Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| R36AG064135 | U.S. NIH Grant/Contract | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| National Institute on Aging (NIA) | NIH |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Despite the documented benefits of hospice, less than 2 million people utilize hospice services annually. Underuse disparities are extreme across race and ethnicity as White Americans comprise 85% of all hospice enrollees. AAs account for only 8% of hospice enrollees but are more likely to die from the top three hospice diagnoses (i.e. cancer, heart disease and dementia) than White Americans. Even when AAs enroll in hospice, they spend less time in hospice than White patients, averaging fewer than seven days in hospice care. Notably, AA hospice enrollees report a higher degree of satisfaction with end of life care when hospice is involved, as compared to AAs who are not enrolled in hospice care. There are several potential barriers that may prevent AAs from enrolling in hospice care including lack of knowledge of hospice care, mistrust in healthcare, perceived discrimination, health literacy. AAs routinely report less knowledge of hospice than White Americans, and the information that AA know about hospice often comes from non-medical professionals and is inaccurate. Some AA have persistent mistrust in healthcare due to events such as the Tuskegee Syphilis Experiments and many AA perceive discrimination when accessing healthcare. Data shows that health literacy is a stronger predictor of hospice use than race and older AAs are more likely to possess low health literacy. The driving hypothesis of this research is that by providing clear and accurate information to older AAs will help address the underutilization of hospice by clarifying misperceptions, building trust, and overcoming literacy barriers. Patient decision aids (PtDAs) are an evidence-based approach to improve patient agency in medical decision making. Research shows that AA report a desire for more agency and autonomy in decision-making yet the use of PtDAs is understudied in AA communities. This proposal offers a unique opportunity to address many of the potential barriers that may prevent older AAs from enrolling in hospice, while simultaneously expanding the literature of SDM specific to older AAs. The goals of this proposal are to evaluate if the relationships between health literacy and hospice knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs is mediated by mistrust in healthcare and perceived discrimination among AAs aged 65 or older (Aim1) and to evaluate the effect of the hospice PtDA on changing hospice knowledge and attitudes and beliefs about hospice in AA aged 65 and older (Aim 2).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Experimental | Receive hospice patient decision aid |
|
| Control | No Intervention | Does not receive hospice decision aid |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A decision aid for patients considering Hospice care. | Behavioral | A 12 page booklet and 17 min video describing hospice care |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Hospice Knowledge Scale | Hospice Knowledge Scale is a 23-item true/false scale. Each question is worth 1 point with 23 being the highest score. Possible scores range from 0 to 23, with higher scores indicate more hospice knowledge. | 1 month |
| Hospice Attitudes and Beliefs Scale | Hospice Attitudes and Beliefs Scale is an 8-item 5-point Likert scale (ranging from Strongly Agree to Strongly Disagree). Each question is scored based on 5 point scale. Maximum score 40 and minimum score 8. Higher scores indicate more favorable opinions of hospice. | 1 month |
| Decision Self Efficacy Scale | Decision Self-Efficacy Scale is an 11-item 5-point Likert scale (ranging from not at all confident to very confident). Maximum score is 100 and minimum score is 0. Higher scores indicate more self-efficacy. | 1 month |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Channing E Tate, MPH, PhD(c) | University of Colorado, Denver | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Colorado Denver | Aurora | Colorado | 80045 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 40014286 | Derived | Tate CE, Perez-Jolles M, Scherer LD, Shiferaw T, Mami G, Matlock DD, Huebschmann AG. "Hospice was Created by the KKK"-Black Americans' Perspectives on Hospice Care. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2026 Apr;13(2):1374-1381. doi: 10.1007/s40615-025-02340-w. Epub 2025 Feb 27. | |
| 35944273 | Derived | Brereton E, Harger G, Matlock DD, Dorsey Holliman B, Tate CE. How Do Patients Describe Hospice Care? A Qualitative Analysis of the Language Used by Older Adults to Describe Hospice Care. J Palliat Med. 2022 Nov;25(11):1692-1696. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2022.0011. Epub 2022 Aug 9. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Intervention | Receive hospice patient decision aid A decision aid for patients considering Hospice care.: A 12 page booklet and 17 min video describing hospice care |
| FG001 | Control | Does not receive hospice decision aid |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Intervention | Receive hospice patient decision aid A decision aid for patients considering Hospice care.: A 12 page booklet and 17 min video describing hospice care |
| BG001 | Control |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Hospice Knowledge Scale | Hospice Knowledge Scale is a 23-item true/false scale. Each question is worth 1 point with 23 being the highest score. Possible scores range from 0 to 23, with higher scores indicate more hospice knowledge. | Posted | Mean | Full Range | units on a scale | 1 month |
|
Not provided
Minimal risk study only collecting survey date and All Cause Mortality, Serious Adverse Events, and other adverse events were not monitored.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Intervention | Receive hospice patient decision aid A decision aid for patients considering Hospice care.: A 12 page booklet and 17 min video describing hospice care |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr. Channing Tate, Assistant Professor | University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus | 3037248985 | channing.tate@cuanschutz.edu |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Jan 24, 2019 | Jul 13, 2022 | Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
| ICF | No | No | Yes | Informed Consent Form | Oct 30, 2018 | Jul 12, 2022 | ICF_001.pdf |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| 33439075 | Derived | Tate CE, Venechuk G, Pierce K, Khazanie P, Ingle MP, Morris MA, Allen LA, Matlock DD. Development of a Decision Aid for Patients and Families Considering Hospice. J Palliat Med. 2021 Apr;24(4):505-513. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2020.0250. Epub 2021 Jan 13. |
Does not receive hospice decision aid
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Participants |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| Hospice Knowledge Test | Hospice Knowledge Scale is a 23-item true/false scale. Each question is worth 1 point with 23 being the highest score. Higher scores indicate more hospice knowledge. Absolute scores were measured at baseline and 1 month follow-up. | Mean | Full Range | units on a scale |
|
| Hospice Beliefs and Attitudes Scale | Hospice Attitudes and Beliefs Scale is an 8-item 5-point Likert scale (ranging from Strongly Agree to Strongly Disagree). Each question is scored based on 5 point scale. Maximum score 40 and minimum score 8. Higher scores indicate more favorable opinions of hospice. Absolute scores were measured at baseline and 1 month follow-up. | Mean | Full Range | units on a scale |
|
| Decision Self-Efficacy Scale | Decision Self-Efficacy Scale is an 11-item 5-point Likert scale (ranging from not at all confident to very confident). Maximum score is 100 and minimum score is 0. Higher scores indicate more self-efficacy. Absolute scores were measured at baseline and 1 month follow-up. | Mean | Full Range | units on a scale |
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
| Primary | Hospice Attitudes and Beliefs Scale | Hospice Attitudes and Beliefs Scale is an 8-item 5-point Likert scale (ranging from Strongly Agree to Strongly Disagree). Each question is scored based on 5 point scale. Maximum score 40 and minimum score 8. Higher scores indicate more favorable opinions of hospice. | Posted | Mean | Full Range | units on a scale | 1 month |
|
|
|
| Primary | Decision Self Efficacy Scale | Decision Self-Efficacy Scale is an 11-item 5-point Likert scale (ranging from not at all confident to very confident). Maximum score is 100 and minimum score is 0. Higher scores indicate more self-efficacy. | Posted | Mean | Full Range | units on a scale | 1 month |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| EG001 | Control | Does not receive hospice decision aid | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Not provided
Not provided