Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The main purpose of this study is to identify short-term predictors of positive responses to a spinal manipulation treatment. To do this, positive responses to treatment, characterized by improvement in pain score, functional capacity, as well as the global perceived change will be evaluated using single and multiple logistic regressions in which biomechanical variables, comfort, expectation will used as potential predictors.
The main purpose of this study is to identify short-term predictors of positive responses to a spinal manipulation treatment. To do this, positive responses to treatment, characterized by improvement in pain score, functional capacity, as well as the global perceived change will be evaluated at baseline and at 7 days. Pain score will be also assessed every day with text-tracking. Global perceived change will be evaluated using single and multiple logistic regressions in which biomechanical variables, comfort, expectation will used as potential predictors. 100 individuals with a history of non-specific back pain will be recruited in a chiropractic care center.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thoracic spinal manipulation | Other | High velocity, low amplitude force manipulation |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Thoracic Back Pain (Numerical Analog Scale) | assessed by a 0-10 points scale, higher score means altered, lower score means improved | change from baseline to Day-7 |
| Functional Disability (Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale) | assessed by 0-100 points questionary. Higher scores correlate to greater disability | change from baseline to Day-7 |
| Global Perceived Change Scale | assessed by a 11-point score scale: higher score means improved, lower score means altered | at day-7 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Dosage | assessed by a force-sensing table recording data through a computer software | during the intervention |
| Expectation (for improvement of pain and disability) | assessed by a 11-point score scale : higher score means improved, lower score means altered |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Participants are patient in the chiropractic care center
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Martin Descarreaux, DC, PhD | Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières | Trois-Rivières | Quebec | G8Z 4M3 | Canada |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001416 | Back Pain |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010146 | Pain |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| at baseline (pre-intervention) |
| Socio-demographic factors | assessed with a patient history questionary | at baseline(pre-intervention) |
| Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia | Questionary, Total score range from 17 to 68, Higher score indicate a worst outcome | at baseline(pre-intervention) |
| Level of anxiety | Assessed using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) (score range from 20 (minimum) to 80 (maximum) : higher score mean a worst outcome) | at baseline (pre-intervention) |
| Level of Comfort | Assessed with a 100mm scale : higher score means very comfortable | at baseline (post-intervention) |