Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Novotech (Australia) | UNKNOWN |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this adaptive trial is to determine the clinical efficacy of Ifenprodil in the treatment of patients infected with COVID-19. This Protocol is largely based on the recommendations of the World Health Organization (WHO) R&D Blueprint Clinical Trials Expert Group COVID-19 Therapeutic Trial Synopsis, and associated Master Protocol.
The choice of the primary outcome measure will be determined by a pilot study of the first 150 subjects. Subject clinical status (on a 7-point ordinal scale) at day 15 in treatment versus the control group is the default primary endpoint.
NP-120 (Ifenprodil) is an N-methyl-D-Aspartate (NDMA) inhibitor that is specific for the NR2B subunit of the NMDA Receptor. The NMDA receptor, and specifically the NR2B subunit, is involved in glutamate signaling, and is expressed on both neutrophils and T cells. In the case of neutrophils, activation of the NMDA receptor can (1) result in expression of CD11b which targets neutrophils via ICAM-1 to areas of inflammation, and (2) trigger the autocrine release of glutamate. In the case of T-cells, activation of T cells via glutamate can cause (1) T cell proliferation and, (2) the release of cytokines. The activation of T cells and cytokine release can be blocked in vitro by the addition of Ifenprodil. As such it could be a potent anti-inflammatory agent.
Ifenprodil was discovered by a genome wide RNAi assay to uncover gene targets associated with cytoprotective activity against highly pathogenic H5N1 influenza, specifically by preserving cell viability in vitro. When tested in a murine model of H5N1, the drug at clinically relevant doses: (1) improved survivability from 0% at day 6 to 40% day 14 post-infection, (2) the drug significantly reduced edema and lung injury score and (3) reduced infiltrating T cells, neutrophils and NK cells and attenuated the 'cytokine storm'. The mortality rate of H5N1 in humans is >50%, whereas the mortality rate of COVID-19 infected patients is < 5%, and both viruses cause acute lung injury and share similar pulmonary pathologies. NP-120 has also been shown to mediate anti-inflammatory responses and reduce pulmonary fibrosis in a murine model of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, a complication which can occur after a respiratory virus infection.
Based on the fact that H5N1 has a significantly higher mortality rate than COVID-19 but still shares similar lung pathologies, Algernon Pharmaceuticals believes Ifenprodil could reduce lung injury associated with COVID-19 infection, thereby improving lung function and accelerating patient recovery.
The purpose of this Phase 2b/3 trial is to determine the safety and efficacy of NP-120 in the treatment of COVID-19 infection.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment Arm A | Experimental | NP-120 (Ifenprodil) 20 mg TID + Standard of Care |
|
| Control Arm | No Intervention | Standard of Care only | |
| Treatment Arm B | Experimental | NP-120 (Ifenprodil) 40 mg TID + Standard of Care |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NP-120 (Ifenprodil) | Drug | Ifenprodil, 20 mg TID Ifenprodil, 40 mg TID |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Patient Clinical Status (on the WHO 7-point Ordinal Scale) at Day 15 in IP Versus SOC Control Group Patients: |
| Day 15 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Status on an Ordinal Scale Assessed Daily While Hospitalized and on Days 15 and 28 in IP Versus Control Group Patients | WHO status of subjects at timepoints from baseline to day 28
|
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Male and female subjects aged ≥18 years of age
Confirmed coronavirus infection
Must be hospitalized and requiring supplemental oxygen, or on non-invasive ventilation or high flow oxygen devices (Score of 4 or 5 on WHO Ordinal Clinical Scale)
Female subjects of childbearing potential who are sexually active with a non-sterilized male partner must use at least 1 highly effective method of contraception (e.g. oral contraceptives, intrauterine device, diaphragm plus spermicide) from the time of screening and must agree to continue using such precautions for 90 days after the final dose of study drug(s)
Non-sterilized males who are sexually active with a female partner of childbearing potential must use condom plus spermicide from day 1 through 90 days after receipt of the last dose of study drug(s)
Subjects (or reasonable legal designate) must have the capacity to understand, sign and date a written, informed consent form and any required authorization prior to initiation of any study procedures
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Westchester Research Center | Miami | Florida | 33155 | United States | ||
| Affinity Health - Loretto Hospital |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Treatment Arm A | NP-120 (Ifenprodil) 20 mg TID + Standard of Care |
| FG001 | Treatment Arm B | NP-120 (Ifenprodil) 40 mg TID + Standard of Care |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Nov 16, 2020 | Nov 22, 2021 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Days 1 through 28 |
| NEWS Assessed Days 3, 5, 8 ,11 Daily While Hospitalized and on Days 15 and 29 in IP Versus Control Group Patients | National Early Warning Score assessed between baseline and Day 29 on subjects in 20, 40 mg TID NP-120 arms versus control group The National Early Warning Score (NEWS) scale is a composite of 7 physiological parameters: Respiration Rate (per minute),Oxygen Saturations (%), Any Supplemental Oxygen, Temperature (°C), Systolic BP (mmHg), Heart Rate (per minute), Level of Consciousness. The aggregate results from all 7 physiological parameters are used to obtain the NEW Score., ranging from 0 - 20. Higher values reflect a worse outcome. | Days 3, 5, 8, 11, 25, 29 |
| Rate of Mechanical Ventilation in IP Versus Control Group Patients | Rate of mechanical ventilation in 20 and 40 mg TID NP-120 versus control group | Up to Day 28 |
| Duration of Mechanical Ventilation (if Applicable) in IP Versus Control Group Patients | Duration of mechanical ventilation in 20 and 40 mg TID subjects versus control who experience mechanical ventilation | Up to day 28 |
| Duration of Supplemental Oxygen in IP Versus Control Group Patients | Duration in patients only receiving supplemental oxygen in IP versus control group up to Day 29 | Up to Day 29 |
| Time to Return to Room Pressure (SpO2 > 94%) on Room Air | Time to return to room pressure (SpO2 > 94%) on room air in patients in 20, 40 mg TID NP-120 groups versus control group with 94% blood oxygen levels at enrolment Time-to-event endpoints with competing risk were analysed for each dosing group using the Cumulative Incidence Function-CIF (KM) graphical display. Data represents the time (in Days) it took for all participants in the group to return to room pressure air (e.g. the time when the CIF curve hit 100%). | Up to Day 29 |
| Duration in ICU (if Applicable) in IP Versus Control Group Patients | Duration of subject in ICU in 20 and 40 TID mg groups versus control group patients | Up to Day 29 |
| Rate of Mortality in IP Versus Control Group Patients | Rate of Overall Mortality in 20, 40 mg TID groups versus control group | Up to Day 29 |
| Duration of Hospitalization in IP Versus Control Group Patients | Day 15, 28 |
| Time to Discharge in IP Versus Control Group Patients | Day 15, 28 |
| Effect on the Rate of Change of Partial Pressure of Oxygen (PaO2) and PaO2/FiO2 Ratio Taken at Baseline and Measured Once Daily up to 2 Weeks of Treatment in IP Versus Control Group Patients | Up to day 15, day 28 |
| Chicago |
| Illinois |
| 60644 |
| United States |
| Heartland Regional Medical Center | Saint Joseph | Missouri | 64507 | United States |
| Promedica Health: Toledo Hospital and BayPark Hospital | Toledo | Ohio | 43606 | United States |
| Princess Alexandra Hospital | Woolloongabba | Queensland | 4102 | Australia |
| Royal Melbourne Hospital | Parkville | Victoria | 3050 | Australia |
| Makati Medical Center | Manila | Philippines |
| Philippine General Hospital | Manila | Philippines |
| Lung Center of the Philippines | Quezon City | Philippines |
| National Institute of Infectious Diseases | Bucharest | 021105 | Romania |
| FG002 | Control Arm | Standard of Care only |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Treatment Arm A | NP-120 (Ifenprodil) 20 mg TID + Standard of Care |
| BG001 | Treatment Arm B | NP-120 (Ifenprodil) 40 mg TID + Standard of Care |
| BG002 | Control Arm | Standard of Care only |
| BG003 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Patient clinical status on WHO 7 point ordinal scale | Mean | Standard Deviation | scores on a scale |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Patient Clinical Status (on the WHO 7-point Ordinal Scale) at Day 15 in IP Versus SOC Control Group Patients: |
| Analysis performed on the number of patients with WHO-7 data | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Day 15 |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Status on an Ordinal Scale Assessed Daily While Hospitalized and on Days 15 and 28 in IP Versus Control Group Patients | WHO status of subjects at timepoints from baseline to day 28
| Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | scores on a scale | Days 1 through 28 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | NEWS Assessed Days 3, 5, 8 ,11 Daily While Hospitalized and on Days 15 and 29 in IP Versus Control Group Patients | National Early Warning Score assessed between baseline and Day 29 on subjects in 20, 40 mg TID NP-120 arms versus control group The National Early Warning Score (NEWS) scale is a composite of 7 physiological parameters: Respiration Rate (per minute),Oxygen Saturations (%), Any Supplemental Oxygen, Temperature (°C), Systolic BP (mmHg), Heart Rate (per minute), Level of Consciousness. The aggregate results from all 7 physiological parameters are used to obtain the NEW Score., ranging from 0 - 20. Higher values reflect a worse outcome. | NEWS score collected on patients currently hospitalized, or returning for follow up visits | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | scores on a scale | Days 3, 5, 8, 11, 25, 29 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Rate of Mechanical Ventilation in IP Versus Control Group Patients | Rate of mechanical ventilation in 20 and 40 mg TID NP-120 versus control group | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Up to Day 28 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Duration of Mechanical Ventilation (if Applicable) in IP Versus Control Group Patients | Duration of mechanical ventilation in 20 and 40 mg TID subjects versus control who experience mechanical ventilation | Posted | Number | participants | Up to day 28 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Duration of Supplemental Oxygen in IP Versus Control Group Patients | Duration in patients only receiving supplemental oxygen in IP versus control group up to Day 29 | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Up to Day 29 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Time to Return to Room Pressure (SpO2 > 94%) on Room Air | Time to return to room pressure (SpO2 > 94%) on room air in patients in 20, 40 mg TID NP-120 groups versus control group with 94% blood oxygen levels at enrolment Time-to-event endpoints with competing risk were analysed for each dosing group using the Cumulative Incidence Function-CIF (KM) graphical display. Data represents the time (in Days) it took for all participants in the group to return to room pressure air (e.g. the time when the CIF curve hit 100%). | Posted | Number | Days | Up to Day 29 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Duration in ICU (if Applicable) in IP Versus Control Group Patients | Duration of subject in ICU in 20 and 40 TID mg groups versus control group patients | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Up to Day 29 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Rate of Mortality in IP Versus Control Group Patients | Rate of Overall Mortality in 20, 40 mg TID groups versus control group | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Up to Day 29 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Duration of Hospitalization in IP Versus Control Group Patients | Not Posted | Day 15, 28 | Participants | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Time to Discharge in IP Versus Control Group Patients | Not Posted | Day 15, 28 | Participants | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Effect on the Rate of Change of Partial Pressure of Oxygen (PaO2) and PaO2/FiO2 Ratio Taken at Baseline and Measured Once Daily up to 2 Weeks of Treatment in IP Versus Control Group Patients | Not Posted | Up to day 15, day 28 | Participants |
From Day 1 to Day 60
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Treatment Arm A | NP-120 (Ifenprodil) 20 mg TID + Standard of Care | 2 | 52 | 2 | 52 | 36 | 52 |
| EG001 | Treatment Arm B | NP-120 (Ifenprodil) 40 mg TID + Standard of Care | 5 | 56 | 6 | 56 | 35 | 56 |
| EG002 | Control Arm | Standard of Care only | 4 | 60 | 5 | 60 | 30 | 60 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cardiac Arrest | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cardiopulmonary Failure | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Acute myocardial infarction | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Coronary artery disease | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| COVID-19 pneumonia | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Coagulation test abnormal | Investigations | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Seizure | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pyelonephritis acute | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pulmonary embolism | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constipation | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Flatulence | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hyperglycaemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypoalbuminaemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Oral candidiasis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urinary tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Anxiety | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Insomnia | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hepatocellular injury | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vessel puncture site bruise | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Coagulopathy | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Intertrigo | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr. Christopher Bryan | Algernon Pharmaceuticals | 2045572308 | cbryan@algernonpharmaceuticals.com |
| Prot_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Jan 15, 2021 | Nov 22, 2021 | SAP_001.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C010739 | ifenprodil |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Between 18 and 65 years |
|
| >=65 years |
|
| Male |
|
| Not Hispanic or Latino |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
| Asian |
|
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
|
| Black or African American |
|
| White |
|
| More than one race |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
| United States |
|
| Philippines |
|
| Australia |
|
|
| 3. Hospitalized not requiring supplemental O2 |
|
| 4. Hospitalized and requires supplemental O2 |
|
| 5. Hospitalized and on non-invasive ventilation or high flow O2 |
|
| 6. Hospitalized and on mechanical ventilation or ECMO |
|
| 7. Death |
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|