Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The aim of the present study is to find out the influence of sarcopenia on outcomes of neuroplasty in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.
Frailty is an aging-related syndrome of physiological decline and correlated with sarcopenia. Furthermore, lumbar spinal stenosis is a common disease in the old population and a neuroplasty is widely used to treat these patients. We postulate that the sarcopenia may be associated with the outcome of neuroplasty in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis, and there is no study about this topic as far as we know.
To evaluate this association, we will use the criteria for sarcopenia which is made by Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia in 2019 in this study. We will compare the outcome of neuroplasty in patients with sarcopenia and without sarcopenia using several tools such as numeric rating scale (NRS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and global perceived effect (GPE) score up to 6 months after the procedure.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| patients with lumbar spinal stenosis | Patients with lumbar spinal stenosis will be scheduled for neuroplasty. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neuroplasty with Racz catheter | Procedure | The patient is placed in the prone position with a pillow placed under the abdomen to correct the lumbar lordosis. After sterile preparation and draping, the epidural space via the sacral hiatus using a 16 gauge needle is accessed. Then, the Racz catheter is advanced to the site of adhesions under the fluoroscopic guidance. The target site is determined by the location of pathology on lumbar MRI, preprocedural epidurography, and clinical symptoms before the adhesiolysis. Adhesiolysis is performed through the high-volume administration of medications, which consist of a combination of a steroid, local anesthetics, hyaluronidase, and 5% hypertonic saline. As needed, the catheter remains in the epidural space for two days, with the additional injection on each of the days. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in numeric rating scale (NRS) at 3 months after the procedure | Numeric rating scale (0-10) 0=no pain, 10=worst pain imaginable We are going to compare the change of NRS at 3 months after the procedure to the baseline value. | Before the procedure and 3 months after the procedure |
| Change in Oswestry disability index (ODI) at 3 months after the procedure | Oswestry disability index (10-60) 10: least score as possible, 60: most score as possible We are going to compare the change of ODI at 3 months after the procedure to the baseline value. | Before the procedure and 3 months after the procedure |
| Global percieved effect (GPE) score at 3 months after the procedure | Global percieved effect score by Likert scale (1-7) 1: Never satisfied with the procedure, 7: Very satisfied with the procedure | 3 months after the procedure |
| Change in Medication Quantification scale (MQS) at 3 months after the procedure | Medication quantification scale is a tool to quantify medication regimen use in chronic pain populations. We are going to use Medication Quantification scale ver 3. The score starts at 0, and there is no specific maximum limit. We are going to compare the change of MQS at 3 months after the procedure to the baseline value. | Before the procedure and 3 months after the procedure |
| The percentage of successful responders at 3 months after the procedure | We are going to assess 4 variables above and then decide who is a successful responder or not at 3 months after the procedure. We defined the successful responders as follows;
NRS, ODI, and MQS will be evaluated before the procedure and become baseline values. NRS, ODI, and MQS will be re-evaluated, and GPE score will be newly evaluated 3 months after the procedure. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in NRS at 1 and 6 months after the procedure | We are going to compare the change of NRS at 1 and 6 months after the procedure to the baseline value. | Before the procedure, and 1 and 6 months after the procedure |
| Change in ODI at 1 and 6 months after the procedure |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Patients with lumbar spinal stenosis who is scheduled for neuroplasty in Asan medical center in Korea
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Doo-Hwan Kim, M.D. | Asan Medical Center | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Asan medical center | Seoul | 05505 | South Korea |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 31056240 | Background | Bentov I, Kaplan SJ, Pham TN, Reed MJ. Frailty assessment: from clinical to radiological tools. Br J Anaesth. 2019 Jul;123(1):37-50. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.03.034. Epub 2019 May 3. | |
| 29135599 | Background | Racz G, Candido K, Helm S. Neuroplasty Is a Safe, Effective Procedure. Anesth Analg. 2018 Jan;126(1):363. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002546. No abstract available. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Date | Date Unknown |
|---|---|---|
| Release | Dec 10, 2025 | |
| Reset | Dec 30, 2025 | |
| Release | Mar 28, 2026 | |
| Reset | Apr 16, 2026 |
Not provided
Not provided
| Release Date | Unrelease Date | Unrelease Date Unknown | Reset Date | MCP Release Number |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 10, 2025 | Dec 30, 2025 | |||
| Mar 28, 2026 |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013130 | Spinal Stenosis |
| D055948 | Sarcopenia |
| D000073496 | Frailty |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013122 | Spinal Diseases |
| D001847 | Bone Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
| D009133 | Muscular Atrophy |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| 3 months after the procedure |
We are going to compare the change of ODI at 1 and 6 months after the procedure to the baseline value. |
| Before the procedure, and 1 and 6 months after the procedure |
| GPE score at 1 and 6 months after the procedure | We are going to check GPE score at 1 and 6 months after the procedure. | 1 and 6 months after the procedure |
| Change in MQS at 1 and 6 months after the procedure | We are going to compare the change of MQS at 1 and 6 months after the procedure to the baseline value. | Before the procedure, and 1 and 6 months after the procedure |
| The percentage of successful responders at 1 and 6 months after the procedure | We are going to evaluate successful responders at 1 and 6 months after the procedure | 1 and 6 months after the procedure |
| 32033882 | Background | Chen LK, Woo J, Assantachai P, Auyeung TW, Chou MY, Iijima K, Jang HC, Kang L, Kim M, Kim S, Kojima T, Kuzuya M, Lee JSW, Lee SY, Lee WJ, Lee Y, Liang CK, Lim JY, Lim WS, Peng LN, Sugimoto K, Tanaka T, Won CW, Yamada M, Zhang T, Akishita M, Arai H. Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia: 2019 Consensus Update on Sarcopenia Diagnosis and Treatment. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020 Mar;21(3):300-307.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2019.12.012. Epub 2020 Feb 4. |
| 28753945 | Background | Yamada Y, Nishizawa M, Uchiyama T, Kasahara Y, Shindo M, Miyachi M, Tanaka S. Developing and Validating an Age-Independent Equation Using Multi-Frequency Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis for Estimation of Appendicular Skeletal Muscle Mass and Establishing a Cutoff for Sarcopenia. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Jul 19;14(7):809. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14070809. |
| 26814254 | Background | Choi SS, Lee JH, Kim D, Kim HK, Lee S, Song KJ, Park JK, Shim JH. Effectiveness and Factors Associated with Epidural Decompression and Adhesiolysis Using a Balloon-Inflatable Catheter in Chronic Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: 1-Year Follow-Up. Pain Med. 2016 Mar;17(3):476-487. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnv018. Epub 2015 Dec 7. |
| Apr 16, 2026 |
| D020879 |
| Neuromuscular Manifestations |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D001284 | Atrophy |
| D020763 | Pathological Conditions, Anatomical |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |