Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Low back pain (LBP) is the most common musculoskeletal condition treated in physical therapy, accounting for an estimated 25-40% of outpatient physical therapy visits. One strategy commonly used for treating LBP is directional preference. Directional preference is the process of examining a patient with LBP's response to a movement direction, i.e., extension, and if it coincides with improvement, the test becomes part of the treatment. Various studies have shown evidence for, and use of directional preference by physical therapists. Specifically for LBP, directional preference usually involves either an extension-bias or flexion-bias, with various studies indication an extension protocol being the most common (estimated > 80% of patients). With extension exercises, a favorable therapeutic effect result in centralization of symptoms (leg pain migrates proximal), improved range of motion (ROM), decreased pain and decreased fear of movement.
In recent years there has been an increased interest in various pain neuroscience strategies to help people in pain, including LBP. It is well established that the physical body of a person is represented in the brain by a network of neurons, often referred to as a representation of that particular body part in the brain. This representation refers to the pattern of activity that is evoked when a particular body part is stimulated. The most famous area of the brain associated with representation is the primary somatosensory cortex (S1). These neuronal representations of body parts are dynamically maintained. It has been shown that patients with pain display different S1 representations than people with no pain. The interesting phenomenon associated with cortical restructuring is the fact that the body maps expand or contract, in essence increasing or decreasing the body map representation in the brain. Furthermore, these changes in shape and size of body maps seem to correlate to increased pain and disability. Various studies have shown that physical movement is associated with restoring the cortical maps, which in turn may be associated with a decreased pain experience.
In patients with high levels of pain, sensitization of the nervous system and fear of movement, physical movement itself may increase a pain experience. An added therapeutic ability to help restore these cortical maps is motor imagery (visualization). Various studies have shown that motor imagery activate the same areas of the brain as when actually physically moving, thus restoring the altered maps "without moving."
Patient arrive to physical therapy with low back pain (physician referral or self-referral)
Patient complete standard clinic medical and insurance intake forms
Based on the intake forms, patients are screened by the physical therapists against the inclusion criteria and if met, asked to participate in the study
Upon agreement, a written consent is signed
Patients complete research intake forms:
Age
Gender
Duration of LBP
Location of LBP (body chart with grid allocation)
Patients undergo a standard physical therapy interview
Patients undergo a standard physical therapy examination
Patients undergo a directional preference test to determine if they are potentially responsive to extension exercises
Once patients are shown to be responsive to extension, they are alternately allocated to receive motor imagery of extension exercises (experimental group; [EG]) or physical extension exercises (control group, [CG]).
Prior to the treatment lumbar extension ROM will be measured via a standardized procedure
Upon completion of the tests, patients will receive one of two allocated treatments
Following the treatment, patients will undergo repeat measures of:
Upon return, measurements will be repeated of:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Motor Imagery | Experimental | Patients are instructed in a motor imagery protocol of imaging extension exercises (similar to the CG), without doing the actual extension exercises. Patients will be instructed in visualizing them moving into extension and back as well as common sensations they may experience (as if doing the actual exercise). They will repeat the visualization process 10 times while in the clinic, after which they will be instructed in a home program containing the same treatment - every 2 hours, perform 10 visualization exercises. |
|
| Control | Active Comparator | Patients are instructed in extension exercises and actually, physically doing the actual extension exercises. Patients will physically repeat the extension exercises 10 times while in the clinic, after which they will be instructed in a home program containing the same treatment - every 2 hours, perform 10 exercises. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Motor Imagery. Imaging doing Extension exercises without actually doing them. | Other | This study will compare imagining doing specific extension based exercises for LBP vs. actually performing the exercises. This intervention will be just imaging doing the exercises. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Spine ROM | range patient is able to bend backward | within a single, 90 minute session |
| Pain rating | Numeric pain rating Scale 0 - 10 (0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain). The minimal detectable change (MDC) for the NPRS for low back pain is reported to be 2.0. | within a single, 90 minute session |
| Fear of Movement | Fear Avoidance Belief Questionnaire (FABQ): The FABQ is a self-report of patients feelings about their fear to move. | within a single, 90 minute session |
| Pain Catastrophization | Pain Catastrophization Scale: The PCS is a self-report questionnaire assessing inappropriate coping strategies and catastrophic thinking about pain and injury. on a 13-item, 5-point Likert scale with higher scores indicating elevated levels of catastrophizing. | within a single, 90 minute session |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Kevin Farrell | St. Ambrose University | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Edward Elmhurst Health Physical Therapy | Naperville | Illinois | 60517 | United States | ||
| Kevin Farrell |
There are no plans to share any of individual's data. All data will be coded for data entry and analysis by research team.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D017116 | Low Back Pain |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001416 | Back Pain |
| D010146 | Pain |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
This is an Randomized Control Trial. Subjects with LBP will be allocated to one of 2 study groups.
Not provided
Not provided
Patients will be assigned in an alternating order to either the experimental or control group.
| Control: Physically performing extension based exercises. | Other | This study will compare imagining doing specific extension based exercises for LBP vs. actually doing them. This intervention will be actually, physically performing the exercises. |
|
| Davenport |
| Iowa |
| 52803 |
| United States |
| Rock Valley Physical Therapy | Davenport | Iowa | 52806 | United States |
| Genesis Physical Therapy - 53rd St | Davenport | Iowa | 52807 | United States |
| D013568 |
| Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |