Endoscopic Antegrade Sphincterotomy (ASD) Versus Standard Sphincterotomy

A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Antegrade Sphincterotomy Dovbenko (ASD) With Conventional Pull-Type Sphincterotomy in Patients Undergoing ERCP

This study compares endoscopic transpapillary antegrade sphincterotomy developed by Dr. Dovbenko (Antegrade Sphincterotomy Dovbenko, ASD) with conventional pull-type endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) in patients undergoing transpapillary interventions for various indications, including biliary stone disease, major duodenal papilla stenosis, choledocholithiasis, and other conditions requiring access to the biliary and/or pancreatic ducts. The ASD technique is performed using a dedicated sphincterotome designed by Dr. Dovbenko. Both the technique and the device are patented in Ukraine (Patent No. UA 117987C2, 2019). This instrument enables selective incision of only the circular muscle layer of the sphincter of Oddi, thereby preserving its sphincteric function and minimizing trauma to the duodenal wall. The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the relative risk of procedure-related complications, including bleeding, perforation, post-ERCP pancreatitis, and the need for cholecystectomy.

Anatomical studies confirm that the sphincter of Oddi comprises an inner circular muscle layer, functionally and structurally distinct from the duodenum, and an outer longitudinal layer derived from the duodenal wall. Preservation of this architecture is critical to maintaining sphincteric function. Standard pull-type sphincterotomy frequently disrupts both layers and adjacent duodenal tissue, contributing to procedure-related complications in up to 23% of ERCPs, including bleeding (≤3%), perforation (≤1%), and post-sphincterotomy reflux complications.

Antegrade Sphincterotomy Dovbenko (ASD) was developed to address these limitations. Using a dedicated sphincterotome (Ukrainian Patent No. UA 117987C2, 2019), ASD enables selective incision of the circular layer while sparing the longitudinal layer and duodenal integrity.

This prospective, randomized, parallel-group trial (NCT04406961) enrolled 1,521 patients requiring transpapillary intervention for biliary or pancreatic indications. Patients were assigned to ASD (n=761) or conventional EST (n=760).

In the ASD group, a trend toward reduced major complications was observed (RR 0.55; 95% CI 0.18-1.67); however, this difference did not reach statistical significance, likely due to the low absolute number of events. Notably, cholecystectomy was avoided in 71.2% of ASD patients with gallstone disease, compared to approximately 10% in the EST group. Temporary stenting (5-10 days) was used selectively to manage post-procedural edema. ASD should be performed exclusively by endoscopists with advanced transpapillary expertise.

Inclusion Criteria:

Clinical diagnosis of Gallstone Disease. Must have anatomy of the esophagus of the stomach and duodenum for the introduction of a duodenoscope to the major duodenal papilla.

Exclusion Criteria:

The acute form of viral hepatitis of any etiology. Acute decompensated heart failure complicated by respiratory failure.