Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Video assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) has recently been evaluated as the standard surgical procedure for lung surgery. Analgesia management is very important for these patients in postoperative period since insufficient analgesia can cause pulmonary complications such as atelectasis, pneumonia and increased oxygen consumption.
Rhomboid intercostal block (RIB) is a novel block and was first described by Elsharkawy et al. It has been reported that RIB may provide effective analgesia management for several surgeries like thoracotomy.
Following Video Assisted Thoracic Surgery Video assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) has recently been evaluated as the standard surgical procedure for lung surgery. The advantages of VATS prodecures compared with open thoracotomy are rapid recovery, short hospital stay and low complication risk. Although VATS is less painful than thoracotomy, patients may feel severe pain during the first hours at postoperative period. Analgesia management is very important for these patients in postoperative period since insufficient analgesia can cause pulmonary complications such as atelectasis, pneumonia and increased oxygen consumption.
Rhomboid intercostal block (RIB) is a novel block and was first described by Elsharkawy et al. Local anesthetic solution is administrated between the rhomboid muscle and intercostal muscles over the T5-6 ribs 2-3 cm medially of the medial border of the scapula. RIB targets both the posterior rami and lateral cutaneous branches of the thoracic nerves and provides analgesia for the hemithorax from T2 to T9. It has been reported that RIB may provide effective analgesia management for several surgeries like thoracotomy.
The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy US-guided Rhomboid intercostal block compared to no intervention control group for postoperative analgesia management after VATS. The primary aim is to compare postoperative opioid consumption and the secondary aim is to evaluate postoperative pain scores (VAS), adverse effects related with opioids (allergic reaction, nausea, vomiting) and complications due to block (pneumothorax, hematoma etc).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Group RIB = Rhomboid intercostal block group | Active Comparator | In group RIB, RIB block will be performed with patients in the lateral decubitus position. The linear high frequency probe will be placed in sagittal plane medially on the medial border of the scapula at T5-6 level. The trapezius muscle, rhomboid major muscle, intercostal muscle, ribs and the pleura will be visualized. The needle will be inserted into the fascial plane between the rhomboid major and intercostal muscles in a cranio-caudal direction. A dose of 20 ml 0,25% bupivacaine will be injected into the fascial plane. |
|
| Group C = Control group | No Intervention | Patients will be administered ibuprofen 400 mgr IV every 8 hours in the postoperative period. A patient controlled device prepared with 10 mcg/ ml fentanyl will be attached to all patients with a protocol included 10 mcg bolus without infusion dose, 10 min lockout time and 4 hour limit. |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group RIB | Other | In group RIB, RIB block will be performed. Patients will be administered ibuprofen 400 mgr IV every 8 hours in the postoperative period. A patient controlled device prepared with 10 mcg/ ml fentanyl will be attached to all patients with a protocol included 10 mcg bolus without infusion dose, 10 min lockout time and 4 hour limit. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Opioid consumption | The primary aim is to compare perioperative and postoperative opioid consumption | Change from baseline opioid consumption at postoperative 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 24 and 48 hours |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Pain scores (Visual analogue scores-VAS) | Postoperative pain assessment will be performed using the VAS score (0 = no pain, 10 = the most severe pain felt). The VAS scores at rest and during cough will be recorded | Changes from baseline pain scores at postoperative 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 24 and 48 hours. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Istanbul Medipol University Hospital | Istanbul | Bagcilar | 34070 | Turkey (Türkiye) |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 27291611 | Background | Elsharkawy H, Saifullah T, Kolli S, Drake R. Rhomboid intercostal block. Anaesthesia. 2016 Jul;71(7):856-7. doi: 10.1111/anae.13498. No abstract available. | |
| 30708149 | Background | Altiparmak B, Korkmaz Toker M, Uysal AI, Turan M, Gumus Demirbilek S. The usage of single-shot ultrasound guided rhomboid intercostal block for analgesia after thoracotomy: Clinical experience in two patients. J Clin Anesth. 2019 Sep;56:98-99. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2019.01.032. Epub 2019 Jan 29. No abstract available. |
Not provided
Not provided
We will not plan to share IPD
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D008171 | Lung Diseases |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012140 | Respiratory Tract Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
There are two models for this study. The first group is rhomboid intercostal block group. The second one is no intervention control group
Not provided
Not provided
The anesthesiologist who performs postoperative pain evaluation will not know the group.
|
| 30851503 | Background | Yayik AM, Ahiskalioglu A, Ates I, Ahiskalioglu EO, Cinal H. Ultrasound guided bilateral rhomboid intercostal block for breast reduction surgery. J Clin Anesth. 2019 Nov;57:38-39. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2019.03.001. Epub 2019 Mar 6. No abstract available. |