Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The aim of this prospective randomised study is to compare the safety and efficacy of novel intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) to the standard therapy of calcified coronary lesions.
The study will include a total of 40 patients with calcified coronary lesions who will be randomised 1:1 to the treatment with IVL (Shockwave; Shockwave Medical, Inc, Santa Clara, USA) or the standard therapy (non-compliat high-pressure or Scoreflex predilatation, rotational atherectomy, etc). Appropriate preparation of the lesions will be followed by DES implantation.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intrvascular Lithotripsy | Experimental | Calcified coronary lesions will be treated with intrvascular lithotripsy |
|
| Standard therapy | Active Comparator | Standard treatment of calcified coronary lesions: cutting, scoring or non-compliant balloon predilatation or rotational atherectomy |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intravascular lithotripsy | Device | Intravascular lithotripsy uses sonic pressure waves to disrupt calcium with minimal impact to soft tissue of coronary vessel |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Minimal lumen diamether (MLD) | minimal diamether of treated lesion measured by quantitative coronary angiography | 1 year |
| Late luemn loss (LLL) | difference between post-procedure MLD and 12-month MLD | 1 year |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Binary in-stent restenosis | diamether stenosis ≥ 50% of reference vessel | 1 year |
| Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) | Cardiac death, myocardial infarction or tagret lesion revascularisation (TVR) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Angiographic success | success in facilitating stent delivery with <50% residual stenosis and without serious angiographic complications | up to end of the procedure, an average of 2 hours |
| Clinical success |
Inclusion Criteria:
Angiographic inclusion criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leos Pleva, MD,PhD. | Contact | +420733414740 | leos.pleva@volny.cz |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, University Hospital | Recruiting | Ostrava | Česká Republika | 70852 | Czechia |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 40898049 | Derived | Pleva L, Kukla P, Konde A. Comparison of the efficacy of intravascular lithotripsy and rotational atherectomy as adjunctive therapy before drug-eluting stent implantation in calcified coronary lesions (CCS- Coronary Calcification Study). BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2025 Sep 2;25(1):648. doi: 10.1186/s12872-025-05082-z. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Standart therapy | Device | conventional preparation of calcified lesion: non-compliant, cutting or scoring ballons predilatation or rotational atherectomy |
|
| 1 year |
angiographic success with no evidence of in-hospital MACE
| up to discharge, an average of 3 days |