Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The benefit of completing the study was not worth exposing subjects to the risk during COVID. Delaying the return visits would make it difficult to analyze the changes in data overtime.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Sure, Inc. | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Prospective, case-control study being conducted to determine the sensitivity of the SureTouch device in detecting known masses at a pre-determined level of specificity.
This is a single-center, prospective, case-control study being conducted to determine the sensitivity of the SureTouch device in detecting known masses at a pre-determined level of specificity.
Results of the mammography will be compared to the SureTouch examination results.
Subjects will have between 1 and 3 research visits and 3 follow-up surveys, up to two years from the initial visit. The number of visits will be based upon comparison of the SureTouch examination to conventional breast screening techniques (mammogram and ultrasound).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subjects without messes | Experimental | Subjects who are believed to be free of masses. |
|
| Subjects with known masses | Experimental | Subjects with known masses. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SureTouch | Device | The first group will consist of 70 women who are believed to be free of masses, recruited during a screening mammography appointment. The second group will include 125 women presenting for diagnostic mammography and/or biopsy appointment with known masses identified on mammogram, ultrasound or both. Both groups will receive breast cancer screening with mammography and SureTouch. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Primary | 1. This study examines the sensitivity of the SureTouchâ„¢ system, compared with methods that are the current standard of care (screening and diagnostic mammography with ultrasound), to detect clinically significant mass lesions in the breast. | 2 years |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Secondary | The study will determine the patient acceptance of and satisfaction with the SureTouch devise. Outcome measure will use an original 8 question Likert-scale survey to assess patient perception of the comfort, duration, and acceptance of the device. A higher score indicates a better outcome. Brief Survey Monkey adapted from Press Ganey Patient Satisfaction Survey for Radiography and US Performed in the Outpatient Setting. Itri JN. Patient-centered Radiology. RadioGraphics 2015; 35:1835-1848 |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Arm 1:
Arm 2:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Rebecca Kaltman, MD | The George Washington University | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| George Washington University - Medical Faculty Associates | Washington D.C. | District of Columbia | 20037 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Background | Cancer Stat Facts: Female Breast Cancer. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER). https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/breast.html#skipnav. Accessed July 2, 2018. | ||
| 28910066 | Background | National Center for Health Statistics (US). Health, United States, 2016: With Chartbook on Long-term Trends in Health. Hyattsville (MD): National Center for Health Statistics (US); 2017 May. Report No.: 2017-1232. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK453378/ | |
| 23673574 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001943 | Breast Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D001941 | Breast Diseases |
| D012871 | Skin Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| 2 years |
| Background |
| Chang JM, Park IA, Lee SH, Kim WH, Bae MS, Koo HR, Yi A, Kim SJ, Cho N, Moon WK. Stiffness of tumours measured by shear-wave elastography correlated with subtypes of breast cancer. Eur Radiol. 2013 Sep;23(9):2450-8. doi: 10.1007/s00330-013-2866-2. Epub 2013 May 15. |
| Background | Michaelson, James & Satija, Sameer & Moore, Richard & Weber, Griffin & Halpern, Elkan & Garland, Andrew & Kopans, Daniel & Hughes, Kevin. (2003). Estimates of the Sizes at Which Breast Cancers Become Detectable on Mammographic and Clinical Grounds. Journal of Women's Imaging. 5. 10.1097/00130747-200302000-00002. |
| 21122101 | Background | Evans A, Whelehan P, Thomson K, McLean D, Brauer K, Purdie C, Jordan L, Baker L, Thompson A. Quantitative shear wave ultrasound elastography: initial experience in solid breast masses. Breast Cancer Res. 2010;12(6):R104. doi: 10.1186/bcr2787. Epub 2010 Dec 1. |
| 8590726 | Background | Skovorda AR, Klishko AN, Gusakian DA, Maevskii EI, Ermilova VD, Oranskaia GA, Sarvazian AP. [Quantitative analysis of mechanical characteristics of pathologically altered soft biological tissues]. Biofizika. 1995 Nov-Dec;40(6):1335-40. Russian. |
| 10197347 | Background | Krouskop TA, Wheeler TM, Kallel F, Garra BS, Hall T. Elastic moduli of breast and prostate tissues under compression. Ultrason Imaging. 1998 Oct;20(4):260-74. doi: 10.1177/016173469802000403. |
| 19578481 | Background | Sarvazyan A, Egorov V, Son JS, Kaufman CS. Cost-effective screening for breast cancer worldwide: current state and future directions. Breast Cancer (Auckl). 2008;1:91-9. doi: 10.4137/bcbcr.s774. Epub 2008 Jul 2. |
| 16978946 | Background | Kaufman CS, Jacobson L, Bachman BA, Kaufman LB. Digital documentation of the physical examination: moving the clinical breast exam to the electronic medical record. Am J Surg. 2006 Oct;192(4):444-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.06.006. |
| 11177142 | Background | Wellman PS, Dalton EP, Krag D, Kern KA, Howe RD. Tactile imaging of breast masses: first clinical report. Arch Surg. 2001 Feb;136(2):204-8. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.136.2.204. |
| Background | Kaufman CS, et al., Objective measurement of the physical exam using a new device: reproducible triage of palpable masses. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2004; 88; supp 1:S223-4- SABCS 2004. |
| Background | Kaufman CS, Son JS, Yered E, Sarvazyan A. Cancer Res May 1 2015 (75) (9 Supplement) P1- 02-09; DOI:10.1158/1538-7445.SABCS14-P1-02-09 |
| 19770337 | Background | Hunt CH, Hartman RP, Hesley GK. Frequency and severity of adverse effects of iodinated and gadolinium contrast materials: retrospective review of 456,930 doses. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Oct;193(4):1124-7. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.2520. |
| 29489663 | Background | Heshmatzadeh Behzadi A, Farooq Z, Newhouse JH, Prince MR. MRI and CT contrast media extravasation: A systematic review. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Mar;97(9):e0055. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000010055. |
| D017437 |
| Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases |