Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
we decided to change the protocol completely to an RCT.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Sheba Medical Center | OTHER_GOV |
| Kaplan Medical Center | OTHER |
| Soroka University Medical Center | OTHER |
| Wolfson Medical Center |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The incidence of T1DM in children, especially infants under 4 years of age, is increasing in the last decade. Not all patients are willing or able, from different reasons, to be treated with insulin pumps. This portion of patients' needs subcutaneous insulin injections, at lest 4 injections per day, sometimes up to 8 injections per day.
The recommended treatment is insulin injection before each carbohydrate content meal. Since each injection may lead to pain, many patients do not inject all recommended doses. The solution could be: eat with no bolus, or not to correct glucose level to retrain from pain sensation. I-Port use is able to address this issue by reducing the pain sensation accompanied with the injection. I-Port advance may give a technological solution to non-insulin pump T1DM pediatric patients.
There are no reports in the literature of the use of iport in children and youth. This information is essential since 95% of pediatric diabetes mellitus cases are insulin dependent and require multiple injections. Better balanced diabetes in childhood may prevent complications to long range and long-term diabetes therapy. Moreover, if discovered safe, the iport can be used also for other subcutaneously delivered medication in children, such as somtostatin analog, human growth hormone and clexane Study is designed as 2 parts. Initial part is a cross over design to compare between ipor use an injections regarding glucose in range, side effects and quality of life.
Second part is designed as prospective. To assess glycemic control with iport use or 3 months .
study withdrawn Nor relevant
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| I-Port use arm | Experimental |
| |
| Regular injection arm | No Intervention |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| I-Port Advance use | Device | participants will apply I-port advance for 4 weeks and will inject all insulin through the port. follow up 3 months with/ without i-port. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Life quality and satisfaction measures | Life quality measure before and after I-Port Advance use by questionnaire-delta of score | 3 months from patient first enrollment |
| Adverse effect | Number of Adverse effect while using I-port-clinical | 3 months from patient first enrollment |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Glycemic control evaluation | HbA1C% before and after 3 month use of I-port advance | 3 months from patient first enrollment |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| OTHER_GOV |
| Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center | OTHER_GOV |
This is a multi-center,2 parts study:
the first part: randomized crossover study second part: prospective follow-up study
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided