Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study targets to compare insertion facility, effect on hemodynamic parameters and effective ventilation using i-gel versus Air-Q LMA for pediatric patients undergoing short-duration surgical procedures.
The patient were divided into 2 groups. I gel group and Air Q group according to LMA type used to maintain airway ventilation.
The patients were compared according to insertion facility, effect on hemodynamic parameters and effective ventilation.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| i gel | Active Comparator | I gel LMA was inserted for all patients |
|
| Air Q LMA | Active Comparator | Air Q LMA was inserted for all patients |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LMA i gel | Other | insertion of LMA for maintaining airway during anesthesia |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Supraglottic device success rate | Fitness of LMA for ventilation | 60 minutes |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ain Shams University | Cairo | Egypt |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided