Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
To evaluate the potential usefulness of 68Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for the diagnosis of primary and metastatic lesions in various types of cancer, compared with 18F-FDG PET/CT.
Subjects with various types of cancer underwent contemporaneous 68Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 and 18F-FDG PET/CT either for an initial assessment or for recurrence detection. Tumor uptake was quantified by the maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy of 18F-FDG and 68Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT were calculated and compared to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental: 68Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 | Experimental | Each subject receive a single intravenous injection of 18F-FDG and 68Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04, and undergo PET/CT imaging within the specified time. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18F-FDG and 68Ga-DOTA-FAPI -04 PET/CT | Diagnostic Test | Each subject receive a single intravenous injection of 18F-FDG and 68Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04, and undergo PET/CT imaging within the specified time. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| SUV | Standardized uptake value (SUV) of 18F/ 68Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 for each target lesion of subject or suspected primary tumor or/and metastasis. | 30 days |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Diagnostic efficacy | The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy of 18F-FDG and 68Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT were calculated and compared to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy. | 30 days |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hua Wu, PhD | Contact | 86 0592-2137166 | wuhua1025@163.com | |
| Haojun Chen, PhD | Contact | 86 0592-2137166 | leochen0821@foxmail.com |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First affiliated hospital of xiamen university | Recruiting | Xiamen | Fujian | 0086-361000 | China |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 33179149 | Derived | Guo W, Pang Y, Yao L, Zhao L, Fan C, Ke J, Guo P, Hao B, Fu H, Xie C, Lin Q, Wu H, Sun L, Chen H. Imaging fibroblast activation protein in liver cancer: a single-center post hoc retrospective analysis to compare [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT versus MRI and [18F]-FDG PET/CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021 May;48(5):1604-1617. doi: 10.1007/s00259-020-05095-0. Epub 2020 Nov 11. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D009362 | Neoplasm Metastasis |
| D004194 | Disease |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009385 | Neoplastic Processes |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
Subjects with various types of cancer undergo contemporaneous 68Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 and 18F-FDG PET/CT either for an initial assessment or for recurrence detection.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided