Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1R43AT010460-01 | U.S. NIH Grant/Contract | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH) | NIH |
| BrightOutcome | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This is a one-year study designed to improve upon the latest version of an education website for adult chronic pain patients called Our Whole Lives for Chronic Pain (OWL-CP). We will gain feedback from stakeholders, beta test new versions, and add the ability to conduct live Medical Group Visits through and on the virtual platform we are creating, GEMINI.
The objectives are:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1 (8 Patients) | A wireframe mock-up of the GEMINI platform will be usability tested by 8 chronic pain patients from whom feedback will be collected by completing a virtual semi-structured interview. Outcomes: Quantitative Testing Data from Usability Testing Prompt. Qualitative data collected as feedback from semi-structured interview using the Usability Test Moderator Guide. |
| |
| Cohort 2 (16 Patients) | A live version of GEMINI will be beta-tested by 16 chronic pain patients through completing a faux medical group visit (MGV). This will include things like exploring the education topics available, interacting with the other participating patients, and interacting with a medical provider posing as the faux group's health care provider, all in order to robustly test the system in a "live" environment. Outcomes: Quantitative Testing/User Experience Data from Usability Testing Prompt, System Usability Scale, Perceived Feature Usefulness Scale, and the Technology Acceptance Model Based Survey. Qualitative data collected as feedback from semi-structured interview using the Usability Test Moderator Guide. |
| |
| Cohort A (8 Healthcare Providers) | Eight healthcare providers will be divided into pairs, and these pairs will each conduct a faux medical group visit (MGV) with faux patients (staff will pose as patients). They will be asked to complete the faux session as if it were actual patients of theirs, conduct pre- and post-session tasks, and provide usability feedback on the platform. Outcomes: Quantitative Testing/User Experience Data from Usability Testing Prompt, System Usability Scale, Perceived Feature Usefulness Scale, and the Technology Acceptance Model Based Survey. Qualitative data collected as feedback from semi-structured interview using the Usability Test Moderator Guide. |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| online patient education teach mindfulness based stress reduction | Other | This is an online self management chronic pain curriculum that presents adapted Mindfulness Based Stress Reduction through videos, audios, and written materials |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Qualitative Feedback (Cohort 1) | Prototype feedback collected during a 30 min to 1 hour semi-structured interview that will be held either in person or virtually, as able and with following all external guidelines. | Following 30 minute hands-on evaluation of system and brief (max 10 mins) survey collection (SUS, listed as add'l outcomes), duration of up to 1 hour. Session max of 2 hours. |
| Qualitative Feedback (Cohort 2) | Prototype feedback collected during a 30 min to 1 hour semi-structured interview that will be held either in person or virtually, as able and with following all external guidelines. | Following 30 minute hands-on evaluation of system and brief (max 30 mins) survey collection (SUS, PFU, TAM-B, all listed as add'l outcomes), duration of up to 1 hour. Session max of 2 hours. |
| Qualitative Feedback (Cohort A) | Prototype feedback collected during a 30 min to 1 hour semi-structured interview that will be held either in person or virtually, as able and with following all external guidelines. | Following 30 minute hands-on evaluation of system and brief (max 30 mins) survey collection (SUS, PFU, TAM-B, all listed as add'l outcomes), duration of up to 1 hour. Session max of 2 hours. |
| System Usability Scale (SUS) | Prototype feedback data collected from all 3 cohorts using the System Usability Scale (SUS). The System Usability Scale is a 10 item survey, with each item ranked on a Likert scale ranging from 1-5, with a calculated score ranging from 0-100 (Subtracting 1 from each odd-numbered item's answer value and for each even-numbered question, subtracting their value from 5, summing both question sets, then multiplying the sum by 2.5). Average scores must fall at or above 70 to equate acceptable usability. Further information regarding scoring can be found by reading Bangor A, Kortum P, Miller J. Determining what individual SUS scores mean: adding an adjective rating scale. J Usability Studies. 2009;4(3):114-123. |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Subjects who are not willing or unable to participate in a focus group or individual appointment over a video conferencing platform/on the University of Massachusetts (UMass) Worcester campus and watch a computer screen and give feedback (Patients
Fetuses, prisoners, and other vulnerable populations are not eligible (Patients & HCP)
Providers/medical students or residents directly supervised by or reporting to the Primary Investigator (HCP)
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Chronic pain patients will be recruited from the local Central Massachusetts area, with a focus on the adult primary care clinics within the UMass Memorial System. Providers can and will be recruited nationally through listservs, professional organizations, and word of mouth.
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Paula Gardiner, MD MPH | University of Massachusetts, Worcester | Principal Investigator |
| Niina Haas, MA | BrightOutcome | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Massachusetts Medical School | Worcester | Massachusetts | 01655 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 25105072 | Background | Gardiner P, Dresner D, Barnett KG, Sadikova E, Saper R. Medical group visits: a feasibility study to manage patients with chronic pain in an underserved urban clinic. Glob Adv Health Med. 2014 Jul;3(4):20-6. doi: 10.7453/gahmj.2014.011. |
Not provided
Not provided
As this is not a clinical trial and the only data being collected is quantitative and qualitative feedback on our team's prototype chronic pain patient education and disease management platform, we do not plan to share any data at this time.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D059350 | Chronic Pain |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010146 | Pain |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Following 30 minute hands-on evaluation of system, up to 10 minutes, followed by Qualitative Feedback collection to end session. Session max of 2 hours. |
| Perceived Feature Usefulness Scale (PFU) | Prototype feedback data collected from Cohorts 2 and A using the Perceived Feature Usefulness Scale, a to-be designed 5-point Likert scale (from strongly disagree to strongly agree) survey. PFU cannot be fully designed before the system functions and the site structure are finalized because it would specifically ask the subject to rate the usefulness of each major system feature to guide our future product development plans. For instance, the statements could be "It is useful to view the profiles of my fellow patients in the group" or "It is useful to receive reminder emails about upcoming group sessions." | Following 30 minute hands-on evaluation of system, up to 10 minutes (30 mins for all 3 surveys), followed by Qualitative Feedback collection to end session. Session max of 2 hours. |
| Technology Acceptance Based Model Survey | Prototype feedback data collected from Cohorts 2 and A using the Technology Acceptance Based Model Survey, a 5-point Likert scale survey. This survey will be based on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) that has been studied extensively to predict the actual use of health information technology (HIT) systems (Holden RJ, Karsh BT. The technology acceptance model: its past and its future in health care. J Biomed Inform. 2010;43(1):159-172). Key constructs include perceived usefulness (e.g., helpful in managing pain), perceived ease of use (e.g., easy to learn, session not too long), social influence (e.g., group effects), and perceived behavioral control (e.g., feasibility of videoconferencing). | Following 30 minute hands-on evaluation of system, up to 10 minutes (30 mins for all 3 surveys), followed by Qualitative Feedback collection to end session. Session max of 2 hours. |