Approximately 90 participants were planned. Assuming an effect size delta = 0, pooled SD = 21.38, an alpha = 0.05 (1-sided), and a non-inferiority limit of 15%, a sample size of 26 patients per treatment group provided a power of 0.80. In the case that the actual effect size delta was 10%, the power was then 0.2. If the real effect was different, the result less likely showed non-inferiority. To account for any potential drop off, 30 participants in each treatment group, were planned.

Approximately 90 participants were planned. Assuming an effect size delta = 0, pooled SD = 21.38, an alpha = 0.05 (1-sided), and a non-inferiority limit of 15%, a sample size of 26 patients per treatment group provided a power of 0.80. In the case that the actual effect size delta was 10%, the power was then 0.2. If the real effect was different, the result less likely showed non-inferiority. To account for any potential drop off, 30 participants in each treatment group, were planned.

Approximately 90 participants were planned. Assuming an effect size delta = 0, pooled SD = 21.38, an alpha = 0.05 (1-sided), and a non-inferiority limit of 15%, a sample size of 26 patients per treatment group provided a power of 0.80. In the case that the actual effect size delta was 10%, the power was then 0.2. If the real effect was different, the result less likely showed non-inferiority. To account for any potential drop off, 30 participants in each treatment group, were planned.

Approximately 90 participants were planned. Assuming an effect size delta = 0, pooled SD = 21.38, an alpha = 0.05 (1-sided), and a non-inferiority limit of 15%, a sample size of 26 patients per treatment group provided a power of 0.80. In the case that the actual effect size delta was 10%, the power was then 0.2. If the real effect was different, the result less likely showed non-inferiority. To account for any potential drop off, 30 participants in each treatment group, were planned.

Approximately 90 participants were planned. Assuming an effect size delta = 0, pooled SD = 21.38, an alpha = 0.05 (1-sided), and a non-inferiority limit of 15%, a sample size of 26 patients per treatment group provided a power of 0.80. In the case that the actual effect size delta was 10%, the power was then 0.2. If the real effect was different, the result less likely showed non-inferiority. To account for any potential drop off, 30 participants in each treatment group, were planned.

Approximately 90 participants were planned. Assuming an effect size delta = 0, pooled SD = 21.38, an alpha = 0.05 (1-sided), and a non-inferiority limit of 15%, a sample size of 26 patients per treatment group provided a power of 0.80. In the case that the actual effect size delta was 10%, the power was then 0.2. If the real effect was different, the result less likely showed non-inferiority. To account for any potential drop off, 30 participants in each treatment group, were planned.

Approximately 90 participants were planned. Assuming an effect size delta = 0, pooled SD = 21.38, an alpha = 0.05 (1-sided), and a non-inferiority limit of 15%, a sample size of 26 patients per treatment group provided a power of 0.80. In the case that the actual effect size delta was 10%, the power was then 0.2. If the real effect was different, the result less likely showed non-inferiority. To account for any potential drop off, 30 participants in each treatment group, were planned.

Approximately 90 participants were planned. Assuming an effect size delta = 0, pooled SD = 21.38, an alpha = 0.05 (1-sided), and a non-inferiority limit of 15%, a sample size of 26 patients per treatment group provided a power of 0.80. In the case that the actual effect size delta was 10%, the power was then 0.2. If the real effect was different, the result less likely showed non-inferiority. To account for any potential drop off, 30 participants in each treatment group, were planned.

Approximately 90 participants were planned. Assuming an effect size delta = 0, pooled SD = 21.38, an alpha = 0.05 (1-sided), and a non-inferiority limit of 15%, a sample size of 26 patients per treatment group provided a power of 0.80. In the case that the actual effect size delta was 10%, the power was then 0.2. If the real effect was different, the result less likely showed non-inferiority. To account for any potential drop off, 30 participants in each treatment group, were planned.

Approximately 90 participants were planned. Assuming an effect size delta = 0, pooled SD = 21.38, an alpha = 0.05 (1-sided), and a non-inferiority limit of 15%, a sample size of 26 patients per treatment group provided a power of 0.80. In the case that the actual effect size delta was 10%, the power was then 0.2. If the real effect was different, the result less likely showed non-inferiority. To account for any potential drop off, 30 participants in each treatment group, were planned.

Approximately 90 participants were planned. Assuming an effect size delta = 0, pooled SD = 21.38, an alpha = 0.05 (1-sided), and a non-inferiority limit of 15%, a sample size of 26 patients per treatment group provided a power of 0.80. In the case that the actual effect size delta was 10%, the power was then 0.2. If the real effect was different, the result less likely showed non-inferiority. To account for any potential drop off, 30 participants in each treatment group, were planned.

Approximately 90 participants were planned. Assuming an effect size delta = 0, pooled SD = 21.38, an alpha = 0.05 (1-sided), and a non-inferiority limit of 15%, a sample size of 26 patients per treatment group provided a power of 0.80. In the case that the actual effect size delta was 10%, the power was then 0.2. If the real effect was different, the result less likely showed non-inferiority. To account for any potential drop off, 30 participants in each treatment group, were planned.