Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
A multicenter, randomized, open-label, three-period, and reference-replicated crossover study was conducted in 48 patients with colorectal or breast cancer under fed conditions to assess the bioequivalence between two formulations of capecitabine.
This was a multicenter, open, random, balanced, three-period, three-sequence and semi-repetitive cross study with 48 subjects. Eligible subjects were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive one period of test formulation or two period of reference formulation, followed by a 1-day washout period and administration of the alternate formulation. Serial blood samples for pharmacokinetic assessment were collected at 0 hours (predose) up to 8 hours postdose. The plasma concentrations of capecitabine were analyzed by LC/MS-MS. Pharmacokinetic parameters (non-compartmental model) were assessed with WinNonlin software. The pharmacokinetic parameters assessed were area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to the time of last measurable concentration (AUC0-t), AUC from time zero to infinity (AUC0-∞), the peak plasma concentration of the drug (C max ), time needed to reach maximum concentration (Tmax), the elimination half-life (t1/2), and terminal elimination rate (λz). All were analyzed using an ANOVA model after logarithmic transformation of the data. For establishing bioequivalence (BE) for capecitabine, reference-scaled average bioequivalence (RSABE) acceptance criteria and average bioequivalence (ABE) acceptance criteria were used. Safety and tolerability was assessed during the entire study period.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| capecitabine reference formulation at a single dose of 150 mg | Active Comparator | 150 mg of Xeloda® produced by Genentech USA, Inc., a subsidiary of the company, was used as the reference intervention in this study. |
|
| capecitabine test formulation at a single dose of 150 mg | Experimental | The tablet of 150 mg of capecitabine from Qilu Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (17H0053DE4, Jinan, Shandong Province, China) was used as the test formulation. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 150 mg of Xeloda® | Drug | Subjects were allocated to one of three groups randomly and equally with a 1-day wash time period. 150 mg of Xeloda® produced by Genentech USA, Inc., a subsidiary of the company, was used as the reference intervention in this study.The subjects randomly received single oral administration of 150 mg of Xeloda®. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Peak Plasma Concentration (Cmax) | Evaluation of Peak Plasma Concentration (Cmax) | 18 days |
| Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC)0-t | Evaluation of Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC)0-t | 18 days |
| Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC)0-∞ | Evaluation of Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC)0-∞ | 18 days |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events | Adverse events were recorded to evaluate the safety of the studied drugs. | 18 days |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| yu Cao, Doctor | the study director of phase I clinical research center | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phase Ⅰ Clinical Research Center | Qingdao | Shandong | 266003 | China |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 34347254 | Derived | Wang CJ, Li T, Lin PP, Tao Y, Jiang X, Li X, Wen Q, Cao Y. Pharmacokinetic and Safety Comparison of Two Capecitabine Tablets in Patients with Colorectal or Breast Cancer Under Fed Conditions: A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label, Three-Period, and Reference-Replicated Crossover Study. Adv Ther. 2021 Sep;38(9):4798-4814. doi: 10.1007/s12325-021-01817-4. Epub 2021 Aug 4. |
Not provided
Not provided
All the technical achievements and outcomes of this trial are owned by Qilu Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. and the research center. The research center can not publish any academic papers without the consent of the sponsor.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010358 | Patient Participation |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010342 | Patient Acceptance of Health Care |
| D000074822 | Treatment Adherence and Compliance |
| D015438 | Health Behavior |
| D001519 | Behavior |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000069287 | Capecitabine |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003841 | Deoxycytidine |
| D003562 | Cytidine |
| D011741 | Pyrimidine Nucleosides |
| D011743 | Pyrimidines |
Not provided
Not provided
A multicenter, randomized, open-label, three-period, and reference-replicated crossover study
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| 150 mg of capecitabine | Drug | Subjects were allocated to one of three groups randomly and equally with a 1-day wash time period.The tablet of 150 mg of capecitabine from Qilu Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (17H0053DE4, Jinan, Shandong Province, China) was used as the test formulation.The subjects randomly received single oral administration of 150 mg of capecitabine. |
|
| D006573 |
| Heterocyclic Compounds, 1-Ring |
| D006571 | Heterocyclic Compounds |
| D005472 | Fluorouracil |
| D014498 | Uracil |
| D011744 | Pyrimidinones |
| D003853 | Deoxyribonucleosides |
| D009705 | Nucleosides |
| D009706 | Nucleic Acids, Nucleotides, and Nucleosides |