Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The rate of therapy-associated side effects during and after radiotherapy of head and neck tumors is essential. The most effective approach to reducing acute toxicity is to cut out healthy tissue from the radiation field. The distance between the tumor and normal tissue can be individually increased using personalized, 3D printer-based tissue retractors (GWR). Even the smallest geometric changes lead to a significant dose reduction in normal tissue and significant advantages for the patient.
The current randomized phase II study evaluates the use of GWR with regard to acute toxicity. In addition, quality of life, long-term toxicity as well as local control and overall survival 12 months after radiotherapy are evaluated.
The most effective approach to reducing acute toxicity after radiotherapy is to cut out healthy tissue from the radiation field. GWR can increase the distance between the tumor and normal tissue. Even the smallest geometric changes lead to a significant dose reduction in normal tissue and significant advantages for the patient. Adequate immobilization also reduces unwanted movements, especially of the tongue.
The GWR are manufactured as combinable modules according to the "modular principle". This improves reproducibility and flexibility and reduces development and manufacturing costs. The study is being conducted as a monocentric, prospective, randomized phase II study. A total of 34 patients who meet the inclusion criteria are examined for acute toxicity after radiotherapy of a malignant head and neck tumor. The primary goal of the study is to reduce acute toxicity through individual immobilization of the jaw and tongue. Secondary study goals are the evaluation of quality of life and long-term toxicity as well as local control and overall survival twelve months after radiotherapy. In both groups, radiation therapy is carried out in accordance with guidelines using image-guided radiotherapy.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Experimental | Patient receive personalized 3D-printed GWR |
|
| Control | Active Comparator | Patient receive standardized radiation protection tooth splints |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| tissue retractors | Device | Patients receive a tissue retractor to spare healthy tissue during the course of radiation |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Toxcicity | Number of grade III toxcicity events | immediately after completin of Radiotherapy |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Assesment of Quality of life: questionnaire | Changes of Parameters on the Core Quality of Life Questionnaire C30, scores 1 to 6 (best) | up to 12 month after completion of radiotherapy |
| Assesment of Quality of life: questionnaire |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Sebastian Adeberg, PD | University Hospital Heidelberg | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University Hopsital Heidelberg | Heidelberg | 69120 | Germany |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 40840174 | Derived | Schroter P, Christ LV, Dvornikovich K, Stritzke F, Franke H, Weusthof K, Bauer L, Regnery S, Deng M, Behnisch R, Kolz TT, Herpel C, Tholken R, Schuler P, Moratin J, Ristow O, Rammelsberg P, Hoffmann J, Schwindling FS, Uzun-Lang K, Herfarth K, Adeberg S, Debus J, Held T. Randomized controlled trial of semi-individualized 3D-printed tissue retraction devices vs. standard shielding splints in head and neck cancer treated with intensity-modulated and particle radiotherapy (GUARD). Oral Oncol. 2025 Oct;169:107604. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2025.107604. Epub 2025 Aug 20. | |
| 33865401 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006258 | Head and Neck Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
Not provided
Not provided
Interventiongroup: Personalized GWR Controlgroupt: standardized radiation protection tooth splints
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Changes of Parameters on the Core Quality of Life Questionnaire H&N35, scores 1 to 6 (best)
| up to 12 month after completion of radiotherapy |
| Derived |
| Held T, Herpel C, Schwindling FS, Christ L, Lang K, Regnery S, Eichkorn T, Hommertgen A, Jaekel C, Krisam J, Moratin J, Mrosek J, Metzger K, Zaoui K, Moutsis T, Harrabi S, Herfarth K, Freudlsperger C, Rammelsberg P, Debus J, Adeberg S. 3D-printed individualized tooth-borne tissue retraction devices compared to conventional dental splints for head and neck cancer radiotherapy: a randomized controlled trial. Radiat Oncol. 2021 Apr 17;16(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s13014-021-01803-8. |