Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of BurstDR dorsal column stimulation, compared with conventional medical management, in improving pain and back-related physical function in subjects suffering with chronic, refractory axial low back pain with a neuropathic component, who have not had lumbar spine surgery and for whom surgery is not an option.
A prospective, multi-center, randomized, controlled clinical study with an optional crossover component. The study is designed to evaluate the efficacy of BurstDR SCS in the treatment of chronic axial low back pain with a neuropathic component, compared to conventional medical management (CMM).
Subjects will be followed in-clinic at 1,3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 months and via phone call or optional clinic visit at 15- and 21-months. The primary endpoint will be assessed at the 6-month follow-up visit. Upon completion of the 6-month follow-up visit, subjects who are dissatisfied with therapy and receiving inadequate improvement with their treatment assignment will be allowed to cross-over to the other treatment arm, if desired.
The study will enroll up to 270 patients at up to 30 sites. Subjects will be randomized in a 3:2 fashion to yield approximately 200 evaluable subjects for the primary endpoint analysis.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) | Active Comparator | An SCS Trial period followed by SCS Implantation with the Abbott Proclaim XR Implantable Pulse Generator |
|
| Conventional Medical Management (CMM) | Active Comparator | CMM consists of an array of therapies including, but not limited to structured physical therapy, medications, injections, and complementary and alternative medicine (e.g. acupuncture, massage therapy) |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spinal Cord Stimulation | Device | Utilization of BURSTDR stimulation |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| The Difference in Responders Between Both Groups | Improvement in pain, defined as percentage of patients who report a ≥ 50% decrease on Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). | 6 Months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Measure of Composite Responder Rate | Composite Responder rate describes percentage of patients who responded on NRS OR ODI improvements (percentage of patients who report at least ≥13 change on ODI from baseline OR a ≥ 50% decrease in NRS from baseline). | 6 Months |
| Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Relative Change From Baseline to 6 Months |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Pathology seen on imaging tests obtained within the past 12 months that is clearly identified and is likely the cause of the CLBP, that can be addressed with surgery.
Primary complaint of leg pain, or leg pain is greater than back pain
Back pain is due to any of the following:
Has widespread pain (e.g. fibromyalgia) or pain in other area(s), not intended to be treated in this study (e.g. neck pain, shoulder pain)
Patient has seronegative spondyloarthropathy (e.g. rheumatoid, lupus, psoriatic)
Neurological deficit (e.g. foot drop)
Prior lumbar spine surgery or sacroiliac joint fusion
Patient has used a morphine equivalent daily dose of more than 50 MME in the last 30 days
Patient is bed bound
Patients with regular intake of systemic steroids (except inhaled steroids used to treat asthma)
Imaging (MRI, CT, X-ray) findings within the last 12 months that contraindicates lead placement
Known allergic reaction to implanted materials
Severe scoliotic deformity (>11 degrees in thoracic or lumbar spine)
Patient has a history of, or existing intrathecal drug pump
Patient has previous experience with neuromodulation devices, including a failed trial
BMI > 40
Patient is enrolled, or intends to participate, in another clinical drug and/or device study or registry that may interfere with the results of this study, as determined by Abbott personnel
Presence of other anatomic or comorbid conditions, or other medical, social, or psychological conditions that, in the investigator's opinion, could limit the subject's ability to participate in the clinical investigation or to comply with follow-up requirements of the clinical investigation results.
Failed psychological evaluation
Suspicion or evidence of untreated mental illness, or substance abuse
Patient demonstrated 2 or more Waddell's signs of nonorganic behavior
Patient is in current litigation for back pain/injury, or is currently receiving worker's compensation
Pregnant or nursing subjects and those who plan pregnancy during the clinical investigation follow-up period.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| James Yue, MD | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barrow Brain & Spine | Phoenix | Arizona | 85048 | United States | ||
| Banner University Medical Center |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 37642628 | Derived | Deer T, Gilligan C, Falowski S, Desai M, Pilitsis J, Jameson J, Moeschler S, Heros R, Tavel E, Christopher A, Patterson D, Wahezi S, Weisbein J, Antony A, Funk R, Ibrahim M, Lim C, Wilson D, Fishell M, Scarfo K, Dickerson D, Braun E, Buchanan P, Levy RM, Miller N, Duncan J, Xu J, Candido K, Kreiner S, Fahey ME, Yue J. Treatment of Refractory Low Back Pain Using Passive Recharge Burst in Patients Without Options for Corrective Surgery: Findings and Results From the DISTINCT Study, a Prospective Randomized Multicenter Controlled Trial. Neuromodulation. 2023 Oct;26(7):1387-1399. doi: 10.1016/j.neurom.2023.07.009. Epub 2023 Aug 28. | |
| 34854473 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The first patient enrolled in July 2020 was screen failed. Post that, the study enrolled the first subject in September, 2020. In total, 269 subjects were randomized at 30 investigational sites: 162 to SCS and 107 to CMM.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) | An SCS Trial period followed by SCS Implantation with the Abbott Proclaim XR Implantable Pulse Generator Spinal Cord Stimulation: Utilization of BURSTDR stimulation |
| FG001 | Conventional Medical Management (CMM) |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Through 6 Months |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Apr 6, 2022 | Oct 16, 2023 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Conventional Medical Management | Other | Assessing type of CMM, location and frequency. |
|
|
The numeric rating scale (NRS) is a verbal or written determination of a pain level on a scale from 0 to 10, in which 0 represents no pain and 10 represents excruciating pain (the worst pain imaginable). Lower scores indicate pain reduction. The data is expressed as relative change (%). |
| Baseline to 6 Months |
| Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) Change From Baseline to 6 Months | The Oswestry Disability Index questionnaire will be completed during selected clinical site visits via the electronic data acquisition portal. These questionnaires will be used for the assessment of study endpoints. An interpretation of 0% to 20% means minimal disability;21% to 40% means moderate disability; 41% to 60% means severe disability; 61% to 80% means crippled; and 81%-100% means bed-bound patients. Lower scores indicate less disability. | Baseline to 6 Months |
| Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) Responder Rate | The Pain Catastrophizing Scale questionnaire is a three part question that measures three pain domains:
| 6 Months |
| Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Responder Rate | PGIC is a 7 point scale depicting a patient's rating of overall improvement. Patients rate their change as "very much improved," "much improved," "minimally improved," "no change," "minimally worse," "much worse," or "very much worse." The percentage of patients who reported "very much improved," or "much improved," are presented. | 6 Months |
| Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) Pain Interference Relative Change From Baseline to 6 Months | The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 29-item short-form health-reported quality of life measures (PROMIS-29) were administered. The transformed score (T-score) for the pain interference domain was used, where 50 (10) is the mean (standard deviation) of a relevant reference population. Higher scores equals more of the concept being measured (i.e., worse outcome). Pain Interferences: Normal: <55; Mild: 55 - 60; Moderate: 60 -70; and Severe: >70. | Baseline to 6 Months |
| Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) Physical Function Relative Change From Baseline to 6 Months | The PROMIS-29 physical function sub-scale includes 4 questions. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 29-item short-form health-reported quality of life measures (PROMIS-29) were administered. The transformed score (T-score) for the physical function domain was used, where 50 (10) is the mean (standard deviation) of a relevant reference population. Higher scores equals more of the concept being measured (i.e., better outcome). Physical function- Normal: >45; Mild: 40 - 45; Moderate: 30 - 40; and Severe: >30. | Baseline to 6 Months |
| Tucson |
| Arizona |
| 85724 |
| United States |
| Spanish Hills Interventional Pain Specialists | Camarillo | California | 93010 | United States |
| Coastal Pain & Spinal Diagnostics Medical Group | Carlsbad | California | 92009 | United States |
| Napa Valley Orthopedic Medical Group | Napa | California | 94558 | United States |
| Connecticut Orthopedic Specialists | Hamden | Connecticut | 06518 | United States |
| International Spine, Pain & Performance Center | Washington D.C. | District of Columbia | 20037 | United States |
| The Orthopedic Institute | Gainesville | Florida | 32607 | United States |
| Anesthesia Pain Care Consultants | Tamarac | Florida | 33321 | United States |
| Axis Spine Center | Coeur d'Alene | Idaho | 83815 | United States |
| Chicago Anesthesia Associates | Chicago | Illinois | 60657 | United States |
| Northshore University Health System | Evanston | Illinois | 60201 | United States |
| Indiana Spine Group | Carmel | Indiana | 46032 | United States |
| Goodman Campbell Brain & Spine | Indianapolis | Indiana | 45133 | United States |
| Kansas University Medical Center | Kansas City | Kansas | 66160 | United States |
| Brigham & Women's Hospital | Boston | Massachusetts | 02115 | United States |
| Mayo Clinic | Rochester | Minnesota | 55905 | United States |
| Saint Louis Pain Consultants | Chesterfield | Missouri | 63017 | United States |
| Advanced Pain Care | Henderson | Nevada | 89052 | United States |
| Nevada Advanced Pain Specialists | Reno | Nevada | 89511 | United States |
| Albany Medical Center | Albany | New York | 12208 | United States |
| Montefiore Medical Center | The Bronx | New York | 10461 | United States |
| The Cleveland Clinic Foundation | Cleveland | Ohio | 44195 | United States |
| Spinal Diagnostics | Tualatin | Oregon | 97062 | United States |
| Center for Interventional Pain & Spine | Exton | Pennsylvania | 19341 | United States |
| Rhode Island Hospital | Providence | Rhode Island | 02903 | United States |
| Clinical Trials of South Carolina | Charleston | South Carolina | 29406 | United States |
| Carolina Orthopedics and Neurosurgical Associates | Spartanburg | South Carolina | 29303 | United States |
| Burkhart Research Institute for Orthopaedics | San Antonio | Texas | 78216 | United States |
| The Spine & Nerve Center of St Francis Hospital | Charleston | West Virginia | 25301 | United States |
| Derived |
| O'Connell NE, Ferraro MC, Gibson W, Rice AS, Vase L, Coyle D, Eccleston C. Implanted spinal neuromodulation interventions for chronic pain in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Dec 2;12(12):CD013756. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013756.pub2. |
CMM consists of an array of therapies including, but not limited to structured physical therapy, medications, injections, and complementary and alternative medicine (e.g. acupuncture, massage therapy) Conventional Medical Management: Assessing type of CMM, location and frequency. |
| The Number of Subjects Implanted |
|
| Cross Over to Alternate Arm |
|
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
| After 6 Months |
|
|
The Overall Number of Baseline Participants includes only the implanted patients.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) | An SCS Trial period followed by SCS Implantation with the Abbott Proclaim XR Implantable Pulse Generator. Spinal Cord Stimulation: Utilization of BURSTDR stimulation. |
| BG001 | Conventional Medical Management (CMM) | CMM consists of an array of therapies including, but not limited to structured physical therapy, medications, injections, and complementary and alternative medicine (e.g. acupuncture, massage therapy). Conventional Medical Management: Assessing type of CMM, location and frequency. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | The number of participants analyzed includes only the implanted patients who completed the demographics questionnaire including age, sex, and race. | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| ||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | The number of participants analyzed includes only the implanted patients who completed the demographics questionnaire including age, sex, and race. | Count of Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||||||
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | The number of participants analyzed includes only the implanted patients who completed the demographics questionnaire including age, sex, and race. | Count of Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||||||
| Pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) | The number of participants analyzed includes only the implanted patients who completed the questionnaire for Pain Numeric Rating Scale. | Mean | Standard Deviation | scores on a scale |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | The Difference in Responders Between Both Groups | Improvement in pain, defined as percentage of patients who report a ≥ 50% decrease on Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). | Percentage of patients who reported a 50% decrease in NRS pain score. | Posted | Number | participants | 6 Months |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Measure of Composite Responder Rate | Composite Responder rate describes percentage of patients who responded on NRS OR ODI improvements (percentage of patients who report at least ≥13 change on ODI from baseline OR a ≥ 50% decrease in NRS from baseline). | The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis. | Posted | Number | participants | 6 Months |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Relative Change From Baseline to 6 Months | The numeric rating scale (NRS) is a verbal or written determination of a pain level on a scale from 0 to 10, in which 0 represents no pain and 10 represents excruciating pain (the worst pain imaginable). Lower scores indicate pain reduction. The data is expressed as relative change (%). | The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | percent change | Baseline to 6 Months |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) Change From Baseline to 6 Months | The Oswestry Disability Index questionnaire will be completed during selected clinical site visits via the electronic data acquisition portal. These questionnaires will be used for the assessment of study endpoints. An interpretation of 0% to 20% means minimal disability;21% to 40% means moderate disability; 41% to 60% means severe disability; 61% to 80% means crippled; and 81%-100% means bed-bound patients. Lower scores indicate less disability. | The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline to 6 Months |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) Responder Rate | The Pain Catastrophizing Scale questionnaire is a three part question that measures three pain domains:
| The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis. | Posted | Number | participants | 6 Months |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Responder Rate | PGIC is a 7 point scale depicting a patient's rating of overall improvement. Patients rate their change as "very much improved," "much improved," "minimally improved," "no change," "minimally worse," "much worse," or "very much worse." The percentage of patients who reported "very much improved," or "much improved," are presented. | The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis. PGIC- % of patients who reported "very much improved," or "much improved." | Posted | Number | participants | 6 Months |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) Pain Interference Relative Change From Baseline to 6 Months | The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 29-item short-form health-reported quality of life measures (PROMIS-29) were administered. The transformed score (T-score) for the pain interference domain was used, where 50 (10) is the mean (standard deviation) of a relevant reference population. Higher scores equals more of the concept being measured (i.e., worse outcome). Pain Interferences: Normal: <55; Mild: 55 - 60; Moderate: 60 -70; and Severe: >70. | The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | scores on a scale | Baseline to 6 Months |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) Physical Function Relative Change From Baseline to 6 Months | The PROMIS-29 physical function sub-scale includes 4 questions. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 29-item short-form health-reported quality of life measures (PROMIS-29) were administered. The transformed score (T-score) for the physical function domain was used, where 50 (10) is the mean (standard deviation) of a relevant reference population. Higher scores equals more of the concept being measured (i.e., better outcome). Physical function- Normal: >45; Mild: 40 - 45; Moderate: 30 - 40; and Severe: >30. | The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | scores on a scale | Baseline to 6 Months |
|
6 months
The CMM arm did not report any adverse event. The adverse events provided are all reported for the SCS arm.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) | An SCS Trial period followed by SCS Implantation with the Abbott Proclaim XR Implantable Pulse Generator Spinal Cord Stimulation: Utilization of BURSTDR stimulation | 5 | 162 | 7 | 162 | 17 | 162 |
| EG001 | Conventional Medical Management (CMM) | CMM consists of an array of therapies including, but not limited to structured physical therapy, medications, injections, and complementary and alternative medicine (e.g. acupuncture, massage therapy) Conventional Medical Management: Assessing type of CMM, location and frequency. | 0 | 107 | 0 | 107 | 0 | 107 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 11.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Digoxin Toxicity | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 11.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bladder Rupture | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA 11.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pulmonary Edema | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 11.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Numbness Below The Level Of Implant | Surgical and medical procedures | MedDRA 11.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Post Surgical Pain | Surgical and medical procedures | MedDRA 11.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 11.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Sleeping Issues And Weird Dreams | General disorders | MedDRA 11.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Leakage | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 11.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Changes In Stimulation Or Reduced Pain Relief Due To Lead Migration | Product Issues | MedDRA 11.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Damage To The IPG Or Leads | General disorders | MedDRA 11.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dermatitis And Desquamation | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA 11.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Implant Migration | General disorders | MedDRA 11.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Movement Or Vibration Of The IPG Or Leads | General disorders | MedDRA 11.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Persistent Pain At The IPG Site | General disorders | MedDRA 11.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Skin Reaction | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA 11.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Devyani Nanduri, Sr. Director, Clinical and Regulatory Affairs | Abbott | +16698329450 | Udoka.okaro@abbott.com |
| Prot_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Jan 12, 2024 | Jan 17, 2024 | SAP_002.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010148 | Pain, Intractable |
| D009437 | Neuralgia |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010146 | Pain |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| D010523 | Peripheral Nervous System Diseases |
| D009468 | Neuromuscular Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D062187 | Spinal Cord Stimulation |
| D026741 | Physical Therapy Modalities |
| D004304 | Dosage Forms |
| D007267 | Injections |
| D015670 | Acupuncture Therapy |
| D008405 | Massage |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D004599 | Electric Stimulation Therapy |
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
| D012046 | Rehabilitation |
| D004364 | Pharmaceutical Preparations |
| D013678 | Technology, Pharmaceutical |
| D008919 | Investigative Techniques |
| D004333 | Drug Administration Routes |
| D004358 | Drug Therapy |
| D000529 | Complementary Therapies |
| D064746 | Therapy, Soft Tissue |
| D026201 | Musculoskeletal Manipulations |
Not provided
Not provided
| IPG/Lead(s) Explanted But Not Replaced |
|
| Subject Participation Terminated By Investigator |
|
| Death |
|
| Lost to Follow-up |
|
| Patient Was Withdrawn Due To Study Timelines |
|
| Patient's Health Significantly Declined |
|
| Subject Had Back Surgery On March 1st |
|
| Subject Failed To Comply With The Protocol Requirements |
|
|
|
| Black or African American |
|
|
| Asian |
|
|
| American Indian or Alaska Native |
|
|
| Declined or Unable to Disclose Due to Local Regulation |
|
|
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
|
|
| More than one race (One subject having both White and Asian race) |
|
|
|
| Right Leg |
|
|
| Left Leg |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Participants |
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
|
|