Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The very slow pace of enrolment and the difficulty in identifying a third study centre.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The Physiological Monitoring Device (PMD-200™) system is comprised of a monitor and a designated finger probe containing 4 sensors. The sensors included are Photoplethysmography (PPG), Galvanic Skin Response (GSR), Accelerometer for movement (ACC) and Thermistor for peripheral temperature (TMP).
The PMD-200 is intended to be used for assessing the nociception level in anesthetized patients.
The purpose of the study is confirmation of a reduction in the dosage of remifentanil allowed by the monitoring of nociception by the NOL which could open the way to a double control of the administration of anesthetic agents: control of the administration of hypnotics by the bispectral index (BIS) and control of the administration of opiate by the NOL.
The PMD-200 continuous pain monitor is intended to be used for assessing changes in pain levels. The system monitors the physiological responses to pain using a relative pain index from 0-100, called the Nociception Level (NOL®) index. In the NOL index, 0 represents no nociception or pain and 100 represents high nociception or pain level.
The PMD-200 system consists of a monitor and a specific finger probe containing 4 sensors. The sensors included are Photoplethysmography (PPG), Galvanic Skin Response (GSR), Accelerometer for movement (ACC) and Thermistor for peripheral temperature (TMP).
The PMD-200™ is intended to be used for assessing the nociception level in anesthetized patients. The device is European Conformity (CE) marked and commercially available.
Meier et al. recently published a randomized trial involving 80 patients for major abdominal surgery, one group receiving routine care and the other NOL-guided analgesia. In the latter group, the remifentanil concentration was reduced when NOL values were below 10 or increased when NOL values were above 25 for at least 1 minute. In both groups, propofol was titrated to have bispectral index values between 45 and 55. Remifentanil administration was reduced in the NOL-guided group: 0.119 ± 0.033 vs 0.086 ± 0.032 μg.kg.min (p < 0.001). In the NOL- guided group, 2 out of 40 (5%) patients had hypotension (mean blood pressure less than 55 mm Hg) compared to 11 out of 40 (28%) in the control group (p = 0.006) and 16 out of 40 (40%) patients received vasoactive drugs vs 25 out of 40 (63%) (p = 0.044).
Previous results cover a small number of patients treated in a single center. The purpose of this study is to confirm this result within a multicenter study involving a larger group of patients. Confirmation of a reduction in the dosage of remifentanil allowed by the monitoring of nociception by the NOL will open the way to a double control of the administration of anesthetic agents: control of the administration of hypnotics by the bispectral index (BIS) and control of the administration of opiate by the NOL.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| "SCS" Group | Sham Comparator | Receiving anesthesia according to routine standard care, with the use of the "hidden" NOL (used to compare the data at the end of anesthesia with those of the classic BIS - without monitoring of the anesthesia by the NOL (without adjustment of treatments )) |
|
| NOL Group | Experimental | Receiving anesthesia monitored by the NOL |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bispectral index | Device | Anesthesia monitoring |
| |
| Bispectral index + NOL index |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Remifentanil consumption during maintenance | Remifentanil consumption during anesthesia maintenance in μg/kg/min | surgery day (D0) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Remifentanil consumption during induction | Remifentanil consumption during anesthesia induction in μg/kg/min | surgery day (D0) |
| Propofol consumption during induction | Propofol consumption during anesthesia induction in μg/kg/min |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Non-Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Morgan LE GUEN, MD | Foch HOSPITAL | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Foch Hospital | Suresnes | France | 92150 | France | ||
| Hôpital d'Instruction des Armées - Sainte-Anne |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 30829658 | Result | Meijer FS, Martini CH, Broens S, Boon M, Niesters M, Aarts L, Olofsen E, van Velzen M, Dahan A. Nociception-guided versus Standard Care during Remifentanil-Propofol Anesthesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Anesthesiology. 2019 May;130(5):745-755. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002634. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D056805 | Consciousness Monitors |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013523 | Surgical Equipment |
| D004864 | Equipment and Supplies |
Not provided
Not provided
Randomized, multi-center, single blinded interventional study with 2 parallel groups: standard clinical care (SCC group, control group) and NOL-guided analgesia (NOL guided analgesia group, interventional group), stratified by site
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Device |
Anesthesia monitoring |
|
| surgery day (D0) |
| Propofol consumption during maintenance | Propofol consumption during anesthesia maintenance in μg/kg/min | surgery day (D0) |
| Proportion of patients with intraoperative hemodynamic abnormality in the NOL index group compared to standard care group during induction | A hemodynamic abnormality is defined as:
| surgery day (D0) |
| Proportion of patients with intraoperative hemodynamic abnormality in the NOL index group compared to standard care group during maintenance | Mean Blood pressure events during anesthesia inductio A hemodynamic abnormality is defined as:
| surgery day (D0) |
| Proportion of patients with intraoperative anesthetic abnormality in the NOL index group compared to standard care group during induction | An anesthetic abnormality is defined as:
| surgery day (D0) |
| Proportion of patients with intraoperative anesthetic abnormality in the NOL index group compared to standard care group during maintenance | An anesthetic abnormality is defined as:
| surgery day (D0) |
| Wake up time | delay between the end of Propofol or Sugammadex/Neostigmine and extubation | surgery day (D0) |
| Intensity of pain in PACU (post-anesthesia care unit) | Morphine consumption in PACU (post-anesthesia care unit) | surgery day (D0) |
| Toulon |
| Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur Region |
| 83800 |
| France |
| Hopital d'Instruction des Armées de Bégin | Saint-Mandé | Saint Mandé | 94160 | France |