Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
A retrospective and prospective study to determine if the use of ambient lighting during screening colonoscopy is well tolerated and if ambient lighting will help physicians maintain adenoma detection rates while decreasing symptoms of eye strain as the day progresses.
This study is a a single-center study at an independent community-based teaching hospital comparing adenoma detection rate in screening colonoscopies performed in low lighting with those performed with ambient lighting (75-150 lux). All cases included in the study involved adult patients undergoing screening colonoscopy with a participating gastroenterologist. Diagnostic colonoscopies, history of colon resection, colorectal cancer, and cases performed in children, pregnant women, and prisoners were excluded from analysis. Cases involving gastroenterology fellows were also excluded. Retrospective data was collected over a six month period from January 2017 to June 2017, followed by a prospective arm the during the same calendar months the subsequent year (January 2018 to June 2018).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Retrospective: Low lighting during screening colonoscopy | Placebo Comparator | Screening colonoscopies performed with low lighting conditions. |
|
| Prospective: Ambient lighting during screening colonoscopy | Active Comparator | Screening colonoscopies performed with ambient lighting conditions. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ambient lighting | Other | Use of ambient lighting (75-150 lux) in endoscopy room. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in adenoma detection rate | Adenoma detection rate, comparing change from first case of the day to the last. Ranges from 0-99%, with greater increases adenoma detection rate (ADR) being more favorable. | 6 months |
| Eye strain score | Eye strain score, as calculated from survey responses completed by physicians. Ranges from 0 - 60, with lower scores indicating less severe symptoms (therefore, lower scores are more favorable). | 6 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Adenoma detection rate (overall) | Overall adenoma detection rate. Ranges from 0% to 100%. Higher ADR is more favorable. | Participants each assessed on one day during 6 month study period |
| Adenoma detection rate (first case vs last case of the day) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Advocate Lutheran General Hospital | Park Ridge | Illinois | 60068 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17700327 | Result | Hayes JR, Sheedy JE, Stelmack JA, Heaney CA. Computer use, symptoms, and quality of life. Optom Vis Sci. 2007 Aug;84(8):738-44. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e31812f7546. | |
| 25996612 | Result | Almadi MA, Sewitch M, Barkun AN, Martel M, Joseph L. Adenoma detection rates decline with increasing procedural hours in an endoscopist's workload. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Aug-Sep;29(6):304-8. doi: 10.1155/2015/789038. Epub 2015 May 21. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Low lighting | Other | Use of low lighting (<75 lux) in endoscopy room. |
|
Adenoma detection rate, comparing first case of the day to the last. Ranges from from -99 to 99%, with greater numbers (increases) being more favorable.
| Participants each assessed on one day during 6 month study period |
| Satisfaction by staff | Satisfaction by staff involved in endoscopy, based on survey responses | 6 months |