Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Ultrasound imaging has revolutionized the practice of regional anesthesia in that the operator can visualize and identify the paravertebral space, needle during its passage through the tissues, as well as deposition and spread of local anesthetic into the desired spaces. The usage of ultrasound may facilitate more rapid block onset and prolong duration with the added advantage of decrease in drug dosage, reduction in incidence of local anesthetic toxicity, increase success rate, reduction in procedure pain and better patient satisfaction.
Paravertebral block targets drug delivery to the site of pain, thus decreasing opioids use. It can provide greater overall comfort with lower pain scores and greater tolerance of physical activity during the initial postoperative period.
Ultrasound imaging has revolutionized the practice of regional anesthesia in that the operator can visualize and identify the paravertebral space, needle during its passage through the tissues, as well as deposition and spread of local anesthetic into the desired spaces. The usage of ultrasound may facilitate more rapid block onset and prolong duration with the added advantage of decrease in drug dosage, reduction in incidence of local anesthetic toxicity, increase success rate, reduction in procedure pain and better patient satisfaction.
To the best of researchers' knowledge, evaluation of unilateral ultrasound guided paravertebral block as perioperative analgesia for lower limb-sparing surgery in adult cancer patients was not investigated before.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Paravertebral group (group P): | Experimental | After induction of general anesthesia and stabilization of the patients, they were positioned in lateral decubitus position with the side to be blocked uppermost. |
|
| Control group (group C): | Experimental | Patients underwent surgery under general anesthesia and received the perioperative routine protocol of analgesia (IV fentanyl 2 μcg/kg at induction and 1 gm of IV paracetamol). |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paravertebral group (group P): | Drug | In both groups, one reading of mean arterial pressure and heart rate were taken before induction of general anaesthesia and were defined as baseline readings and then were recorded intra-operatively at 15 min intervals. Additional bolus doses of fentanyl 0.5µg/kg were given when the mean arterial blood pressure or heart rate raised above 20% of baseline levels. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Total intraoperative fentanyl consumption. | Total intraoperative fentanyl consumption. | 24 hours |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Visual Analouge Scale at 0 , 4 , 8 ,12 ,24 hours postoperatively. | Visual Analouge Scaleat 0 , 4 , 8 ,12 ,24 hours postoperatively.The VAS consists of a 10-cm line, with anchors at either end. One end is marked "no pain" and the other end is marked "the worst imaginable pain". The patient marks the place on the line to indicate his or her pain intensity. The clinician then measures the line with a ruler and assigns a score. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Ahmed Abdalla Mohamed, M.D | Cairo University | Principal Investigator |
| Enas Mohamed Samir, M.D | Cairo University | Principal Investigator |
| Walaa Y Elsabeeny, M.D | National Cancer Institute, Cairo University | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ahmed Abdalla Mohamed | Cairo | 11451 | Egypt |
Until ending the investigator's work
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Prospective randomized controlled double-blind study.
Not provided
Not provided
sealed opaque envelopes prepared by an assistant blinded about the study targets and chosen by patient him/herself, allocated into two groups
|
|
| 24 hours |
| Heart rate and mean arterial blood pressure . | Heart rate(beat per minutes) and mean arterial blood pressure(mm HG) | 24 hours |
| Morphine consumption postoperatively for 24 hours.. | Morphine consumption per mg postoperatively for 24 hours.. | 24 hours Postoperative |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D035061 | Control Groups |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D015340 | Epidemiologic Research Design |
| D004812 | Epidemiologic Methods |
| D008919 | Investigative Techniques |
| D012107 | Research Design |
| D008722 | Methods |
Not provided
Not provided