Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This aim study aims to compare clinical effectiveness of customized lingual brackets and conventional labial brackets in alignment period in a sample of Class I malocclusion patients treated on a nonextraction basis.
The study included 20 patients who presented with Class I malocclusion and scheduled for orthodontic treatment without tooth extraction. The patients were randomly assigned for treatment with customized lingual brackets or with conventional labial brackets. During the alignment period 0.012 inch (T1) , 0.014 inch(T2), 0.016 inch (T3)NiTi arch wires were performed respectively and the control visits were scheduled by 6-weeks intervals. In all sessions, digital models were obtained by intra-oral scanning device after removal of arch wire, which then analyzed by software. In order to analyze change in T0 (pretreatment), T1, T2 and T3; Little's irregularity index, distance between canine teeth, distance between first premolar teeth, distance between second premolar teeth, distance between first molar teeth and arch length measurements were performed on digital models.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lingual brackets | Experimental | Patients with moderate crowding without extraction treated with Incognito lingual bracket (3M Unitek, Bad Essen, Germany) |
|
| Labial brackets | Experimental | Patients with moderate crowding without extraction treated with labial bracket (3M Unitek, Ca, USA |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lingual brackets | Device | A type of bracket that applied lingual surface of teeth. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Irregularity index (mm) | Crowding of anterior teeth changes after alignment | 18 weeks |
| Distance between canine teeth (mm) | Measurement from right canine to left canine distance | 18 weeks |
| Distance between first premolar teeth (mm) | Measurement from right first premolar to left first premolar distance | 18 weeks |
| Distance between second premolar teeth (mm) | Measurement from right first premolar to left first premolar distance | 18 weeks |
| Distance between first molar teeth (mm) | Measurement from right first molar to left first molar distance | 18 weeks |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Arch length (mm) | Measurement of arch length from mesial side of right first molar to messiah side of left first molar | 18 weeks |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Yazgı Ay Ünüvar, PhD | Aydın Adnan Menderes University Faculty of Dentistry Department of Orthodontics | Study Director |
Not provided
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 25707826 | Background | Khattab TZ, Hajeer MY, Farah H, Al-Sabbagh R. Maxillary dental arch changes following the leveling and alignment stage with lingual and labial orthodontic appliances: a preliminary report of a randomized controlled trial. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2014 Sep 1;15(5):561-6. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1579. | |
| 24005948 | Background |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014071 | Tooth Abnormalities |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D018640 | Stomatognathic System Abnormalities |
| D009057 | Stomatognathic Diseases |
| D014076 | Tooth Diseases |
| D000013 | Congenital Abnormalities |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Labial brackets | Device | A type of bracket that applied labial surface of teeth. |
|
|
| Auluck A. Lingual orthodontic treatment: what is the current evidence base? J Orthod. 2013 Sep;40 Suppl 1:S27-33. doi: 10.1179/1465313313Y.0000000073. |
| 29546390 | Background | Alobeid A, El-Bialy T, Reimann S, Keilig L, Cornelius D, Jager A, Bourauel C. Comparison of the efficacy of tooth alignment among lingual and labial brackets: an in vitro study. Eur J Orthod. 2018 Nov 30;40(6):660-665. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjy005. |
| 24785929 | Background | Ziebura T, Hohoff A, Flieger S, Stamm T. Accidental debondings: Buccal vs fully individualized lingual multibracket appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014 May;145(5):649-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.12.030. |
| 22573909 | Background | Sifakakis I, Pandis N, Makou M, Eliades T, Katsaros C, Bourauel C. A comparative assessment of torque generated by lingual and conventional brackets. Eur J Orthod. 2013 Jun;35(3):375-80. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjs029. Epub 2012 May 9. |
| 21464153 | Background | Sifakakis I, Pandis N, Makou M, Katsaros C, Eliades T, Bourauel C. A comparative assessment of forces and moments generated by lingual and conventional brackets. Eur J Orthod. 2013 Feb;35(1):82-6. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjr048. Epub 2011 Apr 4. |
| 16231112 | Background | Fuck LM, Wiechmann D, Drescher D. Comparison of the initial orthodontic force systems produced by a new lingual bracket system and a straight-wire appliance. J Orofac Orthop. 2005 Sep;66(5):363-76. doi: 10.1007/s00056-005-0442-3. English, German. |
| D009358 | Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities |