Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Background Acute appendicitis is an extremely common surgical emergency. Traditionally, appendicitis has been managed surgically. Recently, however, variability in management of acute appendicitis has emerged, with some clinicians practising conservative, i.e. non-operative, management in selected patients. This high-quality pan-European, prospective audit will establish current practices and correlate them against outcomes.
Aim To explore differences in patient presentation, clinical course and outcomes for acute appendicitis across international clinical Centres to identify areas of practice variability in the presentation, management and complications of acute appendicitis.
Endpoints A three-stage data collection strategy will be used in this audit. There will be a 90 day prospective period for data collection during a six month window from September 2020 to end February 2021. Data collection will consist of collecting patient demographics, details of management (conservative vs surgical) and outcomes. Several outcomes measures will be used, including surgical mortality, morbidity (Clavien-Dindo Grade 2 and above) and length of hospital stay.
The data collection points are as follows:
90 Day Prospective Audit Collecting anytime during 6-month window:
All eligible patients will be followed up to 90 days from their admission
Patients who have a complete data set at 90 days post presentation will be followed up to the 1-year mark • Incomplete data sets will be excluded from the study
Methods: This 90 day prospective audit will be performed across Europe from September 2020 to end February 2021., and will be co-ordinated by a designated committee of European Society of Trauma and Emergency Surgery. This will be preceded by a one-week, three-Centre pilot. Sites will be asked to pre-register for the audit and will be required to obtain appropriate regional or national approvals in advance of the enrolment date.
During the study period, all eligible patients with acute appendicitis will be recorded contemporaneously and followed-up through to 90 days from their admission. The audit will be performed using a standardised pre-determined protocol, instrument and a secure online database. The report of this audit will be prepared in accordance with guidelines set by the STROBE (strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology) statement for observational studies.
Discussion: This multi-centre, snapshot audit will be delivered by emergency surgeons and trainees in an coordinated and homogenous manner. The data obtained about areas of variability in provision or practice, and how this may impact upon outcomes, will serve to improve overall patient care as well as being hypothesis generating and inform areas needing future prospective study.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Incidence of acute appendicitis | Incidence of acute appendicitis | 3 months |
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Post-operative (or non-operative complications) | Complications related to disease and/or therapies within 90 post operative days | 90 days |
| Length of post-operative stay in the hospital | 90 days |
6.4 Inclusion Criteria
Adult patients (≥16 years of age) admitted for:
Acute Appendicitis
Procedures which should be included:
Appendectomy (open, laparoscopic or robotic)
Diagnostic laparoscopy
Partial right hemicolectomy (for appendiceal mass or carcinoid tumour) Exclusion Criteria
Methods for identifying patients
Multiple methods may be used according to local circumstances/staffing:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
All hospitals/units performing general surgery are eligible to join this audit. No unit size or case throughput stipulations are made. Countries outside Europe can also participate in this audit.
All participating centres will register with the ESTES cohort study office and will be responsible for their own local approvals process prior to the start of the data collection period. Inclusion of data sets will be subject to local approval from participating clinical Centres.
Normal patient follow-up pathways can be utilised to obtain outcomes data. No additional visits or changes to normal follow-up should be made. However, local investigators should be proactive in identifying post-diagnosis. These may include reviewing the patient notes (paper and electronic) during admission and before discharge to note in-hospital complications, reviewing hospital systems to check for re-attendances or re-admissions, and reviewing post-operative radiology reports.
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Eanna J Ryan, MD MRCSI | St Vincent's University Hospital, Ireland | Study Director |
| Shahin Mohseni, MD, PhD | Orebro University Hospital, Sweden | Study Chair |
| Gary A Bass, MD, MS | Dept Traumatology, Surgical Critical Care, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tallaght University Hospital | Dublin | Ireland |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 36693948 | Derived | Bass GA, Kaplan LJ, Forssten MP, Walsh TN, Cao Y, Mohseni S; ESTES SnapAppy Group. Techniques for mesoappendix transection and appendix resection: insights from the ESTES SnapAppy study. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2023 Feb;49(1):17-32. doi: 10.1007/s00068-022-02191-8. Epub 2023 Jan 24. | |
| 36646862 | Derived | Young N, Ahl Hulme R, Forssten MP, Kaplan LJ, Walsh TN, Cao Y, Mohseni S, Bass GA; ESTES SnapAppy Group. Graded operative autonomy in emergency appendectomy mirrors case-complexity: surgical training insights from the SnapAppy prospective observational study. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2023 Feb;49(1):33-44. doi: 10.1007/s00068-022-02142-3. Epub 2023 Jan 16. |
Not provided
Not provided
Pooled Data will be published. Subgroup analyses by disease, technique or outcome variables may be presented, but no hospital-level or surgeon-level data will be published whereby an individual patient, unit or surgeon can be identified. If local investigators would like their own unit's raw data for benchmarking purposes and local presentation/discussion, this can be made available after the end of the study; however, it will not be possible to de-anonymise patient data stored in Smart-Trial, in strict compliance with GDPR.
The ESTES Cohort Studies Committee welcomes the use of the data for further research that benefits patients. Data sharing is subject to ESTES approval and appropriate safeguarding. Future sub-projects must comply with our policy of single corporate authorship e.g. "ESTES Cohort Studies Group". Authors' contributions will be highlighted in accordance with the recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing, and publication of scholarly work in medical journals.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001064 | Appendicitis |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D059413 | Intraabdominal Infections |
| D007239 | Infections |
| D005759 | Gastroenteritis |
| D005767 | Gastrointestinal Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| cost-analysis of treatment | 90 days |
| Re-admission within 90 postoperative days | 90 days |
| Number of participants with histopathological results, differences in age and clinical presentation | 90 days |
| Time to surgery | 90 days |
| D004066 |
| Digestive System Diseases |
| D002429 | Cecal Diseases |
| D007410 | Intestinal Diseases |