Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
MAIN OBJECTIVE: to assess whether an exercise protocol on the lumbar musculature by adding manual therapy techniques on the diaphragm muscle has the same or greater effect on chronic non-specific lumbar pain than an isolated exercise protocol.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: to evaluate the effectiveness of a lumbar exercise protocol in chronic non-specific low back pain in isolation; To evaluate the effectiveness of both therapies in improving joint range in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain and, finally, to assess catastrophism and the avoidance of lumbar mobility when carrying out loaded movements.
HYPOTHESIS: that a lumbar exercise protocol combined with manual therapy treatment on the diaphragm is equal or more effective on pain in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain than treatment with the same lumbar exercise protocol in isolation.
METHODOLOGY: A prospective randomized clinical trial with two types of intervention (lumbar exercise protocol and manual diaphragm therapy) will be carried out. The variables to be measured are pain, disability, mobility and kinesiophobia. It will be performed in two groups of 21 people who are of legal age, who have low back pain of more than 3 months duration and which is of non-specific origin.
The patients will be randomized and divided into two groups A (control) and B (experimental).
Group A will undergo an exercise protocol.
Group B will undergo the same protocol plus manual therapy techniques on diaphragm muscle. Study participants will have treatment twice a week for 8 weeks, the first information session and the second measurement-evaluation session in the first week of treatment. In the following 3 weeks the session will last 40 minutes for both groups. In the 4th week the established measurements will be carried out again.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Group A: Exercise therapy | Experimental | Group A: will perform an exercise protocol to improve the stability of the spine muscle of low-back |
|
| Group B. Manual therapy and exercises | Experimental | Group B: Will be treated with manual therapy in the diaphragm muscle and the same protocol of therapeutic exercise applied in group A |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exercise protocol | Other | Exercises:
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Low-back pain | The investigators use a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) to determine the intensity of the patient with lowback pain.The VAS is a 100-mm line, oriented horizontally, with one end representing "no pain" and ten the other end representing "worst pain." Subjects will be asked to rate their current pain with a mark on the scale. | Change from Baseline disability at 3 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Disability with Oswestry Disability Index | The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is a questionnaire used by clinicians and researchers to quantify disability for low back pain.The self-completed questionnaire contains ten topics concerning intensity of pain, lifting, ability to care for oneself, ability to walk, ability to sit, sexual function, ability to stand, social life, sleep quality, and ability to travel.Each topic category is followed by 6 statements describing different potential scenarios in the patient's life relating to the topic. The patient then checks the statement which most closely resembles their situation. Each question is scored on a scale of 0-5 with the first statement being zero and indicating the least amount of disability and the last statement is scored 5 indicating most severe disability. The scores for all questions answered are summed, then multiplied by two to obtain the index (range 0 to 100). Zero is equated with no disability and 100 is the maximum disability possible |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Tomas Gallego Izquierdo, PhD | Alcala University | Study Chair |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grupo Fisioterapia y Dolor | Alcalá de Henares | Madrid | 28871 | Spain |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D017116 | Low Back Pain |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001416 | Back Pain |
| D010146 | Pain |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D026201 | Musculoskeletal Manipulations |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000529 | Complementary Therapies |
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
| D026741 | Physical Therapy Modalities |
| D012046 | Rehabilitation |
Not provided
Not provided
Randomized clinical trial
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Manual therapy | Other |
|
|
|
| Change from Baseline disability at 3 months |
| Lumbar range of motion | Mobility. It will be measured using an electronic inclinometer.The TiltMeter© -advanced level and inclinometer app is an inclinometer app of iPhone®. The investigation has demonstrated that the app possesses good to excellent reliability (ICC ≥ 0.77) and concurrent validity with a gravity-based inclinometer (r ≥ 0.86) for measuring standing isolated lumbar flexion and extension range of movement | Change from Baseline disability at 3 months |
| Kinesiophobia | Kinesiophobia was measured by an 11-item version of the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK-11). The 11 items of the scale each have 4 response options; all anchored with the answers "strongly disagree", which scores 1 point, and "strongly agree", which scores 4 points. The total sum score is calculated and can range between 11 and 44 points. A high score indicates strong fear of movement/(re)injury, i.e. high kinesiophobia. TSK-11 has been psychometrically evaluated and has shown good construct validity and reliability among older people (i.e. internal consistency (Cronbach alpha, 0.74-0.87) and test-retest reliability (ICC r = 0.747) | Change from Baseline disability at 3 months |
| D013568 |
| Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |