany |
| University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf - Medizinische Klinik und Polikllinik Onkologie und Knochenmarktransplantation, Haematologie | Hamburg | Germany |
| Klinikum rechts der Isar der TU Muenchen AöR - Innere Medizin III-Haematologie/Onkologie | München | Germany |
| Alexandra Hospital - Department of Clinical Therapeutics National & Kapodistrian University of Athens School of Medicine | Athens | Greece |
| Theageneio General Hospital - Department of Hematology Oncology | Thessaloniki | Greece |
| Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti Umberto I G M Lancisi G Salesi-SOD Clinica Ematologica | Ancona | Italy |
| University Hospital Consorziale Policlinico-U.O. di Ematologia con Trapianto | Bari | Italy |
| Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Bologna IRCCS Istituto Di Ricerca E Di Cura A Carattere Scientifico - U.O. di Ematologia | Bologna | Italy |
| Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Degli Spedali Civili Di Brescia - UOC Ematologia | Brescia | Italy |
| Azienda Ospedaliera Santa Croce E Carle - S.C. Ematologia | Cuneo | Italy |
| Careggi University Hospital - SOD Ematologia | Florence | Italy |
| Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Maggiore Della Carita - SDCU Ematologia | Novara | Italy |
| Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo-UOC Ematologia 1 | Pavia | Italy |
| Azienda Sanitaria Locale Di Pescara - U.O. Ematologia | Pescara | Italy |
| A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino-U.O. Ematologia | Torino | Italy |
| Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Giuliano Isontina-SC U.O.C Ematologia | Trieste | Italy |
| Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep Stichting - Internal Medicine - Hematology | Alkmaar | Netherlands |
| Meander Medisch Centrum -Internal Medicine - Hematology | Amersfoort | Netherlands |
| Amsterdam-Vrije Universiteit Medical Center (VUMC) | Amsterdam | Netherlands |
| Amphia Hospital-Internal Medicine - Hematology | Breda | Netherlands |
| Albert Schweitzerplaats 25 | Dordrecht | Netherlands |
| Zuyderland Medisch Centrum Stichting - Internal Medicine - Hematology | Geleen | Netherlands |
| Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen-Department of Haematology | Groningen | Netherlands |
| Medisch Centrum Leeuwarden B.V. - Oncologisch Centrum Leeuwarden (OCL) and Internal Medicine - Hematology | Leeuwarden | Netherlands |
| Sint Antonius Ziekenhuis Stichting-Internal Medicine - Hematology | Nieuwegein | Netherlands |
| ErasmusMC, Rotterdam-Department of Hematology | Rotterdam | Netherlands |
| Haga Hospital - Internal Medicine - Hematology | s-Gravenweg | Netherlands |
| Oslo University Hospital HF - Oslo myelomatosesenter | Oslo | Norway |
| St. Olavs Hospital HF - Department of Hematology | Trondheim | Norway |
| Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol - Hematology Service ICO Badalona Clinic | Badalona | Spain |
| Hospital Clinic De Barcelona - Myeloma and Amyloidosis Unit | Barcelona | Spain |
| Hospital Universitario 12 De Octubre - Hematology | Madrid | Spain |
| Hospital Universitario 12 De Octubre -Hematology and Hemotherapy Service | Madrid | Spain |
| Clinica Universidad De Navarra - Central Clinical Trials Unit | Pamplona | Spain |
| Hospital Universitario De Salamanca-Department of Hematology of the Salamanca University Care Complex | Salamanca | Spain |
| Hospital Universitario Marques De Valdecilla -Hematology and Hemotherapy Service | Santander | Spain |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009101 | Multiple Myeloma |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D054219 | Neoplasms, Plasma Cell |
| D009370 | Neoplasms by Histologic Type |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D020141 | Hemostatic Disorders |
| D014652 | Vascular Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
| D010265 | Paraproteinemias |
| D001796 | Blood Protein Disorders |
| D006402 | Hematologic Diseases |
| D006425 | Hemic and Lymphatic Diseases |
| D006474 | Hemorrhagic Disorders |
| D008232 | Lymphoproliferative Disorders |
| D007160 | Immunoproliferative Disorders |
| D007154 | Immune System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided