Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| U1111-1238-4679 | Registry Identifier | ICTRP | |
| 2019-004647-74 | EudraCT Number |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Regeneron Pharmaceuticals | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Primary Objective:
• To assess the effect of dupilumab on lung inflammation and related changes in airway volumes detectable by functional respiratory imaging
Secondary Objective:
The study duration for each participant was a total of minimum 29 weeks and up to 41 weeks. This included 4 weeks +/-1 week screening period, 24 weeks of treatment period and a follow-up period up to 12 weeks or until the participants switched to commercialized dupilumab (or other biologic products), whatever came first.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dupilumab | Experimental | Participants received a loading dose of dupilumab 600 mg as 2 subcutaneous (SC) injections on Day 1, followed by a single dupilumab 300 mg SC injection Q2W for 24 weeks along with a stable dose of medium to high ICS dose in combination with a second controller medication +/- a third controller. |
|
| Placebo | Placebo Comparator | Participants received placebo matched to dupilumab as 2 x 2 mL SC injections on Day 1, followed by a single SC injection Q2W for 24 weeks along with a stable dose of medium to high ICS dose in combination with a second controller medication +/- a third controller. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dupilumab | Drug | solution for injection subcutaneous |
|
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide (FeNO) Less Than (<) 25 Parts Per Billion (Ppb) at Week 24 | FeNO was analyzed using a NIOX instrument using a flow rate of 50 milliliters per second (mL/s). This assessment was conducted prior to spirometry and following a fast of greater than or equal to (≥1) hour. The test was performed after a wash out period of bronchodilators. | Week 24 |
| Percent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Untrimmed Distal Specific Airway Volumes ([s]iVaw) at Total Lung Capacity (TLC) | Specific airway volume [(s)iVaw] is the change of volume of the airways (in mL), taking into account the lung volume changes (in liter [L]) as well. It corresponds to the ratio between the airway volume (iVaw) and the lobar volume. This way the air volumes are normalized across participants and become specific. Untrimmed distal [s]iVaw at TLC was assessed based on 3-dimensional (D) rendering of high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) scans. Baseline was defined as the last available valid (non-missing) value up to and including the day of first dose of investigational medicinal product (IMP). | Baseline (Day 1) to Week 24 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Global Lung Mucus Score (University of California, San Francisco [UCSF] Mucus Scoring) | The mucus scoring system was derived, with very minor differences, from UCSF mucus score. The mucus score was calculated by counting the number of bronchopulmonary segments which contained 1 or more mucus plug, up to a maximum score of 18 corresponding to the 18 bronchopulmonary segments present in most people. In this system, a mucus plug is defined as a complete occlusion of the airway visible at TLC. Each bronchopulmonary segment is given a score of 1 (mucus plug[s] present) or 0 (mucus plug[s] absent). The segment scores of each lobe are summed to generate a total mucus score for both lungs, yielding a mucus score ranging from 0-18. Higher scores indicate worse outcome. Baseline was defined as the last available valid (non-missing) value up to and including the date of first dose of IMP. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
NOTES:
Exclusion Criteria:
Current smoker (cigarette or e-cigarette) or cessation of smoking within 1 year prior randomization
Previous smoker with a smoking history >10 pack-years
Known hypersensitivity to dupilumab or any of its excipients
A subject who experiences an asthma exacerbation (defined as a deterioration of asthma that results in emergency treatment, hospitalization due to asthma, or treatment with systemic steroids) during screening
Current acute bronchospasm or status asthmaticus
Diagnosed pulmonary (other than asthma) or systemic disease associated with elevated peripheral eosinophil counts
History or clinical evidence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) including Asthma-COPD Overlap Syndrome (ACOS) or any other significant lung disease (eg, lung fibrosis, sarcoidosis, interstitial lung disease, pulmonary hypertension, bronchiectasis, Churg-Strauss Syndrome, etc)
Active tuberculosis, latent untreated tuberculosis or a history of incompletely treated tuberculosis or non-tuberculous mycobacterial infection unless it is well documented by a specialist that the participants has been adequately treated and the treatment with a biologic agent can be initiated, in the medical judgment of the Investigator and/or infectious disease specialist. Tuberculosis testing would only be performed on a country by country basis according to the routine clinical practice and the local guidelines, if required by regulatory authorities or ethics committees
History of or current evidence of clinically significant disease in any non-respiratory system (e.g. cardiovascular, hepatic, nervous system, gastrointestinal, endocrinological, rheumatological, dermatological), which, in the judgment of the Investigator, could interfere with the study or require treatment that might interfere with the study
Current evidence of clinically significant oncological disease, which in the opinion of the investigator may interfere with the objectives of the study or put the subject at undue risk
Participants with any of the following results at V1:
History of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection or positive HIV serology at V1
Any biologic therapy (including experimental treatments and dupilumab) or any other biologic therapy/immunosuppressant within 3 months prior to V1
Treatment with live (attenuated) vaccine within 4 weeks before V1. For participants who have vaccination with live, attenuated vaccines planned during the course of the study (based on national vaccination schedule/local guidelines), it will be determined, after consultation with a physician, whether the administration of vaccine can be postponed until after the end of the study, or preponed to before the start of the study without compromising the health of the participant:
Treatment with oral corticosteroids (OCS) within 2 weeks prior to V1
Enrolled in other ongoing studies regardless of the investigational product
Treatment with an investigational drug within 1 month or within 5 half-lives (if known), whichever is longer, prior to V1
Suspected or high risk of parasitic infection (helminthic infection), unless clinical and (if necessary) laboratory assessments have ruled out active infection prior to randomization
Females who are lactating, breastfeeding, or who are pregnant
Individuals accommodated in an institution because of regulatory or legal order; prisoners or subjects who are legally institutionalized
Participants are dependent on the Sponsor or Investigator (in conjunction with Section 1.61 of the ICH GCP Ordinance E6)
Participants are employees of the clinical study site or other individuals directly involved in the conduct of the study, or immediate family members of such individuals
Sensitivity to any of the study interventions, or components thereof, or drug or other allergy that, in the opinion of the Investigator, contraindicates participation in the study
Any country-related specific regulation that would prevent the subject from entering the study
The above information is not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a patient's potential participation in a clinical trial.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Allianz Research Institute Site Number : 8400020 | Westminster | California | 92683 | United States | ||
| University of Kansas School of Medicine Site Number : 8400008 |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 41145399 | Derived | Porsbjerg C, Dunican EM, Lugogo NL, Castro M, Papi A, Backer V, Brightling CE, Bourdin A, Virchow JC, Zhang M, Soler X, Rowe PJ, Deniz Y, de Prado Gomez L, Sacks HJ, Jacob-Nara JA. Effect of dupilumab on mucus burden in patients with moderate-to-severe asthma: the VESTIGE trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2026 Feb 1;212(2):241-252. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202410-1894OC. | |
| 39947221 |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| LPS15834 Plain Language Results Summary | View source |
Not provided
Qualified researchers may request access to patient level data and related study documents including the clinical study report, study protocol with any amendments, blank case report form, statistical analysis plan, and dataset specifications. Patient level data will be anonymized and study documents will be redacted to protect the privacy of trial participants. Further details on Sanofi's data sharing criteria, eligible studies, and process for requesting access can be found at: https://vivli.org
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
A total of 109 participants were randomized in a ratio of 2:1 to receive dupilumab 300 milligrams (mg) or matching placebo every 2 weeks (Q2W) for 24 weeks. Randomization was stratified by inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) dose level (medium/high no less than 40% in 'high ICS' stratum) and region (Eastern Europe/Rest of the World [ROW]).
A total of 317 participants were screened from 20 Jun 2020 to 06 Jan 2023 at 72 study sites in 14 countries of which 208 participants were screen failures. Screen failures were mainly due to not meeting the eligibility criteria.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Dupilumab 300 mg Q2W | Participants received a loading dose of dupilumab 600 mg as 2 subcutaneous (SC) injections on Day 1, followed by a single dupilumab 300 mg SC injection Q2W for 24 weeks along with a stable dose of medium to high ICS dose in combination with a second controller medication +/- a third controller. |
| FG001 |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Apr 13, 2023 | Jun 18, 2024 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Placebo | Drug | Solution for injection subcutaneous |
|
| Baseline (Day 1) to Week 24 |
| Percent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Trimmed Distal Specific Airway Resistance ([s]iRaw) at TLC | iRaw is defined as the total pressure drop over an airway, divided by the flow rate through that airway. The specific airway resistance (s)iRaw is derived from iRaw by multiplying the airway resistance with the lobar volume. This way, the airway resistances are normalized across participants and become specific. Trimmed distal ([s]iRaw) at TLC was assessed using HRCT scan. Baseline was defined as the last available valid (non-missing) value up to and including the day of first dose of IMP. | Baseline (Day 1) to Week 24 |
| Percent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Untrimmed Distal Specific Airway Volumes ([s]iVaw) at Functional Residual Capacity (FRC) | (s)iVaw is the change of volume of the airways (mL), taking into account the lung volume changes (in L) as well. It corresponds to the ratio between the airway volume (iVaw) and the lobar volume. Untrimmed distal [s]iVaw at FRC was assessed based on 3-D rendering of HRCT scans. Baseline was defined as the last available valid (non-missing) value up to and including the day of first dose of IMP. | Baseline (Day 1) to Week 24 |
| Percent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Trimmed Distal Specific Airway Resistance ([s]iRaw) at FRC | iRaw is defined as the total pressure drop over an airway, divided by the flow rate through that airway. The specific airway resistance (s)iRaw is derived from iRaw by multiplying the airway resistance with the lobar volume. This way, the airway resistances are normalized across participants and become specific. Trimmed distal [s]iRaw at FRC was assessed using HRCT scan. Baseline was defined as the last available valid (non-missing) value up to and including the day of the first dose of IMP. | Baseline (Day 1) to Week 24 |
| Percent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Global Lung Lobar Volumes (iVlobes) at TLC | The lung volume was determined from the HRCT scan at TLC, by identifying and grouping the voxels that represent the air in the lungs. The total lung volume along with the volume of each lobe individually was determined which allowed to pick up substantial regional physiological changes of the airways and the lobe volumes. Baseline was defined as the last available valid (non-missing) value up to and including the day of first dose of IMP. | Baseline (Day 1) to Week 24 |
| Change From Baseline to Week 24 in HRCT-Based Internal Airflow Distribution (IAD) for Each Lung Zone | The IAD was assessed in the upper and lower lung using HRCT scan. By segmenting the lobes at FRC and TLC for each participant, the participant-specific airflow distribution can be established by assessing lobar and volume expansion. Baseline was defined as the last available valid (non-missing) value up to and including the date of the first dose of IMP. | Baseline (Day 1) to Week 24 |
| Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Image-Based Ventilation/Perfusion (iV/Q) at TLC for Each Lung Zone | Blood vessel density can be considered a surrogate for perfusion, hence image-based perfusion (IQ) is calculated by blood vessel density at TLC multiplied by image-based volume at TLC. Image-based ventilation (IV) is calculated by the imaged volume at TLC subtracted from the image-based volume at FRC. The ventilation/perfusion ratio IV/Q is then the ratio IV/IQ. The iV/Q was assessed in the upper and lower lung using HRCT scan at TLC. Baseline was defined as the last available valid (non-missing) value up to and including the day of the first dose of IMP. | Baseline (Day 1) to Week 24 |
| Change From Baseline to Week 24 in FeNO | FeNO was analyzed using a NIOX instrument using a flow rate of 50 mL/s. This assessment was conducted prior to spirometry and following a fast of ≥1 hour. The test was performed after a wash out period of bronchodilators. Baseline was defined as the last available valid (non-missing) value up to and including the day of the first dose of IMP. | Baseline (Day 1) to Week 24 |
| Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Pre-Bronchodilator and Post-Bronchodilator Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) | FEV1 was the volume of air exhaled in the first second of a forced expiration. Lung function parameters: pre- and post-bronchodilator FEV1 were measured by spirometry before IMP administration. Spirometry was performed after a wash out period of bronchodilators. Post-BD FEV1 was measured within 30 minutes after short-acting beta-2 agonists (2 to up to 4 puffs of albuterol/salbutamol) administration. Baseline was defined as the last available valid (non-missing) value up to and including the date of the first dose of IMP. | Baseline (Day 1) to Week 24 |
| Change From Baseline to Week 24 in 7 Item Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-7) | The ACQ-7 comprises of 7 items:first 5 items assess most common asthma symptoms: 1. frequency in past week awoken by asthma during the night; 2. severity of asthma symptoms in the morning; 3. limitation of daily activities due to asthma; 4. shortness of breath due to asthma; and 5. wheeze; plus questions 6. short-acting bronchodilator use; and 7. FEV1 (pre-bronchodilator use, % and % predicted use).Participants are asked to recall how their asthma has been during the previous week and to respond to the symptom questions on a 7-point scale (0=no impairment, 6=maximum impairment).Clinic staff scores the FEV1% predicted on a 7-point scale.A global score is calculated: the questions are equally weighted, and the overall ACQ-7 score is the mean of the 7 questions and, therefore, between 0 (totally controlled) and 6 (severely uncontrolled).Higher score indicates lower asthma control. Baseline=last available valid (non-missing) value up to and including day of the first dose of IMP. | Baseline (Day 1) to Week 24 |
| Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs), and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs) | AE: any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. TEAEs: AEs that developed or worsened or became serious during the TEAE period, defined as the time from the first administration of the IMP (on Day 1) to the last administration of the IMP + 98 days and up to the end of the study follow-up. Serious adverse events (SAE): AE that at any dose: resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect, was a medically important event. AESI: AE (serious or nonserious) of scientific and medical concern specific to the Sponsor's product or program, for which ongoing monitoring and immediate notification by the Investigator to the Sponsor is required. | From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to end of study (up to 36 weeks) |
| Kansas City |
| Kansas |
| 66103 |
| United States |
| University of Michigan Site Number : 8400002 | Ann Arbor | Michigan | 48109 | United States |
| The Lung Research Center Site Number : 8400010 | Chesterfield | Missouri | 63017 | United States |
| American Health Research Site Number : 8400005 | Charlotte | North Carolina | 28277 | United States |
| Velocity Clinical Research, Medford Site Number : 8400014 | Medford | Oregon | 97504 | United States |
| Medical University of South Carolina - Pulmonary & Critical Care Clinical Research Program Site Number : 8400009 | Charleston | South Carolina | 29425 | United States |
| VitaLink Research-Greenville Site Number : 8400013 | Greenville | South Carolina | 29615 | United States |
| VitaLink Research - Spartanburg Site Number : 8400011 | Spartanburg | South Carolina | 29303 | United States |
| ~Spartanburg Medical Research Site Number : 8400004 | Spartanburg | South Carolina | 29303 | United States |
| Investigational Site Number : 1000013 | Dupnitsa | 2600 | Bulgaria |
| Investigational Site Number : 1000004 | Montana | 3403 | Bulgaria |
| Investigational Site Number : 1000018 | Plovdiv | 4000 | Bulgaria |
| Investigational Site Number : 1000012 | Plovdiv | 4002 | Bulgaria |
| Investigational Site Number : 1000008 | Rousse | 7002 | Bulgaria |
| Investigational Site Number : 1000015 | Sofia | 1000 | Bulgaria |
| Investigational Site Number : 1000005 | Sofia | 1202 | Bulgaria |
| Investigational Site Number : 1000003 | Sofia | 1233 | Bulgaria |
| Investigational Site Number : 1000006 | Sofia | 1233 | Bulgaria |
| Investigational Site Number : 1000011 | Sofia | 1407 | Bulgaria |
| Investigational Site Number : 1000010 | Sofia | 1431 | Bulgaria |
| Investigational Site Number : 1000002 | Sofia | 1680 | Bulgaria |
| Investigational Site Number : 1000007 | Stara Zagora | 6001 | Bulgaria |
| Investigational Site Number : 2080006 | Aarhus N | 8200 | Denmark |
| Investigational Site Number : 2080002 | Copenhagen | 2100 | Denmark |
| Investigational Site Number : 2080003 | Copenhagen Nv | 2400 | Denmark |
| Investigational Site Number : 2080001 | Hvidovre | 2650 | Denmark |
| Investigational Site Number : 2500001 | Montpellier | France |
| Investigational Site Number : 3800003 | Cona | Ferrara | 44124 | Italy |
| Investigational Site Number : 3800004 | Rozzano | Milano | 20089 | Italy |
| Investigational Site Number : 3800001 | Pisa | 56124 | Italy |
| Investigational Site Number : 6200004 | Coimbra | 3000-075 | Portugal |
| Investigational Site Number : 6200005 | Guimarães | 4810-061 | Portugal |
| Investigational Site Number : 6200006 | Lisbon | 1649-035 | Portugal |
| Investigational Site Number : 6200003 | Porto | 4100-180 | Portugal |
| Investigational Site Number : 6200001 | Porto | 4202-451 | Portugal |
| Investigational Site Number : 6420005 | Bragadiru | 769764 | Romania |
| Investigational Site Number : 6420008 | Brasov | 500283 | Romania |
| Investigational Site Number : 6420006 | Cluj-Napoca | 400275 | Romania |
| Investigational Site Number : 6420001 | Cluj-Napoca | 400371 | Romania |
| Investigational Site Number : 6420007 | Oradea | 410155 | Romania |
| Investigational Site Number : 6420003 | Timișoara | 300134 | Romania |
| Investigational Site Number : 6820008 | Dammam | 31952 | Saudi Arabia |
| Investigational Site Number : 6820004 | Jeddah | 21423 | Saudi Arabia |
| Investigational Site Number : 6820006 | Riyadh | 11426 | Saudi Arabia |
| Investigational Site Number : 6820001 | Riyadh | 11525 | Saudi Arabia |
| Investigational Site Number : 6820002 | Riyadh | 12372 | Saudi Arabia |
| Investigational Site Number : 6820010 | Riyadh | 12746 | Saudi Arabia |
| Investigational Site Number : 7240001 | Barcelona | Barcelona [Barcelona] | 08035 | Spain |
| Investigational Site Number : 7240002 | Santiago de Compostela | Galicia [Galicia] | 15706 | Spain |
| Investigational Site Number : 7240005 | Madrid | Madrid, Comunidad de | 28041 | Spain |
| Investigational Site Number : 7240003 | Madrid | Madrid, Comunidad de | 28046 | Spain |
| Investigational Site Number : 7520001 | Lund | 221 85 | Sweden |
| Investigational Site Number : 1580004 | Kaohsiung City | 807 | Taiwan |
| Investigational Site Number : 1580002 | Taichung | 40447 | Taiwan |
| Investigational Site Number : 1580003 | Tainan | 704 | Taiwan |
| Investigational Site Number : 1580001 | Taipei | 110 | Taiwan |
| Investigational Site Number : 8040003 | Chernivtsi | 58001 | Ukraine |
| Investigational Site Number : 8040001 | Ivano-Frankivsk | 76018 | Ukraine |
| Investigational Site Number : 8040002 | Kharkiv | 61124 | Ukraine |
| Investigational Site Number : 8040004 | Kyiv | 01023 | Ukraine |
| Investigational Site Number : 8040005 | Odesa | 65025 | Ukraine |
| Investigational Site Number : 8040007 | Ternopil | 46000 | Ukraine |
| Investigational Site Number : 8260001 | Leicester | Leicestershire | LE3 9QP | United Kingdom |
| Investigational Site Number : 8260002 | Bradford | BD9 6RJ | United Kingdom |
| Castro M, Papi A, Porsbjerg C, Lugogo NL, Brightling CE, Gonzalez-Barcala FJ, Bourdin A, Ostrovskyy M, Staevska M, Chou PC, Duca L, Pereira AM, Fogarty C, Nadama R, Zhang M, Rodrigues A, Soler X, Sacks HJ, Deniz Y, Rowe PJ, de Prado Gomez L, Jacob-Nara JA. Effect of dupilumab on exhaled nitric oxide, mucus plugs, and functional respiratory imaging in patients with type 2 asthma (VESTIGE): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 4 trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2025 Mar;13(3):208-220. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(24)00362-X. Epub 2025 Feb 10. |
| Placebo |
Participants received placebo matched to dupilumab as 2 x 2 milliliter (mL) SC injections on Day 1, followed by a single SC injection Q2W for 24 weeks along with a stable dose of medium to high ICS dose in combination with a second controller medication +/- a third controller. |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
The Intent-to-Treat (ITT) analysis set consisted of randomized participant (participant with a study intervention kit number allocated and recorded in the interactive voice recognition system [IVRS]/ interactive web response system [IWRS] database, regardless of whether the study intervention kit was used or not).
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Dupilumab 300 mg Q2W | Participants received a loading dose of dupilumab 600 mg as 2 SC injections on Day 1, followed by a single dupilumab 300 mg SC injection Q2W for 24 weeks along with a stable dose of medium to high ICS dose in combination with a second controller medication +/- a third controller. |
| BG001 | Placebo | Participants received placebo matched to dupilumab as 2 x 2 mL SC injections on Day 1, followed by a single SC injection Q2W for 24 weeks along with a stable dose of medium to high ICS dose in combination with a second controller medication +/- a third controller. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Untrimmed Distal Specific Airway Volumes ([s]iVaw) at Total Lung Capacity (TLC) | Only those participants with data available at baseline are reported. | Mean | Standard Deviation | mL |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide (FeNO) Less Than (<) 25 Parts Per Billion (Ppb) at Week 24 | FeNO was analyzed using a NIOX instrument using a flow rate of 50 milliliters per second (mL/s). This assessment was conducted prior to spirometry and following a fast of greater than or equal to (≥1) hour. The test was performed after a wash out period of bronchodilators. | The ITT analysis set consisted of randomized participants (participants with a study intervention kit number allocated and recorded in the IVRS/IWRS database, regardless of whether the study intervention kit was used or not). | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Week 24 |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Percent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Untrimmed Distal Specific Airway Volumes ([s]iVaw) at Total Lung Capacity (TLC) | Specific airway volume [(s)iVaw] is the change of volume of the airways (in mL), taking into account the lung volume changes (in liter [L]) as well. It corresponds to the ratio between the airway volume (iVaw) and the lobar volume. This way the air volumes are normalized across participants and become specific. Untrimmed distal [s]iVaw at TLC was assessed based on 3-dimensional (D) rendering of high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) scans. Baseline was defined as the last available valid (non-missing) value up to and including the day of first dose of investigational medicinal product (IMP). | The ITT analysis set consisted of randomized participants (participants with a study intervention kit number allocated and recorded in the IVRS/IWRS database, regardless of whether the study intervention kit was used or not). Only participants with data collected at Week 24 are reported. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | percent change | Baseline (Day 1) to Week 24 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Global Lung Mucus Score (University of California, San Francisco [UCSF] Mucus Scoring) | The mucus scoring system was derived, with very minor differences, from UCSF mucus score. The mucus score was calculated by counting the number of bronchopulmonary segments which contained 1 or more mucus plug, up to a maximum score of 18 corresponding to the 18 bronchopulmonary segments present in most people. In this system, a mucus plug is defined as a complete occlusion of the airway visible at TLC. Each bronchopulmonary segment is given a score of 1 (mucus plug[s] present) or 0 (mucus plug[s] absent). The segment scores of each lobe are summed to generate a total mucus score for both lungs, yielding a mucus score ranging from 0-18. Higher scores indicate worse outcome. Baseline was defined as the last available valid (non-missing) value up to and including the date of first dose of IMP. | The ITT analysis set consisted of randomized participants (participants with a study intervention kit number allocated and recorded in the IVRS/IWRS database, regardless of whether the study intervention kit was used or not). Only participants with data collected at Week 24 are reported. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | score on a scale | Baseline (Day 1) to Week 24 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Trimmed Distal Specific Airway Resistance ([s]iRaw) at TLC | iRaw is defined as the total pressure drop over an airway, divided by the flow rate through that airway. The specific airway resistance (s)iRaw is derived from iRaw by multiplying the airway resistance with the lobar volume. This way, the airway resistances are normalized across participants and become specific. Trimmed distal ([s]iRaw) at TLC was assessed using HRCT scan. Baseline was defined as the last available valid (non-missing) value up to and including the day of first dose of IMP. | The ITT analysis set consisted of randomized participants (participants with a study intervention kit number allocated and recorded in the IVRS/IWRS database, regardless of whether the study intervention kit was used or not). Only participants with data collected at Week 24 are reported. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | percent change | Baseline (Day 1) to Week 24 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Untrimmed Distal Specific Airway Volumes ([s]iVaw) at Functional Residual Capacity (FRC) | (s)iVaw is the change of volume of the airways (mL), taking into account the lung volume changes (in L) as well. It corresponds to the ratio between the airway volume (iVaw) and the lobar volume. Untrimmed distal [s]iVaw at FRC was assessed based on 3-D rendering of HRCT scans. Baseline was defined as the last available valid (non-missing) value up to and including the day of first dose of IMP. | The ITT analysis set consisted of randomized participants (participants with a study intervention kit number allocated and recorded in the IVRS/IWRS database, regardless of whether the study intervention kit was used or not). Only participants with data collected at Week 24 are reported. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | percent change | Baseline (Day 1) to Week 24 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Trimmed Distal Specific Airway Resistance ([s]iRaw) at FRC | iRaw is defined as the total pressure drop over an airway, divided by the flow rate through that airway. The specific airway resistance (s)iRaw is derived from iRaw by multiplying the airway resistance with the lobar volume. This way, the airway resistances are normalized across participants and become specific. Trimmed distal [s]iRaw at FRC was assessed using HRCT scan. Baseline was defined as the last available valid (non-missing) value up to and including the day of the first dose of IMP. | The ITT analysis set consisted of randomized participants (participants with a study intervention kit number allocated and recorded in the IVRS/IWRS database, regardless of whether the study intervention kit was used or not). Only participants with data collected at Week 24 are reported. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | percent change | Baseline (Day 1) to Week 24 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Global Lung Lobar Volumes (iVlobes) at TLC | The lung volume was determined from the HRCT scan at TLC, by identifying and grouping the voxels that represent the air in the lungs. The total lung volume along with the volume of each lobe individually was determined which allowed to pick up substantial regional physiological changes of the airways and the lobe volumes. Baseline was defined as the last available valid (non-missing) value up to and including the day of first dose of IMP. | The ITT analysis set consisted of randomized participants (participants with a study intervention kit number allocated and recorded in the IVRS/IWRS database, regardless of whether the study intervention kit was used or not). Only participants with data collected at Week 24 are reported. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | percent change | Baseline (Day 1) to Week 24 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline to Week 24 in HRCT-Based Internal Airflow Distribution (IAD) for Each Lung Zone | The IAD was assessed in the upper and lower lung using HRCT scan. By segmenting the lobes at FRC and TLC for each participant, the participant-specific airflow distribution can be established by assessing lobar and volume expansion. Baseline was defined as the last available valid (non-missing) value up to and including the date of the first dose of IMP. | The ITT analysis set consisted of randomized participants (participants with a study intervention kit number allocated and recorded in the IVRS/IWRS database, regardless of whether the study intervention kit was used or not). Only participants with data collected at Week 24 are reported. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | percentage of IAD | Baseline (Day 1) to Week 24 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Image-Based Ventilation/Perfusion (iV/Q) at TLC for Each Lung Zone | Blood vessel density can be considered a surrogate for perfusion, hence image-based perfusion (IQ) is calculated by blood vessel density at TLC multiplied by image-based volume at TLC. Image-based ventilation (IV) is calculated by the imaged volume at TLC subtracted from the image-based volume at FRC. The ventilation/perfusion ratio IV/Q is then the ratio IV/IQ. The iV/Q was assessed in the upper and lower lung using HRCT scan at TLC. Baseline was defined as the last available valid (non-missing) value up to and including the day of the first dose of IMP. | The ITT analysis set consisted of randomized participants (participants with a study intervention kit number allocated and recorded in the IVRS/IWRS database, regardless of whether the study intervention kit was used or not). Only participants with data collected at Week 24 are reported. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Ratio | Baseline (Day 1) to Week 24 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline to Week 24 in FeNO | FeNO was analyzed using a NIOX instrument using a flow rate of 50 mL/s. This assessment was conducted prior to spirometry and following a fast of ≥1 hour. The test was performed after a wash out period of bronchodilators. Baseline was defined as the last available valid (non-missing) value up to and including the day of the first dose of IMP. | The ITT analysis set consisted of randomized participants (participants with a study intervention kit number allocated and recorded in the IVRS/IWRS database, regardless of whether the study intervention kit was used or not). | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | parts per billion | Baseline (Day 1) to Week 24 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Pre-Bronchodilator and Post-Bronchodilator Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) | FEV1 was the volume of air exhaled in the first second of a forced expiration. Lung function parameters: pre- and post-bronchodilator FEV1 were measured by spirometry before IMP administration. Spirometry was performed after a wash out period of bronchodilators. Post-BD FEV1 was measured within 30 minutes after short-acting beta-2 agonists (2 to up to 4 puffs of albuterol/salbutamol) administration. Baseline was defined as the last available valid (non-missing) value up to and including the date of the first dose of IMP. | The ITT analysis set consisted of randomized participants (participants with a study intervention kit number allocated and recorded in the IVRS/IWRS database, regardless of whether the study intervention kit was used or not). | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | liter | Baseline (Day 1) to Week 24 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline to Week 24 in 7 Item Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-7) | The ACQ-7 comprises of 7 items:first 5 items assess most common asthma symptoms: 1. frequency in past week awoken by asthma during the night; 2. severity of asthma symptoms in the morning; 3. limitation of daily activities due to asthma; 4. shortness of breath due to asthma; and 5. wheeze; plus questions 6. short-acting bronchodilator use; and 7. FEV1 (pre-bronchodilator use, % and % predicted use).Participants are asked to recall how their asthma has been during the previous week and to respond to the symptom questions on a 7-point scale (0=no impairment, 6=maximum impairment).Clinic staff scores the FEV1% predicted on a 7-point scale.A global score is calculated: the questions are equally weighted, and the overall ACQ-7 score is the mean of the 7 questions and, therefore, between 0 (totally controlled) and 6 (severely uncontrolled).Higher score indicates lower asthma control. Baseline=last available valid (non-missing) value up to and including day of the first dose of IMP. | The ITT analysis set consisted of randomized participants (participants with a study intervention kit number allocated and recorded in the IVRS/IWRS database, regardless of whether the study intervention kit was used or not). Only participants with data collected at Week 24 are reported. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | score on a scale | Baseline (Day 1) to Week 24 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs), and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs) | AE: any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. TEAEs: AEs that developed or worsened or became serious during the TEAE period, defined as the time from the first administration of the IMP (on Day 1) to the last administration of the IMP + 98 days and up to the end of the study follow-up. Serious adverse events (SAE): AE that at any dose: resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect, was a medically important event. AESI: AE (serious or nonserious) of scientific and medical concern specific to the Sponsor's product or program, for which ongoing monitoring and immediate notification by the Investigator to the Sponsor is required. | The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 injection of IMP. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to end of study (up to 36 weeks) |
|
From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to end of study (up to 36 weeks)
Analysis was performed on safety analysis set.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Dupilumab 300 mg Q2W | Participants received a loading dose of dupilumab 600 mg as 2 SC injections on Day 1, followed by a single dupilumab 300 mg SC injection Q2W for 24 weeks along with a stable dose of medium to high ICS dose in combination with a second controller medication +/- a third controller. | 0 | 72 | 3 | 72 | 18 | 72 |
| EG001 | Placebo | Participants received placebo matched to dupilumab as 2 x 2 mL SC injections on Day 1, followed by a single SC injection Q2W for 24 weeks along with a stable dose of medium to high ICS dose in combination with a second controller medication +/- a third controller. | 0 | 37 | 1 | 37 | 15 | 37 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eosinophilia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDra 26.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Eosinophilic Granulomatosis With Polyangiitis | Immune system disorders | MedDra 26.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Facial Bones Fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDra 26.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Soft Tissue Injury | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDra 26.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Asthma | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDra 26.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDra 26.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Injection Site Reaction | General disorders | MedDra 26.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Covid-19 | Infections and infestations | MedDra 26.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pneumonia | Infections and infestations | MedDra 26.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDra 26.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Asthma | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDra 26.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Rhinorrhoea | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDra 26.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Sleep Apnoea Syndrome | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDra 26.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
The Sponsor supports publication of clinical trial results but may request that investigators temporarily delay or alter publications in order to protect proprietary information. The Sponsor may also require that the results of multicenter studies be published only in their entirety and not as individual site data.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trial Transparency Team | Sanofi aventis recherche & développement | 800-633-1610 | 6# | Contact-US@sanofi.com |
| Prot_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Jul 25, 2023 | Jun 18, 2024 | SAP_001.pdf |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001249 | Asthma |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001982 | Bronchial Diseases |
| D012140 | Respiratory Tract Diseases |
| D008173 | Lung Diseases, Obstructive |
| D008171 | Lung Diseases |
| D012130 | Respiratory Hypersensitivity |
| D006969 | Hypersensitivity, Immediate |
| D006967 | Hypersensitivity |
| D007154 | Immune System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C582203 | dupilumab |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
|
Participants received placebo matched to dupilumab as 2 x 2 mL SC injections on Day 1, followed by a single SC injection Q2W for 24 weeks along with a stable dose of medium to high ICS dose in combination with a second controller medication +/- a third controller.
|
|
|
| OG001 |
| Placebo |
Participants received placebo matched to dupilumab as 2 x 2 mL SC injections on Day 1, followed by a single SC injection Q2W for 24 weeks along with a stable dose of medium to high ICS dose in combination with a second controller medication +/- a third controller. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
| OG001 | Placebo | Participants received placebo matched to dupilumab as 2 x 2 mL SC injections on Day 1, followed by a single SC injection Q2W for 24 weeks along with a stable dose of medium to high ICS dose in combination with a second controller medication +/- a third controller. |
|
|
| OG001 | Placebo | Participants received placebo matched to dupilumab as 2 x 2 mL SC injections on Day 1, followed by a single SC injection Q2W for 24 weeks along with a stable dose of medium to high ICS dose in combination with a second controller medication +/- a third controller. |
|
|