Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Study was stopped due to COVID-19 related issues. Collected data could be present as pilot trial.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Patients with complaints of shoulder pain or limitation of motion and had rotator cuff rupture diagnosed with magnetic resonance imaging will be analyzed and the patients with surgical indication will be included in a randomized fashion. One group of patient will undergo standard arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, while the other group will have microfracture procedure in addition to the standard arthroscopic repair. Before the operation, functional and clinical conditions will be recorded with Constant and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Score (ASES) universal shoulder scoring systems and Visual Analogue Scale(VAS) pain scale. The blood supply and healing of the tendon in the repair area will be compared by the doppler ultrasound (superb microvascular imaging) at the 2nd, 4th, 8th and 12th week after the operation. Post-operative clinical, functional status and pain levels will be evaluated with Constant, ASES and VAS pain scales at 24th week.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair | Active Comparator |
| |
| Microfracture and Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair | Experimental |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Microfracture + Standard Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair | Procedure | drilling of rotator cuff footprint area on humerus and standard arthroscopic rotator cuff repair |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| assessing early change of tendon and footprint area vascularity | we will evaluate it by superb microvascular imaging via ultrasound, this ultrasound software give us quantitative value of vascularity | 4th week |
| assessing early change of tendon and footprint area vascularity | we will evaluate it by superb microvascular imaging via ultrasound, this ultrasound software give us quantitative value of vascularity | 8th week |
| assessing early change of tendon and footprint area vascularity | we will evaluate it by superb microvascular imaging via ultrasound, this ultrasound software give us quantitative value of vascularity | 12th week |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| functional outcome | This entity will be asses by functional scoring systems.These are American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Score (ASES) and Constant Shoulder Score. The ASES is a composite instrument, requiring both a physician assessment and a patient-completed portion; however, it is commonly presented as solely the patient-reported survey. This includes a section on pain (7 items) and a section on activities of daily living (10 items). Scores range from 0 to 100 with a score of 0 indicating a worse shoulder condition and 100 indicating a better shoulder condition. Constant Score was designed to assess the functional state of a normal, a diseased, or a treated shoulder.The Constant score contains both physician-completed and patient-reported portions. The four domains include pain (15 possible points), activities of daily living (20 possible points), mobility (40 possible points), and strength (25 possible points). Scores range from 0 points (most disability) to 100 points (least disability). |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Istanbul University- Cerrahpasa Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty | Istanbul | 34098 | Turkey (Türkiye) |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 22495146 | Background | Rodeo SA, Delos D, Williams RJ, Adler RS, Pearle A, Warren RF. The effect of platelet-rich fibrin matrix on rotator cuff tendon healing: a prospective, randomized clinical study. Am J Sports Med. 2012 Jun;40(6):1234-41. doi: 10.1177/0363546512442924. Epub 2012 Apr 10. | |
| 24331121 | Background | Zumstein MA, Rumian A, Lesbats V, Schaer M, Boileau P. Increased vascularization during early healing after biologic augmentation in repair of chronic rotator cuff tears using autologous leukocyte- and platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF): a prospective randomized controlled pilot trial. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014 Jan;23(1):3-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.08.017. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000070636 | Rotator Cuff Injuries |
| D015775 | Fractures, Stress |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012421 | Rupture |
| D014947 | Wounds and Injuries |
| D000070599 | Shoulder Injuries |
| D013708 | Tendon Injuries |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Standard Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair | Procedure | Standard Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair |
|
| 24th week |
| 23522987 | Background | Milano G, Saccomanno MF, Careri S, Taccardo G, De Vitis R, Fabbriciani C. Efficacy of marrow-stimulating technique in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a prospective randomized study. Arthroscopy. 2013 May;29(5):802-10. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2013.01.019. Epub 2013 Mar 21. |
| 23760681 | Background | Osti L, Del Buono A, Maffulli N. Microfractures at the rotator cuff footprint: a randomised controlled study. Int Orthop. 2013 Nov;37(11):2165-71. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-1952-z. Epub 2013 Jun 13. |
| 28395947 | Background | Bilsel K, Yildiz F, Kapicioglu M, Uzer G, Elmadag M, Pulatkan A, Esrefoglu M, Bozdag E, Milano G. Efficacy of bone marrow-stimulating technique in rotator cuff repair. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017 Aug;26(8):1360-1366. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.02.014. Epub 2017 Apr 7. |
| D050723 |
| Fractures, Bone |