Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of the study is to compare the risk of PEP after pancreatic sphincterotomy performed for difficult cannulation in a group of patients with and in a group of patients without placement of a prophylactic pancreatic stent. The definition of difficult cannulation is defined according to the literature.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pancreatic sphincterotomy | Active Comparator | Pancreatic sphincterotomy performed in difficult cannulation |
|
| Pancreatic sphincterotomy + pancreatic stent | Active Comparator | Pancreatic sphincterotomy performed in difficult cannulation + pancreatic stent placement |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Biliary cannulation | Device | Cannulation of biliary duct by sphincterotome |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Post-ERCP pancreatitis rate | 30 days |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrea Tenca, MD, PhD | Contact | +358408484955 | ante14@hotmail.it |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Helsinki Univeristy Hospital | Recruiting | Helsinki | Finland |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided