Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1U19AI120249 | U.S. NIH Grant/Contract | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) | NIH |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This is a double-blinded crossover study to evaluate whether Eudragit® content impacts the ability to self-insert placebo vaginal films. Thirty women will self-insert one high and and one low Eudragit® content film. The insertion order will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio. After inserting each film, participants will complete a survey reporting their perceptions and experience. The primary endpoint is successful insertion defined as all of the film inside the vagina upon visual assessment by a study clinician. Secondary outcomes include preference for the low level or high level Eudragit® formulation film with respect to insertion and participants' description of identified challenges.
This is a double-blinded crossover study to evaluate whether ammonio methacrylate copolymer dispersion type B (Eudragit®) content impacts the ability to self-insert placebo vaginal films. Eudragit® is a commonly used pharmaceutical excipient, present in several FDA approved products. This hydrophobic excipient is used in vaginal film formulations to increase disintegration time and impart extended drug release property. The presence of Eudragit and its concentration level affects film disintegration and spreadability in the vaginal environment, and are likely to affect tactile properties. Consequently, these attributes may impact ease of film administration, acceptability, and user preferences for specific film type.
Thirty pre-menopausal women, 18 - 45 years of age, will self-insert one high and and one low Eudragit® content film. High and low Eudragit films correspond to 12.8% and 6.4% of Eudragit® added during the formulation blending stage. The insertion order will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio. Within 10 minutes of the insertion, clinical staff will perform a speculum exam to assess the location of the film and remove the residual film. After inserting each film, participants will complete a survey reporting their perceptions and experience. The primary endpoint is successful insertion defined as all of the film inside the vagina upon visual assessment by a study clinician. Secondary outcomes include preference for the low level or high level Eudragit® formulation film with respect to insertion and participants' description of identified challenges.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| High Eudragit® Film, then Low Eudragit® Film | Experimental | High (12.8%) Eudragit® content vaginal film, then low (6.4%) Eudragit® content vaginal film |
|
| Low Eudragit® Film, then High Eudragit® Film | Experimental | Low (6.4%) Eudragit® content vaginal film, then high (12.8%) Eudragit® content vaginal film |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| High Eudragit® Content Vaginal Film | Device | High (12.8%) Eudragit® Content Vaginal Film |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants That Successfully Insert Vaginal Film | Number of participants that successfully insert each vaginal film defined as the film location being completely inside the vagina upon visual assessment by a clinician | Approximately 30 minutes |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants That Report Self-Insertion of Vaginal Film Was Easy | Participants that report that self-insertion of the placebo vaginal film was not difficult at all as assessed on a Likert scale from 1 (not difficult at all) to 4 (very difficult) | Approximately 30 minutes |
| Number of Participants That Prefer the High Over the Low Eudragit® Content Vaginal Film |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Sharon L Hillier, PhD | University of Pittsburgh | Principal Investigator |
| Katherine Bunge, MD | University of Pittsburgh | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Pittsburgh, Magee Womens Hospital | Pittsburgh | Pennsylvania | 15213 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9863584 | Background | Visness CM, Ulin P, Pfannenschmidt S, Zekeng L. Views of Cameroonian sex workers on a woman-controlled method of contraception and disease protection. Int J STD AIDS. 1998 Nov;9(11):695-9. doi: 10.1258/0956462981921224. | |
| 21774672 | Background | Nel AM, Mitchnick LB, Risha P, Muungo LT, Norick PM. Acceptability of vaginal film, soft-gel capsule, and tablet as potential microbicide delivery methods among African women. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2011 Aug;20(8):1207-14. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2010.2476. Epub 2011 Jul 20. |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| UNAIDS Women and Girls and HIV. | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | High Eudragit® Film, Then Low Eudragit® Film | High (12.8%) Eudragit® content vaginal film, then low (6.4%) Eudragit® content vaginal film High Eudragit® Content Vaginal Film: High (12.8%) Eudragit® Content Vaginal Film Low Eudragit® Content Vaginal Film: Low (6.4%) Eudragit® Content Vaginal Film |
| FG001 | Low Eudragit® Film, Then High Eudragit® Film | Low (6.4%) Eudragit® content vaginal film, then high (12.8%) Eudragit® content vaginal film High Eudragit® Content Vaginal Film: High (12.8%) Eudragit® Content Vaginal Film Low Eudragit® Content Vaginal Film: Low (6.4%) Eudragit® Content Vaginal Film |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | High Eudragit® Film, Then Low Eudragit® Film | High (12.8%) Eudragit® content vaginal film, then low (6.4%) Eudragit® content vaginal film High Eudragit® Content Vaginal Film: High (12.8%) Eudragit® Content Vaginal Film Low Eudragit® Content Vaginal Film: Low (6.4%) Eudragit® Content Vaginal Film |
| BG001 |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Number of Participants That Successfully Insert Vaginal Film | Number of participants that successfully insert each vaginal film defined as the film location being completely inside the vagina upon visual assessment by a clinician | All participants who attempted insertion of both vaginal film products which included the entire cohort of 30 enrolled participants. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Approximately 30 minutes |
|
1 week
The arms were combined since participants used both films within a single visit which lasted 60-90 minutes. Within 10 minutes after the first film insertion, a speculum exam was performed to assess location of the film, then all film was removed. The participant then inserted the second film, and the aforementioned procedure was repeated. Thus, it was not possible to determine which film any adverse events would be attributable to. No adverse events were observed or reported during this study.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | High Eudragit® Film, Then Low Eudragit® Film | High (12.8%) Eudragit® content vaginal film, then low (6.4%) Eudragit® content vaginal film High Eudragit® Content Vaginal Film: High (12.8%) Eudragit® Content Vaginal Film Low Eudragit® Content Vaginal Film: Low (6.4%) Eudragit® Content Vaginal Film |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr. Leslie Meyn | University of Pittsburgh Medical School | 412-641-4233 | meynla@mwri.magee.edu |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Apr 7, 2020 | Oct 22, 2021 | Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
| ICF | No | No | Yes | Informed Consent Form | Jul 1, 2020 | Oct 22, 2021 | ICF_001.pdf |
Not provided
Each participant will self-insert one low level Eudragit® and one high level Eudragit® formulation film. The sequence of insertion will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio.
Not provided
Not provided
The participants, clinicians, and assessors of the study outcomes will be blinded to Eudragit® content of the film.
| Low Eudragit® Content Vaginal Film | Device | Low (6.4%) Eudragit® Content Vaginal Film |
|
Number of participants that report that they would prefer to use the high Eudragit® content vaginal film over the low Eudragit® content vaginal film. This outcome was analyzed by order of film product use (high then low vs low then high) as this may influence product preference. |
| Approximately 1 hour |
| 10549452 | Background | Raymond E, Alvarado G, Ledesma L, Diaz S, Bassol S, Morales E, Fernandez V, Carlos G. Acceptability of two spermicides in five countries. Contraception. 1999 Jul;60(1):45-50. doi: 10.1016/s0010-7824(99)00060-8. |
| Low Eudragit® Film, Then High Eudragit® Film |
Low (6.4%) Eudragit® content vaginal film, then high (12.8%) Eudragit® content vaginal film High Eudragit® Content Vaginal Film: High (12.8%) Eudragit® Content Vaginal Film Low Eudragit® Content Vaginal Film: Low (6.4%) Eudragit® Content Vaginal Film |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| Body Mass Index | Mean | Standard Deviation | kg/m^2 |
|
| Sexually Active | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Prior participation in vaginal film studies | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Participants That Report Self-Insertion of Vaginal Film Was Easy | Participants that report that self-insertion of the placebo vaginal film was not difficult at all as assessed on a Likert scale from 1 (not difficult at all) to 4 (very difficult) | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Approximately 30 minutes |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Participants That Prefer the High Over the Low Eudragit® Content Vaginal Film | Number of participants that report that they would prefer to use the high Eudragit® content vaginal film over the low Eudragit® content vaginal film. This outcome was analyzed by order of film product use (high then low vs low then high) as this may influence product preference. | All participants that attempted insertion of both vaginal film products; this included the entire cohort of 30 enrolled. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Approximately 1 hour |
|
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 15 |
| 0 |
| 15 |
| 0 |
| 15 |
| EG001 | Low Eudragit® Film, Then High Eudragit® Film | Low (6.4%) Eudragit® content vaginal film, then high (12.8%) Eudragit® content vaginal film High Eudragit® Content Vaginal Film: High (12.8%) Eudragit® Content Vaginal Film Low Eudragit® Content Vaginal Film: Low (6.4%) Eudragit® Content Vaginal Film | 0 | 15 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
Not provided
Not provided
| No Preference |
|